
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[ The Cloudflare Blog ]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[ Get the latest news on how products at Cloudflare are built, technologies used, and join the teams helping to build a better Internet. ]]></description>
        <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com</link>
        <atom:link href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <language>en-us</language>
        
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 23:47:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The 2025 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review: The rise of AI, post-quantum, and record-breaking DDoS attacks]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ We present our 6th annual review of Internet trends and patterns observed across the globe, revealing the disruptions, advances and metrics that defined 2025.  ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/"><u>2025 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review</u></a> is here: our sixth annual review of the Internet trends and patterns we observed throughout the year, based on Cloudflare’s expansive network view.</p><p>Our view is unique, due to Cloudflare’s global <a href="https://cloudflare.com/network"><u>network</u></a>, which has a presence in 330 cities in over 125 countries/regions, handling over 81 million HTTP requests per second on average, with more than 129 million HTTP requests per second at peak on behalf of millions of customer Web properties, in addition to responding to approximately 67 million (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/dns-server-types/"><u>authoritative + resolver</u></a>) DNS queries per second. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a> uses the data generated by these Web and DNS services, combined with other complementary data sets, to provide near-real time insights into <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic"><u>traffic</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots"><u>bots</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/"><u>security</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/quality"><u>connectivity</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/dns"><u>DNS</u></a> patterns and trends that we observe across the Internet. </p><p>Our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/"><u>Radar Year in Review</u></a> takes that observability and, instead of a real-time view, offers a look back at 2025: incorporating interactive charts, graphs, and maps that allow you to explore and compare selected trends and measurements year-over-year and across geographies, as well as share and embed Year in Review graphs. </p><p>The 2025 Year In Review is organized into six sections: <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Traffic</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#robots-txt"><u>AI</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#ios-vs-android"><u>Adoption &amp; Usage</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#internet-outages"><u>Connectivity</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#mitigated-traffic"><u>Security</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#malicious-emails"><u>Email Security</u></a>, with data spanning the period from January 1 to December 2, 2025. To ensure consistency, we kept underlying methodologies unchanged from previous years’ calculations. We also incorporated several new data sets this year, including multiple AI-related metrics, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#speed-tests"><u>global speed test activity</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#ddos-attacks"><u>hyper-volumetric DDOS size progression</u></a>. Trends for over 200 countries/regions are available on the microsite; smaller or less-populated locations are excluded due to insufficient data. Some metrics are only shown worldwide and are not displayed if a country/region is selected. </p><p>In this post, we highlight key findings and interesting observations from the major Year In Review microsite sections, and we have again published a companion <i>Most Popular Internet Services </i><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>blog post</u></a> that specifically explores trends seen across <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#internet-services"><u>top Internet Services</u></a>.</p><p>We encourage you to visit the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/"><u>2025 Year in Review microsite</u></a> to explore the datasets and metrics in more detail, including those for your country/region to see how they have changed since 2024, and how they compare to other areas of interest. </p><p>We hope you’ll find the Year in Review to be an insightful and powerful tool — to explore the disruptions, advances, and metrics that defined the Internet in 2025. </p><p>Let’s dig in.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Key Findings</h2>
      <a href="#key-findings">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
    <div>
      <h3>Traffic</h3>
      <a href="#traffic">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Global Internet traffic grew 19% in 2025, with significant growth starting in August. <a href="#global-internet-traffic-grew-19-in-2025-with-significant-growth-starting-in-august"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>The top 10 most popular Internet services saw a few year-over-year shifts, while a number of new entrants landed on category lists. <a href="#the-top-10-most-popular-internet-services-saw-some-year-over-year-shifts-while-the-category-lists-saw-a-number-of-new-entrants"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Starlink traffic doubled in 2025, including traffic from over 20 new countries/regions. <a href="#starlink-traffic-doubled-in-2025-including-traffic-from-over-20-new-countries-regions"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Googlebot was again responsible for the highest volume of request traffic to Cloudflare in 2025 as it crawled millions of Cloudflare customer sites for search indexing and AI training. <a href="#googlebot-was-again-responsible-for-the-highest-volume-of-request-traffic-to-cloudflare-in-2025-as-it-crawled-millions-of-cloudflare-customer-sites-for-search-indexing-and-ai-training"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>The share of human-generated Web traffic that is post-quantum encrypted has grown to 52%. <a href="#the-share-of-human-generated-web-traffic-that-is-post-quantum-encrypted-has-grown-to-52"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Googlebot was responsible for more than a quarter of Verified Bot traffic. <a href="#googlebot-was-responsible-for-more-than-a-quarter-of-verified-bot-traffic"><u>➜</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>AI</h3>
      <a href="#ai">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Crawl volume from dual-purpose Googlebot dwarfed other AI bots and crawlers. <a href="#crawl-volume-from-dual-purpose-googlebot-dwarfed-other-ai-bots-and-crawlers"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>AI “user action” crawling increased by over 15x in 2025. <a href="#ai-user-action-crawling-increased-by-over-15x-in-2025"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>While other AI bots accounted for 4.2% of HTML request traffic, Googlebot alone accounted for 4.5%. <a href="#while-other-ai-bots-accounted-for-4-2-of-html-request-traffic-googlebot-alone-accounted-for-4-5"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Anthropic had the highest crawl-to-refer ratio among the leading AI and search platforms. <a href="#anthropic-had-the-highest-crawl-to-refer-ratio-among-the-leading-ai-and-search-platforms"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>AI crawlers were the most frequently fully disallowed user agents found in robots.txt files. <a href="#ai-crawlers-were-the-most-frequently-fully-disallowed-user-agents-found-in-robots-txt-files"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>On Workers AI, Meta’s llama-3-8b-instruct model was the most popular model, and text generation was the most popular task type. <a href="#on-workers-ai-metas-llama-3-8b-instruct-model-was-the-most-popular-model-and-text-generation-was-the-most-popular-task-type"><u>➜</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Adoption &amp; Usage</h3>
      <a href="#adoption-usage">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>iOS devices generated 35% of mobile device traffic globally — and more than half of device traffic in many countries. <a href="#ios-devices-generated-35-of-mobile-device-traffic-globally-and-more-than-half-of-device-traffic-in-many-countries"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>The shares of global Web requests using HTTP/3 and HTTP/2 both increased slightly in 2025. <a href="#the-shares-of-global-web-requests-using-http-3-and-http-2-both-increased-slightly-in-2025"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>JavaScript-based libraries and frameworks remained integral tools for building Web sites. <a href="#javascript-based-libraries-and-frameworks-remained-integral-tools-for-building-web-sites"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>One-fifth of automated API requests were made by Go-based clients. <a href="#one-fifth-of-automated-api-requests-were-made-by-go-based-clients"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Google remains the top search engine, with Yandex, Bing, and DuckDuckGo distant followers. <a href="#google-remains-the-top-search-engine-with-yandex-bing-and-duckduckgo-distant-followers"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Chrome remains the top browser across platforms and operating systems – except on iOS, where Safari has the largest share. <a href="#chrome-remains-the-top-browser-across-platforms-and-operating-systems-except-on-ios-where-safari-has-the-largest-share"><u>➜</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Connectivity</h3>
      <a href="#connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Almost half of the 174 major Internet outages observed around the world in 2025 were due to government-directed regional and national shutdowns of Internet connectivity. <a href="#almost-half-of-the-174-major-internet-outages-observed-around-the-world-in-2025-were-due-to-government-directed-regional-and-national-shutdowns-of-internet-connectivity"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Globally, less than a third of dual-stack requests were made over IPv6, while in India, over two-thirds were. <a href="#globally-less-than-a-third-of-dual-stack-requests-were-made-over-ipv6-while-in-india-over-two-thirds-were"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>European countries had some of the highest download speeds, all above 200 Mbps. Spain remained consistently among the top locations across measured Internet quality metrics. <a href="#european-countries-had-some-of-the-highest-download-speeds-all-above-200-mbps-spain-remained-consistently-among-the-top-locations-across-measured-internet-quality-metrics"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>London and Los Angeles were hotspots for Cloudflare speed test activity in 2025. <a href="#london-and-los-angeles-were-hotspots-for-cloudflare-speed-test-activity-in-2025"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>More than half of request traffic comes from mobile devices in 117 countries/regions. <a href="#more-than-half-of-request-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices-in-117-countries-regions"><u>➜</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Security</h3>
      <a href="#security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>6% of global traffic over Cloudflare’s network was mitigated by our systems — either as potentially malicious or for customer-defined reasons. <a href="#6-of-global-traffic-over-cloudflares-network-was-mitigated-by-our-systems-either-as-potentially-malicious-or-for-customer-defined-reasons"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>40% of global bot traffic came from the United States, with Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud originating a quarter of global bot traffic. <a href="#40-of-global-bot-traffic-came-from-the-united-states-with-amazon-web-services-and-google-cloud-originating-a-quarter-of-global-bot-traffic"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Organizations in the "People and Society” sector were the most targeted during 2025. <a href="#organizations-in-the-people-and-society-vertical-were-the-most-targeted-during-2025"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Routing security, measured as the shares of RPKI valid routes and covered IP address space, saw continued improvement throughout 2025. <a href="#routing-security-measured-as-the-shares-of-rpki-valid-routes-and-covered-ip-address-space-saw-continued-improvement-throughout-2025"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Hyper-volumetric DDoS attack sizes grew significantly throughout the year. <a href="#hyper-volumetric-ddos-attack-sizes-grew-significantly-throughout-the-year"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>More than 5% of email messages analyzed by Cloudflare were found to be malicious. <a href="#more-than-5-of-email-messages-analyzed-by-cloudflare-were-found-to-be-malicious"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Deceptive links, identity deception, and brand impersonation were the most common types of threats found in malicious email messages. <a href="#deceptive-links-identity-deception-and-brand-impersonation-were-the-most-common-types-of-threats-found-in-malicious-email-messages"><u>➜</u></a></p></li><li><p>Nearly all of the email messages from the .christmas and .lol Top Level Domains were found to be either spam or malicious. <a href="#nearly-all-of-the-email-messages-from-the-christmas-and-lol-top-level-domains-were-found-to-be-either-spam-or-malicious"><u>➜</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Traffic trends</h2>
      <a href="#traffic-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3EqqyX4A0PI27tBdVijUq2/9102522d8661d7d5911ece00c1b1e678/BLOG-3077_2.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Global Internet traffic grew 19% in 2025, with significant growth starting in August</h3>
      <a href="#global-internet-traffic-grew-19-in-2025-with-significant-growth-starting-in-august">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>To determine the traffic trends over time for the Year in Review, we use the average daily traffic volume (excluding bot traffic) over the second full calendar week (January 12-18) of 2025 as our baseline. (The second calendar week is used to allow time for people to get back into their “normal” school and work routines after the winter holidays and New Year’s Day.) The percent change shown in the traffic trends chart is calculated relative to the baseline value — it does not represent absolute traffic volume for a country/region. The trend line represents a seven-day trailing average, which is used to smooth the sharp changes seen with data at a daily granularity. </p><p>Traffic growth in 2025 appeared to occur in several phases. Traffic was, on average, somewhat flat through mid-April, generally within a couple of percent of the baseline value. However, it then saw growth through May to approximately 5% above baseline, staying in the +4-7% range through mid-August. It was at that time that growth accelerated, climbing steadily through September, October, and November, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#internet-traffic-growth"><u>peaking at 19% growth</u></a> for the year. Aided by a late-November increase, 2025’s rate of growth is about 10% higher than the 17% growth observed in 2024. In <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/#global-internet-traffic-grew-17-2-in-2024"><u>past years</u></a>, we have also observed traffic growth accelerating in the back half of the year, although in 2022-2024, that acceleration started in July. It’s not clear why this year’s growth was seemingly delayed by several weeks.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3I9BSisZlIKlCrANpDTBtx/deb202dba9ca9aa7e23379bab6d81412/BLOG-3077_3_-_traffic-internet_traffic_growth_-_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bw#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Botswana</u></a> saw the highest peak growth, reaching 298% above baseline on November 8, and ending the period 295% over baseline. (More on what accounts for that growth in the Starlink section below.) Botswana and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sd#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Sudan</u></a> were the only countries/regions to see traffic more than double over the course of the year, although some others experienced peak increases over 100% at some point during the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1z4fQNQvLZM5li5h7JWeIq/ed3afd5c7d2412a7426f3e7c4985be33/BLOG-3077_4_-_traffic-internet_traffic_growth_-_Botswana.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2025, Botswana</i></sup></p><p>The impact of extended Internet disruptions are clearly visible within the graphs as well. For example, on October 29, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/tz#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Tanzanian</u></a> government imposed an Internet shutdown there in response to election day protests. That shutdown lasted just a day, but another one followed from October 30 until November 3. Although traffic in the country had increased more than 40% above baseline ahead of the shutdowns, the disruption ultimately dropped traffic more than 70% below baseline — a rapid reversal. Traffic recovered quickly after connectivity was restored. A similar pattern was observed in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/jm#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Jamaica</u></a>, where Internet traffic spiked ahead of the arrival of <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1983188999461319102?s=20"><u>Hurricane Melissa</u></a> on October 28, and then dropped significantly after the storm caused power outages and infrastructure damage on the island. Traffic began to rebound after the storm’s passing, returning to a level just above baseline by early December.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4dVMnD0mQvl4sB1bbn6kka/a7c433aaf2df3319328b27156bf70618/BLOG-3077_5_-_traffic-internet_traffic_growth_-_Tanzania.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2025, Tanzania</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4dovYDK7vTfjsL9FBNAvjE/a80a0c8fe69cce81ecc03605ae874859/BLOG-3077_6_-_traffic-internet_traffic_growth_-_Jamaica.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2025, Jamaica</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>The top 10 most popular Internet services saw some year-over-year shifts, while the category lists saw a number of new entrants</h3>
      <a href="#the-top-10-most-popular-internet-services-saw-some-year-over-year-shifts-while-the-category-lists-saw-a-number-of-new-entrants">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>For the Year in Review, we look at the 11-month year-to-date period. In addition to an “overall” ranked list, we also rank services across nine categories, based on analysis of anonymized query data of traffic to our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 public DNS resolver</u></a> from millions of users around the world. For the purposes of these rankings, domains that belong to a single Internet service are grouped together.</p><p>Google and Facebook once again held the top two spots among the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#internet-services"><u>top 10</u></a>. Although the other members of the top 10 list remained consistent with 2024’s rankings, there was some movement in the middle. Microsoft, Instagram, and YouTube all moved higher; Amazon Web Services (AWS) dropped one spot lower, while TikTok fell four spots.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4vMi7DU13dkmLCkhEvvzVO/bdc5b0baa3b140c6112abf3b7414da83/BLOG-3077_7_-_traffic-topinternetservices.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top Internet services in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Among Generative AI services, ChatGPT/OpenAI remained at the top of the list. But there was movement elsewhere, highlighting the dynamic nature of the industry. Services that moved up the rankings include Perplexity, Claude/Anthropic, and GitHub Copilot. New entries in the top 10 for 2025 include Google Gemini, Windsurf AI, Grok/xAI, and DeepSeek.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/vUiNheIzMym9Mr3TPK3yN/c4684bb93696e31dcd689b1a150d35cd/BLOG-3077_8_-_Generative_AI.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top Generative AI services in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Other categories saw movement within their lists as well – Shopee (“the leading e-commerce online shopping platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan”) is a new entrant to the E-Commerce list, and HBO Max joined the Video Streaming ranking. These categorical rankings, as well as trends seen by specific services, are explored in more detail in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>a separate blog post</u></a>.</p><p>In addition, this year we are also providing top Internet services insights at a country/region level for the Overall, Generative AI, Social Media, and Messaging categories. (In 2024, we only shared Overall insights.)</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Starlink traffic doubled in 2025, including traffic from over 20 new countries/regions</h3>
      <a href="#starlink-traffic-doubled-in-2025-including-traffic-from-over-20-new-countries-regions">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>SpaceX Starlink’s satellite-based Internet service continues to be a popular option for bringing connectivity to unserved or underserved areas, as well as to users on <a href="https://starlink.com/business/aviation"><u>planes</u></a> and <a href="https://starlink.com/business/maritime"><u>boats</u></a>. We analyzed aggregate request traffic volumes associated with Starlink's primary <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a> (<a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as14593"><u>AS14593</u></a>) to track the growth in usage of the service throughout 2025. The request volume shown on the trend line in the chart represents a seven-day trailing average. </p><p>Globally, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>traffic from Starlink</u></a> continued to see consistent growth throughout 2025, with total request volume up 2.3x across the year. We tend to see rapid traffic growth when Starlink service becomes available in a country/region, and that trend continues in 2025. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4d7DF8FT1RuK8rbrFfUu1E/c05645dc7640e11794b35770bc0bcd70/BLOG-3077_9_-_traffic-starlink-worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>That’s exactly what we saw in the more than 20 new countries/regions where <a href="https://x.com/starlink"><u>@Starlink</u></a> announced availability: within days, Starlink traffic in those places increased rapidly. These included <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/am#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Armenia</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ne#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Niger</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/lk#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Sri Lanka</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sx#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Sint Maarten</u></a>.</p><p>We also saw Starlink traffic from a number of locations that are not currently <a href="https://starlink.com/map"><u>marked for service availability</u></a>. However, there are IPv4 and/or IPv6 prefixes associated with these countries in Starlink’s <a href="https://geoip.starlinkisp.net/feed.csv"><u>published geofeed</u></a>. Given the ability for Starlink users to <a href="https://starlink.com/roam"><u>roam</u></a> with their service (and equipment), this traffic likely comes from roaming users in those areas.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4knmSgVn4FFyMm3ZRNRvuq/887455ee737217a7f9bad2cedbbff009/BLOG-3077_10_-_traffic-starlink-niger.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth in 2025, Niger</i></sup></p><p>Of countries/regions where service was active before 2025, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bj#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Benin</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/tl#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Timor-Leste</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bw#starlink-traffic-trends"><u>Botswana</u></a> had some of the largest traffic growth, at 51x, 19x, and 16x respectively. Starlink service availability in <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1720438167944499638"><u>Benin</u></a> was first announced in November 2023, <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1866631930902622360"><u>Timor-Leste</u></a> in December 2024, and <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1828840132688130322"><u>Botswana</u></a> in August 2024.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/PlOuYo67dUghmsSVtzd5k/d8ff2816e5703cc425c403c52bd56be1/BLOG-3077_11_-_traffic-starlink-botswana.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth in 2025, Botswana</i></sup></p><p>Similar services, such as <a href="https://leo.amazon.com/"><u>Amazon Leo</u></a>, <a href="https://www.eutelsat.com/satellite-services/tv-internet-home/satellite-internet-home-business-konnect"><u>Eutelsat Konnect</u></a>, and China’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianfan"><u>Qianfan</u></a>, continue to grow their satellite constellations and move towards commercial availability. We hope to review traffic growth across these services in the future as well.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Googlebot was again responsible for the highest volume of request traffic to Cloudflare in 2025 as it crawled millions of Cloudflare customer sites for search indexing and AI training</h3>
      <a href="#googlebot-was-again-responsible-for-the-highest-volume-of-request-traffic-to-cloudflare-in-2025-as-it-crawled-millions-of-cloudflare-customer-sites-for-search-indexing-and-ai-training">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>To look at the aggregate request traffic Cloudflare saw in 2025 from the entire IPv4 Internet, we can use a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_curve"><u>Hilbert curve</u></a>, which allows us to visualize a sequence of IPv4 addresses in a two-dimensional pattern that keeps nearby IP addresses close to each other, making them <a href="https://xkcd.com/195/"><u>useful</u></a> for surveying the Internet's IPv4 address space. Within the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ipv4-traffic-distribution"><u>visualization</u></a>, we aggregate IPv4 addresses into <a href="https://www.ripe.net/about-us/press-centre/IPv4CIDRChart_2015.pdf"><u>/20</u></a> prefixes, meaning that at the highest zoom level, each square represents traffic from 4,096 IPv4 addresses. This level of aggregation keeps the amount of data used for the visualization manageable. See the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/#googlebot-was-responsible-for-the-highest-volume-of-request-traffic-to-cloudflare-in-2024-as-it-retrieved-content-from-millions-of-cloudflare-customer-sites-for-search-indexing"><u>2024 Year in Review blog post</u></a> for additional details about the visualization.</p><p>For the third year in a row, the IP address block that had the maximum request volume to Cloudflare during 2025 was Google’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/prefix/66.249.64.0/20"><u>66.249.64.0/20</u></a> –  <a href="https://developers.google.com/static/search/apis/ipranges/googlebot.json"><u>one of several</u></a> used by the <a href="https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/googlebot"><u>Googlebot</u></a> web crawler to retrieve content for search indexing and AI training. That a Googlebot IP address block ranked again as the top request traffic source is unsurprising, given the number of web properties on Cloudflare’s network and <a href="#googlebot-was-responsible-for-more-than-a-quarter-of-verified-bot-traffic"><u>Googlebot’s aggressive crawling activity</u></a>. The Googlebot prefix accounted for nearly 4x as much IPv4 request traffic as the next largest traffic source, 146.20.240.0/20, which is part of a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/prefix/146.20.0.0/16"><u>larger block of IPv4 address space announced by Rackspace Hosting</u></a>. As a cloud and hosting provider, Rackspace supports many different types of customers and applications, so the driver of the observed traffic to Cloudflare isn’t known.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5NpjYc7D7ykOlLh837jarL/59c2bd9927a2fb16bb39973f4d8d1db8/BLOG-3077_12_-_traffic-ipv4distribution-googlebot.png" />
          </figure><p><i><sup>Zoomed Hilbert curve view showing the address block that generated the highest volume of requests in 2025</sup></i></p><p>This year, we’ve added the ability to search for an autonomous system (ASN) to the visualization, allowing you to see how broadly a network provider’s IP address holdings are distributed across the IPv4 universe. </p><p>One example is AS16509 (AMAZON-02, used with AWS), which shows the results of Amazon’s acquisitions of <a href="https://toonk.io/aws-and-their-billions-in-ipv4-addresses/index.html"><u>large amounts of IPv4 address space</u></a> over the years. Another example is AS7018 (ATT-INTERNET4, AT&amp;T), which is one of the largest <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/us#ases-registered-in-united-states"><u>announcers of IPv4 address space in the United States</u></a>. Much of the traffic we see from this ASN comes from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/prefix/12.0.0.0/8"><u>12.0.0.0/8</u></a>, a block of over 16 million IPv4 addresses that has been <a href="https://wq.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl?searchtext=12.147.5.178"><u>owned by AT&amp;T since 1983</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/42mehcaIRV4Kp9h6P86z6d/436e033e353710419fcc49865d765258/BLOG-3077_13_-_traffic-ipv4distribution-as7018.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Hilbert curve showing the IPv4 address blocks from AS7018 that sent traffic to Cloudflare in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>The share of human-generated Web traffic that is post-quantum encrypted has grown to 52%</h3>
      <a href="#the-share-of-human-generated-web-traffic-that-is-post-quantum-encrypted-has-grown-to-52">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>“<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography"><u>Post-quantum</u></a>” refers to a set of cryptographic techniques designed to protect encrypted data from “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvest_now,_decrypt_later"><u>harvest now, decrypt later</u></a>” attacks by adversaries that have the ability to capture and store current data for future decryption by sufficiently advanced quantum computers. The Cloudflare Research team has been <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/sidh-go/"><u>working on post-quantum cryptography since 2017</u></a>, and regularly publishes <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/pq-2025/"><u>updates</u></a> on the state of the post-quantum Internet.</p><p>After seeing <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#post-quantum-encryption"><u>significant growth in 2024</u></a>, the global share of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#post-quantum-encryption"><u>post-quantum encrypted traffic</u></a> nearly doubled throughout 2025, from 29% at the start of the year to 52% in early December. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/qqehh1EqKIMi7xNcSr8SN/c24962ce446e153fbd37c9abe7254f78/BLOG-3077_14_-_traffic-postquantum-worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Post-quantum encrypted TLS 1.3 traffic growth in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Twenty-eight countries/regions saw their share of post-quantum encrypted traffic more than double throughout the year, including significant growth in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/pr#post-quantum-encryption"><u>Puerto Rico</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/kw#post-quantum-encryption"><u>Kuwait</u></a>. Kuwait’s share nearly tripled, from 13% to 37%, and Puerto Rico’s share grew from 20% to 49%. </p><p>Those three were among others that saw significant share growth in mid-September, <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2025/09/09/apple-announces-ios-26-release-date-september-15/"><u>concurrent with</u></a> Apple releasing operating system updates, in which “<i>TLS-protected connections will </i><a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/122756"><i><u>automatically advertise support for hybrid, quantum-secure key exchange</u></i></a><i> in TLS 1.3</i>”. In Kuwait and Puerto Rico, over half of request traffic is from mobile devices, and approximately half comes from iOS devices in both locations as well, so it is not surprising that this software update resulted in a significant increase in post-quantum traffic share</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5Y65KuTezdGnAfilj9Xosr/a74b60f9f24322827ea89f9ad1eef035/BLOG-3077_15_-_traffic-postquantum-puertorico.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Post-quantum encrypted TLS 1.3 traffic growth in 2025, Puerto Rico</i></sup></p><p>To that end, the share of post-quantum encrypted traffic from Apple iOS devices <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;groupBy=post_quantum&amp;filters=botClass%253DLIKELY_HUMAN%252Cos%253DiOS&amp;dt=2025-09-01_2025-09-28"><u>grew significantly in September</u></a> after iOS 26 was officially released. Just <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1969159602999640535?s=20"><u>four days after release</u></a>, the global share of requests with post-quantum support from iOS devices grew from just under 2% to 11%. By <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;groupBy=post_quantum&amp;filters=deviceType%253DMobile%252Cos%253DiOS%252CbotClass%253DLikely_Human&amp;dt=2025-12-01_2025-12-07"><u>early December</u></a>, more than 25% of requests from iOS devices used post-quantum encryption.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Googlebot was responsible for more than a quarter of Verified Bot traffic</h3>
      <a href="#googlebot-was-responsible-for-more-than-a-quarter-of-verified-bot-traffic">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The new <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?kind=all"><u>Bots Directory</u></a> on Cloudflare Radar provides a wealth of information about <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot/verified-bots/"><u>Verified Bots</u></a> and <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot/signed-agents/"><u>Signed Agents</u></a>, including their operators, categories, and associated user agents, links to documentation, and traffic trends. Verified Bots must conform to a <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot/verified-bots/policy/"><u>set of requirements</u></a> as well as being verified through either <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/reference/bot-verification/web-bot-auth/"><u>Web Bot Auth</u></a> or <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/reference/bot-verification/ip-validation/"><u>IP validation</u></a>. A signed agent is controlled by an end user and a verified signature-agent from their <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/reference/bot-verification/web-bot-auth/"><u>Web Bot Auth</u></a> implementation, and must conform to a separate <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot/signed-agents/policy/"><u>set of requirements</u></a>.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/google"><u>Googlebot</u></a> is used to crawl Web site content for search indexing and AI training, and it was far and away the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#per-bot-traffic"><u>most active bot seen by Cloudflare</u></a> throughout 2025. It was most active between mid-February and mid-July, peaking in mid-April, and was responsible for over 28% of traffic from Verified Bots. Other Google-operated bots that were responsible for notable amounts of traffic included <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/googleads"><u>Google AdsBot</u></a> (used to monitor Web sites where Google ads are served), <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/googleimageproxy"><u>Google Image Proxy</u></a> (used to retrieve and cache images embedded in email messages), and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/google-other"><u>GoogleOther</u></a> (used by various product teams for fetching publicly accessible content from sites).</p><p>OpenAI’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/gptbot"><u>GPTBot</u></a>, which crawls content for AI training, was the next most active bot, originating about 7.5% of Verified Bot traffic, with fairly volatile crawling activity during the first half of the year. Microsoft’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/bing"><u>Bingbot</u></a> crawls Web site content for search indexing and AI training and generated 6% of Verified Bot traffic throughout the year, showing relatively stable activity. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/01CNwrALbfJ1DBJpX3hHvw/58f278f76b4e57d095e5e61b879f3728/BLOG-3077_16_-_traffic-verifiedbot-bots.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Verified Bot traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Search engine crawlers and AI crawlers are the two most active Verified Bot categories, with traffic patterns mapping closely to the leading bots in those categories, including GoogleBot and OpenAI’s GPTBot. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=SEARCH_ENGINE_CRAWLER&amp;kind=all"><u>Search engine crawlers</u></a> were responsible for 40% of Verified Bot traffic, with <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=AI_CRAWLER&amp;kind=all"><u>AI crawlers</u></a> generating half as much (20%). <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=SEARCH_ENGINE_OPTIMIZATION&amp;kind=all"><u>Search engine optimization</u></a> bots were also quite active, driving over 13% of requests from Verified Bots.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6IFOI7astEqMk1fqLPvhMK/860c1b28fe6d2987b7bcd8510d1495b5/BLOG-3077_17_-_traffic-verifiedbots-category.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Verified Bot traffic trends by category in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>AI insights</h2>
      <a href="#ai-insights">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7IY2MCHqrWK7wPO5XSrHwc/2d4622db6417472e2702c31a95d31cef/BLOG-3077_18_-_.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2> Crawl volume from dual-purpose Googlebot dwarfed other AI bots and crawlers</h2>
      <a href="#crawl-volume-from-dual-purpose-googlebot-dwarfed-other-ai-bots-and-crawlers">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In September, a Cloudflare <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-a-better-internet-with-responsible-ai-bot-principles/"><u>blog post</u></a> laid out a proposal for responsible AI bot principles, one of which was “AI bots should have one distinct purpose and declare it.” In the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights#ai-bot-best-practices"><u>AI bots best practices overview</u></a> on Radar, we note that several bot operators have dual-purpose crawlers, including Google and Microsoft.</p><p>Because <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/google"><u>Googlebot</u></a> crawls for both search engine indexing and AI training, we have included it in this year’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ai-bot-and-crawler-traffic"><u>AI crawler overview</u></a>. In 2025, its crawl volume dwarfed that of other leading AI bots. Request traffic began to increase in mid-February, peaking in late April, and then slowly declined through late July. After that, it grew gradually into the end of the year. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/bing"><u>Bingbot</u></a> also has a similar dual purpose, although its crawl volume is a fraction of Googlebot’s. Bingbot’s crawl activity trended generally upwards across the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/14AYO1s8q9J0zN9gcTaz0h/d60ad6cdd7af04938d98eda081bea834/BLOG-3077_19_-_ai-botandcrawlertraffic.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>AI crawler traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>OpenAI’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/gptbot"><u>GPTBot</u></a> is used to crawl content that may be used in training OpenAI's generative AI foundation models. Its crawling activity was quite volatile across the year, reaching its highest levels in June, but it ended November slightly above the crawl levels seen at the beginning of the year. </p><p>Crawl volume for OpenAI’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/chatgpt-user"><u>ChatGPT-User</u></a>, which visits Web pages when users ask ChatGPT or a CustomGPT questions, saw sustained growth over the course of the year, with a weekly usage pattern becoming more evident starting in mid-February, suggesting increasing usage at schools and in the workplace. Peak request volumes were as much as 16x higher than at the beginning of the year. A drop in activity was also evident in the June to August timeframe, when many students were out of school and many professionals took vacation time. </p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory/oai-searchbot"><u>OAI-SearchBot</u></a>, which is used to link to and surface websites in search results in ChatGPT's search features, saw crawling activity grow gradually through August, then several traffic spikes in August and September, before starting to grow more aggressively heading into October, with peak request volume during a late October spike approximately 5x higher than the beginning of the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Y39lUtvOLcaxwSwop4Egs/b9790ef1314a35ff811e4ed09d875271/BLOG-3077_20_-_image59.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>OpenAI crawler traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Crawling by Anthropic’s ClaudeBot effectively doubled through the first half of the year, but gradually declined during the second half, returning to a level approximately 10% higher than the start of the year. Perplexity’s PerplexityBot crawling traffic grew slowly through January and February, but saw a big jump in activity from mid-March into April. After that, growth was more gradual through October, before seeing a significant increase again in November, winding up about 3.5x higher than where it started the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4PgjYaCVUzZgmt23SdKj6q/142ebab34ffbea6dd6770bcebdf2f1d2/BLOG-3077_21_-_image42.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>ClaudeBot traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/hkDU4jX6T7GibKUxDqycO/c0eab7d698916d05ef7314973974ef5d/BLOG-3077_22_-_.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>PerplexityBot traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>ByteDance’s Bytespider, one of 2024’s top AI crawlers, saw crawling volume below several other training bots, and its activity dropped across the year, continuing the decline observed last year.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>AI “user action” crawling increased by over 15x in 2025</h3>
      <a href="#ai-user-action-crawling-increased-by-over-15x-in-2025">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Most AI bot crawling is done for one of three <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ai-crawler-traffic-by-purpose"><u>purposes</u></a>: training, which gathers Web site content for AI model training; search, which indexes Web site content for search functionality available on AI platforms; and user action, which visits Web sites in response to user questions posed to a chatbot. Note that search crawling may also include crawling for <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ai-search/concepts/what-is-rag/"><u>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)</u></a>, which enables a content owner to bring their own data into LLM generation without retraining or fine-tuning a model. (A fourth “undeclared” purpose captures traffic from AI bots whose crawling purpose is unclear or unknown.)</p><p>Crawling for model training is responsible for the overwhelming majority of AI crawler traffic, reaching as much as 7-8x search crawling and 32x user action crawling at peak. The training traffic figure is heavily influenced by OpenAI’s GPTBot, and as such, it followed a very similar pattern through the year.</p><p>Crawling for search was strongest through mid-March, when it dropped by approximately 40%. It returned to more gradual growth after that, though it ended the surveyed time period just under 10% lower than the start of the year.</p><p>User action crawling started 2025 with the lowest crawl volume of the three defined purposes, but more than doubled through January and February. It again doubled in early March, and from there, it continued to grow throughout the year, up over 21x from January through early December. This growth maps very closely to the traffic trends seen for OpenAI’s ChatGPT-User bot.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/Cs9yjb8rpfwiOgfGmYGxx/7e11b9014a69b84af3b7b25cde4e73ac/BLOG-3077_23_-_ai-crawlpurpose-useraction.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>User action crawler traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>While other AI bots accounted for 4.2% of HTML request traffic, Googlebot alone accounted for 4.5%</h3>
      <a href="#while-other-ai-bots-accounted-for-4-2-of-html-request-traffic-googlebot-alone-accounted-for-4-5">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>AI bots have frequently been in the news during 2025 as content owners raise concerns about the amount of traffic that they are generating, especially as much of it <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/content-independence-day-no-ai-crawl-without-compensation/"><u>does not translate into</u></a> end users being referred back to the source Web sites. To better understand the impact of AI bot crawling activity, as compared to non-AI bots and human Web usage, we analyzed request traffic for HTML content across Cloudflare’s customer base and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ai-traffic-share"><u>classified it</u></a> as coming from a human, an AI bot, or another “non-AI” type of bot. (Note that because we are focusing on just HTML content here, the bot and human shares of traffic will differ from that shown on Radar, which analyzes request traffic for all content types.) Because Googlebot crawls so actively, and is dual-purpose, we have broken its share out separately in this analysis.</p><p>Throughout 2025, we found that traffic from AI bots accounted for an average of 4.2% of HTML requests. The share varied widely throughout the year, dropping as low as 2.4% in early April, and reaching as high as 6.4% in late June.</p><p>To that end, non-AI bots started 2025 responsible for half of requests to HTML pages, seven percentage points above human-generated traffic. This gap grew as wide as 25 percentage points during the first few days of June. However, these traffic shares began to draw closer together starting in mid June, and starting on September 11, entered a period where the human generated share of HTML traffic sometimes exceeded that of non-AI bots. As of December 2, human traffic generated 47% of HTML requests, and non-AI bots generated 44%.</p><p>Googlebot is a particularly voracious crawler, and this year it originated 4.5% of HTML requests, a share slightly larger than AI bots in aggregate. Starting the year at just under 2.5%, its share ramped quickly over the next four months, peaking at 11% in late April. It subsequently fell back towards its starting point over the next several months, and then grew again during the second half of the year, ending with a 5% share. This share shift largely mirrors Googlebot’s crawling activity as discussed above.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/69Kmxq3C29UO0AM7yWOJmY/411e1fe6e4799ae08cfdfec8783a8a71/BLOG-3077_24_-_ai-aibottrafficshare.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>HTML traffic shares by bot type in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Anthropic had the highest crawl-to-refer ratio among the leading AI and search platforms</h3>
      <a href="#anthropic-had-the-highest-crawl-to-refer-ratio-among-the-leading-ai-and-search-platforms">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-search-crawl-refer-ratio-on-radar/"><u>launched the crawl-to-refer ratio metric on Radar</u></a> on July 1 to track how often a given AI or search platform sends traffic to a site relative to how often it crawls that site. A high ratio means a whole lot of AI crawling without sending actual humans to a Web site.</p><p>It can be a volatile metric, with the values shifting day-by-day as crawl activity and referral traffic change. This <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-search-crawl-refer-ratio-on-radar/#how-does-this-measurement-work"><u>metric compares</u></a> total number of requests from relevant user agents associated with a given search or AI platform where the response was of Content-type: text/html by the total number of requests for HTML content where the Referer header contained a hostname associated with a given search or AI platform. </p><p>Anthropic had the highest <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#crawl-refer-ratio"><u>crawl-to-refer ratios this year</u></a>, reaching as much as 500,000:1, although they were quite erratic from January through May. Both the magnitude and erratic nature of the metric was likely due to sparse referral traffic over that time period. After that, the ratios became more consistent, but remained higher than others, ranging from ~25,000:1 to ~100,000:1.</p><p>OpenAI’s ratios over time were quite spiky, and reached as much as 3,700:1 in March. These shifts may be due to the stabilization of GPTBot crawling activity, coupled with increased usage of ChatGPT search functionality, which includes links back to source Web sites within its responses. Users following those links would increase Referer counts, potentially lowering the ratio. (Assuming that crawl traffic wasn’t increasing at a similar or greater rate.)</p><p>Perplexity had the lowest crawl-to-refer ratios of the major AI platforms, starting the year below 100:1 before spiking in late March above 700:1, concurrent with a spike of crawl traffic seen from PerplexityBot.  Settling back down after the spike, peak ratio values generally remained below 400:1, and below 200:1 from September onwards.</p><p>Among search platforms, Microsoft’s ratio unexpectedly exhibited a cyclical weekly pattern, reaching its lowest levels on Thursdays, and peaking on Sundays. Peak ratio values were generally in the 50:1 to 70:1 range across the year. Starting the year just over 3:1, Google’s crawl-to-refer ratio increased steadily through April, reaching as high as 30:1. After peaking, it fell somewhat erratically through mid-July, dropping back to 3:1, although it has been slowly increasing through the latter half of 2025. DuckDuckGo’s ratio remained below 1:1 for the first three calendar quarters of 2025, but experienced a sudden jump to 1.5:1 in mid-October and stayed elevated for the remainder of the period.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/Z0LM4kJGevPxirhokT85o/401363b41b9f5987fe06976197967d9a/BLOG-3077_25_-_ai-crawltoreferratios.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>AI &amp; search platform crawl-to-refer ratios in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>AI crawlers were the most frequently fully disallowed user agents found in robots.txt files</h3>
      <a href="#ai-crawlers-were-the-most-frequently-fully-disallowed-user-agents-found-in-robots-txt-files">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The robots.txt file, formally defined in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9309.html"><u>RFC 9309</u></a> as the Robots Exclusion Protocol, is a text file that content owners can use to signal to Web crawlers which parts of a Web site the crawlers are allowed to access, using directives to explicitly allow or disallow search and AI crawlers from their whole site, or just parts of it. The directives within the file are effectively a “keep out” sign and don’t provide any formal access control. Having said that, Cloudflare’s <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/control-content-use-for-ai-training/#putting-up-a-guardrail-with-cloudflares-managed-robots-txt"><u>managed robots.txt</u></a> feature automatically updates a site’s existing robots.txt or creates a robots.txt file on the site that includes directives asking popular AI bot operators to not use the content for AI model training. In addition, our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-audit-enforcing-robots-txt/"><u>AI Crawl Control</u></a> capabilities can track violations of a site’s robots.txt directives, and give the site owner the ability to block requests from the offending user agent.</p><p>On Cloudflare Radar, we provide <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights#ai-user-agents-found-in-robotstxt"><u>insight</u></a> into the number of robots.txt files found among our top 10,000 <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>domains</u></a> and the full/partial disposition of the allow and disallow directives found within the files for selected crawler user agents. (In this context, “full” refers to directives that apply to the whole site, and “partial” refers to directives that apply to specified paths or file types.) <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#robots-txt"><u>Within the Year in Review microsite</u></a>, we show how the disposition of these directives changed over the course of 2025.</p><p>The user agents with the highest number of fully disallowed directives are those associated with <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/how-to-block-ai-crawlers/">AI crawlers</a>, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2025/11/common-crawl-ai-training-data/684567/"><u>CCBot</u></a>. The directives for Googlebot and Bingbot crawlers, used for both search indexing and AI training, leaned heavily towards partial disallow, likely focused on cordoning off login endpoints and other non-content areas of a site. For these two bots, directives applying to the whole site remained a small fraction of the total number of disallow directives observed through the year. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6hCZ4jExApvVaK2CrEulZO/5eb528b8851868d0c90b56e638ffae86/BLOG-3077_26_-_ai-robotstxt-disallow.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Robots.txt disallow directives by user agent</i></sup></p><p>The number of explicit allow directives found across the discovered robots.txt files was a fraction of the observed disallow directives, likely because allow is the default policy, absent any specific directive. Googlebot had the largest number of explicit allow directives, although over half of them were partial allows. Allow directives targeting AI crawlers were found across fewer domains, with directives targeting OpenAI’s crawlers leaning more towards explicit full allows. </p><p><a href="https://developers.google.com/crawling/docs/crawlers-fetchers/google-common-crawlers#google-extended"><u>Google-Extended</u></a> is a user agent token that web publishers can use to manage whether content that Google crawls from their sites may be used for training <a href="https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/"><u>Gemini models</u></a> or providing site content from the Google Search index to Gemini, and the number of allow directives targeting it tripled during the year — most partially allowed access at the start of the year, while the end of the year saw a larger number of directives that explicitly allowed full site access than those that allowed access to just some of the site’s content. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6hCZ4jExApvVaK2CrEulZO/5eb528b8851868d0c90b56e638ffae86/BLOG-3077_26_-_ai-robotstxt-disallow.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Robots.txt allow directives by user agent</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>On Workers AI, Meta’s llama-3-8b-instruct model was the most popular model, and text generation was the most popular task type</h3>
      <a href="#on-workers-ai-metas-llama-3-8b-instruct-model-was-the-most-popular-model-and-text-generation-was-the-most-popular-task-type">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The AI model landscape is rapidly evolving, with providers regularly releasing more powerful models, capable of tasks like text and image generation, speech recognition, and image classification. Cloudflare collaborates with AI model providers to ensure that <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/"><u>Workers AI supports these models</u></a> as soon as possible following their release, and we <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/replicate-joins-cloudflare/"><u>recently acquired Replicate</u></a> to greatly expand our catalog of supported models. In <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/expanded-ai-insights-on-cloudflare-radar/#popularity-of-models-and-tasks-on-workers-ai"><u>February 2025</u></a>, we introduced visibility on Radar into the popularity of publicly available supported <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights/#workers-ai-model-popularity"><u>models</u></a> as well as the types of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights/#workers-ai-task-popularity"><u>tasks</u></a> that these models perform, based on customer account share. </p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#workers-ai-model-and-task-popularity"><u>Throughout the year</u></a>, Meta’s <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/llama-3-8b-instruct/"><u>llama-3-8b-instruct</u></a> model was dominant, with an account share (36.3%) more than three times larger than the next most popular models, OpenAI’s <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/whisper/"><u>whisper</u></a> (10.1%) and Stability AI’s <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0/"><u>stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0</u></a> (9.8%). Both Meta and BAAI (Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence) had multiple models among the top 10, and the top 10 models had an account share of 89%, with the balance spread across a long tail of other models.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1a3GPm3cqrr0KcK6nCeLRZ/fd5ba576f02518c50fd6efbe312cacae/BLOG-3077_28_-_ai-workersaimostpopularmodels.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Most popular models on Workers AI in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Task popularity was driven in large part by the top models, with text generation, text-to-image, and automatic speech recognition topping the list. Text generation was used by 48.2% of Workers AI customer accounts, nearly four times more than the text-to-image share of 12.3% and automatic speech recognition’s 11.0% share. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3JxZW6bB7q0kxnzPrh454m/b057fd945ce521aceaf0e8cd27b14f3d/BLOG-3077_29_-_ai-workersaimostpopulartasks.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Most popular tasks on Workers AI in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>What’s being crawled</h2>
      <a href="#whats-being-crawled">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In addition to the year-to-date analysis presented above, below we present point-in-time analyses of what is being crawled. Note that these insights are not included in the Year in Review microsite.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Crawling by geographic region</h3>
      <a href="#crawling-by-geographic-region">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Within the AI section of Year in Review, we are looking at traffic from AI bots and crawlers globally, without regard for the geography associated with the account that owns the content being crawled. If we drill down a level geographically, using data from October 2025, and look at which bots generate the most crawling traffic for sites owned by customers with a billing address in a given geographic region, we find that Googlebot accounts for between 35% and 55% of crawler traffic in each region.</p><p>OpenAI’s GPTBot or Microsoft’s Bingbot are second most active, with crawling shares of 13-14%. In the developed economies across North America, Europe, and Oceania, Bingbot maintains a solid lead over AI crawlers. But for sites based in fast-growing markets across South America and Asia, GPTBot holds a slimmer lead over Bingbot.</p><table><tr><th><p><b>Geographic region</b></p></th><th><p><b>Top crawlers</b></p></th></tr><tr><td><p>North America</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (45.5%)
Bingbot (14.0%)</p><p>Meta-ExternalAgent (7.7%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South America</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (44.2%)
GPTBot (13.8%)
Bingbot (13.5%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Europe</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (48.6%)
Bingbot (13.2%)
GPTBot (10.8%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Asia</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (39.0%)
GPTBot (14.0%)
Bingbot (12.6%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Africa</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (35.8%)
Bingbot (13.7%)
GPTBot (13.1%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oceania</p></td><td><p>Googlebot (54.2%)
Bingbot (13.8%)
GPTBot (6.6%)</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h3>Crawling by industry</h3>
      <a href="#crawling-by-industry">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In analyzing AI crawler activity by customer industry during October 2025, we found that Retail and Computer Software consistently attracted the most AI crawler traffic, together representing just over 40% of all activity.</p><p>Others in the top 10 accounted for much smaller shares of crawling activity. These top 10 industries accounted for just under 70% of crawling, with the balance spread across a long tail of other industries.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2N55U6SrN7zKkCp66hmhFz/304b038e492e4eda249f3b1fdb664b4a/BLOG-3077_30_-_AI-crawlbyindustry.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Industry share of AI crawling activity, October 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Adoption &amp; usage</h2>
      <a href="#adoption-usage">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/73LdMVjBBlMOnQGi8LF4oy/f659eaf5d95219e5b54d62b9e16db809/BLOG-3077_31_-_image35.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>iOS devices generated 35% of mobile device traffic globally – and more than half of device traffic in many countries</h3>
      <a href="#ios-devices-generated-35-of-mobile-device-traffic-globally-and-more-than-half-of-device-traffic-in-many-countries">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The two leading mobile device operating systems globally are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS"><u>Apple’s iOS</u></a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)"><u>Google’s Android</u></a>. By analyzing information in the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> header included with each Web request, we can calculate the distribution of traffic by client operating system throughout the year. Android devices generate the majority of mobile device traffic globally, due to the wide distribution of price points, form factors, and capabilities of such devices.</p><p>Globally, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ios-vs-android"><u>share of traffic from iOS</u></a> grew slightly <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/#globally-nearly-one-third-of-mobile-device-traffic-was-from-apple-ios-devices-android-had-a-90-share-of-mobile-device-traffic-in-29-countries-regions-peak-ios-mobile-device-traffic-share-was-over-60-in-eight-countries-regions"><u>year-over-year</u></a>, up two percentage points to 35% in 2025. Looking at the top countries for iOS traffic share, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/mc#ios-vs-android"><u>Monaco</u></a> had the highest share, at 70%, and iOS drove 50% or more of mobile device traffic in a total of 30 countries/regions, including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/dk#ios-vs-android"><u>Denmark</u></a> (65%), <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/jp#ios-vs-android"><u>Japan</u></a> (57%), and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/pr#ios-vs-android"><u>Puerto Rico</u></a> (52%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/btCnb93d23FUPVfkupEGb/79574bfd6f045f88d6331caf488f37a5/BLOG-3077_32_-_adoption-iosvsandroid.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of mobile device traffic by operating system in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>For countries/regions with higher Android usage, the shares were significantly larger. Twenty-seven had Android adoption above 90% in 2025, with <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/pg#ios-vs-android"><u>Papua New Guinea</u></a> the highest at 97%. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sd#ios-vs-android"><u>Sudan</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/mw#ios-vs-android"><u>Malawi</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bd#ios-vs-android"><u>Bangladesh</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/et#ios-vs-android"><u>Ethiopia</u></a> also registered an Android share of 95% or more. Android was responsible for 50% or more of mobile device traffic in 175 countries/regions, with the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bs#ios-vs-android"><u>Bahamas</u></a>’ 51% share placing it at the bottom of that list. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2SAm11BSUjgT2uBOfMT4dU/67d85c4786bb8bfe924f92f28956e5b6/BLOG-3077_33_-_adoption-iosvsandroid-map.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of iOS and Android usage in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>The shares of global Web requests using HTTP/3 and HTTP/2 both increased slightly in 2025</h3>
      <a href="#the-shares-of-global-web-requests-using-http-3-and-http-2-both-increased-slightly-in-2025">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol) is the protocol that makes the Web work. Over the last 30+ years, it has gone through several major revisions. The first standardized version, <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1945"><u>HTTP/1.0</u></a>, was adopted in 1996, <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.html"><u>HTTP/1.1</u></a> in 1999, and <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7540.html"><u>HTTP/2</u></a> in 2015. <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9114.html"><u>HTTP/3</u></a>, standardized in 2022, marked a significant update, running on top of a new transport protocol known as <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-road-to-quic/"><u>QUIC</u></a>. Using QUIC as its underlying transport allows <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/performance/what-is-http3/"><u>HTTP/3</u></a> to establish connections more quickly, as well as deliver improved performance by mitigating the effects of packet loss and network changes. Because it also provides encryption by default, using HTTP/3 mitigates the risk of attacks. </p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#http-versions"><u>Globally in 2025</u></a>, 50% of requests to Cloudflare were made over HTTP/2, HTTP/1.x accounted for 29%, and the remaining 21% were made via HTTP/3. These shares are largely unchanged <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#http-versions"><u>from 2024</u></a> — HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 gained just fractions of a percentage point this year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1GdxQoS6Zgx6IPgHapkS8N/07d2d023e2e91f58793e7b4359faa263/BLOG-3077_34_-_adoption-httpversions.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of traffic by HTTP version in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Geographically, usage of HTTP/3 appears to be both increasing and spreading. Last year, we noted that we had found eight countries/regions sending more than a third of their requests over HTTP/3. In 2025, 15 countries/regions sent more than a third of requests over HTTP/3, with Georgia’s 38% adoption just exceeding 2024’s top adoption rate of 37% in Réunion. (Looking at <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage/ge?dateStart=2025-01-01&amp;dateEnd=2025-12-02"><u>historical data</u></a>, Georgia <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage/ge?dateStart=2025-01-01&amp;dateEnd=2025-01-07"><u>started the year</u></a> around 46% HTTP/3 adoption, but dropped through the first half of the year before leveling off.) Armenia had the largest increase in HTTP/3 adoption year-over-year, jumping from 25% to 37%. </p><p>Seven countries/regions saw overall HTTP/3 usage levels below 10% due to high levels of bot-originated HTTP/1.x traffic. These include Hong Kong, Dominica, Singapore, Ireland, Iran, Seychelles, and Gibraltar. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>JavaScript-based libraries and frameworks remained integral tools for building Web sites</h3>
      <a href="#javascript-based-libraries-and-frameworks-remained-integral-tools-for-building-web-sites">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>To deliver a modern Web site, developers must capably integrate a growing collection of libraries and frameworks with third-party tools and platforms. All of these components must work together to ensure a performant, feature-rich, problem-free user experience. As in past years, we used <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan"><u>Cloudflare Radar’s URL Scanner</u></a> to scan Web sites associated with the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>top 5,000 domains</u></a> to identify the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#website-technologies"><u>most popular technologies and services</u></a> used across eleven categories. </p><p><a href="https://jquery.com/"><u>jQuery</u></a> is self-described as a fast, small, and feature-rich JavaScript library, and our scan found it on 8x as many sites as <a href="https://kenwheeler.github.io/slick/"><u>Slick</u></a>, a JavaScript library used to display image carousels. <a href="https://react.dev/"><u>React</u></a> remained the top JavaScript framework used for building Web interfaces, found on twice as many scanned sites as <a href="https://vuejs.org/"><u>Vue.js</u></a>. PHP, node.js, and Java remained the most popular programming languages/technologies, holding a commanding lead over other languages, including Ruby, Python, Perl, and C.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/QBZ6xnDPw9i3y7EBhTqsd/f232925caf1cf3caa91e80a4e16d5ba8/BLOG-3077_35_-_adoption-websitetechnologies.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top Web site technologies, JavaScript libraries category in 2025</i></sup></p><p><a href="https://wordpress.org/"><u>WordPress</u></a> remained the most popular content management system (CMS), though its share of scanned sites dropped to 47%, with the difference distributed across gains seen by multiple challengers. <a href="https://www.hubspot.com/"><u>HubSpot</u></a> and <a href="https://business.adobe.com/products/marketo.html"><u>Marketo</u></a> remained the top marketing automation platforms, with a combined share 10% higher YoY. Among A/B testing tools, <a href="https://vwo.com/"><u>VWO</u></a>’s share grew by eight percentage points year-over-year, extending its lead over <a href="https://www.optimizely.com/"><u>Optimizely</u></a>, while <a href="https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/12979939?hl=en"><u>Google Optimize</u></a>, which was sunsetted in September 2023, saw its share fall from 14% to 4%.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>One-fifth of automated API requests were made by Go-based clients</h3>
      <a href="#one-fifth-of-automated-api-requests-were-made-by-go-based-clients">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Application programming interfaces (APIs) are the foundation of modern dynamic Web sites and both Web-based and native applications. These sites and applications rely heavily on automated API calls to provide customized information. Analyzing the Web traffic protected and delivered by Cloudflare, we can identify requests being made to API endpoints. By applying heuristics to these API-related requests determined to not be coming from a person using a browser or native mobile application, we can identify the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#api-client-language-popularity"><u>top languages used to build API clients</u></a>.</p><p>In 2025, 20% of automated API requests were made by Go-based clients, representing significant growth from Go’s 12% share in 2024. Python’s share also increased year-over-year, growing from 9.6% to 17%. Java jumped to third place, reaching an 11.2% share, up from 7.4% in 2024. <a href="http://node.js"><u>Node.js</u></a>, last year’s second-most popular language, saw its share fall to just 8.3% in 2025, pushing it down to fourth place, while .NET remained at the bottom of the top five, dropping to just 2.3%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4tntP1mMqqsH5Bjj0r6xyc/0b03ad6b7257b7b935e102d78ec6bdb4/BLOG-3077_36_-_image56.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Most popular automated API client languages in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Google remains the top search engine, with Yandex, Bing, and DuckDuckGo distant followers</h3>
      <a href="#google-remains-the-top-search-engine-with-yandex-bing-and-duckduckgo-distant-followers">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare is in a unique position to measure <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#search-engine-market-share"><u>search engine market share</u></a> because we protect websites and applications for millions of customers. To that end, since the fourth quarter of 2021, we have been publishing quarterly <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports"><u>reports</u></a> on this data. We use the HTTP <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referer"><u>referer header</u></a> to identify the search engine sending traffic to customer sites and applications, and present the market share data as an overall aggregate, as well as broken out by device type and operating system. (Device type and operating system insights are based on the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> and <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints"><u>Client Hints</u></a> HTTP request headers.)</p><p>Globally, Google referred the most traffic to sites protected and delivered by Cloudflare, with a nearly 90% share in 2025. The other search engines in the top 5 include Bing (3.1%), Yandex (2.0%), Baidu (1.4%), and DuckDuckGo (1.2%). Looking at trends across the year, Yandex dropped from a 2.5% share in May to a 1.5% share in July, while Baidu grew from 0.9% in April to 1.6% in June.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7As9GnMsW9ru3h0RaH0zoX/55e396801f33af890b24aa871f989be5/BLOG-3077_37_-_adoption-searchenginemarketshare.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall search engine market share in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>Yandex users are primarily based in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ru#search-engine-market-share"><u>Russia</u></a>, where the domestic platform holds a 65% market share, almost double that of Google at 34%. In the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/cz#search-engine-market-share"><u>Czech Republic</u></a>, users prefer Google (84%), but local search engine Seznam’s 7.7% share is a strong showing compared to the second place search engines in other countries. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/fUk9r7hXP0SaMiFiFa3UK/ea4e213f4ac2fb55273e731eacdc10a4/BLOG-3077_38_-_adoption-searchenginemarketshare-czechrepublic.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall search engine market share in 2025, Czech Republic</i></sup></p><p>For traffic from “desktop” systems aggregated globally, Google’s market share drops to about 80%, while Bing’s jumps to nearly 11%. This is likely driven by the continued market dominance of Windows-based systems: On Windows, Google refers just 76% of traffic, while Bing refers about 14%. For traffic from mobile devices, Google holds almost 93% of market share, with the same share seen for traffic from both Android and iOS devices.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5ATWm3D3Jp8v0Pob2qibkw/71869e620f0ec7fb42e636d8da6840d7/BLOG-3077_39_-_adoption-searchenginemarketshare-windows.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall search engine market share in 2025, Windows-based systems</i></sup></p><p>For additional details, including search engines aggregated under “Other”, please refer to the quarterly <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/search-engines"><u>Search Engine Referral Reports</u></a> on Cloudflare Radar.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Chrome remains the top browser across platforms and operating systems – except on iOS, where Safari has the largest share</h3>
      <a href="#chrome-remains-the-top-browser-across-platforms-and-operating-systems-except-on-ios-where-safari-has-the-largest-share">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare is also in a unique position to measure <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#browser-market-share"><u>browser market share</u></a>, and we have been publishing quarterly <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports"><u>reports</u></a> on the topic for several years. To identify the browser and associated operating system making content requests, we use information from the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> and <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints"><u>Client Hints</u></a> HTTP headers. We present browser market share data as an overall aggregate, as well as broken out by device type and operating system. Note that the shares of browsers available on both desktop and mobile devices, such as Google Chrome or Apple Safari, are presented in aggregate.</p><p>Globally, two-thirds of request traffic to Cloudflare came from Chrome in 2025, similar to its share last year. Safari, available exclusively on Apple devices, was the second most-popular browser, with a 15.4% market share. They were followed by Microsoft Edge (7.4%), Mozilla Firefox (3.7%) and Samsung Internet (2.3%). </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6NH8hVOr8lxytXTdrCARAk/ac7173e80db1b39da11c2564a3ae4980/BLOG-3077_40_-_adoption-browsermarketshare.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall browser market share in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ru#browser-market-share"><u>Russia</u></a>, Chrome remains the most popular with a 44% share, but the domestic Yandex Browser comes in a strong second with a 33% market share, as compared to the sub-10% shares for Safari, Edge, and Opera. Interestingly, the Yandex Browser actually beat Chrome by a percentage point (39% to 38%) in June before giving up significant market share to Chrome as the year progressed.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2PGmYbREZR4xvALWdrRqzF/737b9550291d3d5cacfc85cbe72e3551/BLOG-3077_41_-_adoption-browsermarketshare-Russia.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall browser market share in 2025, Russia</i></sup></p><p>As the default browser on iOS, Safari is far and away the most popular on such devices, with a 79% market share, four times Chrome’s 19% share. Less than 1% of requests come from DuckDuckGo, Firefox, and QQ Browser (developed in China by Tencent). In contrast, on Android, 85% of requests are from Chrome, while vendor-provided Samsung Internet is a distant second with a 6.6% share. Huawei Browser, another vendor-provided browser, is third at just 1%. And despite being the default browser on Windows, Edge’s 19% share pales in comparison to Chrome, which leads with a 69% share on that operating system.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/zXj6HWrNSNdAWnDXIrLc5/79b47c9671a1c7691b1fde68749d5812/BLOG-3077_42_-_adoption-browsermarketshare-ios.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall browser market share in 2025, iOS devices</i></sup></p><p>For additional details, including browsers aggregated under “Other”, please refer to the quarterly <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/browser"><u>Browser Market Share Reports</u></a> on Cloudflare Radar.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Connectivity</h2>
      <a href="#connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1ZkJ7IDSXBHzKnK9RSNHsY/f042e40576b2380a77282831fe194398/BLOG-3077_43_-_image13.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Almost half of the 174 major Internet outages observed around the world in 2025 were due to government-directed regional and national shutdowns of Internet connectivity</h3>
      <a href="#almost-half-of-the-174-major-internet-outages-observed-around-the-world-in-2025-were-due-to-government-directed-regional-and-national-shutdowns-of-internet-connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Internet outages continue to be an ever-present threat, and the potential impact of these outages continues to grow, as they can lead to economic losses, disrupted educational and government services, and limited communications. During 2025, we covered significant Internet disruptions and their associated causes in our quarterly summary posts (<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q1-2025-internet-disruption-summary/"><u>Q1</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q2-2025-internet-disruption-summary/"><u>Q2</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2025-internet-disruption-summary/"><u>Q3</u></a>) as well standalone posts covering major outages in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-power-outage-in-portugal-spain-impacted-internet/"><u>Portugal &amp; Spain</u></a> and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/nationwide-internet-shutdown-in-afghanistan/"><u>Afghanistan</u></a>. The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/outage-center"><u>Cloudflare Radar Outage Center</u></a> tracks these Internet outages, and uses Cloudflare traffic data for insights into their scope and duration.</p><p>Nearly half of the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#internet-outages"><u>observed outages</u></a> this year were related to Internet shutdowns intended to prevent cheating on academic exams. Countries including <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1930310203083210760"><u>Iraq</u></a>, <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1952002641896288532"><u>Syria</u></a>, and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2025-internet-disruption-summary/#sudan"><u>Sudan</u></a> again implemented regular multi-hour shutdowns over the course of several weeks during exam periods. Other government-directed shutdowns in <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1924531952993841639"><u>Libya</u></a> and <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1983502557868666900"><u>Tanzania</u></a> were implemented in response to protests and civil unrest, while in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/nationwide-internet-shutdown-in-afghanistan/"><u>Afghanistan</u></a>, the Taliban ordered the shutdown of fiber optic Internet connectivity in multiple provinces as part of a drive to “prevent immorality.”</p><p>Cable cuts, affecting both submarine and domestic fiber optic infrastructure, were also a leading cause of Internet disruptions in 2025. These cuts resulted in network providers in countries/regions including the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2025-internet-disruption-summary/#texas-united-states"><u>United States</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2025-internet-disruption-summary/#south-africa"><u>South Africa</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q2-2025-internet-disruption-summary/#digicel-haiti"><u>Haiti</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2025-internet-disruption-summary/#pakistan-united-arab-emirates"><u>Pakistan</u></a>, and <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1910709632756019219"><u>Hong Kong</u></a> experiencing service disruptions lasting from several hours to several days. Other notable outages include one caused by a <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com/post/3ltf6jtxd5s2p"><u>fire</u></a> in a telecom building in Cairo, Egypt, which disrupted Internet connectivity across multiple service providers for several days, and another in <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1983188999461319102"><u>Jamaica</u></a>, where damage caused by Hurricane Melissa resulted in lower Internet traffic from the island for over a week.</p><p>Within the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025#internet-outages"><u>timeline</u></a> on the Year in Review microsite, hovering over a dot will display information about that outage, and clicking on it will link to additional insights.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7gC9MsV4mObyNllxyQPzDy/cfe5dcee5e751e00309f7b4f6902a03e/BLOG-3077_44_-_connectivity-internetoutages.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Over 170 major Internet outages were observed around the world during 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Globally, less than a third of dual-stack requests were made over IPv6, while in India, over two-thirds were</h3>
      <a href="#globally-less-than-a-third-of-dual-stack-requests-were-made-over-ipv6-while-in-india-over-two-thirds-were">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Available IPv4 address space has been largely exhausted <a href="https://ipv4.potaroo.net/"><u>for a decade or more</u></a>, though solutions like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation"><u>Network Address Translation</u></a> have enabled network providers to stretch limited IPv4 resources. This has served in part to slow the adoption of <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1883"><u>IPv6</u></a>, designed in the mid-1990s as a successor protocol to IPv4, and offers an expanded address space intended to better support the expected growth in the number of Internet-connected devices.</p><p>For nearly 15 years, Cloudflare has been a vocal and active advocate for IPv6 as well, launching solutions including <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cloudflares-automatic-ipv6-gatewa/"><u>Automatic IPv6 Gateway</u></a> in 2011, which enabled free IPv6 support for all of our customers and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/i-joined-cloudflare-on-monday-along-with-5-000-others"><u>IPv6 support by default for all of our customers</u></a> in 2014. Simplistically, server-side support is only half of what is needed to drive IPv6 adoption, because end user connections need to support it as well. By aggregating and analyzing the IP version used for requests made to Cloudflare across the year, we can get insight into the distribution of traffic across IPv6 and IPv4.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ipv6-adoption"><u>Globally</u></a>, 29% of IPv6-capable (“<a href="https://www.techopedia.com/definition/19025/dual-stack-network"><u>dual-stack</u></a>”) requests for content were made over IPv6, up a percentage point from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#ipv6-adoption"><u>28% in 2024</u></a>. India again topped the list with an IPv6 adoption rate of 67%, followed by just three other countries/regions (<a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/my#ipv6-adoption"><u>Malaysia</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sa#ipv6-adoption"><u>Saudi Arabia</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/uy#ipv6-adoption"><u>Uruguay</u></a>) that also made more than half of such requests over IPv6, the same as last year. Some of the largest gains were seen in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bz#ipv6-adoption"><u>Belize</u></a>, which grew from 4.3% to 24% year-over-year, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/qa#ipv6-adoption"><u>Qatar</u></a>, which saw its adoption nearly double to 33% in 2025. Unfortunately, some countries/regions still lag the leaders, with 94 seeing adoption rates below 10%, including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ru#ipv6-adoption"><u>Russia</u></a> (8.6%), <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ie#ipv6-adoption"><u>Ireland</u></a> (6.5%), and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/hk#ipv6-adoption"><u>Hong Kong</u></a> (3.0%). Even further behind are the 20 countries/regions with adoption rates below 1%, including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/tz#ipv6-adoption"><u>Tanzania</u></a> (0.9%), <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sy#ipv6-adoption"><u>Syria</u></a> (0.3%), and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/gi#ipv6-adoption"><u>Gibraltar</u></a> (0.1%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2NkFC1eLbAPdpJv6WPkvHT/26a260f8068656f8ed4aa0a28009a5d9/BLOG-3077_45_-_connectivity-ipv6.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of traffic by IP version in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3Mzu2k3Xs1YZVNhpZpx9xH/23d19f5057b52690e2def65bc2c9c64a/BLOG-3077_46_-_connectivity-ipv6-top5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top five countries for IPv6 adoption in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>European countries had some of the highest download speeds, all above 200 Mbps. Spain remained consistently among the top locations across measured Internet quality metrics</h3>
      <a href="#european-countries-had-some-of-the-highest-download-speeds-all-above-200-mbps-spain-remained-consistently-among-the-top-locations-across-measured-internet-quality-metrics">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Over the past decade or so, we have turned to Internet speed tests for many purposes: keeping our service providers honest, troubleshooting a problematic connection, or showing off a particularly high download speed on social media. In fact, we’ve become conditioned to focus on download speeds as the primary measure of a connection’s quality. While it is absolutely an important metric, for increasingly popular use cases — like videoconferencing, live-streaming, and online gaming — strong upload speeds and low latency are also critical. However, even when Internet providers offer service tiers that include high symmetric speeds and lower latency, consumer adoption is often mixed due to cost, availability, or other issues.</p><p>Tests on <a href="https://speed.cloudflare.com/"><u>speed.cloudflare.com</u></a> measure both download and upload speeds, as well as loaded and unloaded latency. By aggregating the results of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#internet-quality"><u>tests taken around the world during 2025</u></a>, we can get a country/region perspective on average values for these <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/glossary/#connection-quality"><u>connection quality</u></a> metrics, as well as insight into the distribution of the measurements.</p><p>Europe was well-represented among those with the highest average download speeds in 2025. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/es#internet-quality"><u>Spain</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/hu#internet-quality"><u>Hungary</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/pt#internet-quality"><u>Portugal</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/dk#internet-quality"><u>Denmark</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ro#internet-quality"><u>Romania</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/fr#internet-quality"><u>France</u></a> were all in the top 10, with both Spain and Hungary averaging download speeds above 300 Mbps. Spain’s average grew by 25 Mbps from 2024, while Hungary’s jumped 46 Mbps. Meanwhile, Asian countries had many of the highest average upload speeds, with <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/kr#internet-quality"><u>South Korea</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/mo#internet-quality"><u>Macau</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sg#internet-quality"><u>Singapore</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/jp#internet-quality"><u>Japan</u></a> reaching the top 10, all seeing averages in excess of 130 Mbps.</p><p>But it was Spain that topped the list for the upload metric as well at 206 Mbps, up 13 Mbps from 2024. The country’s strong showing across both speed metrics is potentially attributable to <a href="https://commission.europa.eu/projects/unico-broadband_en"><u>“UNICO-Broadband,”</u></a> a “<i>call for projects by telecommunications operators aiming at the deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructure capable of providing services at symmetric speeds of at least 300 Mbps, scalable at 1 Gbps,</i>” which aimed to cover 100 % of the population in 2025.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4pZCAQEMEmbUjXkIUzAwUP/8aec93e96debe19d496396a6e6cd1db7/BLOG-3077_47_-_connectivity-downloadspeeds.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Countries/regions with the highest download speeds in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>As noted above, low latency connections are needed to provide users with good <a href="https://www.screenbeam.com/wifihelp/wifibooster/how-to-reduce-latency-or-lag-in-gaming-2/#:~:text=Latency%20is%20measured%20in%20milliseconds,%2C%2020%2D40ms%20is%20optimal."><u>gaming</u></a> and <a href="https://www.haivision.com/glossary/video-latency/#:~:text=Low%20latency%20is%20typically%20defined,and%20streaming%20previously%20recorded%20events."><u>videoconferencing/streaming</u></a> experiences. The <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-radar-internet-quality-page/#connection-speed-quality-data-is-important"><u>latency metric</u></a> can be broken down into loaded and idle latency. The former measures latency on a loaded connection, where bandwidth is actively being consumed, while the latter measures latency on an “idle” connection, when there is no other network traffic present. (These definitions are from the speed test application’s perspective.) </p><p>In 2025, a number of European countries were among those with both the lowest idle and loaded latencies. For average idle latency, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/is#internet-quality"><u>Iceland</u></a> measured the lowest at 13 ms, just 2 ms better than <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/md#internet-quality"><u>Moldova</u></a>. In addition to these two, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/pt#internet-quality"><u>Portugal</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/es#internet-quality"><u>Spain</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/hu#internet-quality"><u>Hungary</u></a> also ranked among the top 10, all with average idle latencies below 20 ms. Moldova topped the list of countries/regions with the lowest average loaded latency, at 73 ms. Hungary, Spain, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/be#internet-quality"><u>Belgium</u></a>, Portugal, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sk#internet-quality"><u>Slovakia</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/si#internet-quality"><u>Slovenia</u></a> were also part of the top 10, all with average loaded latencies below 100 ms.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4yFdtVsghuBNrCe0sqdEuS/1ed59c6a972f2c511ed567ef69863f39/BLOG-3077_48_-_connectivity-latency-moldova.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Measured idle/loaded latency, Moldova</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>London and Los Angeles were hotspots for Cloudflare speed test activity in 2025</h3>
      <a href="#london-and-los-angeles-were-hotspots-for-cloudflare-speed-test-activity-in-2025">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As we discussed above, the speed test at <a href="http://speed.cloudflare.com"><u>speed.cloudflare.com</u></a> measures a user’s connection speeds and latency. We reviewed the aggregate findings from those tests, highlighting the countries/regions with the best results. However, we also wondered about test activity around the world -– where are users most concerned about their connection quality, and how frequently do they perform tests? <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#speed-tests"><u>A new animated Year in Review visualization illustrates speed test activity</u></a>, aggregated weekly.</p><p>Data is aggregated at a regional level and the associated activity is plotted on the map, with circles sized based on the number of tests taken each week. Note that locations with fewer than 100 speed tests per week are not plotted. Looking at test volume across the year, the greater London and Los Angeles areas were most active, as were Tokyo and Hong Kong and several U.S. cities.</p><p>Animating the graph to see changes across the year, a number of week-over-week surges in test volume are visible. These include in the Nairobi, Kenya, area during the seven-day period ending June 10; in the Tehran, Iran, area the period ending July 29; across multiple areas in Russia the period ending August 5; and in the Karnataka, India, area the period ending October 28. It isn’t clear what drove these increases in test volume — the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/outage-center?dateStart=2025-01-01&amp;dateEnd=2025-12-02"><u>Cloudflare Radar Outage Center</u></a> does not show any observed Internet outages impacting those areas around those times, so it is unlikely to be subscribers testing the restoration of connectivity.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/73PtVEdvkENBbF5O8qD8ij/482d15f05359cbf6ae24fb606ed61793/BLOG-3077_49_-_connectivity-globalspeedtestactivity.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Cloudflare speed test activity by location in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>More than half of request traffic comes from mobile devices in 117 countries/regions</h3>
      <a href="#more-than-half-of-request-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices-in-117-countries-regions">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>For better or worse, over the last quarter-century, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of everyday life. Adoption varies around the world — statistics from <a href="https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/voices/Mobile-phone-ownership-is-widespread-Why-is-digital-inclusion-still-lagging"><u>the World Bank</u></a> show multiple countries/regions with mobile phone ownership above 90%, while in several others, ownership rates are below 10%, as of October 2025. In some countries/regions, mobile devices primarily connect to the Internet via Wi-Fi, while other countries/regions are “mobile first,” where 4G/5G services are the primary means of Internet access.</p><p>Information contained within the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> header included with each request to Cloudflare enables us to categorize it as coming from a mobile, desktop, or other type of device. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Aggregating this categorization globally across 2025</u></a> found that 43% of requests were from mobile devices, up from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>41% in 2024</u></a>. The balance came from “classic” laptop and desktop type devices. Similar to an observation <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/#41-3-of-global-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices-in-nearly-100-countries-regions-the-majority-of-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices"><u>made last year</u></a>, these traffic shares were in line with those measured in Year in Review reports dating back to 2022, suggesting that mobile device usage has achieved a “steady state.”</p><p>In 117 countries/regions, more than half of requests came from mobile devices, led by <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sd#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Sudan</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/mw#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Malawi</u></a> at 75% and 74% respectively. Five other African countries/regions — <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/sz#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Eswatini (Swaziland)</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ye#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Yemen</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bw#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Botswana</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/mz#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Mozambique</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/so#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Somalia</u></a> — also had mobile request shares above 70% in 2025, in line with <a href="https://voxdev.org/topic/understanding-mobile-phone-and-internet-use-across-world"><u>strong mobile phone ownership</u></a> in the region. Among countries/regions with low mobile device traffic share, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/gi#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Gibraltar</u></a> was the only one below 10% (at 5.1%), with just six others originating less than a quarter of requests from mobile devices. This is fewer than in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>2024</u></a>, when a dozen countries/regions had a mobile share below 25%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/fcUaDzUxKouChLsJzfQf5/13e3eb93633c6d5ed017378022218505/BLOG-3077_50_-_connectivity-mobiledesktop.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of traffic by device type in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p><p><sup><i></i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6X1wD6uZUA4eB5vyf3vwl6/72a9445980b21e2917424eca151c77b4/BLOG-3077_51_-_connectivity-mobiledesktop-map.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global distribution of traffic by device type in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Security</h2>
      <a href="#security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1X1yOLxEicpVw5U4ukcAQF/f7d0b02841a8220151a66cd6f0226302/BLOG-3077_52_-_image18.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>6% of global traffic over Cloudflare’s network was mitigated by our systems — either as potentially malicious or for customer-defined reasons</h3>
      <a href="#6-of-global-traffic-over-cloudflares-network-was-mitigated-by-our-systems-either-as-potentially-malicious-or-for-customer-defined-reasons">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare automatically mitigates attack traffic targeting customer websites and applications using <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>DDoS</u></a> mitigation techniques or <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/managed-rules/"><u>Web Application Firewall (WAF) Managed Rules</u></a>, protecting them from a variety of threats posed by malicious actors. We also enable customers to mitigate traffic, even if it isn’t malicious, using techniques like <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/rate-limiting-rules/"><u>rate-limiting</u></a> requests or <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/tools/ip-access-rules/"><u>blocking all traffic from a given location</u></a>. The need to do so may be driven by regulatory or business requirements. We looked at the overall share of traffic to Cloudflare’s network throughout 2025 that was mitigated for any reason, as well as the share that was blocked as a DDoS attack or by WAF Managed Rules.</p><p>This year, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#mitigated-traffic"><u>6.2% of global traffic was mitigated</u></a>, down a quarter of a percentage point <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#mitigated-traffic"><u>from 2024</u></a>. 3.3% of traffic was mitigated as a DDoS attack, or by managed rules, up one-tenth of a percentage point year over year. General mitigations were applied to more than 10% of the traffic coming from over 30 countries/regions, while 14 countries/regions had DDoS/WAF mitigations applied to more than 10% of originated traffic. Both counts were down in comparison to 2024. </p><p>Equatorial Guinea had the largest shares of mitigated traffic with 40% generally mitigated and 29% with DDoS/WAF mitigations applied. These shares grew over the last year, from 26% (general) and 19% (DDoS/WAF). In contrast, Dominica had the smallest shares of mitigated traffic, with just 0.7% of traffic mitigated, with DDoS/WAF mitigations applied to just 0.1%.</p><p>The large increase in mitigated traffic seen during July in the graph below is due to a very large DDoS attack campaign that primarily targeted a single Cloudflare customer domain.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5xzs0onu96x2qCwGRNHrPW/a730564c03b600f793ae92df8ad38ee8/BLOG-3077_53_-_security-mitigatedtraffic.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Mitigated traffic trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>40% of global bot traffic came from the United States, with Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud originating a quarter of global bot traffic</h3>
      <a href="#40-of-global-bot-traffic-came-from-the-united-states-with-amazon-web-services-and-google-cloud-originating-a-quarter-of-global-bot-traffic">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>A <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot/"><u>bot</u></a> is a software application programmed to do certain tasks, and Cloudflare uses advanced <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/bots-heuristics/"><u>heuristics</u></a> to differentiate between bot traffic and human traffic, <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot-score/"><u>scoring</u></a> each request on the likelihood that it originates from a bot or a human user. By monitoring traffic suspected to be from bots, site and application owners can spot and, if necessary, block potentially malicious activity. However, not all bots are malicious — bots can also be helpful, and Cloudflare maintains a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?kind=all"><u>directory of verified bots</u></a> that includes those used for things like <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=SEARCH_ENGINE_CRAWLER&amp;kind=all"><u>search engine indexing</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=SECURITY&amp;kind=all"><u>security scanning</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/directory?category=MONITORING_AND_ANALYTICS&amp;kind=all"><u>site/application monitoring</u></a>. Regardless of intent, we analyzed <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#bot-traffic-sources"><u>where bot traffic was originating from in 2025</u></a>, using the IP address of a request to identify the network (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a>) and country/region associated with the bot making the request. </p><p>Globally, the top 10 countries/regions accounted for 71% of observed bot traffic. Forty percent originated from the United States, far ahead of Germany’s 6.5% share. The US share was up over five percentage points <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#bot-traffic-sources"><u>from 2024</u></a>, while Germany’s share was down a fraction of a percentage point. The remaining countries in the top 10 all contributed bot traffic shares below 5% in 2025.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/29tI5aXT8HeRwmzHMyFaTt/0081d745e48499966611a4d2f3a14f2e/BLOG-3077_54_-_security-bottraffic-countries.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global bot traffic distribution by source country/region in 2025</i></sup></p><p>Looking at bot traffic by network, we found that cloud platforms remained among the leading sources. This is due to a number of factors, including the ease of using automated tools to quickly provision compute resources, their relatively low cost, their broadly distributed geographic footprints, and the platforms’ high-bandwidth Internet connectivity. </p><p>Two autonomous systems associated with Amazon Web Services accounted for a total of 14.4% of observed bot traffic, and two associated with Google Cloud were responsible for a combined 9.7% of bot traffic. They were followed by Microsoft Azure, which originated 5.5% of bot traffic. The shares from all three platforms were up as compared to 2024. These cloud platforms have a strong regional data center presence in many of the countries/regions in the top 10. Elsewhere, around the world, local telecommunications providers frequently accounted for the largest shares of automated bot traffic observed in those countries/regions.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3NCt3TgkYWbl9cQmZH2QZW/3ed0e512bdff74025dd34744b989dc41/BLOG-3077_55_-_security-bottraffic-asns.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global bot traffic distribution by source network in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Organizations in the "People and Society” vertical were the most targeted during 2025</h3>
      <a href="#organizations-in-the-people-and-society-vertical-were-the-most-targeted-during-2025">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Attackers are constantly shifting their tactics and targets, mixing things up in an attempt to evade detection, or based on the damage they intend to cause. They may try to cause financial harm to businesses by targeting ecommerce sites during a busy shopping period, make a political statement by attacking government-related or civil society sites, or attempt to knock opponents offline by attacking a game server. To identify vertical-targeted attack activity during 2025, we analyzed mitigated traffic for customers that had an associated industry and vertical within their customer record. Mitigated traffic was aggregated weekly by source country/region across 17 target verticals.</p><p>Organizations in the "People and Society” vertical were the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#most-attacked-industries"><u>most targeted across the year</u></a>, with 4.4% of global mitigated traffic targeting the vertical. Customers classified as “People and Society” include religious institutions, nonprofit organizations, civic &amp; social organizations, and libraries. The vertical started out the year with under 2% of mitigated traffic, but saw the share jump to 10% the week of March 5, and increase to over 17% by the end of the month. Other attack surges targeting these sites occurred in late April (to 19.1%) and early July (to 23.2%). Many of these types of organizations are protected by Cloudflare’s Project Galileo, and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/celebrating-11-years-of-project-galileo-global-impact/"><u>this blog post</u></a> details the attacks and threats they experienced in 2024 and 2025.</p><p>Gambling/Games, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#most-attacked-industries"><u>most-targeted vertical last year</u></a>, saw its share of mitigated attacks drop by more than half year-over-year, to just 2.6%. While one might expect to see attacks targeting gambling sites peak around major sporting events like the Super Bowl and March Madness, such a trend was not evident, as attack share peaked at 6.5% the week of March 5 — a month after the Super Bowl, and a couple of weeks before the start of March Madness.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6HqH4NQhC77KEgh1Z3tJDw/a9787f0913ad8160607a1cb21de6347a/BLOG-3077_56_-_security-mostattackedverticals.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global mitigated traffic share by vertical in 2025, summary view</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Routing security, measured as the shares of RPKI valid routes and covered IP address space, saw continued improvement throughout 2025</h3>
      <a href="#routing-security-measured-as-the-shares-of-rpki-valid-routes-and-covered-ip-address-space-saw-continued-improvement-throughout-2025">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/what-is-bgp/"><u>Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)</u></a> is the Internet’s core routing protocol, enabling traffic to flow between source and destination by communicating routes between networks. However, because it relies on trust between connected networks, incorrect information shared between peers (intentionally or not) can send traffic to the wrong place — potentially to <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/bgp-leaks-and-crypto-currencies/"><u>systems under control of an attacker</u></a>. To address this, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki/"><u>Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)</u></a> was developed as a cryptographic method of signing records that associate a BGP route announcement with the correct originating autonomous system (AS) number to ensure that the information being shared originally came from a network that is allowed to do so. Cloudflare has been a vocal advocate for routing security, including as a founding participant in the <a href="https://www.internetsociety.org/news/press-releases/2020/leading-cdn-and-cloud-providers-join-manrs-to-improve-routing-security/"><u>MANRS CDN and Cloud Programme</u></a> and by providing a <a href="https://isbgpsafeyet.com/"><u>public tool</u></a> that enables users to test whether their Internet provider has implemented BGP safely. </p><p>We analyzed data available on Cloudflare Radar’s <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing"><u>Routing page</u></a> to determine the share of <a href="https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/help.html"><u>RPKI valid routes</u></a> and how that share changed throughout 2025, as well as determining the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#routing-security"><u>share of IP address space covered by valid routes</u></a>. The latter metric is noteworthy because a route announcement covering a large amount of IP address space (millions of IPv4 addresses) has a greater potential impact than an announcement covering a small block of IP address space (hundreds of IPv4 addresses).</p><p>We started 2025 with 50% valid IPv4 routes, growing to 53.9% by December 2. The share of valid IPv6 routes increased to 60.1%, up 4.7 percentage points. Looking at the global share of IP address space covered by valid routes, IPv4 increased to 48.5%, a three percentage point increase. The share of IPv6 address space covered by valid routes fell slightly to 61.6%. Although the year-over-year changes for these metrics are slowing, we have made significant progress over the last five years. Since the start of 2020, the share of RPKI valid IPv4 routes and IPv4 address space have both grown by approximately 3x.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4EtRqY7MgRKLxjsLIlNuis/013b3bf92c6d3b173cd8086b1ff370c4/BLOG-3077_57_-_security-routingsecurity-routes.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Shares of global RPKI valid routing entries by IP version in 2025</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3JEv5ViM6qYdYxSzE6sbYD/4f89f5acbd2aeef55562fbee63dd2f07/BLOG-3077_58_-_security-routingsecurity-addressspace.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Shares of globally announced IP address space covered by RPKI valid routes in 2025</i></sup></p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/bb#routing-security"><u>Barbados</u></a> saw the biggest growth in the share of valid IPv4 routes, growing from 2.2% to 20.8%. Looking at valid IPv6 routes, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/ml#routing-security"><u>Mali</u></a> saw the most significant share growth in 2025, from 10.0% to 58.3%. </p><p>Barbados also experienced the biggest increase in the share of IPv4 space covered by valid routes, jumping from just 2.0% to 18.6%. For IPv6 address space, both <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/tj#routing-security"><u>Tajikistan</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/dm#routing-security"><u>Dominica</u></a> went from having effectively no space covered by valid routes at the start of the year, to 5.5% and 3.5% respectively. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>Hyper-volumetric DDoS attack sizes grew significantly throughout the year </h3>
      <a href="#hyper-volumetric-ddos-attack-sizes-grew-significantly-throughout-the-year">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In our quarterly DDoS Report series (<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-for-2025-q1/"><u>Q1</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-for-2025-q2/"><u>Q2</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-2025-q3/"><u>Q3</u></a>), we have highlighted the increasing frequency and size of hyper-volumetric network layer attacks targeting Cloudflare customers and Cloudflare’s infrastructure. We define a “hyper-volumetric network layer attack” as one that operates at Layer 3/4 and that peaks at more than one terabit per second (1 Tbps) or more than one billion packets per second (1 Bpps). These reports provide a quarterly perspective, but we also wanted to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#ddos-attacks"><u>show a view of activity across the year</u></a> to understand when attackers are most active, and how attack sizes have grown over time. </p><p>Looking at hyper-volumetric attack activity in 2025 from a Tbps perspective, July saw the largest number of such attacks, at over 500, while February saw the fewest, at just over 150. Attack intensity remained generally below 5 Tbps, although a 10 Tbps attack blocked at the end of August was a harbinger of things to come. This attack was the first of a campaign of &gt;10 Tbps attacks that took place during the first week of September, ahead of a series of &gt;20 Tbps attacks during the last week of the month. In early October, multiple increasingly larger hyper-volumetric attacks were observed, with the largest for the month <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-2025-q3/#aisuru-breaking-records-with-ultrasophisticated-hyper-volumetric-ddos-attacks"><u>peaking at 29.7 Tbps</u></a>. However, that record was soon eclipsed, as an early November attack reached 31.4 Tbps.</p><p>From a Bpps perspective, hyper-volumetric attack activity was much lower, with November experiencing the most (over 140), while just three were seen in February and June. Attack intensity across the year generally remained below 4 Bpps through late August, though a succession of increasingly larger attacks were seen over the next several months, peaking in October. Although the intensity of most of the 110+ attacks blocked in October was below 5 Bpps, a 14 Bpps attack seen during the month was the largest hyper-volumetric attack by packets per second blocked during the year, besting five other successive record-setting attacks that occurred in September.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5q4Ruw6z07JUGXF6FsZMTv/414a388b7f10eff0940a460e1356e938/BLOG-3077_59_-_security-hypervolumetricddos.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Peak DDoS attack sizes in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Email security</h2>
      <a href="#email-security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1mchtw8EWCzTpDs3K4jQ1A/3b740b7facca7869a4a191808e94ef45/BLOG-3077_60_-_image12.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>More than 5% of email messages analyzed by Cloudflare were found to be malicious</h3>
      <a href="#more-than-5-of-email-messages-analyzed-by-cloudflare-were-found-to-be-malicious">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://www.signite.io/emails-are-still-king"><u>Recent statistics</u></a> suggest that email remains the top communication channel for external business contact, despite the growing enterprise use of collaboration/messaging apps. Given its broad enterprise usage, attackers still find it to be an attractive entry point into corporate networks. Generative AI tools <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/dispelling-the-generative-ai-fear-how-cloudflare-secures-inboxes-against-ai-enhanced-phishing/"><u>make it easier</u></a> to craft highly targeted malicious emails that convincingly impersonate trusted brands or legitimate senders (like corporate executives) but contain deceptive links, dangerous attachments, or other types of threats. <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/zero-trust/products/email-security/"><u>Cloudflare Email Security</u></a> protects customers from email-based attacks, including those carried out through targeted malicious email messages. </p><p>In 2025, an <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#malicious-emails"><u>average of 5.6% of emails analyzed by Cloudflare were found to be malicious</u></a>. The share of messages processed by Cloudflare Email Security that were found to be malicious generally ranged between 4% and 6% throughout most of the year. Our data shows a jump in malicious email share starting in October, likely due to an improved classification system implemented by Cloudflare Email Security.  </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/422qqM5R83j6IkdbWdasYR/696a68ded36a67dba1b73e045ab5bb28/BLOG-3077_61_-_emailsecurity-maliciousemailpercentage.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global malicious email share trends in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Deceptive links, identity deception, and brand impersonation were the most common types of threats found in malicious email messages</h3>
      <a href="#deceptive-links-identity-deception-and-brand-impersonation-were-the-most-common-types-of-threats-found-in-malicious-email-messages">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Deceptive links were the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#top-email-threats"><u>top malicious email threat category in 2025</u></a>, found in 52% of messages, up from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#top-email-threats"><u>43% in 2024</u></a>. Since the display text for a hyperlink in HTML can be arbitrarily set, attackers can make a URL appear as if it links to a benign site when, in fact, it is actually linking to a malicious resource that can be used to steal login credentials or download malware. The share of processed emails containing deceptive links was as high as 70% in late April, and again in mid-November.</p><p>Identity deception occurs when an attacker sends an email claiming to be someone else. They may do this using domains that look similar, are spoofed, or use display name tricks to appear to be coming from a trusted domain. Brand impersonation is a form of identity deception where an attacker sends a phishing message that impersonates a recognizable company or brand. Brand impersonation may also use display name spoofing or domain impersonation. Identity deception (38%) and brand impersonation (32%) were growing threats in 2025, up from 35% and 23% respectively in 2024. Both saw an increase in mid-November.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1sq7v5IqOTPZZ5DwCnr8Mv/762e5bd4dda4c34475ffb5507898a08a/BLOG-3077_62_-_emailsecurity-maliciousemail-threatcategory.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Email threat category trends in 2025, worldwide</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Nearly all of the email messages from the .christmas and .lol Top Level Domains were found to be either spam or malicious</h3>
      <a href="#nearly-all-of-the-email-messages-from-the-christmas-and-lol-top-level-domains-were-found-to-be-either-spam-or-malicious">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In addition to providing traffic, geographic distribution, and digital certificate insights for Top Level Domains (TLDs) like <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/com"><u>.com</u></a> or <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/us"><u>.us</u></a>, Cloudflare Radar also provides insights into the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/email#most-abused-tlds"><u>“most abused” TLDs</u></a> – those with domains that we have found are originating the largest shares of malicious and spam email among messages analyzed by Cloudflare Email Security. The analysis is based on the sending domain’s TLD, found in the From: header of an email message. For example, if a message came from sender@example.com, then example.com is the sending domain, and .com is the associated TLD. For the Year in Review analysis, we only included TLDs from which we saw an average minimum of 30 messages per hour.</p><p>Based on <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025/#most-abused-tlds"><u>messages analyzed throughout 2025</u></a>, we found that <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/christmas"><u>.christmas</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/lol"><u>.lol</u></a> were the most abused TLDs, with 99.8% and 99.6% of messages from these TLDs respectively characterized as either spam or malicious. Sorting the list of TLDs by malicious email share, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/cfd"><u>.cfd</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/sbs"><u>.sbs</u></a> both had more than 90% of analyzed emails categorized as malicious. The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tlds/best"><u>.best</u></a> TLD was the worst in terms of spam email share, with 69% of email messages characterized as spam.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/tTPjf9VkDFDnzaKCUXE9y/93e88ce8e7f65ef6373308f805b0219f/BLOG-3077_63_-_emailsecurity-maliciousemail-mostabusedtlds.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>TLDs originating the largest total shares of malicious and spam email in 2025</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Although the Internet and the Web continue to evolve and change over time, it appears that some of the key metrics have become fairly stable. However, we expect that others, such as those metrics tracking AI trends, will shift over the coming years as that space evolves at a rapid pace. </p><p>We encourage you to visit the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025"><u>Cloudflare Radar 2025 Year In Review microsite</u></a> and explore the trends for your country/region, and consider how they impact your organization as you plan for 2026. You can also get near real-time insight into many of these metrics and trends on <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. And as noted above, for insights into the top Internet services across multiple industry categories and countries/regions, we encourage you to read the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>companion Year in Review blog post</u></a>.</p><p>If you have any questions, you can contact the Cloudflare Radar team at <a><u>radar@cloudflare.com</u></a> or on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky).</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Acknowledgements</h2>
      <a href="#acknowledgements">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As the saying goes, it takes a village to make our annual Year in Review happen, from aggregating and analyzing the data, to creating the microsite, to developing associated content. I’d like to acknowledge those team members that contributed to this year’s effort, with thanks going out to: Jorge Pacheco, Sabina Zejnilovic, Carlos Azevedo, Mingwei Zhang, Sofia Cardita (data analysis); André Páscoa, Nuno Pereira (frontend development); João Tomé (Most Popular Internet Services); David Fidalgo, Janet Villarreal, and the internationalization team (translations); Jackie Dutton, Kari Linder, Guille Lasarte (Communications); Laurel Wamsley (blog editing); and Paula Tavares (Engineering Management), as well as other colleagues across Cloudflare for their support and assistance.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Outage]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Quality]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2Mp06VKep73rBpdUmywpQ2</guid>
            <dc:creator>David Belson</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[ChatGPT's rivals, Kwai's quiet rise: the top Internet services of 2025]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review-internet-services/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ AI competition intensified in 2025 as ChatGPT gained strong challengers. Instagram climbed, X declined, and platforms like Shopee, Temu, and Kwai reshaped global Internet usage. Our 2025 DNS data shows how Internet patterns evolved. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>In 2025, the Internet is more central to our lives than ever, and we rely on an array of online services to get things done, connect with others, and enjoy ourselves. Cloudflare’s Top Internet Services of 2025 report explores how the connected world interacted this year, based on Cloudflare’s observations and analysis of DNS trends. </p><p>This report is part of the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025"><u>2025 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review</u></a>, focused on shifts in popularity of Internet services. We hope you find the results are a compelling view of trends in nine major categories — who’s moving up, who’s sliding down, and who continues to hold our attention.</p><p>These rankings show relative popularity within each category, based on anonymized DNS query data from Cloudflare’s <a href="https://1.1.1.1/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-1.1.1.1/"><u>DNS resolver</u></a> and a machine-learning-assisted ranking method introduced in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-domain-rankings/#our-approach"><u>2022</u></a>. A lower rank does not imply lower traffic, only that other services may have grown faster.</p>
    <div>
      <h4>Categories</h4>
      <a href="#categories">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Generative AI <a href="#generative-ai-claude-perplexity-and-gemini-become-serious-chatgpt-competitors">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Social Media <a href="#social-media-instagram-and-snapchat-up-x-down">➜</a></p></li><li><p>E-commerce <a href="#e-commerce-shopee-and-temu-rise">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Video Streaming <a href="#video-streaming-youtube-and-netflix-lead-hbo-enters-top-10">➜</a></p></li><li><p>News <a href="#news-globo-and-bbc-global-perspectives">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Messaging <a href="#messaging-whatsapp-dominates-signal-rises">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Metaverse &amp; Gaming <a href="#metaverse-gaming-roblox-leads-playstation-overtakes-xbox">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Financial Services <a href="#financial-services-stripe-keeps-lead-with-no-changes-on-top">➜</a></p></li><li><p>Cryptocurrency Services <a href="#cryptocurrency-binance-leads-okx-shines-at-the-end-of-the-year">➜</a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Key trends and takeaways</h3>
      <a href="#key-trends-and-takeaways">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>From the dominance of social media and streaming to the rapid growth of AI chatbots, the data reflects an Internet that is constantly adapting to user needs and new technologies. Some of the shifts we observed coincide with news events such as the short Israel-Iran war and Donald Trump’s inauguration — as well as global phenomena like Eurovision and Black Friday.</p><ul><li><p><b>Asian e-commerce climbs:</b> Shopee and Temu joined Amazon in the global e-commerce top 3.</p></li><li><p><b>ChatGPT still leads, but rivals emerge:</b> Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and DeepSeek turned Generative AI into a crowded field, with Gemini holding the #2 spot by year’s end.</p></li><li><p><b>Instagram up, TikTok and X down:</b> Instagram rose to #5 overall (from #7) and #2 in Social Media, while TikTok slipped to #8 and X fell outside the Top 20.</p></li><li><p><b>Kwai’s quiet rise in emerging markets:</b> The Chinese short-video app climbed in our global social ranking and is now #3 in Brazil and high in several emerging markets.</p></li><li><p><b>Roblox still rules gaming, PlayStation overtakes Xbox:</b> Roblox kept the #1 spot in Metaverse &amp; Gaming, while PlayStation passed Xbox for #2.</p></li><li><p><b>Stripe and Nubank digital-first finance dominates</b>: Stripe remained #1 in Financial Services, while Brazilian neobank Nubank highlights Latin America's digital banking surge.</p></li><li><p><b>Crypto steadies, OKX surges:</b> Binance kept the top spot, but OKX jumped to #2 as crypto traffic spiked around Trump’s inauguration and market rallies.</p></li><li><p><b>News under AI pressure</b>: Globo and ESPN dominated the News category, and most traditional outlets slid in our Overall ranking as AI platforms are reshaping how people find information.</p></li></ul><p>We’re also including a by-country and by-region perspective on the most popular Internet services in our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025"><u>Year in Review microsite</u></a> for the second year. It features Top 10 lists not only for the Overall ranking but also for Generative AI, Social Media, and Messaging across more than 100 countries and regions. At the end of this post, we highlight key trends from this localized data.</p><p>Explore the full <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025"><u>2025 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review microsite</u></a> for interactive visualizations, additional metrics, and deeper analysis of Internet traffic patterns, security trends, and network performance data. Check out the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2025-year-in-review/"><u>2025 Year in Review blog post</u></a> for more insights.</p>
    <div>
      <h4>Methodology</h4>
      <a href="#methodology">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Our analysis uses anonymized DNS query data from the <a href="https://1.1.1.1/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> public <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-1.1.1.1/"><u>DNS resolver</u></a>, used by millions globally. We aggregate domains associated with each service (e.g., twitter.com, t.co, and x.com are grouped as “X”) and focus on services accessed by end users, excluding infrastructure domains like root-servers.net. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Google is still #1, while Instagram and YouTube move up</h2>
      <a href="#google-is-still-1-while-instagram-and-youtube-move-up">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Since we introduced our current ranking method in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2022-year-in-review/"><u>2022</u></a>, Google (which includes services like Google Maps and Google Calendar) has remained the #1 most popular Internet service globally. Facebook continued to hold the #2 position for the third year in a row.</p><p>Apple and Microsoft follow a similar pattern to Google in that their main domains (apple.com and microsoft.com) power many different services. Other services with distinct domains, such as Outlook or iCloud, are counted separately.</p>


<p><i>(Note: In these rankings we use <span>▲</span><span>▼</span> symbols to indicate changes from 2024.)</i></p>

<strong>Top 10 most popular Internet services in 2025, overall</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Google</li>
    <li>Facebook</li>
    <li>Apple</li>
    <li>Microsoft <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Instagram <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>AWS <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>YouTube <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>TikTok <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Amazon </li>
    <li>WhatsApp</li>
</ol>
<p>
Apple held #3 through most of the year, but beginning in the summer Microsoft briefly challenged it, reaching that spot on several days in late 2025. Even so, Apple finished the year at #3. Microsoft’s tools performed better overall than in 2024 — Outlook and Microsoft 365/Office were just outside the Top 10.</p><p>Instagram was one of 2025’s strongest performers. It started the year at #7, matching its 2024 position, but climbed to #5 by year-end, reaching #4 on several days in May and June. YouTube also improved, rising one place to #7. Another Meta service, WhatsApp, remained #10 but appeared more frequently at #9 in late 2025 and even reached #7 during parts of May and June.</p><p>TikTok declined in the Overall ranking after a turbulent start to the year, including a temporary ban in the U.S. It fell from #4 in late 2024 to #8 by the end of 2025, performing worst during and after the summer. Amazon Web Services (AWS), which is tracked separately from Amazon through the amazonaws.com domain, also slipped slightly, moving down one position to #6. Amazon remained #9 but faced stronger competition than in 2024.</p><p>The chart below shows how these top Internet services evolved throughout the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7Jjm9FRa7YPVSviBV9APob/e9485d5203a4099f4d3a3cb8fd50d560/BLOG-3095_1_Overall_top_10.png" />
          </figure><p>X continued its downward trajectory. In 2022, it ranked as high as #10 and was close to Instagram. In 2023, it fell out of the Top 10 and, in 2024, dropped to around #14-15. In 2025, it began at #15 and slid further, ending the year outside the Top 20. More on X’s performance appears in the <a href="#social-media-instagram-and-snapchat-up-x-down">Social Media section</a> below.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Generative AI: Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini become serious ChatGPT competitors</h2>
      <a href="#generative-ai-claude-perplexity-and-gemini-become-serious-chatgpt-competitors">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Generative AI became a globally recognized category in late 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT, which turned into a worldwide phenomenon throughout <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>2023</u></a>. In 2025, as in 2024, OpenAI’s ChatGPT remained by far the most popular service in this category, which includes chatbots, coding assistants, and other AI tools. But it now faces serious all-purpose chatbot competitors, including Claude, Perplexity, and Google Gemini, which saw more growth as the year went on.</p>

<strong>Top 10 Generative AI services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>ChatGPT / OpenAI</li>
    <li>Claude / Anthropic <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Perplexity <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Google Gemini <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Character.AI <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>GitHub Copilot  <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Windsurf AI <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>QuillBot <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Grok / xAI <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>DeepSeek <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>In 2024, the closest services behind ChatGPT were Character.AI (role-play chatbots), Codeium (the coding assistant that’s now Windsurf), and QuillBot (writing and paraphrasing). These tools dropped in the rankings in 2025, especially QuillBot, as users sought out broad, consumer-facing chatbots. The drop in Character.AI’s ranking also coincides with its October announcement that <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq837y3v9y1o"><u>it would be banning teens</u></a> from using its AI chatbots — by November it was oscillating between #5 and #7.</p><p>The biggest jump came from Google’s Gemini. It began 2025 outside the Top 10 but climbed steadily and, from mid-September onward, held the #2 position on most days. In our year-end weighted ranking, it finished at #4.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2P9pcO1tvMhqXCSN132jsr/8a8120f9fd5559120c2a933159ee4ed2/BLOG-3095_2_GenAI_top_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Claude, Perplexity, Grok, and the explosive entrance of DeepSeek</h2>
      <a href="#claude-perplexity-grok-and-the-explosive-entrance-of-deepseek">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic, delivered one of the year’s strongest performances, rising from #8-10 in early 2025 to #2 on most weekdays in July and August, before Gemini overtook it in mid-September. Consistent with its enterprise positioning, Claude showed markedly stronger weekday usage.</p><p>Perplexity climbed from #7 to secure #3 from September onward, while Grok (the chatbot from xAI) entered the Top 20 in mid-February and reached #9 by the end of the month, later peaking at #6 on several weekends in October and November.</p><p>DeepSeek, the Chinese chatbot and open-source model developer, made the year’s most notable entrance. Between January 28 and February 3, it surged from outside the Top 20 to #3, demonstrating how quickly new entrants can disrupt the GenAI landscape. It stabilized between #6 and #10 for the remainder of the year.</p><p>Clear weekend-versus-weekday patterns emerged: ChatGPT and Claude dominated weekdays, reflecting workplace adoption, while Grok, Perplexity, and DeepSeek performed better on weekends, indicating stronger consumer and potentially hobbyist appeal.</p><p>Among coding assistants, GitHub Copilot improved from #7 in 2024 to #6 in 2025, reaching #3 on several days during the first half of the year. Windsurf AI (formerly Codeium) started strong at #4 but declined to #7-8 by year-end as consumer-facing platforms rose.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7BLXH0PyTtxCuSn1dJiCoJ/13bfaa843a2c0202a86a831bc86ddfe5/BLOG-3095_3_GitHub_copilot.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>AI chatbots Doubao and Dola/Cici gaining traction</h2>
      <a href="#ai-chatbots-doubao-and-dola-cici-gaining-traction">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>ByteDance’s Doubao, launched in 2023, performed strongly despite one complication: it operates under a <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/bytedances-ai-chatbot-is-quietly-gaining-traction-around-the-world/"><u>different name internationally</u></a> — Dola (formerly Cici). While the international version uses its own domains, network patterns suggest they may still rely on some shared backend infrastructure with Doubao, including endpoints associated with doubao.com. This overlap helps explain why Doubao shows up in global rankings even in regions where Dola/Cici are the consumer-facing brands. Doubao ranks highly outside China — it is #7 in the GenAI category in Australia, #8 in New Zealand, and #9 in the UK, and climbs even higher in several African countries (#2 in Angola and Congo).</p><p>Among specialized AI services, Hugging Face, the open-source model repository, had some of the sharpest spikes of the year, reaching #3 on September 20-21, likely driven by model releases. Google’s dedicated AI properties showed more modest traction: DeepMind peaked at #12 in May, while AI Studio briefly entered the Top 20 in mid-September.</p><p>ElevenLabs (AI voice generation) reached #13-14 during peak periods, while Poe (Quora’s multi-bot aggregator) declined from #11 to #18. Meta AI remained outside the Top 10, appearing only sporadically in August and again in October–November.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>ChatGPT’s growth to the Top 40 of our Overall category</h2>
      <a href="#chatgpts-growth-to-the-top-40-of-our-overall-category">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>When looking at trends for Generative AI services within our larger <b>Overall</b> ranking, some notable trends included:</p><ul><li><p>ChatGPT continued its steady ascent in the Overall domain ranking. After launching in late 2022, it hovered around #200 in early 2023, nearing the Top 100 by year-end. It then approached the Top 50 in late 2024, helped by back-to-school and return-to-work patterns. In 2025, it started between #51-60 and peaked at #33 on November 25, consistently ranking higher on weekdays.
</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7GXwjNKnWii2NZXonVyPrb/12b76cd5174174393d494e65adfa2e6f/BLOG-3095_4_ChatGPT_growth.png" />
          </figure></li><li><p>By late November, ChatGPT sat just behind X (between #26-29) and ahead of Discord, Pinterest, and Reddit, a significant milestone for a service that didn’t exist three years earlier.</p></li><li><p>Other GenAI services also climbed the Overall rankings, though none matched ChatGPT’s momentum. Gemini rose quickly after entering the Top 500 in mid-March, peaking at #133 on November 24. Claude, barely inside the Top 500 in January, reached #155 on December 2 and held a Top 200 position from August onward. Perplexity surged from around #450 in early 2025 to peak at #155 on October 19, hovering near #160 in November. Grok reached #223 on November 18.</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6HmctomJlFSCHxXNb0RVJr/502deda8f5e0cc2f8f2dc283fd903257/BLOG-3095_5_Gemini_Claude.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Social media: Instagram and Snapchat up, X down</h2>
      <a href="#social-media-instagram-and-snapchat-up-x-down">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://datareportal.com/social-media-users"><u>Reports</u></a> estimate that over 5 billion people worldwide use social media, and that number has been growing. Facebook remains the dominant global platform, but the biggest shift in our rankings was Instagram displacing TikTok to secure the #2 spot. These platforms, along with Facebook, all appear in the Top 10 most popular Internet services overall. </p>

<strong>Top 10 Social Media services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Facebook</li>
    <li>Instagram <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>TikTok <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Snapchat <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Linkedin <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>X / Twitter <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Kwai <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Discord <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Pinterest</li>
    <li>Reddit</li>
</ol>
<p>Instagram and TikTok swapped positions starting in May, with Instagram securing an uncontested #2 from late June onward. Snapchat moved into #4 in March, displacing X, which ended the year at #6, behind LinkedIn for the first time in our rankings. Discord and Reddit both briefly reached #7 before settling at #8 and around #9-10 respectively.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Kwai’s rise in emerging markets</h2>
      <a href="#kwais-rise-in-emerging-markets">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Kwai (known as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuaishou"><u>Kuaishou</u></a> in China) climbed from #8 in late 2024 to #7 in 2025, driven by <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202503/02/WS67d0f077a310c240449da5b4.html"><u>growth</u></a> in Latin America and other emerging markets. The Chinese short-video platform now ranks #2 in Brazil’s social media category (behind Facebook) and #3 in Brazil’s overall ranking.</p><p>Kwai reached top 10 status in two major emerging markets — Brazil (#3) and Indonesia (#9). It also ranked #15 in Syria, #18 in Colombia, and #20 in Egypt. Beyond these, it showed meaningful presence in markets like the Dominican Republic (#25), Guyana (#26), Oman (#28), and Argentina (#30).</p><p>Our global ranking also highlights several non-Western platforms inside the Top 20. Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok) held #11 for the second year in a row. VK (often described as Russia’s Facebook) remained at #12, and SnackVideo, a <a href="https://www.ipsos.com/en-id/uncovering-growth-short-video-indonesia"><u>Southeast Asian</u></a> TikTok rival also owned by Kuaishou, ranked #13. Xiaohongshu (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaohongshu"><u>RedNote</u></a>), which gained attention during the brief U.S. <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tiktok-ban-traffic-decline-alternatives-rednote/"><u>TikTok ban</u></a> in January, ranked #14.</p><p>Looking at microblogging competitors to X, none gained significant traction. Meta’s microblogging app Threads did not enter the Top 20 at any point, and Bluesky only briefly appeared on January 30, during the U.S. TikTok ban. Tumblr was in the Top 20 for much of the year, and Mastodon servers appeared there through most of October.</p><p>OnlyFans, the subscription-based content platform, appeared consistently in the Top 20 between May and early August (around #19) but declined in the second half of the year. Here’s the Social Media Top 10 chart for 2024:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/76e8qhIdmEr6VbUquIWWNH/f18cb25ff1fc07046b956837a8925175/BLOG-3095_6_Social_media_top_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>X alternatives in the Overall ranking</h2>
      <a href="#x-alternatives-in-the-overall-ranking">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Let’s go beyond the Social Media category to see how these platforms performed in our Overall ranking, where bigger shifts between services are evident.</p><p>X alternatives showed limited DNS presence. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(social_network)"><u>Mastodon</u></a> (aggregated servers) performed best, consistently ranking between #208 and #248, with stronger weekend traffic. Bluesky peaked around #240 in May but declined through most of the year, with a notable spike as the U.S. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_elections"><u>held off-year, state and local elections</u></a> on November 4 (#229). This mirrors the pattern seen after the 2024 U.S. presidential election, when Bluesky performed better around election day and peaked on November 14 at #193.</p><p>Threads trailed both platforms, peaking at #279 in June but generally ranking around #360. <i>(Note: Threads uses Meta’s shared infrastructure, so some images could load from Facebook/Instagram domains, which may reduce its standalone DNS footprint.)</i></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4rp255ykzYIoFWgs2NaKVk/df3ad27ca91be18f7a8b5b0f55a7d71c/BLOG-3095_7_X_alternatives.png" />
          </figure><p>Usage patterns in the Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Weekday vs. weekend trends</b>: X, LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Discord performed better on weekdays, while Kwai, Pinterest, Tumblr, and OnlyFans peaked on weekends. LinkedIn ranked highest Monday–Wednesday, and Tinder continued its pattern of Sunday peaks.</p></li><li><p><b>Growth stories</b>: Reddit stayed in the Top 50 throughout 2025 (an improvement over 2024), stabilizing in the #34-40 range after May and performing strongest Monday-Thursday. Kwai also had a strong second half of the year, peaking at #28 in September.</p></li><li><p><b>Declines</b>: Quora continued the downward trajectory seen in 2024, falling from around #160 to outside the Top 200. Tinder and Tumblr followed similar patterns, both dropping below #200. OnlyFans remained inside the Top 200 from April to June but declined in the second half of the year.</p></li><li><p><b>Event-driven spikes</b>: Instagram reached #4 for several days between mid-May and mid-June. X peaked at #15 on March 2 during the Oscars (compared with a #12 peak in 2024). Pinterest surged on November 30, the Sunday of Black Friday week.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>E-commerce: Shopee and Temu rise</h2>
      <a href="#e-commerce-shopee-and-temu-rise">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Every Cyber Week and Black Friday season reminds us how central e-commerce has become to global Internet traffic. In this category, Amazon remained the undisputed leader in 2025, but the strongest momentum came from newer players that now round out the top three: Shopee (which launched in Singapore in 2015 and is popular in Southeast Asia) and China’s Temu (which expanded to the U.S. in 2022). Meanwhile, 2024’s top-three finishers Taobao and AliExpress both moved down the ranking to #5 and #10 respectively.</p>

<strong>Top 10 E-commerce services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Amazon</li>
    <li>Shopee <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Temu <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Shopify</li>
    <li>Taobao <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>eBay <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Alibaba <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Shein</li>
    <li>Mercado Libre</li>
    <li>AliExpress <span>▼</span></li>
</ol>
<p>Shopee and Taobao began 2025 competing for the #2 position, but from mid-April to early July, Temu temporarily overtook both. From July onward, Shopee held #2 consistently, with Temu settling at #3. In 2024, Shopee was just outside the Top 10, while Temu finished at #5.</p><p>Shopify also strengthened its position. It opened the year at #6 and has remained steadily at #4 since July — the same finishing position as in 2024, but now ahead of Taobao and AliExpress and just behind Shopee and Temu.</p><p>eBay showed a clearer recovery: after ending 2024 at #7 (and 2023 at #3), it moved between #3 and #6 early in the year and ultimately held #6. Shein maintained #8, identical to 2024, and continued to outperform Mercado Libre (#9).</p><p>Just outside the Top 10 were Russia’s Wildberries, followed by Walmart and Japan’s Rakuten.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7nJKoPr94TSk2g6Gay4DZ7/df350a17261e5f4d8e7f0d0b43f2a92c/BLOG-3095_7_Ecommerce_Top_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Black Friday impact in the Overall ranking</h2>
      <a href="#black-friday-impact-in-the-overall-ranking">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Looking at the broader Overall ranking, several patterns stood out:</p><ul><li><p><b>Amazon</b> followed a trajectory similar to 2024. It hovered between #9 and #10 after July, rose to #8 during Black Friday week, and peaked at #7 on November 29 (the day after Black Friday). It continued to perform better on Sundays.</p></li><li><p><b>Shopee</b> remained around #50 for most of the year, outperforming its Black Friday number on Singles' Day (November 11), when it reached #46 (vs. #48 on Black Friday). Shopify closed the gap in November: its best day was Black Friday, November 28, and it also hit #49 on November 6. Shopify continued to show stronger weekday performance.</p></li><li><p><b>Temu</b>, known for its low-cost marketplace model, peaked at #36 on May 18 (the day after the 2025 Eurovision final). It began the year near #60 (vs. outside the Top 100 in early 2024) and ended 2025 around #50. Black Friday did not visibly impact its ranking.
</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1Ho9YjNC8Jq9u0QYMaiZiJ/6b647192c480d8c56ad5bad2e9689ebb/BLOG-3095_8_Temu_and_company.png" />
          </figure><p></p></li><li><p><b>Shein</b> remained more stable this year, holding between #80 and #90 after finishing just outside the Top 100 in 2024. It peaked at #78 on November 29. Temu, which had a similar performance to Shein in 2024, clearly outpaced it in 2025.</p></li><li><p><b>eBay</b> improved its consistency, ranking between #46 and #62 throughout the year (vs. remaining outside the Top 70 in 2024). It peaked at #42 on April 15. As with previous years, Black Friday had little impact, reflecting lower seasonal demand for second-hand marketplaces.</p></li><li><p><b>Mercado Libre</b> grew meaningfully in 2025, entering the Top 100 from September onward. Its best day, as in 2024, was Black Friday (November 28), when it reached #82 (vs. #100 in 2024).</p></li></ul><p>Other retail services also had a Black Friday week impact in the Overall category:</p><ul><li><p><b>Adidas</b> entered the top 250, reaching #229 on Cyber Monday and #249 on Black Friday (similar to 2024).</p></li><li><p><b>Nike</b> slipped slightly, peaking at #287 on Black Friday.</p></li><li><p><b>Target</b> hit #117 on Cyber Monday, improving on its 2024 high of #127. It performed best on Saturdays.</p></li><li><p><b>Walmart</b> performed slightly better than Target, peaking at #101 on the August 23-24 weekend and reaching #120 ahead of Thanksgiving.</p></li><li><p><b>Ikea</b> showed a nearly identical pattern to 2024, peaking at #242 on June 2-3.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Video streaming: YouTube and Netflix lead, HBO enters Top 10</h2>
      <a href="#video-streaming-youtube-and-netflix-lead-hbo-enters-top-10">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Video streaming remained one of the most stable categories of 2025, even as industry consolidation intensified. The Top 3 did not change for the third year in a row: YouTube held #1, followed by Netflix and Twitch.</p>

<strong>Top 10 Video streaming services 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>YouTube</li>
    <li>Netflix</li>
    <li>Twitch</li>
    <li>Roku</li>
    <li>Disney Plus</li>
    <li>Prime Video</li>
    <li>Vimeo</li>
    <li>Pluto TV <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Plex TV <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>HBO Max <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>HBO Max was the year’s biggest climber, entering the Top 10 for the first time and reaching #8 on Cyber Monday (December 1), boosted by new episodes of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_%E2%80%93_Welcome_to_Derry"><u>IT: Welcome to Derry</u></a>. The only other shift in the Top 10 was Pluto TV, a free ad-supported service, moving ahead of Plex TV.</p><p>Among paid services, Netflix remained the clear leader, followed by Disney Plus (#5) and Prime Video (#6). Hulu (#11), Peacock (#15), Apple TV+ (#17), and Paramount Plus (#20) stayed outside the Top 10. Roku consistently held #4 and briefly overtook Twitch during Black Friday week. Disney Plus held #5 throughout the year but climbed to #4 on several weekends between March and June, around the time of the premieres of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daredevil:_Born_Again"><u>Daredevil: Born Again</u></a> and later <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andor"><u>Andor</u></a> season 2.</p><p>The Top 10 over 2025:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/HOB1C1kctSfTXMj1qKXmS/d958e749f6c0c01930a86b839455fb95/BLOG-3095_9_Video_streaming_top_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>
Content-driven weekend spikes in the Overall ranking</h2>
      <a href="#content-driven-weekend-spikes-in-the-overall-ranking">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Across the year, major premieres produced clear surges in the broader Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>YouTube</b> peaked at #5 on July 5, the day MrBeast released “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWAdfuPpLOc"><u>World's Fastest Car Vs Cheetah!</u></a>”</p></li><li><p><b>Netflix</b> stayed near #11 on weekends from late June and peaked at #10 on November 30, following the release of Stranger Things season 5.</p></li><li><p><b>Disney Plus</b> ranged between #47 and #60, with its strongest spikes possibly tied to Daredevil: Born Again.</p></li><li><p><b>Prime Video</b> reached #53 after the launch of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Family_Man_(Indian_TV_series)"><u>The Family Man</u></a> season 3 on November 22-23 and again on November 30.
</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2YYOWLwl7ZUlLFVnDBs3ta/c79268f003c604bad66626976b5a0be9/BLOG-3095_10_Disney_Prime.png" />
          </figure><p></p></li><li><p><b>HBO Max</b> was consistently close to the Top 100 in our Overall ranking and peaked on November 23 during a release of IT: Welcome to Derry. Hulu showed similar Cyber Week behavior, reaching #132. Paramount Plus outperformed Peacock at the end of November on weekends, peaking at #197 on November 23 and 30.</p></li></ul><p>As with previous years, most paid streaming platforms were strongest on weekends, especially Sundays, reflecting global viewing habits.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>News: Globo and BBC global perspectives</h2>
      <a href="#news-globo-and-bbc-global-perspectives">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>News organizations continue to inform the public, though their visibility and traffic appears increasingly <a href="https://digiday.com/media/google-ai-overviews-linked-to-25-drop-in-publisher-referral-traffic-new-data-shows/"><u>diminished</u></a> by AI-powered search and summarization tools (a trend we explored in our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/crawlers-click-ai-bots-training/#google-referrals-fall-as-ai-overviews-expand"><u>August 2025 blog post</u></a>). This category, which includes traditional news outlets as well as aggregators, highlights several shifts in 2025.</p>

<strong>Top 10 News services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Globo</li>
    <li>ESPN <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>BBC <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>NY Times <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>CNN <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Fox News <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Yahoo Finance</li>
    <li>Google News <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>NewsBreak <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Times of India <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>Globo, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupo_Globo"><u>Brazilian media giant</u></a> spanning TV, radio, and print, held the #1 position for the third consecutive year. ESPN moved into #2, overtaking the BBC (#3), which operates globally in <a href="https://www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/whatwedo/worldservice"><u>43 languages</u></a>. The New York Times (#4), CNN (#5), and Fox News (#6) each fell one place due to ESPN’s rise. </p><p>Google News rose to #8 (with a clear weekend bias) while NewsBreak, a U.S. local-news aggregator, surged late in the year and reached #7 on several days in November.</p><p>Outside the Top 10, The Guardian briefly reached #10 during Canada’s March <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Liberal_Party_of_Canada_leadership_election"><u>leadership election</u></a>, while RT (Russian state media) declined from the Top 10 early in the year to around #20 by year-end. The Financial Times spiked to #4 between July 24-27 during high-stakes U.S.-EU tariffs-related trade negotiations.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6HTIcD7BBkQd4VpTrQf0Nv/6b5f9bf237a9ed2e9090defa9e466fc1/BLOG-3095_11_News_Top_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Israel–Iran escalation, and Trump’s inauguration and trade deals</h3>
      <a href="#israel-iran-escalation-and-trumps-inauguration-and-trade-deals">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Across the broader Overall ranking, major geopolitical, political, and sporting events produced surges in news traffic. <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/#us-elections-attacks-and-protests"><u>Last year</u></a>, the surge was election-driven.</p><ul><li><p><b>Trump inauguration</b> (January 20–21): CNN, New York Times (NYT), and Fox News all spiked prominently.</p></li><li><p><b>U.S.-UK trade deal</b> <b>announced &amp; VE Day 80th anniversary</b> (May 8): The year’s highest peaks: CNN (#126), NYT (#129), Fox News (#164), BBC (#106).</p></li><li><p><b>Israel-Iran conflict </b>(the conflict started on June 13, when Israel <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_war"><u>launched</u></a> a bombing campaign against Iran, and ended on June 24): BBC reached its yearly peak (#101), with CNN (#125), NYT (#136), and Fox News (#160) showing parallel spikes.</p></li></ul><p>In the next chart we show rankings around the May and June peaks for BBC, CNN, NY Times, and Fox News.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3LeLgCNCUCSScGhPctaTDd/93fa036b09e0efe77d0bb031d4f44d5d/BLOG-3095_12_News_peaks_Israel_war.png" />
          </figure><ul><li><p><b>U.S. off-year Election Day </b>(November 5): CNN (#157), NYT (#169), and Fox News (#191) all saw moderate increases.</p></li></ul><p>Regional dynamics also stood out. Globo peaked during Brazil’s Supercopa do Brasil final on February 2, moving within the #60-77 range. ESPN saw similar event-driven spikes, reaching #82 on April 26 during the NFL Draft and NBA playoffs; and then #79 on September 28, when NFL Week 4 overlapped with the dramatic final day of the MLB regular season; and also at #79 on October 26, as the F1 Mexico City Grand Prix coincided with NFL Week 8 and the first week of the new NBA season, pushing fans to track multiple leagues at once.</p><p>Across the second half of 2025, most major U.S. news outlets showed a gradual decline in the Overall ranking, moving from higher early-year positions toward the #200 range. This suggests shifting consumption patterns as AI tools and social platforms increasingly intermediate how users access news.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Messaging: WhatsApp dominates, Signal rises</h2>
      <a href="#messaging-whatsapp-dominates-signal-rises">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Messaging remains a core part of Internet communication, and this category shows continued maturity with stable leaders at the top. WhatsApp remained the clear #1 for the fourth consecutive year, while the standout shift in 2025 was Signal’s move into #5, reflecting growing demand for privacy-focused tools.</p><p><i>(Note: Apple’s iMessage is excluded because it lacks distinct domains. Messaging features inside social platforms — Instagram DMs, X messages, Snapchat — are not measurable as distinct from the other features of their respective social media platforms.)</i></p>

<strong>Top Messaging services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>WhatsApp</li>
    <li>QQ</li>
    <li>Telegram</li>
    <li>Rakuten Viber</li>
    <li>Signal <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>WeChat <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>LINE</li>
    <li>Messenger <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Zalo.me <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>KakaoTalk <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>Chinese service QQ (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent_QQ"><u>Tencent QQ</u></a>) held #2 for the third year, supported by its integrated ecosystem of games, mobile payments, and communication tools. Telegram (#3) and Rakuten Viber (#4) held steady, remaining key platforms across Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. </p><p>Signal, the open-source encrypted messaging service, overtook Chinese app WeChat to secure #5 from October onward, reversing the order seen in 2024. Its rise highlights growing interest in open-source, end-to-end encrypted messaging, especially among security-conscious communities. Asian apps also performed strongly: LINE from Japan remained #7, while Vietnam’s Zalo.me reached #9, and South Korea’s KakaoTalk dropped to #10 (it was #8 in late 2024). Meta’s Messenger reached #8 after June.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4UJ3QOTO9RKQV2sn9er8BK/0896fa15fc74d993e4441220398dcc63/BLOG-3095_13_Messaging_Top_10.png" />
          </figure><p>Patterns in the Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>WhatsApp</b> maintained its #9 Overall position and reached #8 in January and on several days in November.</p></li><li><p><b>Telegram</b> peaked at #56 on July 1, coinciding with major regional unrest in the Middle East.</p></li><li><p><b>WeChat</b> slipped from near the Top 100 early in the year to around #130 by December.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Metaverse &amp; Gaming: Roblox leads, PlayStation overtakes Xbox</h2>
      <a href="#metaverse-gaming-roblox-leads-playstation-overtakes-xbox">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Gaming continues to drive substantial Internet traffic, even as “metaverse” news fades from public attention. Roblox dominated this category for the third year in a row, while the biggest shift in 2025 was PlayStation overtaking Xbox to claim the #2 position from May onward.</p>

<strong>Top 10 Metaverse &amp; Gaming services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Roblox</li>
    <li>PlayStation <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Xbox / Xbox Live <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Epic Games / Fortnite <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Steam <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Electronic Arts</li>
    <li>Blizzard</li>
    <li>Minecraft <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Riot Games / League of Legends <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Nintendo <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>Steam held #4, continuing its strong performance after its surprise rise in 2024. It performed best on weekdays and during key release periods, reaching #3 on several days in March, April, and July. Its best day was April 24, when it reached #2, coinciding with the release of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_Fury:_City_of_the_Wolves"><u>Fatal Fury: City of the Wolves</u></a>. </p><p>Electronic Arts (#6) and Blizzard (#7) remained steady, while Minecraft climbed to #8 (from #9), showing consistent weekend strength. Riot Games/League of Legends dropped to #9, and Nintendo returned to the Top 10. Meta’s Oculus stayed outside the Top 10 for the second year in a row, slipping from around the Top 100 to closer to #130 in the Overall ranking.</p><p>Here’s the top chart across 2025:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/57PktZo0h1t7kCGDSPMWIs/9fbd2eefc63bfac328e5ddc1f08ee388/BLOG-3095_14_Metaverse_gaming_Top_10.png" />
          </figure><p>Usage patterns in the Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Roblox</b> peaked at #15 on July 6 during its annual <a href="https://roblox.fandom.com/wiki/The_Hatch"><u>Hatch</u></a> event (July 2-12), and consistently was higher on weekends.</p></li><li><p><b>PlayStation</b> reached #30 during Black Friday week (November 22-23 and 29-30), its strongest performance of the year.</p></li><li><p><b>Minecraft</b> remained between #87 and #120, with predictable weekend spikes.</p></li><li><p><b>Oculus</b> declined across 2025, moving from around the Top 100 to roughly #130 by year-end, reflecting slower mainstream VR adoption.</p></li></ul><p>Gaming platforms such as Roblox, Xbox, Epic Games/Fortnite, Steam, and PlayStation, all displayed strong weekend effects, with most services ranking 20-40 positions higher on Saturdays and Sundays than during the workweek. This pattern reflects gaming’s role as a leisure-driven category.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Financial services: Stripe keeps lead, with no changes on top</h2>
      <a href="#financial-services-stripe-keeps-lead-with-no-changes-on-top">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Digital-first financial services continued their dominance in 2025, even as traditional banks and tax tools remain present. Stripe, the Irish-American payment platform, kept its #1 spot for the third consecutive year after overtaking PayPal in 2023.</p>

<strong>Top 10 Financial Services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Stripe</li>
    <li>TradingView</li>
    <li>Alipay</li>
    <li>PayPal</li>
    <li>Nubank</li>
    <li>Binance</li>
    <li>Banco do Brasil <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Intuit <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Google Pay <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>OKX <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>The first six positions in 2025 remained unchanged from late 2024. PayPal, usually #4, briefly reached #1 for a few days in late February and early March. TradingView, a platform for traders and investors, held a steady #2 (performing better on weekdays) and peaked at #1 on January 13, when U.S. markets <a href="https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/stock-market-news-jan-13-2025"><u>tumbled</u></a> after strong December jobs data renewed fears of persistent inflation. Alipay, the Chinese mobile and online payment platform, stayed at #3.</p><p>Brazil’s continued <a href="https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/economia/noticia/2025-07/numero-de-pessoas-que-acessam-banco-online-cresce-22-milhoes-em-2-anos"><u>expansion</u></a> in online banking was clear again this year. Nubank, the world's <a href="https://qz.com/nubank-digital-bank-mexico-latin-america-1851096374"><u>largest</u></a> digital bank and a <a href="https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/banking-technology/latin-american-fintech-winner-nubank-taps-ai-for-expansion-muscle-193871"><u>major Latin American financial group</u></a>, held #5 for the second year in a row. Banco do Brasil entered the Top 10 for the first time, while fellow Brazilian bank Bradesco fell out.</p><p>Binance kept its #6 position, while Coinbase fell out of the Top 10. Intuit entered the Top 10 this year, peaking during the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Day"><u>U.S. Tax Day</u></a> period (April 14-15) at #6. Google Pay and the cryptocurrency exchange OKX also reached the Top 10 for the first time, driven by strong end-of-year performance.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/lSZMlEac7J1fk8IFYzLu7/a684f81183481a32c3d9b3e92de879ec/BLOG-3095_15_Financial_Top_10.png" />
          </figure><p>Other financial services trends in the Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p>Stripe had its best days late in the year, reaching #70 the day after Singles Day (November 12) and #71 on Cyber Monday (December 1). It continued to perform better on weekends and showed a steady upward trend in the Overall ranking, moving from around #80 to near #70.</p></li><li><p>PayPal ranked higher during Black Friday week, spiking at #82 on November 29. Its overall peak, however, came earlier in the year on March 2, when it reached #73.</p></li><li><p>Nubank performed best a few days before Carnival in Brazil (February 28-March 5), reaching #85 on February 22. It also spiked on Black Friday, November 28, hitting #96.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Cryptocurrency: Binance leads, OKX shines at the end of the year</h2>
      <a href="#cryptocurrency-binance-leads-okx-shines-at-the-end-of-the-year">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Alongside our Financial Services category, we track cryptocurrency-focused services separately. After several volatile years, the crypto ecosystem was relatively stable in 2025. Binance continued to lead the category, while the strongest momentum came from OKX, which climbed steadily from September onward to finish the year at #2 — overtaking Coinbase, which held that position in 2024.</p>

<strong>Top 10 Cryptocurrency services in 2025</strong>
<ol>
    <li>Binance</li>
    <li>OKX <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Coinbase <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>CoinGecko <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>2miners.com <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>CoinMarketCap <span>▼</span></li>
    <li>Bybit</li>
    <li>MEXC <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Exodus <span>▲</span></li>
    <li>Bitget <span>▲</span></li>
</ol>
<p>CoinGecko, the cryptocurrency data platform, rose from #6 to #4, while 2miners.com slipped to #5. The final three entries were all newcomers to the Top 10:</p><ul><li><p>MEXC (#8): a global cryptocurrency exchange known for spot and futures trading.</p></li><li><p>Exodus (#9): a multi-asset crypto wallet focused on ease of use and self-custody.</p></li><li><p>Bitget (#10): a cryptocurrency exchange specializing in derivatives and copy-trading (where users automatically replicate the trades of experienced traders) features.</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/ueXqxiN2zjH2Y1xvsQYAT/4b0e82d7746f53a604479e9d48320d23/BLOG-3095_16_Crypto-Top10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Event-driven spikes in the Overall ranking</h2>
      <a href="#event-driven-spikes-in-the-overall-ranking">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The U.S. presidential inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20 produced noticeable traffic surges across crypto platforms, building on the elevated interest that followed the November 2024 election:</p><ul><li><p>Binance peaked at #95 on January 20.</p></li><li><p>Coinbase reached #121 the same day.</p></li><li><p>OKX peaked earlier, at #157 on January 19.</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6UrOr9uGNn8scOXn1qsuM9/5f8494db8300da2e93af34bfb3c82d9b/BLOG-3095_17_Binance_and_company-US-inauguration.png" />
          </figure><p>CoinGecko showed a clear downward trend in the Overall ranking, starting the year near the Top 200 and ending around #270. Binance and Coinbase remained relatively stable throughout 2025, while OKX showed clear growth beginning in September, rising toward the #150 range.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Beyond the categories: notable spikes and seasonal patterns</h2>
      <a href="#beyond-the-categories-notable-spikes-and-seasonal-patterns">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Outside our primary categories, several services showed significant traffic spikes </p><p>tied to major events, cultural moments, and seasonal behaviors:</p><p><b>Crisis and real-time tracking</b></p><ul><li><p>FlightRadar24 spiked to #260 on June 13-15 during <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_war"><u>Israeli airstrikes</u></a> on Iranian nuclear facilities, reflecting heightened global demand for real-time airspace disruption tracking.
</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/792yECKEvdNBjkcxil4MCO/b18044376cb44aabca7768f78bc2a980/BLOG-3095_18_FlightRadar.png" />
          </figure><p></p></li><li><p>NOAA Tides &amp; Currents reached #300 on October 27 as Hurricane Melissa — an extremely powerful Category 5 storm — intensified and threatened the Caribbean.</p></li></ul><p><b>Entertainment and media</b></p><ul><li><p>Spotify held a stable #16–19 range throughout 2025, similar to 2024. It performed strongest in September and November, spending most of those months at #16. (Our dataset ends December 2, so the impact of the December 3 Spotify Wrapped release was not captured.)</p></li><li><p>IMDb peaked on September 14, coinciding with the Primetime Emmy Awards.</p></li><li><p>Wikipedia typically ranked between #22 and #24 but peaked at #19 on July 5, the same day of this viral moment: a failed “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2025_Japan_megaquake_prophecy"><u>July 5, 2025, disaster prophecy</u></a>” from a 1999 manga, which caused “Nothing happened in Japan” to trend #1 on China’s Sina Weibo.</p></li></ul><p><b>Sports</b></p><ul><li><p>The NBA reached #237 on April 19, the opening day of the NBA Playoffs, highlighted by a dramatic Nuggets-Clippers overtime game.</p></li><li><p>FIFA made a rare appearance in the Top 500, peaking at #373 on November 17 when FIFA and the U.S. State Department announced the FIFA Priority Appointment Scheduling System (<a href="https://inside.fifa.com/organisation/media-releases/world-cup-2026-ticket-holders-prioritised-visa-appointments-united-states"><u>FIFA PASS</u></a>) for World Cup 2026 ticket holders.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h4>Developer tools</h4>
      <a href="#developer-tools">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>GitHub remained between #27 and #36 for most of the year, mirroring its 2024 performance and underscoring its status as core development infrastructure.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Insights by country/region</h2>
      <a href="#insights-by-country-region">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In our country and region-specific Popular Internet Services lists on the Year in Review <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2025"><u>microsite</u></a>, we saw Google rank #1 in almost every location (Libya, dominated by Facebook, was a rare exception). In addition to our Overall list, this year we are sharing specific categories: Social Media, Generative AI, and Messaging. </p><p>Here are several other highlights worth noting from the Overall rankings in particular countries:</p><p><b>AI’s strength in emerging markets</b></p><p>ChatGPT performed unexpectedly well outside traditional tech hubs, reaching the Top 30 in countries such as Kyrgyzstan, Somalia, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia  — evidence that AI adoption is spreading quickly in a wide range of markets.</p><p>Google Gemini also showed notable traction in emerging regions. It ranked highest in Ethiopia (#94), Sri Lanka (#105), Guatemala (#118), Rwanda (#122), and Thailand (#124), with similar patterns across Peru, Taiwan, Nepal, Vietnam, and Malawi (where Gemini ranked #128-137). </p>
    <div>
      <h4>Regional fragmentation in social platforms</h4>
      <a href="#regional-fragmentation-in-social-platforms">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Facebook held #1-2 in many countries, but regional players built strong footholds. Kwai reached #3 in Brazil and showed significant presence across Latin America and the Middle East. Instagram ranked highest in parts of Central Asia and the Gulf region, while TikTok dominated broad stretches of Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia.</p><p>Snapchat performed best in markets such as Iraq, Libya, Palestine, and Pakistan. LinkedIn showed a dual profile, ranking high in advanced economies like Australia and France as well as fast-growing markets including Bangladesh, Peru, and Saudi Arabia.</p>
    <div>
      <h4>Entertainment and messaging follow regional lines</h4>
      <a href="#entertainment-and-messaging-follow-regional-lines">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Netflix remained strongest in Latin America (#8-10 in multiple countries) but ranked lower in Asia and much of Europe, where Spotify performed best, especially in the Nordics and Southern Europe.</p><p>Messaging showed clear geographic divides. WhatsApp led across the Caribbean, Africa, and parts of Asia; Telegram ranked highest in Eastern Europe and Central Asia; Signal gained share in privacy-minded markets such as Ukraine and Switzerland; and Viber continued to dominate the Balkans.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>ChatGPT dominated everywhere, except Venezuela</h2>
      <a href="#chatgpt-dominated-everywhere-except-venezuela">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4IZl2YISypOuqBOTXYAHJ4/d23f23e5927db4b752c90538e5591c3a/BLOG-3095_19_cloudflare-radar-dev_yir2025-internet-services-table_ve_20251203-20251210.png" />
          </figure><p>GenAI highlights by country/region include:</p><ul><li><p>ChatGPT ranked #1 in the Generative AI category across nearly every country, with one exception: Venezuela, where Google Gemini took the top spot.</p></li><li><p>Google Gemini secured #2 across Latin America (including Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia) and Southeast Asia (Thailand, Indonesia), reflecting Google's platform strength in mobile-first emerging markets.</p></li><li><p>Perplexity dominated as the #2 choice across Europe (Germany, France, Spain) and #3 in major English-speaking markets (U.S., UK, Australia), suggesting strong appeal among information-seeking users.</p></li><li><p>Claude showed selective strength at #3-5, performing best in Western Europe (Georgia, Switzerland) and developed markets like Germany, France or Japan, aligning with its enterprise and developer focus.</p></li><li><p>Lovable, the Swedish vibe coding platform, reached #10 in the GenAI category in one country: Angola. It reached #16 in Sweden and Slovenia, and #17 in Brazil.</p></li></ul><p>ChatGPT remains the clear global leader, yet the contest for second place is highly regional: Google Gemini in emerging markets, Perplexity across Europe, and Claude in more technologically advanced economies. It’s a reminder that the Internet contains a multitude of local behaviors shaped by culture, infrastructure, and economic context.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>2025 on the Internet: AI competition heated up as platforms saw fragmentation</h2>
      <a href="#2025-on-the-internet-ai-competition-heated-up-as-platforms-saw-fragmentation">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The Internet’s evolution in 2025 showed both stability and disruption. Google, Facebook, and Instagram remained dominant in our Overall rankings, but the year’s defining story was generative AI’s rapid maturation. ChatGPT climbed into the global Top 40, while Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and DeepSeek became credible challengers in a category that barely existed three years ago. By late November, Gemini had secured the #2 spot in our GenAI rankings, directly contesting ChatGPT’s lead.</p><p>Social media continued to fragment: Instagram rose to #5 overall while X fell outside the Top 20, and emerging platforms like Kwai gained meaningful traction across Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. In e-commerce, Shopee and Temu joined Amazon in the global top three, displacing long-established Chinese marketplaces. Cryptocurrency stabilized after earlier volatility, with traffic surging around events such as the U.S. presidential inauguration.</p><p>Global developments triggered coordinated spikes across news and other real-time information services, underscoring how quickly real-world events shape online behavior.</p><p>These rankings reflect continued data validation and methodological refinement by our team. We <a><u>welcome</u></a> your feedback and suggestions for categories to explore in future editions.</p><p><i>Thanks to data scientist Sabina Zejnilovic, who played a crucial role in gathering the Internet services data.</i></p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7FGmUuKceINtevY1MTsBd1</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Fresh insights from old data: corroborating reports of Turkmenistan IP unblocking and firewall testing]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/fresh-insights-from-old-data-corroborating-reports-of-turkmenistan-ip/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ Cloudflare used historical data to investigate reports of potential new firewall tests in Turkmenistan. Shifts in TCP resets/timeouts across ASNs corroborate large-scale network control system changes.
 ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Here at Cloudflare, we frequently use and write about data in the present. But sometimes understanding the present begins with digging into the past.  </p><p>We recently learned of a 2024 <a href="https://turkmen.news/internet-amnistiya-v-turkmenistane-razblokirovany-3-milliarda-ip-adresov-hostingi-i-cdn/"><u>turkmen.news article</u></a> (available in Russian) that reports <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tm"><u>Turkmenistan</u></a> experienced “an unprecedented easing in blocking,” causing over 3 billion previously-blocked IP addresses to become reachable. The same article reports that one of the reasons for unblocking IP addresses was that Turkmenistan may have been testing a new firewall. (The Turkmen government’s tight control over the country’s Internet access <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-16095369"><u>is well-documented</u></a>.) </p><p>Indeed, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a> shows a surge of requests coming from Turkmenistan around the same time, as we’ll show below. But we had an additional question: Does the firewall activity show up on Radar, as well? Two years ago, we launched the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"><u>dashboard on Radar</u></a> to give a window into the TCP connections to Cloudflare that close due to resets and timeouts. These stand out because they are considered ungraceful mechanisms to close TCP connections, according to the TCP specification. </p><p>In this blog post, we go back in time to share what Cloudflare saw in connection resets and timeouts. We must remind our readers that, as passive observers, there are <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/connection-tampering/#limitations-of-our-data"><u>limitations on what we can glean from the data</u></a>. For example, our data can’t reveal attribution. Even so, the ability to observe our environment <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tricky-internet-measurement/"><u>can be insightful</u></a>. In a recent example, our visibility into resets and timeouts helped corroborate reports of large-scale <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/russian-internet-users-are-unable-to-access-the-open-internet/"><u>blocking and traffic tampering by Russia</u></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Turkmenistan requests where there were none before</h3>
      <a href="#turkmenistan-requests-where-there-were-none-before">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Let’s look first at the number of requests, since those should increase if IP addresses are unblocked. In mid-June 2024 Cloudflare started receiving a noticeable increase in HTTP requests, consistent with <a href="https://turkmen.news/internet-amnistiya-v-turkmenistane-razblokirovany-3-milliarda-ip-adresov-hostingi-i-cdn/"><u>reports</u></a> of Turkmenistan unblocking IPs.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3Kqaxxjv9g52RVMWg92AYu/e57468cf523702cadd634c34775be033/BLOG_3069_2.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic/tm?dateStart=2024-06-01&amp;dateEnd=2024-06-30"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Overall TCP resets and timeouts</h3>
      <a href="#overall-tcp-resets-and-timeouts">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a lower-layer mechanism used to create a connection between clients and servers, and also carries <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage#http1x-vs-http2-vs-http3"><u>70% of HTTP traffic</u></a> to Cloudflare. A TCP connection works <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/connection-tampering/#explaining-tampering-with-telephone-calls"><u>much like a telephone call</u></a> between humans, who follow graceful conventions to end a call—and who are acutely aware when conventions are broken if a call ends abruptly.  </p><p>TCP also defines conventions to end the connection gracefully, and we developed <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"><u>mechanisms to detect</u></a> when they don’t. An ungraceful end is triggered by a reset instruction or a timeout. Some are due to benign artifacts of software design or human user behaviours. However, sometimes they are exploited by <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/connection-tampering"><u>third parties to close connections</u></a> in everything from school and enterprise firewalls or software, to zero-rating on mobile plans, to nation-state filtering.</p><p>When we look at connections from Turkmenistan, we see that on June 13, 2024, the combined proportion of the four coloured regions increases; each coloured region represents ungraceful ends at a distinct stage of the connection lifetime. In addition to the combined increase, the relative proportions between stages (or colours) changes as well.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1hNDpdNS9lDPKg3jFHigiL/ff3de33af7974c5d32ba421cbbc3c42e/BLOG_3069_3.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p><p>Further changes appeared in the weeks that followed. Among them are an increase in Post-PSH (orange) anomalies starting around July 4; a reduction in Post-ACK (light blue) anomalies around July 13; and an increase in anomalies later in connections (green) starting July 22.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6IavKOkF7tB02MtNqJPqqD/f08c78f65894e751b7c9fce9820dee85/BLOG_3069_4.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2024-07-01&amp;dateEnd=2024-07-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p><p>The shifts above <i>could</i> be explained by a large firewall system. It’s important to keep in mind that data in each of the connection stages (captured by the four coloured regions in the graphs) can be explained by browser implementations or user actions. However, the scale of the data would need a great number of browsers or users doing the same thing to show up. Similarly, individual changes in behaviour would be lost unless they occur in large numbers at the same time.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Digging down to individual networks</h3>
      <a href="#digging-down-to-individual-networks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We’ve learned that it can be helpful to look at the data for individual networks to reveal common patterns between different networks in different regions <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/#zero-rating-in-mobile-networks"><u>operated by single entities</u></a>. </p><p>Looking at individual networks within Turkmenistan, trends and timelines appear more pronounced. July 22 in particular sees greater proportions of anomalies associated with the <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ssl/what-is-sni/"><u>Server Name Indication</u></a>, or domain name, rather than the IP address (dark blue), although the connection stage where the anomalies appear varies by individual network.</p><p>The general Turkmenistan trends are largely mirrored in connections from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as20661"><u>AS20661 (TurkmenTelecom)</u></a>, indicating that this <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a> (AS) accounts for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/tm#autonomous-systems"><u>a large proportion of Turkmenistan’s traffic</u></a> to Cloudflare’s network. There is a notable reduction in Post-ACK (light blue) anomalies starting around July 26.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5ukNOB1CYUAPW2s7ofdqMK/7d1dca367374db90627413e2c40a6ee3/BLOG_3069_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p><p>A different picture emerges from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as51495"><u>AS51495 (Ashgabat City Telephone Network)</u></a>. Post-ACK anomalies almost completely disappear on July 12, corresponding with an increase in anomalies during the Post-PSH stage. An increase of anomalies in the Later (green) connection stage on July 22 is apparent for this AS as well.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7btBYWx2VVVg0MH10yY9ot/17e87bf94f97b1cd43139e432f189770/BLOG_3069_6.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p><p>Finally, for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as59974"><u>AS59974 (Altyn Asyr)</u></a>, you can see below that there is a clear spike in Post-ACK anomalies starting July 22. This is the stage of the connection where a firewall could have seen the SNI, and chooses to drop the packets immediately, so they never reach Cloudflare’s servers.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4pxUHjzkRwnbmaSsgkhiKd/b56fbc84e2fdcd8b889b6e8b3a68dc40/BLOG_3069_7.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Timeouts and resets in context, never isolation</h3>
      <a href="#timeouts-and-resets-in-context-never-isolation">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We’ve previously discussed <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"><u>how to use the resets and timeouts</u></a> data because, while useful, it can also be misinterpreted. Radar’s data on resets and timeouts is unique among operators, but in isolation it’s incomplete and subject to human bias. </p><p>Take the figure above for AS59974 where Post-ACK (light blue) anomalies markedly increased on July 22. The Radar view is proportional, meaning that the increase in proportion could be explained by greater numbers of anomalies – but could also be explained, for example, by a smaller number of valid requests. Indeed, looking at the HTTP request levels for the same AS, there was a similarly pronounced drop starting on the same day, as shown below. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2PAYPpcFeInis6zo4lWrSx/f28a1f84fbe5b1c21659911b11331c30/BLOG_3069_8.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p><p>If we look at the same two graphs before July 22, however, rates of reset and timeout anomalies do not appear to mirror the very large shifts up and down in HTTP requests.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Looking ahead can also mean looking behind</h3>
      <a href="#looking-ahead-can-also-mean-looking-behind">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>These charts from Radar above offer a way to analyze news events from a different angle, by looking at requests and TCP connection resets and timeouts. Does this data tell us definitively that new firewalls were being tested in Turkmenistan? No. But the trends in the data are consistent with what we could expect to see if that were the case.</p><p>If thinking about ways to use the resets and timeouts data going forward, we’d encourage also looking at the data in retrospect—or even further past to improve context.</p><p>A natural question might be, for example, “If Turkmenistan stopped blocking IPs in mid-2024, what did the data say beforehand?” The figure below captures October and November 2023. (The red-shaded region contains missing data due to the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-mortem-on-cloudflare-control-plane-and-analytics-outage"><u>Nov. 2 Cloudflare control plane and metrics outage</u></a>.) Signals about the Internet in Turkmenistan were evolving well before the <a href="https://turkmen.news/internet-amnistiya-v-turkmenistane-razblokirovany-3-milliarda-ip-adresov-hostingi-i-cdn/"><u>news article</u></a> that prompted us to look.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2W4MfieKNV24PmvynAAIfO/af42a2328059eb15fba0619372973887/BLOG_3069_9.png" />
          </figure><p><sup>Source: </sup><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/network-layer/tm?dateStart=2023-10-01&amp;dateEnd=2023-11-30#tcp-resets-and-timeouts"><sup>Cloudflare Radar</sup></a></p>
    <div>
      <h3>What’s next?</h3>
      <a href="#whats-next">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>To learn more, see our guide about <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"><u>how to use the resets and timeouts data available on Radar</u></a>, as well as the technical details about our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/connection-tampering/"><u>third-party tampering measurement </u></a>and some perspectives by a former <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/experience-of-data-at-scale/"><u>intern who helped drive</u></a> the study. </p><p>We’re proud to offer a unique view of TCP connection anomalies on Radar. It’s a testament to the long-lived benefits that emerge when approaching <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tricky-internet-measurement/"><u>Internet measurement as a science</u></a>. In keeping with the open spirit of science, we’ve also shared how we<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tricky-internet-measurement/"><u> detect and log resets and timeouts</u></a> so that others can reproduce the observability on their servers, whether by hobbyists or other large operators.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Shutdown]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Consumer Services]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">404c64k0KinGRYZkfe0xum</guid>
            <dc:creator>Luke Valenta</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Marwan Fayed</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[How a volunteer-run wildfire site in Portugal stayed online during DDoS attacks]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/wildfire-fogos-pt-portugal-ddos-attack/</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fogos.pt, a volunteer-run wildfire tracker in Portugal, grew from a side project into a critical national resource used by citizens, media, and government. During 2025 fire season it was hit by DDoS  ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On July 31, 2025, just as Portugal entered the peak of another intense wildfire season, João Pina, also known as <a href="https://x.com/tomahock"><u>Tomahock</u></a>, received an automated alert from Cloudflare. His volunteer-run project, <a href="https://fogos.pt"><u>fogos.pt</u></a>, now a trusted source of real-time wildfire information for millions across Portugal, was under attack.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3dgHHbPyF5op5kCreLO8Zz/b69e125f95751f5dd056d1145604fcd2/BLOG-2934_2.png" />
          </figure><p><sub>One of the several alerts </sub><a href="http://fogos.pt"><sub><u>fogos.pt</u></sub></a><sub> received related to the DDoS attack</sub></p><p>What started in 2015 as a late-night side project with friends around a dinner table in Aveiro has grown into a critical public resource. During wildfires, the site is where firefighters, journalists, citizens, and even government agencies go to understand what’s happening on the ground. Over the years, fogos.pt has evolved from parsing PDFs into visual maps to a full-featured app and website with historical data, weather overlays, and more. It’s also part of Project Galileo, Cloudflare’s initiative to protect vulnerable but important public interest sites at no cost.</p><p>Wildfires are not just a Portuguese challenge. They are frequent across southern Europe (Spain, Greece, currently also under alert), California, Australia, and in Canada, which in 2023 faced <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Canadian_wildfires"><u>record-setting</u></a> fires. In all these cases, reliable information can be crucial, sometimes life-saving. Other organizations offering similar public services can also apply to join <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/galileo/"><u>Project Galileo</u></a> to receive protection and handle heavy traffic.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>A side project that became a national reference</h2>
      <a href="#a-side-project-that-became-a-national-reference">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Fogos.pt began with a simple question: why was fire data only available in hard-to-read PDF documents? João and a group of friends, including volunteer firefighters, decided to build something better. They pulled the data, geolocated the fire reports, and visualized them on a map.</p><p>Soon, thousands of people were using it. Then tens of thousands. Today, fogos.pt is integrated into official communications, including mentions from the Portuguese government on social media and direct links from the national wildfire information portal (<a href="https://www.sgifr.gov.pt/"><u>SGIFR.gov.pt</u></a>).</p><p>In 2018, fogos.pt formally joined forces with<a href="https://vost.pt"><u> VOST Portugal</u></a>, a digital volunteer organization that was early on also part of our <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/galileo/"><u>Project Galileo</u></a> — whose<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/case-studies/vost-portugal/"><u> story was also featured in an earlier case study</u></a>. João Pina is also a co-founder of VOSTPT. Together, they created a complementary model: fogos.pt provides data and the platform; VOSTPT validates and communicates it to the public in real-time during emergencies.</p><p>It’s an operation run entirely by volunteers, with no funding, no formal team — just passion, and the help of partners.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6NjIxtp7YJjI8IPkDTdVtC/1a14e97700ab05992c1ea0610747d624/BLOG-2934_3.jpg" />
          </figure><p><sub>Homepage of fogos.pt on August 20, 2025, highlighting a major wildfire near Piódão in central Portugal.</sub></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Under attack during fire season</h3>
      <a href="#under-attack-during-fire-season">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>On July 31 and August 1, 2025, two Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks targeted fogos.pt. Cloudflare automatically detected and mitigated both attacks.</p><p><b>July 31 attack:</b>
 • Duration: 7 minutes
 • Peak: 33,000 requests per second at 11:27 UTC
 • Bandwidth: 1.7 Gbps (Max)

How the attack looks like in requests per second:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5HF7TpL7tF66oK6plP5N7T/a2bce9539e21b216b8d3ae1fd7885623/BLOG-2934_4.png" />
          </figure><p><b>August 1 attack</b>:
 • Duration: 5 minutes
 • Peak: 31,000 requests per second at 10:24 UTC
 • Bandwidth: 849 Mbps (Max)

How the attack looks like in requests per second from our perspective:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/iaaqt3cvSbjQ5M9cODkhH/6202d16fc65aeeb510ba761317f0f43f/BLOG-2934_5.png" />
          </figure><p>By Cloudflare’s standards, these were small. For comparison, last year we mitigated an attack exceeding <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/"><u>700,000 requests per second</u></a> against a high-profile US election campaign site. But for an civic project like fogos.pt, even tens of thousands of requests per second — if unprotected — can be enough to take services offline at the worst possible time.</p><p>Attackers typically use three main methods for DDoS attacks:</p><ul><li><p>IoT devices: hacked cameras, routers, or smart gadgets sending traffic.</p></li><li><p>Proxies: open or misconfigured servers, residential proxy networks, or anonymity tools that hide attackers’ IPs.</p></li><li><p>Cloud machines: compromised or rented servers from cloud providers.</p></li></ul><p>The July 31 attack likely relied on open proxies, with much of the traffic arriving unencrypted (a common sign of proxy-based attacks). The August 1 attack, in contrast, came largely from cloud machines, matching patterns we see from botnets that exploit cloud infrastructure.</p><p>These attacks were blocked without disruption. Cloudflare’s autonomous mitigation systems kicked in, and email alerts were automatically sent to João and the team. No downtime, no manual intervention required.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>The role of Project Galileo: traffic surges</h3>
      <a href="#the-role-of-project-galileo-traffic-surges">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Fogos.pt has used Cloudflare’s free services since the beginning, starting with DNS and gradually expanding to DDoS mitigation, caching, rate limiting, and more. The site joined Project Galileo, which protects journalists, human rights defenders, and public service projects, to get stronger, upgraded features and service at no cost.</p><blockquote><p><i>“Without Cloudflare, the site would have gone down many times during fire season,” says João Pina. “We use almost every product — but protection against attacks is critical.”</i></p></blockquote>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2NGImat2Q9nujadgXBf22K/96e0aca2752f135e86efdb25d6502a18/BLOG-2934_6.png" />
          </figure><p><sub>August 11, 2025, detail the area of interest of a wildfire in central Portugal. </sub></p><p>Traffic to fogos.pt surges when wildfires hit the news or get mentioned by authorities. These spikes can bring tens of thousands of visitors per day. And as attention grows, so does the risk. Attacks can be used to silence or disrupt critical services, or simply as distractions for more malicious activity. In August 2025, the site often had close to 60,000 people browsing at the same time, with around 40,000 being the norm across the web and app services.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5dNqwHSVBjXdWZqA5jkJiq/f2eed592d0e09df61e14285a0167197c/BLOG-2934_7.png" />
          </figure><p>In just two weeks (with an August 15 peak of almost 70 million requests), fogos.pt handled over 550 million requests (more than 25 million per day) 9 TB of data transfer, nearly 100 million page views, 15 million visits, and 240 million API calls. A massive load for a volunteer-run project, as the next screenshot from the <a href="http://fogos.pt"><u>fogos.pt</u></a> team shows:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5Ofxc7GGgKgWiEbcj4JEiv/2368a8f6ec344d77a044c0a1b371201a/BLOG-2934_8.png" />
          </figure><p>In a time when timely wildfire updates can mean the difference between safety and danger, keeping the site online is essential. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>Built by community, supported by allies</h3>
      <a href="#built-by-community-supported-by-allies">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Fogos.pt is a reminder of what’s possible when public service meets technology, and why we launched Project Galileo: to protect the digital infrastructure that keeps people informed and safe. Built with no formal funding or full-time team, it runs on volunteers, partners, and a shared sense of purpose, an authenticity that João Pina believes is why it works, and why it matters.</p><p>And while this story is about Portugal, wildfires are a global challenge. Other organizations providing critical public services can also apply to join <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/galileo/"><u>Project Galileo</u></a> and receive this protection.</p><p>From a dinner-table idea by an engineer to critical national infrastructure, fogos.pt shows the Internet at its best. Cloudflare is proud to help protect it.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Project Galileo]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Consumer Services]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">44bwGeajQNVHyhbL6x3f1p</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Global expansion in Generative AI: a year of growth, newcomers, and attacks]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/global-expansion-in-generative-ai-a-year-of-growth-newcomers-and-attacks/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ Looking at which Generative AI services are more popular, new entrants into the space, how these services have grown in traffic, where that traffic originates, and others. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>AI (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/what-is-artificial-intelligence/"><u>Artificial Intelligence</u></a>) is a broad concept encompassing machines that simulate or duplicate human cognitive tasks, with <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/what-is-machine-learning/"><u>Machine Learning</u></a> (ML) serving as its data-driven engine. Both have existed for decades but gained fresh momentum when <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/what-is-generative-ai/"><u>Generative AI</u></a>, AI models that can create text, images, audio, code, and video, surged in popularity following the <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/"><u>release</u></a> of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in late 2022. In this blog post, we examine the most popular Generative AI services and how they evolved throughout 2024 and early 2025. We also try to answer questions like how much traffic growth these Generative AI websites have experienced from Cloudflare’s perspective, how much of that traffic was malicious, and other insights.</p><p>To accomplish this, we use aggregated data from our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 DNS resolver</u></a> to measure the popularity of specific Generative AI services. We typically do this for our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>Year in Review</u></a> and now also on the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>DNS domain rankings page</u></a> of Cloudflare Radar, where we aggregate related domains for each service and identify sites that provide services to users. For overall traffic growth and attack trends, we rely on aggregated data from the cohort of Generative AI customers that use Cloudflare for performance (including AI inference) and security.</p><p>Key takeaways:</p><ul><li><p><b>ChatGPT maintains the top spot:</b> OpenAI’s ChatGPT remains #1 in Generative AI popularity, hovering around the top 50 Internet domains overall, up from #200 in late 2023.</p></li><li><p><b>Rapid traffic growth:</b> Monthly traffic to Generative AI services grew by 251% over the past year, between February 1, 2024, and March 1, 2025.</p></li><li><p><b>New entrants on the rise:</b> Chinese chatbot DeepSeek and Grok/xAI quickly climbed the ranks, illustrating how fast newcomers can gain traction in the AI space.</p></li><li><p><b>Global reach with regional variations:</b> The U.S. leads with 23% of Generative AI visitors, but Asia dominates certain platforms like poe.com. Brazil also shows up as a strong user of multiple AI services.</p></li><li><p><b>Targeted by cyberattacks:</b> Over 197 billion potential attack requests were blocked by Cloudflare in the past year, with 39 billion part of DDoS attack campaigns — particularly affecting general AI chatbots and image-generation sites.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Generative AI services popularity ranking: new kids in town</h3>
      <a href="#generative-ai-services-popularity-ranking-new-kids-in-town">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We begin by looking at Generative AI service popularity using the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights"><u>new AI tab on Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. The newest entrant to our Top 10 is DeepSeek, a Chinese chatbot launched on January 10, 2025. It debuted at #9 on January 26, 2025, climbed to #3 on January 29 (coinciding with Lunar/Chinese New Year), and maintained that position until February 4, before settling at its current position of #6. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/s9pGGWSp87CqvIOcbZ4gb/8a5a83deabdf8a0ed7f9898fc384c74d/image1.png" />
          </figure><p>Also highlighted here is another AI chatbot that has recently gained popularity — X’s Grok/xAI. This Generative AI service released its Android app in February and gained <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/18/tech/grok-3-release-elon-musk/index.html"><u>attention</u></a> after February 17, 2025, when it launched the Grok-3 model. In our Generative AI ranking, it first entered the top 10 on February 21, 2025, at #9, briefly reached Claude’s typical spot at #8, and is now fluctuating between #9 and #10.</p><p>Here is the current Generative AI Top 10 from the Cloudflare Radar <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ai-insights?dateStart=2025-01-01&amp;dateEnd=2025-03-06"><u>AI page</u></a>, as of March 9, 2025, with ChatGPT/OpenAI as #1 since the start of the year (a trend also observed in previous years, as the table below shows).</p><p>To make ranking changes and trends easier to spot, the table below shows the February 1 - March 1, 2025 (monthly average) standings on the left, with color-coded comparisons to 2024’s list: services that dropped since 2024 appear in red, while new or higher-ranked ones appear in green. For reference, the second column presents the top 10 from our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>2024 Year in Review</u></a> (including comparisons to the previous year), and the third column displays the 2023 Top 10.</p>
<figure>
    <table>
        <colgroup>
            <col></col>
            <col></col>
            <col></col>
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
            <tr>
                <th><span><span><strong>Top 10 Generative AI services </strong></span></span><br /><span><span><strong>in February 2025</strong></span></span><br /><span><span>ChatGPT / OpenAI (=)</span></span><br /><span><span>Character.AI (=)</span></span><br /><span><span>QuillBot (</span></span><span><span><strong>#4 in 2024</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Codeium (</span></span><span><span><strong>#3</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>GitHub Copilot (</span></span><span><span><strong>#7</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>DeepSeek (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Perplexity </span></span><span><span><strong>(#6</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Claude / Anthropic (</span></span><span><span><strong>#5</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Hugging Face (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Suno AI (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span></th>
                <th><span><span><strong>Top 10 Generative AI services in 2024 (</strong></span></span><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/#ready-to-face-the-generative-ai-era"><span><span><strong><u>Radar Year in Review</u></strong></span></span></a><span><span><strong>)</strong></span></span><br /><br /><span><span>ChatGPT / OpenAI (=)</span></span><br /><span><span>Character.AI (=)</span></span><br /><span><span>Codeium (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>QuillBot (#3 in 2023)</span></span><br /><span><span>Claude / Anthropic (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Perplexity (=)</span></span><br /><span><span>GitHub Copilot (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Wordtune (</span></span><span><span><strong>#7</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Poe (</span></span><span><span><strong>#5</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span><br /><span><span>Tabnine (</span></span><span><span><strong>new</strong></span></span><span><span>)</span></span></th>
                <th><span><span><strong>Top 10 Generative AI services in 2023 (</strong></span></span><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#internet-services"><span><span><strong><u>Radar Year in Review</u></strong></span></span></a><span><span><strong>)</strong></span></span><br /><span><span>ChatGPT / OpenAI</span></span><br /><span><span>Character.AI</span></span><br /><span><span>QuillBot</span></span><br /><span><span>Hugging Face</span></span><br /><span><span>Poe</span></span><br /><span><span>Perplexity</span></span><br /><span><span>Wordtune</span></span><br /><span><span>Google Bard</span></span><br /><span><span>ProWritingAid</span></span><br /><span><span>Voicemod</span></span></th>
            </tr>
        </thead>
    </table>
</figure><p>Other than the previously mentioned DeepSeek, Grok/xAI and ChatGPT/OpenAI, the top 10 includes other chatbots like Anthropic’s Claude, as well as other types of Generative AI services. Character.AI — a specialized platform for creating and interacting with character-based personalities — is #2, then there’s Perplexity (#7) that functions as an AI search engine, while QuillBot (#3) is an AI-powered writing assistant for paraphrasing, grammar, and summarizing. Codeium (#4), which includes developer productivity services like Windsurf AI, and GitHub Copilot (#5) serve as AI coding assistants.</p><p>There’s also Hugging Face (#9), an open-source hub for AI models (we’re including it here as a Generative AI platform, just as we do for other AI model enablers like Replicate and Stability AI), and Suno AI (#10), a music generator that creates songs from text prompts.</p><p>We saw that Grok/xAI entered the top 10 during the last days of February, but since we’re using February’s monthly average, it appears at #11 here. Curious about the rest of the February 2025 Top 20? Here it is, with AI coding services having a strong presence — beyond Codeium and GitHub Copilot, Sider AI and Tabnine also make the list.</p><p>11	Grok / xAI</p><p>12	Poe</p><p>13	Sider AI</p><p>14	Civitai</p><p>15	Tabnine</p><p>16	Google Gemini</p><p>17	Voicemod</p><p>18	GliaCloud</p><p>19	Runway ml</p><p>20	Midjourney</p><p>We have published Generative AI popularity rankings in both the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#internet-services"><u>2023</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>2024</u></a> Cloudflare Radar Year in Review, and in both, OpenAI’s ChatGPT has consistently held the #1 spot. In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>2024</u></a>, as explained in our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>blog post</u></a>, ChatGPT also moved in our overall rankings, nearly breaking into the top 50 by the end of the year. (It was just outside the top 100 in 2023).</p>
    <div>
      <h3>ChatGPT's influence in the overall ranking </h3>
      <a href="#chatgpts-influence-in-the-overall-ranking">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>A recent addition to Cloudflare Radar is the updated domains ranking page in our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/dns"><u>DNS section</u></a>, which includes a number of detailed trends. There, we now show the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>top 100 overall Internet services ranking</u></a> next to a top 100 domains list. ChatGPT / OpenAI, the leading Generative AI service, is typically ranked in the mid-50’s on weekdays and close to #60 on weekends (based on early March 2025 insights), next to non-AI services like Temu, eBay, or Disney Plus.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4miBGzkADr0y6XTYzyFpCR/cea822eb3c9b7c8c25d27858a72762ca/image5.png" />
          </figure><p>Looking at previous trends, as noted in our  <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>Year in Review blog</u></a>, ChatGPT / OpenAI ranked around #200 in early 2023 and climbed to near the top 100 by the end of the year. In 2024, it started just outside the top 100, reached the top 60 in May with the <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-and-more-tools-to-chatgpt-free/"><u>release of the 4o model</u></a>, and has been near the top 50 since September 2024, aligning with the return of employees and students to their routines.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Visitor location distribution: Americas, Europe and Asia</h3>
      <a href="#visitor-location-distribution-americas-europe-and-asia">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>Domain Information page on Cloudflare Radar</u></a> enables users to look at the location popularity of a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain"><u>specific domain</u></a> (from the last seven days), derived from Cloudflare <a href="https://one.one.one.one/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> resolver traffic data in a period of 48 hours (Radar’s default) on March 3-4, 2025.</p><p>In this case, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/chatgpt.com"><u>chatgpt.com</u></a> domain has most of its DNS traffic from the United States (17%), followed by Germany(7%), Brazil (4%), Indonesia (4%), and India (4%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/MsCFiTsGRVF1N3c1oa87b/d5e02c68d7558b16e4fdb518ef5c776a/image2.png" />
          </figure><p>In the case of the new kid in town, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/deepseek.com"><u>deepseek.com</u></a>, the U.S. is #1 location, with 14% of that domain’s DNS traffic, followed by China (11%), Germany (10%), Brazil (7%), and Hong Kong (5%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/YKbSmz0ksNrbef2Xt7UE0/3fd694750f2cb413cd0e6e5001dfb248/image10.png" />
          </figure><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/grok.com"><u>Grok.com</u></a>, on the other hand, has 20% of its traffic from the U.S., 8% from Hong Kong, 6% from Germany, 6% from Japan, and 6% from Vietnam, reflecting a strong presence in Asia within its top 5 locations. Asia is even more dominant for another well-known Generative AI chatbot domain, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/poe.com"><u>poe.com</u></a>, with Hong Kong ranking #1 (29% of traffic), followed by the U.S. (13%), Japan (6%), China (6%), and Singapore (5%).</p><p>Hugging Face (<a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/huggingface.co"><u>huggingface.co</u></a>), the Generative AI models platform, also has the U.S. as its top location (34% of traffic), but its top 5 includes four European countries: France (6%), the United Kingdom (6%), Germany (4%), and Sweden (4%).</p><p>Looking more specifically at AI-powered coding tools, DNS traffic for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/githubcopilot.com"><u>githubcopilot.com</u></a> is primarily driven by the United States (22%), followed by Germany (6%), Hong Kong (5%), India (5%), and Japan (5%). A similar pattern appears for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/codeium.com"><u>codeium.com</u></a>, where the U.S. leads with 15%, followed by Hong Kong (8%), Japan (7%), Brazil (5%), and the Netherlands (5%). Likewise, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/cursor.com"><u>cursor.com</u></a> has 20% of its DNS traffic from the U.S., followed by Hong Kong (10%), India (6%), China (6%), and Japan (5%). <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/tabnine.com"><u>Tabnine.com</u></a>, another AI code completion tool, has its highest traffic from the U.S. (15%), followed by India (6%), Brazil (5%), Germany (5%), and Hong Kong (5%).</p><p>The DNS traffic data from Cloudflare Radar highlights strong U.S. usage across all major Generative AI and AI coding tools, with regional adoption varying by platform. (It is worth noting that 1.1.1.1 has a larger user base in the U.S., but these specific trends vary depending on the domains.)</p><ul><li><p>Asia dominates poe.com and AI coding tools like Codeium and Cursor.</p></li><li><p>Europe plays a significant role in Hugging Face and GitHub Copilot.</p></li><li><p>Brazil emerges as a notable player, particularly in DeepSeek and Tabnine.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Generative AI general traffic growth </h3>
      <a href="#generative-ai-general-traffic-growth">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare, in terms of Generative AI customers, has a unique perspective on the industry. We power many Generative AI services, both large and small. From a cohort of Generative AI customers — some recently popular, others established chatbots or image AI generators, and some just starting — we’ve aggregated both HTTP request data over the past months and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/application-layer-ddos-attack/"><u>application-layer attack</u></a> trends.</p><p>Let’s start with HTTP requests traffic growth in the past year. From February 1, 2024, through March 1, 2025 (a 13-month period to compare February 2024 with February 2025), <b>monthly traffic grew a total of 251%</b>, and over 2% of the requests processed by Cloudflare were mitigated as potential attacks.</p><p>Note that there was an increase over most of the entities in the cohort of Generative AI websites, and this 251% growth also includes recent Generative AI customers, although those mostly don’t influence the growth trend that much — if we exclude Generative AI customers that onboarded to Cloudflare in late 2024 and early 2025, year growth is 234%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4323TeVxE3VqSEoFjopa8t/640305a2b4b3583218115f7a9c35cd60/image11.png" />
          </figure><p>In this next perspective, shown at a daily level, the expected drop during Christmas and the end of the year holidays is quite clear. Another trend surfaces: the cohort of Cloudflare’s Generative AI customers definitely see more use during weekdays than weekends, suggesting a workplace focus. The clear drop during the holidays also includes the summer in the Northern Hemisphere — there's a slight drop in peak traffic in July, for example (similar to what we typically see in terms of general traffic in most countries).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1NvzlVxeom6omVtgFjwauB/a3088b03dc870581c9b6b1f86a810f6d/image12.png" />
          </figure><p>We also have a perspective on the top visitor locations to Generative AI websites, where the U.S. ranks #1, with 23% of all requests in this category, followed by India (8%), Brazil (5%), Indonesia (4%), and Philippines (4%) in the top 5. European countries, such as the U.K. and Germany, come next in the ranking. Below, we show the top 50 for further exploration. Note that Egypt is the first African country appearing in the ranking, at #32, with the same 0.7% as South Africa.</p><p><b>Top locations by share of traffic to Generative AI websites</b></p><table><tr><td><p><b>Rank</b></p></td><td><p><b>Country</b></p></td><td><p><b>Percentage of total</b></p></td><td><p><b>Rank</b></p></td><td><p><b>Country</b></p></td><td><p><b>Percentage of total</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>22.7%</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>Singapore</p></td><td><p>1.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>India</p></td><td><p>8.3%</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>Ukraine</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>4.9%</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>Taiwan</p></td><td><p>0.9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Indonesia</p></td><td><p>4.2%</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>Thailand</p></td><td><p>0.9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>0.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>3.8%</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>United Arab Emirates</p></td><td><p>0.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>3.7%</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>Egypt</p></td><td><p>0.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>3.2%</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>Saudi Arabia</p></td><td><p>0.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>0.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>2.7%</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>Japan</p></td><td><p>2.4%</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>Russian Federation</p></td><td><p>2.2%</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>Bangladesh</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>2%</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>2%</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>Morocco</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>South Korea</p></td><td><p>1.8%</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>Ecuador</p></td><td><p>0.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>Vietnam</p></td><td><p>1.6%</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>Israel</p></td><td><p>0.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>1.5%</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>0.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>Malaysia</p></td><td><p>1.5%</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>0.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>Turkey</p></td><td><p>1.4%</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>0.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>1.4%</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>Kazakhstan</p></td><td><p>0.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>1.4%</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>1.2%</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>1.2%</p></td><td><p>48</p></td><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>Pakistan</p></td><td><p>1.2%</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>Algeria</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>Peru</p></td><td><p>1.1%</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>Denmark</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h3>Attacks targeting Generative AI websites</h3>
      <a href="#attacks-targeting-generative-ai-websites">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>On the security front, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/best-practices-sase-for-ai/">Generative AI websites have become key targets</a> for DDoS attacks as they have gained attention and grown in popularity. Recently, our Cloudforce One team published a threat analysis on attacks by Anonymous Sudan targeting AI-related companies: <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/threat-intelligence/research/report/inside-lameduck-analyzing-anonymous-sudans-threat-operations/"><u>Inside LameDuck: Analyzing Anonymous Sudan’s Threat Operations</u></a>. In this report, they explained how the U.S. Department of Justice indicted two Sudanese brothers behind LameDuck, linking them to 35,000+ DDoS attacks via the Skynet Botnet. The case exposes both political and financial motives behind their operations and underscores the global effort — including Cloudflare’s — to strengthen cybersecurity.</p><p>Over the last 13 months, from February 1, 2024, until March 1, 2025, Cloudflare blocked <b>197 billion requests </b>as potential attacks. Of that number, <b>39 billion</b> requests were part of <b>DDoS attacks</b> targeting Generative AI websites.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4R9GfQsKixZ3CcGB4GPazz/2e43fa46125d22a3058e2099a1c8c38e/image6.png" />
          </figure><p>In terms of malicious requests that were blocked, June 2024 saw the highest number of potential attacks blocked by Cloudflare, followed by January 2025. For DDoS attacks, January 2025 recorded the highest activity, followed by November 2024 and February 2024.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7KtuwFvwQWbjHL464kDbUG/45bc21c813d9a0ab0fb621da4eb4367d/image14.png" />
          </figure><p>Looking more closely at DDoS traffic at a daily level, the largest attack occurred on February 23, 2024, when 3.7 billion requests were blocked as part of a DDoS attack. The second largest was a 1.5 billion request DDoS attack on November 13, 2024. Additionally, a series of multiday DDoS attacks took place between January 20 and 31, 2025, with January 29 seeing the highest number of DDoS attack-related requests, at over one billion (7.3 billion in total for the month).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2DpI9bSIUziw2mVCA6WwUh/06d00c656656af711cba830f6380ae98/image3.png" />
          </figure><p>During the February 23, 2024, DDoS attack, which targeted a specific Generative AI customer, more than 20% of all requests across all Generative AI customers were blocked as part of the attack.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1gh467o7mEZBvm0wu3s9eI/1e2a21f47e3645de4257549937bc5ba0/image8.png" />
          </figure><p>Taking a more granular view of DDoS attacks against that particular Generative AI customer, the attack began on February 22, 2024, at 22:45 UTC, lasting for over eight hours of continuous traffic spikes, peaking at 270,000 requests per second. Further attacks followed, with the most significant occurring on February 26, 2024, at 03:45 UTC, lasting three minutes and peaking at 309,000 requests per second.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5ccxcb4WCqyoZOpZvJkv8/1748a4044e7de327aff9f289d51e4fdc/image9.png" />
          </figure><p>Another popular Generative AI customer was targeted in a DDoS campaign from January 25 to January 31, 2025, with traffic peaking on January 30, reaching 523,000 requests per second.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/ZBMBJXBlyk7kHc85TthBG/ba0309a070b3d920b9ba2f9651fb1343/image7.png" />
          </figure><p>Another perspective to consider over the same February 2024 to February 2025 period is the type of Generative AI websites most targeted by DDoS attacks. General AI chatbots accounted for over 80% of all blocked requests, making them the primary targets.</p><p><b>DDoS attacks targets by Generative AI category</b></p><table><tr><td><p><b>Category</b></p></td><td><p><b>Percentage</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>General Chatbots</p></td><td><p>82.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Image AI Generators</p></td><td><p>8.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Code Assistants</p></td><td><p>3.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>2.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Research &amp; Infra</p></td><td><p>1.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Music Creation</p></td><td><p>1.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Writing &amp; Content AI</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Voice &amp; Video AI</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td></tr></table><p>However, when looking at the percentage of total traffic blocked as DDoS attacks within each category, image AI-related websites had the highest proportion, with over 50% of their total traffic being blocked.</p><p><b>Websites category with the highest percentage of traffic blocked as DDoS attacks </b></p><table><tr><td><p><b>Category</b></p></td><td><p><b>Blocked DDoS (%)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Image AI</p></td><td><p>50.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Chatbot</p></td><td><p>31%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Search</p></td><td><p>9.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Code Assistant</p></td><td><p>6.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Model</p></td><td><p>5.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Music</p></td><td><p>3.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AI Company</p></td><td><p>2.9%</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h3>Conclusion: AI transformation</h3>
      <a href="#conclusion-ai-transformation">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Generative AI continues to grow and transform Internet usage, driving traffic growth of over 250% for AI services over the course of the last year. ChatGPT is definitely the most popular service, and nears the top 50 of all Internet services as seen through analysis of traffic from our 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver. New entrants like DeepSeek and Grok/xAI have quickly climbed the popularity rankings, while regional adoption patterns show the U.S., India, and Brazil leading in visitor traffic.</p><p>This rapid rise has also drawn cyberattacks, with 39 billion requests identified as DDoS attacks targeting specific Generative AI websites over the past year. While most attacks focus on general AI chatbots, image-generation sites show the highest percentage of blocked requests, at over 50%. As Generative AI evolves, tracking these trends provides a historical record of growth surges, global reach, and emerging threats.</p><p>If you’re interested in more trends and insights about the Internet, check out <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. Follow us on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky), or contact us via email.</p><p></p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Generative AI]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Domain Rankings]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">37sDCMT8KRe3efzPLqVEoN</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Offline celebrations: how Christmas, NYE, and Lunar New Year festivities shape online behavior]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/offline-celebrations-how-christmas-nye-and-lunar-new-year-festivities-shape-online-behavior/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ This blog examines how diverse cultural celebrations — from Western Christmas to Orthodox and Lunar New Year festivities — shape global Internet traffic. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Now that 2025 has been here for a few weeks and 2024 has closed with a variety of year-end traditions — from Christmas and Hanukkah celebrations to New Year’s Eve (NYE) countdowns, as well as celebrations of Orthodox Christmas, and Lunar/Chinese New Year — let’s examine how these events have shaped online behavior across continents and cultures. Reflecting on Christmas and NYE 2024 provides insights into how these trends compared with those of the previous year, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/"><u>as detailed in an earlier blog</u></a>.</p><p>One notable finding is the remarkable consistency in human online patterns from one year to the next, a trend that persists despite cultural differences among countries. Data from over 50 countries reveal how people celebrated in 2024–2025, offering a timely reminder of typical holiday trends. While Christmas remains a dominant influence in many regions, other cultural and religious events — such as Hanukkah and local festivities — also shape online habits where Western traditions hold less sway.</p><p>In regions where Christmas is deeply rooted, Internet traffic dips significantly during Christmas Eve dinners, midnight masses, morning gift exchanges, and Christmas Day lunches, a pattern evident in both our previous and current analyses.</p><p>This analysis focuses exclusively on non-bot Internet traffic, filtering out automated activity to highlight genuine human behavior during the most recent holiday season. Before going into specific countries, here’s a global hourly snapshot (UTC-based) of Christmas and New Year’s Eve 2024 traffic from the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dt=2024-12-19_2025-01-04&amp;timeCompare=1&amp;dataSet=http&amp;filters=botClass%253DLikely_Human"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>: </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5z6aUJ5SZ6iFr5dIMABPfb/bc740e88003c6e53b06b4331116f2131/image1.png" />
          </figure><p>This worldwide perspective captures notable drops across a 23-hour window, from New Zealand to Hawaii. Globally, December 25 saw a 19% drop in traffic from the previous week, followed by December 24 with a 14% drop. This holiday period also included the four days with the lowest global traffic during the period between October 1, 2024, and February 6, 2025. In descending order, these days were: December 25, December 24, January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2024.</p><p>Some key takeaways:</p><ul><li><p><b>Europe:</b> Christmas Eve drops in Internet traffic reached up to 67% (seen in Denmark; Spain reached 66%).</p></li><li><p><b>Americas:</b> December 25 was key, with drops ranging from 26% in the US and up to 70% at midnight in Argentina.</p></li><li><p><b>Regional timing</b> differs: Nordic countries on Christmas Eve disconnect earlier at around 18:00, Southern Europe at 21:00-22:00, and Latin America even later.</p></li><li><p><b>New Year's</b> shows worldwide impact, strongest in Latin America: a 73% drop in Chile, followed by 68% drop in Argentina.</p></li><li><p><b>Lunar New Year:</b> January 29 is a peak offline moment, with drops of 25% in Hong Kong, 23% in Singapore, and 24% in Vietnam.</p></li></ul><p><i>Note: Unless otherwise noted, all times used in this blog post are local ones; in countries with several timezones, we’re using the timezone where more people live. For the US, Eastern time is used.</i></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Global Christmas and New Year’s Eve daily trends</h2>
      <a href="#global-christmas-and-new-years-eve-daily-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In this analysis, we apply the same methods as our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/"><u>previous blog post</u></a> to rank countries and regions by their lowest holiday traffic dates, showing each day’s percentage drop. Many locations, such as the United States, experience clear dips on December 24 and 25 as people disconnect for Christmas Eve and Christmas Day celebrations. In contrast, some regions show smaller declines on December 31 as the New Year approaches. The order and magnitude of these drops vary by country, reflecting cultural nuances — some nations register their largest drop on Christmas Eve, others on Christmas Day, and still others exhibit unique patterns around New Year’s Eve or January 1.</p><p>Below is a world map highlighting where traffic dropped the most on December 24 or 25; darker colors indicate larger drops based on our analysis.</p><p>In the following table, we provide more details than can be shown in the map. The data focuses only on locations that had their lowest traffic days between December 24-25 and December 31-January 1, along with the respective percentage drop on each of those days compared to the previous week (where applicable).</p><p><b><i>Top days with the lowest Internet traffic in December 2024 - January 2025</i></b></p><p><i>(with respective percentage drops, if any, from the previous week)</i></p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>December 24</b></p></td><td><p><b>December 25</b></p></td><td><p><b>December 31</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 1</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Denmark</p></td><td><p>-42%</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>-34%</p></td><td><p>-29%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>-33%</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway</p></td><td><p>-33%</p></td><td><p>-15%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td><td><p>-26%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>-30%</p></td><td><p>-28%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finland</p></td><td><p>-30%</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>-29%</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>-28%</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>-28%</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p>-5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>-28%</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>-28%</p></td><td><p>-11%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>-26%</p></td><td><p>-35%</p></td><td><p>-5%</p></td><td><p>-8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>-26%</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td><td><p>-1%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td><td><p>-30%</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p>-3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td><td><p>-23%</p></td><td><p>-1%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p>-1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p>-32%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p>-23%</p></td><td><p>-2%</p></td><td><p>-1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td><td><p>-26%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-20%</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td><td><p>-30%</p></td><td><p>-8%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td><td><p>-29%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Zealand</p></td><td><p>-18%</p></td><td><p>-27%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greece</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p>-5%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td><td><p>-7%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td><td><p>-4%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>-10%</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Japan</p></td><td><p>-6%</p></td><td><p>-6%</p></td><td><p></p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>-4%</p></td><td><p>-6%</p></td><td><p>-5%</p></td><td><p>-3%</p></td></tr></table><p>In cultures with a strong Christmas tradition — mostly in the West — people generally go offline on Christmas Eve (December 24) or Christmas Day (December 25). In regions where Christmas is less culturally significant, key offline moments occur on other dates, such as December 31 or January 1.</p><p>In Europe, most countries (including Denmark, Norway, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, Finland, Czech Republic, Germany, France, Poland, Sweden, Austria, the United Kingdom, Italy, Ireland, Belgium, and Romania) experience their largest traffic drop on December 24, making Christmas Eve the primary offline moment. Some countries also exhibit a less significant drop in traffic on December 25 or December 31.</p><p>North America and Latin America display similar patterns, with the United States, Canada, and Mexico showing the largest drop on December 25. In Latin America — specifically in Argentina, Chile, and Colombia — December 25 also sees a significant decline, though in some cases January 1 emerges as a key offline moment, indicating slight variations in local celebration timing.</p><p>In Asia, the traffic drops are milder. For example, Japan experienced only modest declines on December 24 and 25, while in the Philippines, January 1 recorded a 3% drop compared with December 25, which had a 6% drop from the previous week. In Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia, the influence of Lunar/Chinese New Year is more pronounced; however, Christmas Day 2024 still registered noticeable declines of 12%, 13%, and 9% in these locations, respectively. Meanwhile, in Indonesia and Turkey, December 31 is their peak low-traffic day, suggesting that Christmas plays a less central role in their offline behavior.</p><p>As an example, here’s the US perspective from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;loc=US&amp;timeCompare=1&amp;dt=2023-12-18_2024-01-02"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>, where the drop in traffic during Christmas 2024 and New Year’s 2025 is evident:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1uQOG9ZRE6Fi3y3kXTdQqN/5fefb453b84fbf23d1b3a1ff5982cbc5/image5.png" />
          </figure><p>Comparing Christmas 2023 with 2024, most European regions experienced a stronger traffic drop on their key Christmas day — whether December 24 or December 25 — than in the previous year. The ranking of the days with the lowest traffic sometimes shifts, with new dates such as December 23 or January 1 entering the top three. In North and Latin America, while December 24 and 25 remain important, January 1 has also emerged in several cases. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>Orthodox Christmas impact</h3>
      <a href="#orthodox-christmas-impact">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In countries that celebrate Orthodox Christmas (January 7), Internet traffic follows a distinct pattern. During the December 25 Christmas period, the drops are relatively modest — for example, Russia sees a 6% decrease on December 25, while Romania and Ukraine register declines of 16% on December 24 and 12–13% on December 25. However, because traffic falls significantly on December 30–31 — even more so than on December 24–25 — the levels on January 6–7 are considerably higher compared with the previous week. In fact, a notable surge occurs on January 7 compared with December 31, with traffic increasing by 30% in Russia, 32% in Romania, 24% in Ukraine, 31% in Belarus, and 15% in Kazakhstan.</p><p>Below is a daily chart of Internet traffic in Russia, which clearly shows the December 30–31 drop and a strong rebound in the following days of the new year. Notably, there is a slight decline on January 6, 2025 — the Orthodox Christmas Eve — registering a 4% drop compared with the previous day.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/56wavWZZT4FMg8IwP6zoQv/5e9869e9c4d892341639588dbf3e1e23/image2.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Where Christmas isn’t central</h3>
      <a href="#where-christmas-isnt-central">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Not every country’s December revolves around Christmas. Hanukkah’s timing changes each year, influencing when people log off. In 2024, Hanukkah started on the evening of December 25, leading to a 5% drop in traffic in Israel, followed by 4% drops on the next two days. (Hanukkah lasted until January 2, 2025.) Looking at a more granular view, traffic dropped ~15% between 14:45 and 20:00 in Israel on December 25. The chart below highlights the days that Hanukkah was celebrated.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3GVwc2be7mvoHsh4bMavXK/c0d6a3abb88d83cad8ab6520b4c68742/image6.png" />
          </figure><p>In 2023, Hanukkah began on December 7, leading to an 8% traffic drop in Israel that day and a 7% decline on the following days. More granular data shows that on December 7, traffic dropped the most around 17:00, reaching as much as 17%.</p><p>In Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, and Indonesia, the lowest traffic days don’t align with December 24-25. In those regions, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramadan"><u>Ramadan</u></a> is a much more impactful event, as we’ve noted in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-ramadan-shows-up-in-internet-trends/"><u>previous blog posts</u></a>. Meanwhile, in other regions such as China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, Taiwan, and South Korea, Lunar New Year plays a much bigger role, as we’ll analyze in more detail below.</p><p>Now, let’s focus on a more granular perspective of these trends, showing the impact of Christmas dinners and lunches, and also New Year’s Eve drops in traffic.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>A more granular perspective of Christmas</h2>
      <a href="#a-more-granular-perspective-of-christmas">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5lCnDEUTNr2y8tk6z2LgPI/edcb32bf7d81f27f903696c4b78e3d36/image7.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Europe</h3>
      <a href="#europe">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The Christmas 2024 data show that in Europe, as we saw in the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/"><u>previous year</u></a>, the stronger traffic drop still occurs during Christmas Eve dinner. In Spain, for example, there is a 66% drop compared with the previous week at 21:45, while the morning and lunch periods on Christmas Day see further declines of 55% at 08:00 and 47% at 15:30. Denmark recorded a 67% drop at 18:45 and a 50% drop the next morning at 07:00. Poland and the Czech Republic experience steep dinner declines, with drops as high as 60% (17:15) and 55% (17:45) respectively, followed by substantial drops in the early morning. France, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, and Germany follow similar patterns, with dinnertime drops ranging between 46% and 57%, along with additional significant declines during the morning or lunchtime hours.</p><p>A closer look at timing reveals interesting regional differences also related to typical times for <a href="https://www.stoketravel.com/backpacking-europe/average-dinner-time-europe/"><u>dinner</u></a>. In Nordic countries such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Poland, the Christmas Eve dinnertime drop in traffic happens relatively early — Denmark’s is at 18:45, and Norway’s occurs around 17:45 to 18:15, with Sweden and Finland also showing early declines. A similar pattern appears in the Czech Republic (17:45). Some countries show mixed trends, such as the UK, which sees a 34% drop in traffic both at 16:15 and 20:30, or Switzerland, with 47% at 19:00 and 50% at 21:00, and Germany, with 46% at 19:15.</p><p>In contrast, many Latin and Southern European countries experience peak drops later in the evening (this includes Latin America, as we’ll highlight below). Spain, for instance, reaches its maximum drop at 21:45, while Italy and Portugal see the largest declines at 21:15. Greece records its biggest drop between 21:45 and 22:45, at 37%. Romania and France, for example, are slightly earlier, at 20:45. These early or late traffic drops reflect local dinner traditions, which vary by region.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Americas</h3>
      <a href="#americas">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the Americas, holiday patterns continue to reflect a mix of cultural traditions. In the United States, Christmas Eve sees a 30% drop between 19:45 and 20:45, aligning with family gatherings, while Christmas Day mornings record a 39% decline at 09:30 and a 33% drop at 13:15, highlighting the quiet start to the day. It’s similar in Canada, both in the drop (35%) and the time (20:30), but Mexico aligns more closely with South American countries.</p><p>In Latin America, Christmas Eve (<a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/12/23/nochebuena-meaning-celebrate-on-the-24th/71981540007/"><u>Nochebuena</u></a>) remains the key period of reduced Internet usage, and the following trends are consistent with <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/"><u>Christmas 2023</u></a>. Significant traffic declines align with late-night traditions like the Midnight Toast (in Argentina, the late-night feast is especially popular) and Misa de Gallo (Midnight Mass). For example:</p><ul><li><p>Chile: -62% at 22:45, -63% at midnight (December 25)</p></li><li><p>Argentina: -60% at 22:15, -70% at midnight</p></li><li><p>Colombia: -49% at 22:15, -34% at midnight</p></li><li><p>Peru: -47% at 22:30, -53% at midnight</p></li><li><p>Mexico: -48% at 22:30, -40% at midnight</p></li><li><p>Brazil: -46% at 22:00</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Asia Pacific</h3>
      <a href="#asia-pacific">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the Asia Pacific region and other parts of the world, the reduction in online activity is noticeably milder. Countries such as Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, and Thailand record much smaller drops at Christmas Eve dinner and in the morning. For instance, Japan’s dinner drop is only 11%, while South Korea’s is 18%.</p><p>Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and the Philippines show more variability, with some moderate dinnertime drops but stronger declines later in the day in places like Singapore and Hong Kong. New Zealand and Australia, in the Southern Hemisphere, experienced a 29% and 30% drop respectively at dinner followed by even deeper declines in the morning and early afternoon.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Middle East and Africa</h3>
      <a href="#middle-east-and-africa">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Turning to the Middle East and Africa, the trends reflect regional cultural differences. In these areas the reduction in online activity is generally less dramatic than in predominantly Christian regions. Nigeria, for example, shows a 20% drop at dinner (with additional declines at later times). Our analysis also includes other Middle Eastern locations such as the United Arab Emirates, which registers a relatively modest -12% drop at Christmas Eve dinner with deeper declines later in the day.</p><p>In <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/easter-passover-ramadan-internet-trends-2023/"><u>previous blog posts</u></a>, we have shown how events like <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-ramadan-shows-up-in-internet-trends/"><u>Ramadan</u></a> clearly impact Internet traffic in countries with large Muslim populations. One example from our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ae?compareWith=ID&amp;cf_history_state=%7B%22guid%22%3A%22C255D9FF78CD46CDA4F76812EA68C350%22%2C%22historyId%22%3A15%2C%22targetId%22%3A%2211B31B8E5374713A1265DF95F60D0530%22%7D#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Year in Review 2024</u></a> highlights Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates, where traffic dropped during Eid al-Fitr, the festival marking the end of Ramadan (April 9-10, 2024).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5iYCMXqn92mgjAS4SSqqzK/291f7fe6602b723a0f49862690f45951/image4.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Boxing Day trends</h3>
      <a href="#boxing-day-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Boxing Day on December 26 shows a sharp rebound in online activity after the significant drop in traffic during Christmas. In the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, traffic recovered as people return online after the Christmas break, even if daily traffic in the UK and Canada compared with the previous week was still lower -2% and -3% respectively, it was much higher than Christmas Day (+42% in the UK and +24% in Canada). Traditionally associated with charitable activities, family gatherings, and shopping, the day sees traffic spikes across these regions:</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>December 26 increase/decrease in daily traffic</b></p></td><td><p><b>Peak traffic increase on December 26</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>+6%</p></td><td><p>December 26, 10:00: +12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-2%</p></td><td><p>December 26, 12:45: +7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-3%</p></td><td><p>December 26, 12:15: +1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Zealand</p></td><td><p>+2%</p></td><td><p>December 26, 10:30: +7%, 17:15: +11%</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h3>Christmas traffic drops in more detail</h3>
      <a href="#christmas-traffic-drops-in-more-detail">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Here is the list of locations that saw a clear drop in traffic on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day in the morning or around lunch. We selected the time (morning or lunch) with the largest drop compared to the previous week for further analysis. The list is ordered by the Christmas Eve dinner drop. Countries like Russia (where <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/59905614"><u>Orthodox Christians</u></a> celebrate Christmas later, on January 7), Japan, China, Indonesia, Turkey, Israel, Thailand, Egypt, Singapore, Vietnam, and Bangladesh showed no impact during Christmas Eve dinner or Christmas Day morning or lunch.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>Christmas Eve Dinner Drop</b></p></td><td><p><b>Christmas Day Morning/Lunch Drop</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>-66% at 21:45</p></td><td><p>-55% at 08:00, -47% at 15:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Denmark</p></td><td><p>-67% at 18:45</p></td><td><p>-50% at 07:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>-60% at 22:15, (-70% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-60% at 08:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>-60% at 17:15</p></td><td><p>-52% at 07:15, -33% at 15:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>-62% at 22:45, (-63% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-55% at 08:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway</p></td><td><p>-56% at 17:45, -56% at 18:15</p></td><td><p>-49% at 07:30, -23% at 13:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>-55% at 17:45</p></td><td><p>-51% at 06:45, -26% at 14:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>-54% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-50% at 07:00, -43% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>-57% at 21:15</p></td><td><p>-54% at 07:30, -47% at 14:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>-48% at 21:15</p></td><td><p>-53% at 06:45, -55% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>-47% at 19:00, -50% at 21:00</p></td><td><p>-50% at 06:45, -37% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>-46% at 19:15</p></td><td><p>-40% at 07:15, -21% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>-46% at 22:00</p></td><td><p>-42% at 08:15, -35% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>-46% at 15:15, -46% at 16:30</p></td><td><p>-43% at 07:15, -20% at 13:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>-49% at 22:15,  (-34% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-55% at 07:45, -44% at 15:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>-51% at 19:45</p></td><td><p>-49% at 07:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>-48% at 22:30, (-40% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-46% at 08:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finland</p></td><td><p>-45% at 15:30, -43% at 17:00-17:45</p></td><td><p>-46% at 08:30, -34% at 14:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>-48% at 19:30</p></td><td><p>-47% at 06:15, -29% at 14:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-34% at 16:15, -34% at 20:30</p></td><td><p>-36% at 09:00, -43% at 14:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>-34% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-34% at 06:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>-38% at 16:15, -40% at 21:00</p></td><td><p>-42% at 09:30, -42% at 15:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-35% at 20:30</p></td><td><p>-35% at 09:30, -27% at 16:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>-26% at 19:30</p></td><td><p>-35% at 09:30, -46% at 14:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>-35% at 21:00</p></td><td><p>-38% at 08:30, -40% at 16:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>-30% at 19:45-20:45</p></td><td><p>-39% at 09:30, -33% at 13:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>-30% at 21:00</p></td><td><p>-44% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Zealand</p></td><td><p>-29% at 19:45</p></td><td><p>-39% at 09:30, -44% at 13:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ukraine</p></td><td><p>-25% at 18:15</p></td><td><p>-25% at 09:00, -19% at 14:30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>-20% at 16:45, -21% at 22:30</p></td><td><p>-22% at 13:45, (-36% at 21:45)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Korea</p></td><td><p>-18% at 21:00</p></td><td><p>-19% at 07:45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malaysia</p></td><td><p>-19% at 22:15</p></td><td><p>-22% at 09:15, -13% at 14:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>-19% at 21:30</p></td><td><p>-26% at 06:00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>-13% at 20:30</p></td><td><p>-20% at 10:00, -17% at 16:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Japan</p></td><td><p>-11% at 19:45</p></td><td><p>-12% at 18:00</p></td></tr></table><p>
</p><p>Many countries, though not all, experienced a noticeable drop in Internet traffic during Christmas Day lunch, with variations in timing. Spain, Poland, Norway, the Czech Republic, France, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Brazil, Sweden, Colombia, Finland, Austria, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, South Africa, the Netherlands, the United States, New Zealand, and Ukraine all recorded significant declines, mostly in the early afternoon. In contrast, Denmark, Argentina, Chile, Belgium, Mexico, Romania, and Australia did not exhibit the same lunch decline.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>New Year’s Eve: A planetary moment</h2>
      <a href="#new-years-eve-a-planetary-moment">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4uoXOtiOJn1y6fRtZo9Xuo/d56016c1ad03a2d6274825facd242d54/image10.png" />
          </figure><p>Midnight on January 1 — a moment when people around the world turned away from their screens — revealed regional differences in digital behavior as people disconnected to celebrate. To accurately assess New Year’s impact, we compared traffic at 00:00 on January 1 with 00:00 on December 18 (the same time two weeks prior), avoiding Christmas distortions. This approach highlights the distinct drop in Internet activity due to the celebrations. These latest holiday patterns mirror those of <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/"><u>2023</u></a>, with slight percentage changes and Latin American countries exhibiting larger drops than Northern Europe or some Asian regions.</p><p>Latin America countries led our global analysis with the strongest drops: Chile registered a 73% decline, Argentina 68%, and Colombia a 50% drop, underscoring deep-rooted traditions that drove people to disconnect at midnight.</p><p>European nations also experienced substantial declines in Internet traffic, especially those in Latin or Southern Europe, with Romania (-60%), Italy (-58%), Portugal (-57%), and Spain (-56%) demonstrating pronounced drops, while countries like Germany (-48%) and Switzerland (-42%) also emphasized the cultural importance of New Year’s celebrations. Northern Europe, however, showed a more moderate impact, with Norway dropping by 41% and Sweden by 22%.</p><p>In contrast, North America experienced a relatively milder decrease in online activity, with the United States with a drop in traffic of 11% and Canada at 15%, likely due to the spread of time zones and staggered celebrations. The trend was similar in 2023, with a 12% drop in the US and 14% in Canada, reinforcing the consistency of local Internet usage patterns from year to year.</p><p>Across Asia and the Pacific, the impact varied: the Philippines (-41%), Australia (-21%), South Korea (-18%), and Singapore (-18%) showed significant declines, while Indonesia (-7%) and Malaysia (-11%) experienced a smaller drop.</p><p>In the Middle East, the United Arab Emirates saw a 29% decline, and Egypt dropped by 7%, whereas Israel recorded an 11% increase, indicating different cultural or post-celebration dynamics. The 2024 data highlighted New Year’s global influence, with patterns of reduced online activity shaped by diverse local traditions that impacted digital activity.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Locations</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 1, 00:00 drop (compared to December 18)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Locations</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 1, 00:00 drop (compare to December 18)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>-73%</p></td><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>-68%</p></td><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>-60%</p></td><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>-58%</p></td><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>-20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>-57%</p></td><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>-20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>-56%</p></td><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>-50%</p></td><td><p>South Korea</p></td><td><p>-18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>-48%</p></td><td><p>Singapore</p></td><td><p>-18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>-48%</p></td><td><p>Thailand</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>-48%</p></td><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>-42%</p></td><td><p>Finland</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>-41%</p></td><td><p>Taiwan</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway</p></td><td><p>-41%</p></td><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>-41%</p></td><td><p>New Zealand</p></td><td><p>-15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>-40%</p></td><td><p>China</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ukraine</p></td><td><p>-39%</p></td><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>-11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>-38%</p></td><td><p>Malaysia</p></td><td><p>-11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>-38%</p></td><td><p>Indonesia</p></td><td><p>-7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russia</p></td><td><p>-35%</p></td><td><p>Egypt</p></td><td><p>-7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td><td><p>Vietnam</p></td><td><p>-3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Arab Emirates</p></td><td><p>-29%</p></td><td><p>Saudi Arabia</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p>Israel</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h2>Chinese &amp; Lunar New Year: family time</h2>
      <a href="#chinese-lunar-new-year-family-time">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3WWDRsMW1itlNJ5OxwV5KU/c8f1c2a0064e2124fdc62f7b341da55d/image8.png" />
          </figure><p>The Lunar New Year, also known as Chinese New Year or Spring Festival, is widely celebrated across Asia. It began on Wednesday, January 29, 2025, marking the start of the Year of the Snake, a symbol of wisdom and intuition. A few days prior, China’s extended holiday period began, running from January 29 to February 4, 2025.</p><p>This period is marked by Chunyun, the <a href="https://focus.cbbc.org/what-is-chunyun-and-why-is-it-the-worlds-largest-annual-human-migration"><u>world’s largest annual human migration</u></a>, as millions return home. Key traditions include the New Year’s Eve Reunion Dinner, fireworks, and cultural performances such as temple fairs and dragon or lion dances. In South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore, the holiday period was shorter, lasting from January 28 to 30, 2025. Here’s Vietnam as an example, where it is also clearly evident how traffic started to decrease after January 21, 2025:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6kGLwhLKc2V7dL9ITNWeNc/f31ec0df97ed0439efe3bce8cbae256b/image11.png" />
          </figure><p>Daily Internet traffic drops when people disconnected to celebrate across Asia. Hong Kong saw its sharpest decline on January 29 (-25%), while Singapore peaked at -23% on the same day. Vietnam (-24%) and Malaysia (-16%) also hit their lowest points on January 29. Taiwan’s biggest drop occurred on January 28 (-15%), while South Korea recorded moderate declines of 8% on both January 28 and 29. China experienced its largest drop on January 28 (-17%), while Indonesia saw its strongest decline on January 29 (-11%). In general, January 29 stood out as a key moment of reduced Internet traffic, though the impact varied by country.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 28</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 29</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 30</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td><td><p>-22%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Vietnam</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td><td><p>-24%</p></td><td><p>-18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Singapore</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td><td><p>-23%</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malaysia</p></td><td><p>-9%</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Taiwan</p></td><td><p>-15%</p></td><td><p>-14%</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Indonesia</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p>-11%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>China</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td><td><p>-9%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Korea</p></td><td><p>-8%</p></td><td><p>-8%</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr></table><p>The more granular traffic data revealed specific offline moments that mirrored rich cultural traditions. In China, digital activity dropped sharply on January 28 around midday (-36%) and again in the late afternoon. It also declined by 28% at 00:00 on January 29, likely reflecting deep engagement in family reunions and festivities. Hong Kong, Vietnam, and the Philippines also experienced significant declines around midnight, while Singapore, Malaysia, and Taiwan exhibited notable, though varied, drops.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 28/29 drops in traffic</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>China</p></td><td><p>January 28, 12:30: -36%, 18:15-20:15: -32% 
January 29, 00:00: -28%, 08:00: -31%, 13:00: -19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Singapore</p></td><td><p>January 29, 00:00: -12%, 15:00: -35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Vietnam</p></td><td><p>January 28, 21:30: -33%, 
January 29, 00:00: -33%, 06:00: -40%, 18:15: -38%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>January 28, 20:30: -7% 
January 29, 00:00: +3%, 06:00: -8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>January 28, 19:45: -36% 
January 29, 00:00: -29%, 09:30: -40%, 14:45: -35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malaysia</p></td><td><p>January 28, 20:30-21:45: -18%, 
January 29, 00:00: -12%, 09:30: -30%, 15:00: -25%, 21:15: -20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Taiwan</p></td><td><p>January 28, 18:30: -34%;
January 29, 00:00: -14%, 12:30: -26%</p></td></tr></table><p>It’s important to note that the midnight drop in traffic during Lunar or Chinese New Year was not as pronounced as during the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar"><u>Gregorian calendar’s</u></a> New Year, as seen in previous data.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion: traditions stand the test of time</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion-traditions-stand-the-test-of-time">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In 2024, the trends remain strikingly consistent with those of 2023. In Europe, Christmas Eve continues to be the main offline moment, with traffic drops reaching 67% in Denmark and 66% in Spain. In North and Latin America, December 25 remained the key day, as seen with a 26% drop in the US and up to 70% drop at midnight in Argentina. These patterns demonstrate that traditional celebrations still heavily influence online behavior.</p><p>Across Asia, unique cultural events drive distinct periods of reduced online activity. The Lunar New Year showed peak disconnection around January 29 in China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Vietnam. Overall, the 2024 data reinforce the enduring impact of cultural rituals on global Internet usage. Those are also demonstrated by Ramadan in a different part of the year. It also reminds us that while the Internet connects billions, cultural rhythms continue to shape our relationship with technology.</p><p>If you’re interested in more trends and insights about the Internet, check out <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. Follow us on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky), or contact us via <a><u>email</u></a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">mljaUpYN9x5uUxMSbXy0f</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Record-breaking 5.6 Tbps DDoS attack and global DDoS trends for 2024 Q4]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-for-2024-q4/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ 2024 ended with a bang. Cloudflare mitigated another record-breaking DDoS attack peaking at 5.6 Tbps. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Welcome to the 20th edition of the Cloudflare DDoS Threat Report, marking five years since our first report in 2020.</p><p>Published quarterly, this report offers a comprehensive analysis of the evolving threat landscape of <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ddos/glossary/denial-of-service/"><u>Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks</u></a> based on data from the <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/network/"><u>Cloudflare network</u></a>. In this edition, we focus on the fourth quarter of 2024 and look back at the year as a whole.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Cloudflare’s unique vantage point</h2>
      <a href="#cloudflares-unique-vantage-point">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>When we published our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/network-layer-ddos-attack-trends-for-q1-2020/"><u>first report</u></a>, Cloudflare’s global network capacity was 35 Terabits per second (Tbps). Since then, our network’s capacity has grown by 817% to 321 Tbps. We also significantly expanded our global presence by 65% from 200 cities in the beginning of 2020 to 330 cities by the end of 2024.</p><p>Using this massive network, we now serve and protect nearly <a href="https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/proxy"><u>20% of all websites</u></a> and close to 18,000 unique Cloudflare customer <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-a-subnet/"><u>IP networks</u></a>. This extensive infrastructure and customer base uniquely positions us to provide key insights and trends that benefit the wider Internet community.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Key DDoS insights</h2>
      <a href="#key-ddos-insights">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>In 2024, Cloudflare’s autonomous DDoS defense systems blocked around 21.3 million DDoS attacks, representing a 53% increase compared to 2023. On average, in 2024, Cloudflare blocked 4,870 DDoS attacks every hour.</p></li><li><p>In the fourth quarter, over 420 of those attacks were hyper-volumetric, exceeding rates of 1 billion packets per second (pps) and 1 Tbps. Moreover, the amount of attacks exceeding 1 Tbps grew by a staggering 1,885% quarter-over-quarter.</p></li><li><p>During the week of Halloween 2024, Cloudflare’s DDoS defense systems successfully and autonomously detected and blocked a 5.6 Terabit per second (Tbps) DDoS attack — the largest attack ever reported.</p></li></ul><p><i>To learn more about DDoS attacks and other types of cyber threats, visit our </i><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/"><i><u>Learning Center</u></i></a><i>, access </i><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/ddos-reports"><i><u>previous DDoS threat reports</u></i></a><i> on the Cloudflare blog, or visit our interactive hub, </i><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports?q=DDoS"><i><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></i></a><i>. There's also a </i><a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/"><i><u>free API</u></i></a><i> for those interested in investigating these and other Internet trends. You can also learn more about the </i><a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/reference/quarterly-ddos-reports/"><i><u>methodologies</u></i></a><i> used in preparing these reports.</i></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Anatomy of a DDoS attack</h2>
      <a href="#anatomy-of-a-ddos-attack">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In 2024 Q4 alone, Cloudflare mitigated 6.9 million DDoS attacks. This represents a 16% increase quarter-over-quarter (QoQ) and 83% year-over-year (YoY).</p><p>Of the 2024 Q4 DDoS attacks, 49% (3.4 million) were <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/layer-3-ddos-attacks/"><u>Layer 3</u></a>/<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-the-network-layer/"><u>Layer 4</u></a> DDoS attacks and 51% (3.5 million) were HTTP DDoS attacks.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/33qc2yEBIE4Tmq6ke3dOIY/398216db2fb03e6093f55dac35394568/image13.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of 6.9 million DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>HTTP DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#http-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The majority of the HTTP DDoS attacks (73%) were launched by known <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-botnet/">botnets</a>. Rapid detection and blocking of these attacks were made possible as a result of operating a massive network and seeing many types of attacks and botnets. In turn, this allows our security engineers and researchers to craft heuristics to increase mitigation efficacy against these attacks.</p><p>An additional 11% were HTTP DDoS attacks that were caught pretending to be a legitimate browser. Another 10% were attacks which contained suspicious or unusual HTTP attributes. The remaining 8% “Other” were generic <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/http-flood-ddos-attack/"><u>HTTP floods</u></a>, volumetric cache busting attacks, and volumetric attacks targeting login endpoints.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/27nsCB9HReu48XtiJKufwg/cb8814d1cc390e4cd1ffea9316fd589e/image19.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top HTTP DDoS attack vectors: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p><p>These <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/attack-vector/">attack vectors</a>, or attack groups, are not necessarily exclusive. For example, known botnets also impersonate browsers and have suspicious HTTP attributes, but this breakdown is our attempt to categorize the HTTP DDoS attacks in a meaningful way.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top user agents</h3>
      <a href="#top-user-agents">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As of this report’s publication, the current stable version of Chrome for Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android is 132, according to Google’s <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/"><u>release notes</u></a>. However, it seems that threat actors are still behind, as thirteen of the top user agents that appeared most frequently in DDoS attacks were Chrome versions ranging from 118 to 129.</p><p>The HITV_ST_PLATFORM user agent had the highest share of DDoS requests out of total requests (99.9%), making it the user agent that’s used almost exclusively in DDoS attacks. In other words, if you see traffic coming from the HITV_ST_PLATFORM user agent, there is a 0.1% chance that it is legitimate traffic.</p><p>Threat actors often avoid using uncommon user agents, favoring more common ones like Chrome to blend in with regular traffic. The presence of the HITV_ST_PLATFORM user agent, which is associated with smart TVs and set-top boxes, suggests that the devices involved in certain cyberattacks are compromised smart TVs or set-top boxes. This observation highlights the importance of securing all Internet-connected devices, including smart TVs and set-top boxes, to prevent them from being exploited in cyberattacks.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5uUCjjPdGu63u7OmgRE6Yw/4b15c1e88cfe86ae0bc5824346908b24/image18.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top user agents abused in DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p><p>The user agent <a href="https://github.com/benoitc/hackney"><u>hackney</u></a> came in second place, with 93% of requests containing this user agent being part of a DDoS attack. If you encounter traffic coming from the hackney user agent, there is a 7% chance that it is legitimate traffic. Hackney is an HTTP client library for Erlang, used for making HTTP requests and is popular in Erlang/Elixir ecosystems.</p><p>Additional user agents that were used in DDoS attacks are <a href="https://www.utorrent.com/"><u>uTorrent</u></a>, which is associated with a popular BitTorrent client for downloading files. <a href="https://pkg.go.dev/net/http"><u>Go-http-client</u></a> and <a href="https://github.com/valyala/fasthttp"><u>fasthttp</u></a> were also commonly used in DDoS attacks. The former is the default HTTP client in Go’s standard library and the latter is a high-performance alternative. fasthttp is used to build fast web applications, but is often exploited for DDoS attacks and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/how-to-prevent-web-scraping/">web scraping</a> too.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>HTTP attributes commonly used in DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#http-attributes-commonly-used-in-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
    <div>
      <h3>HTTP methods</h3>
      <a href="#http-methods">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/hypertext-transfer-protocol-http/"><u>HTTP methods</u></a> (also called HTTP verbs) define the action to be performed on a resource on a server. They are part of the HTTP protocol and allow communication between clients (such as browsers) and servers.</p><p>The GET method is most commonly used. Almost 70% of legitimate HTTP requests made use of the GET method. In second place is the POST method with a share of 27%.</p><p>With DDoS attacks, we see a different picture. Almost 14% of HTTP requests using the HEAD method were part of a DDoS attack, despite it hardly being present in legitimate HTTP requests (0.75% of all requests). The DELETE method came in second place, with around 7% of its usage being for DDoS purposes.</p><p>The disproportion between methods commonly seen in DDoS attacks versus their presence in legitimate traffic definitely stands out. Security administrators can use this information to optimize their security posture based on these headers.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1fD5aUHaIkRMUNPZJI0LKW/d5856e7ce13cb7d1e28727401b885b1a/image10.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of HTTP methods in DDoS attacks and legitimate traffic: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>HTTP paths</h3>
      <a href="#http-paths">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>An HTTP path describes a specific server resource. Along with the HTTP method, the server will perform the action on the resource.</p><p>For example, GET <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/"><u>https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/</u></a> will instruct the server to retrieve the content for the resource /ddos-protection/.</p><p>DDoS attacks often target the root of the website (“/”), but in other cases, they can target specific paths. In 2024 Q4, 98% of HTTP requests towards the /wp-admin/ path were part of DDoS attacks. The /wp-admin/ path is the default <a href="https://wordpress.com/support/dashboard/"><u>administrator dashboard for WordPress websites</u></a>.</p><p>Obviously, many paths are unique to the specific website, but in the graph below, we’ve provided the top <i>generic</i> paths that were attacked the most. Security administrators can use this data to strengthen their protection on these endpoints, as applicable. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/I9SweJVs4sLYjgHy469NN/b7d0e76648b0ec26af32143a45dc1dd6/image21.png" />
          </figure><p> <sup><i>Top HTTP paths targeted by HTTP DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>HTTP vs. HTTPS</h2>
      <a href="#http-vs-https">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In Q4, almost 94% of legitimate traffic was <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ssl/what-is-https/"><u>HTTPS</u></a>. Only 6% was plaintext HTTP (not encrypted). Looking at DDoS attack traffic, around 92% of HTTP DDoS attack requests were over HTTPS and almost 8% were over plaintext HTTP.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1grfbkXvzjh8nXJYtrhiJP/8ff46ac59d296fcad89475f2bc242184/unnamed__2_.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>HTTP vs. HTTPS in legitimate traffic and DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Layer 3/Layer 4 DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#layer-3-layer-4-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The top three most common Layer 3/Layer 4 (network layer) attack vectors were <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/syn-flood-ddos-attack/"><u>SYN flood</u></a> (38%), <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/dns-flood-ddos-attack/"><u>DNS flood attacks</u></a> (16%), and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/udp-flood-ddos-attack/"><u>UDP floods</u></a> (14%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1hXTXtKe2kVD9fjw26aIN8/7bbd5ef01b04a3bba28232cdcf876c3a/image1.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top L3/4 DDoS attack vectors: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p><p>An additional common attack vector, or rather, botnet type, is <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/mirai-botnet/"><u>Mirai</u></a>. Mirai attacks accounted for 6% of all network layer DDoS attacks — a 131% increase QoQ. In 2024 Q4, a Mirai-variant botnet was responsible for the largest DDoS attack on record, but we’ll discuss that further in the <a href="#the-largest-ddos-attack-on-record"><u>next section</u></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Emerging attack vectors</h2>
      <a href="#emerging-attack-vectors">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Before moving on to the next section, it’s worthwhile to discuss the growth in additional attack vectors that were observed this quarter. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7Hz074MxtzzdG4uvCM8P93/af6c86b023160f66acf0fe209386acf7/image8.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top emerging threats: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p><p><sup><i></i></sup><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/memcached-ddos-attack/"><u>Memcached DDoS attacks</u></a> saw the largest growth, with a 314% QoQ increase. <a href="https://memcached.org/"><u>Memcached</u></a> is a database caching system for speeding up websites and networks. Memcached servers that support <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/user-datagram-protocol-udp/">UDP</a> can be abused to launch amplification or reflection DDoS attacks. In this case, the attacker would request content from the caching system and spoof the victim's IP address as the source IP in the UDP packets. The victim will be flooded with the Memcache responses, which can be up to 51,200x larger than the initial request.</p><p>BitTorrent DDoS attacks also surged this quarter by 304%. The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent"><u>BitTorrent protocol</u></a> is a communication protocol used for peer-to-peer file sharing. To help the BitTorrent clients find and download the files efficiently, BitTorrent clients may utilize <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_tracker"><u>BitTorrent Trackers</u></a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_hash_table"><u>Distributed Hash Tables (DHT)</u></a> to identify the peers that are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_BitTorrent_terms#Seed_/_seeding"><u>seeding</u></a> the desired file. This concept can be abused to launch DDoS attacks. A malicious actor can <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/ip-spoofing/"><u>spoof</u></a> the victim’s IP address as a seeder IP address within Trackers and DHT systems. Then clients would request the files from those IP addresses. Given a sufficient number of clients requesting the file, it can flood the victim with more traffic than it can handle.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>The largest DDoS attack on record</h2>
      <a href="#the-largest-ddos-attack-on-record">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>On October 29, a 5.6 Tbps <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/udp-flood-ddos-attack/"><u>UDP DDoS attack</u></a> launched by a Mirai-variant botnet targeted a Cloudflare <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/network-services/products/magic-transit/"><u>Magic Transit</u></a> customer, an Internet service provider (ISP) from Eastern Asia. The attack lasted only 80 seconds and originated from over 13,000 <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/internet-of-things-iot/"><u>IoT</u></a> devices. Detection and mitigation were fully autonomous by Cloudflare’s distributed defense systems. It required no human intervention, didn’t trigger any alerts, and didn’t cause any performance degradation. The systems worked as intended.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/kx3Uj4y4G4KZ6yNritxg4/d47e8f1b51a630bce28e8b036a4e7b64/image16.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Cloudflare’s autonomous DDoS defenses mitigate a 5.6 Tbps Mirai DDoS attack without human intervention</i></sup></p><p>While the total number of unique source IP addresses was around 13,000, the average unique source IP addresses per second was 5,500. We also saw a similar number of unique source ports per second. In the graph below, each line represents one of the 13,000 different source IP addresses, and as portrayed, each contributed less than 8 Gbps per second. The average contribution of each IP address per second was around 1 Gbps (~0.012% of 5.6 Tbps).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2biclYyny81QnJxQpP3PcF/8e1ec9c4b227043b1bd05914c1f543b1/image14.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>The 13,000 source IP addresses that launched the 5.6 Tbps DDoS attack</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Hyper-volumetric DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#hyper-volumetric-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In 2024 Q3, we started seeing a rise in hyper-volumetric network layer DDoS attacks. In 2024 Q4, the amount of attacks exceeding 1 Tbps increased by 1,885% QoQ and attacks exceeding 100 Million pps (packets per second) increased by 175% QoQ. 16% of the attacks that exceeded 100 Million pps also exceeded 1 Billion pps.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3L3X48ztfIeGRVe3Su009z/b6798328b8926b33ea78b0617ee3aad5/image6.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Distribution of hyper-volumetric L3/4 DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Attack size</h2>
      <a href="#attack-size">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The majority of HTTP DDoS attacks (63%) did not exceed 50,000 requests per second. On the other side of the spectrum, 3% of HTTP DDoS attacks exceeded 100 million requests per second.</p><p>Similarly, the majority of network layer DDoS attacks are also small. 93% did not exceed 500 Mbps and 87% did not exceed 50,000 packets per second. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/25TQ7mayQOrr3ZpG1yLADa/ce08756eec2fbb2b213aad1668d59b4f/unnamed.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>QoQ change in attack size by packet rate: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1eNqV8gIxZgukwropBeyvs/23f128993b6573a3acb6e2a33306813d/unnamed__1_.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>QoQ change in attack size by bit rate: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Attack duration</h2>
      <a href="#attack-duration">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The majority of HTTP DDoS attacks (72%) end in under ten minutes. Approximately 22% of HTTP DDoS attacks last over one hour, and 11% last over 24 hours.</p><p>Similarly, 91% of network layer DDoS attacks also end within ten minutes. Only 2% last over an hour.</p><p>Overall, there was a significant QoQ decrease in the duration of DDoS attacks. Because the duration of most attacks is so short, it is not feasible, in most cases, for a human to respond to an alert, analyze the traffic, and apply mitigation. The short duration of attacks emphasizes the need for an <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/ddos/">in-line, always-on, automated DDoS protection service</a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6Yfb7JGpZ2GTXR2HYK5pAS/55a1dbf4eec229e7154cf223d542e3bf/unnamed__3_.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>QoQ change in attack duration: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Attack sources</h2>
      <a href="#attack-sources">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the last quarter of 2024, Indonesia remained the <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/reference/quarterly-ddos-reports/#source-country"><u>largest source of DDoS attacks</u></a> worldwide for the second consecutive quarter. To understand where attacks are coming from, we map the source IP addresses launching HTTP DDoS attacks because they cannot be spoofed, and for Layer 3/Layer 4 DDoS attacks, we use the location of our data centers where the DDoS packets were ingested. This lets us overcome the spoofability that is possible in Layer 3/Layer 4. We’re able to achieve geographical accuracy due to our extensive network spanning over 330 cities around the world.</p><p>Hong Kong came in second, having moved up five spots from the previous quarter. Singapore advanced three spots, coming in third place.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4Z7DgqDBlKbd3eDRv7ZVmL/49aabaee6301a3c93bb40851e645dd42/image2.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top 10 largest sources of DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top source networks</h3>
      <a href="#top-source-networks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>An <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a> (AS) is a large network or group of networks that has a unified routing policy. Every computer or device that connects to the Internet is connected to an AS. To find out what your AS is, visit <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/ip">https://radar.cloudflare.com/ip</a>.</p><p>When looking at where the DDoS attacks originate from, specifically HTTP DDoS attacks, there are a few autonomous systems that stand out.</p><p>The AS that we saw the most HTTP DDoS attack traffic from in 2024 Q4 was German-based <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security-and-attacks/as24940"><u>Hetzner (AS24940)</u></a>. Almost 5% of all HTTP DDoS requests originated from Hetzer’s network, or in other words, 5 out of every 100 HTTP DDoS requests that Cloudflare blocked originated from Hetzner.</p><p>In second place we have the US-based <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security-and-attacks/as14061"><u>Digital Ocean (AS14061)</u></a>, followed by France-based <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/security-and-attacks/as16276"><u>OVH (AS16276)</u></a> in third place.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7pQUunzZ0ioH48lTOJOLVe/8dc42b7904b0f0b838f117ce5f35a35a/image12.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top 10 largest source networks of DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p><p>For many network operators such as the ones listed above, it can be hard to identify the malicious actors that abuse their infrastructure for launching attacks. To help network operators and service providers crack down on the abuse, we provide a <b>free</b> <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/botnet-threat-feed/"><u>DDoS Botnet threat intelligence feed</u></a> that provides ASN owners a list of their IP addresses that we’ve seen participating in DDoS attacks. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Top threat actors</h2>
      <a href="#top-threat-actors">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>When surveying Cloudflare customers that were targeted by DDoS attacks, the majority said they didn’t know who attacked them. The ones that did know reported their competitors as the number one threat actor behind the attacks (40%). Another 17% reported that a state-level or state-sponsored threat actor was behind the attack, and a similar percentage reported that a disgruntled user or customer was behind the attack.</p><p>Another 14% reported that an extortionist was behind the attacks. 7% claimed it was a self-inflicted DDoS, 2% reported hacktivism as the cause of the attack, and another 2% reported that the attacks were launched by former employees.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7gThccj4k75gfFoGBn301W/403bd5cf3984611490e7d90f3435f3c1/image15.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top threat actors: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Ransom DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#ransom-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the final quarter of 2024, as anticipated, we observed a surge in <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/ransom-ddos-attack/"><u>Ransom DDoS attacks</u></a>. This spike was predictable, given that Q4 is a prime time for cybercriminals, with increased online shopping, travel arrangements, and holiday activities. Disrupting these services during peak times can significantly impact organizations' revenues and cause real-world disruptions, such as flight delays and cancellations.</p><p>In Q4, 12% of Cloudflare customers that were targeted by DDoS attacks reported being threatened or extorted for a ransom payment. This represents a 78% QoQ increase and 25% YoY growth compared to 2023 Q4.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1BV3NoLbxwzO0ShVyCwQ97/7ccb684195b6efef0db209aefffff476/image17.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Reported Ransom DDoS attacks by quarter: 2024</i></sup></p><p>Looking back at the entire year of 2024, Cloudflare received the most reports of Ransom DDoS attacks in May. In Q4, we can see the gradual increase starting from October (10%), November (13%), and December (14%) — a seven-month-high.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/EllNHd6iUWkQ6Z481gLss/a20b10f96d4f7a649dfa23beceebad8e/image9.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Reported Ransom DDoS attacks by month: 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Target of attacks</h2>
      <a href="#target-of-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In 2024 Q4, China maintained its position as the most <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/reference/quarterly-ddos-reports/#target-country"><u>attacked country</u></a>. To understand which countries are subject to more attacks, we group DDoS attacks by our customers’ billing country. </p><p>Philippines makes its first appearance as the second most attacked country in the top 10. Taiwan jumped to third place, up seven spots compared to last quarter.</p><p>In the map below, you can see the top 10 most attacked locations and their ranking change compared to the previous quarter.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4TosbZ02NmNGbgpwkskUNs/6f96885b4de89c34403551a03a01e634/image5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top 10 most attacked locations by DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Most attacked industries</h2>
      <a href="#most-attacked-industries">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the fourth quarter of 2024, the <i>Telecommunications, Service Providers and Carriers</i> industry jumped from the third place (last quarter) to the first place as the most <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/reference/quarterly-ddos-reports/#target-industry"><u>attacked industry</u></a>. To understand which industries are subject to more attacks, we group DDoS attacks by our customers’ industry. The <i>Internet</i> industry came in second, followed by <i>Marketing and Advertising</i> in third.</p><p>The <i>Banking &amp; Financial Services</i> industry dropped seven places from number one in 2024 Q3 to number eight in Q4.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/444JREdNrmb6yePqqfGI4B/a268a1d3d3cd1dd7d9e076ffcf5b06c5/image7.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top 10 most attacked industries by DDoS attacks: 2024 Q4</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Our commitment to unmetered DDoS protection</h2>
      <a href="#our-commitment-to-unmetered-ddos-protection">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The fourth quarter of 2024 saw a surge in hyper-volumetric Layer 3/Layer 4 DDoS attacks, with the largest one breaking our previous record, peaking at 5.6 Tbps. This rise in attack size renders capacity-limited cloud DDoS protection services or on-premise DDoS appliances obsolete.</p><p>The growing use of powerful botnets, driven by geopolitical factors, has broadened the range of vulnerable targets. A rise in Ransom DDoS attacks is also a growing concern.</p><p>Too many organizations only implement DDoS protection after suffering an attack. Our observations show that organizations with proactive security strategies are more resilient. At Cloudflare, we invest in automated defenses and a comprehensive security portfolio to provide proactive protection against both current and emerging threats.</p><p>With our 321 Tbps network spanning 330 cities globally, we remain committed to providing <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/ddos/">unmetered and unlimited DDoS protection</a> no matter the size, duration and quantity of the attacks.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS Reports]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS Alerts]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Mirai]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Attacks]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1qstsc71dUKtPimn2nGewc</guid>
            <dc:creator>Omer Yoachimik</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Jorge Pacheco</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The fall and rise of TikTok (traffic)]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-fall-and-rise-of-tiktok-traffic/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 13:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ On January 19, 2025, ByteDance suspended TikTok and related apps for US users. We examine the 14-hour traffic plunge, recovery near Donald Trump’s inauguration. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The United States ban on TikTok went into effect on January 19, 2025, and although service began to be restored after just 14 hours, it was only close to the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th President of the United States that associated DNS traffic started to recover to closer to previous levels. In this post, we analyze the events of January 19 and 20, and what they meant for TikTok-related DNS traffic, but also other competitors (including their growth outside the US).</p><p>For context, we wrote an <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tiktok-ban-traffic-decline-alternatives-rednote/"><u>initial blog</u></a> post about the TikTok ban on Sunday, January 19, 2025. The ban was part of the "<a href="https://www.congress.gov/118/plaws/publ50/PLAW-118publ50.pdf"><u>Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act</u></a>," proposed in Congress, which ordered ByteDance to divest due to alleged security concerns. The bill was signed into law by Congress and President Biden in April 2024, and was upheld by the Supreme Court on January 17, 2025.</p><p>Aggregated data from our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 DNS resolver</u></a> shows — as we’ve posted <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1880890502364672216"><u>on social media</u></a> — that the TikTok shutdown in the US began to impact DNS traffic to TikTok-related domains on January 19, just after 03:30 UTC (22:30 ET on January 18). This includes DNS traffic not only for TikTok, but also for other ByteDance-owned platforms, such as the CapCut video editor. Here’s the timeline focused on DNS traffic for TikTok related domains (with the respective line chart), as we’ve observed it:</p><ul><li><p><b>January 19, just after 03:30 UTC (22:30 ET on January 18):</b> DNS traffic to TikTok-related domains dropped by as much as 85% compared to the previous week, and showed signs of further decline in the following hours.</p></li><li><p><b>January 19, 17:30 UTC (12:30 ET):</b> After a 14-hour shutdown, TikTok announced it was starting service restoration following assurances from Donald Trump. DNS traffic began to recover slightly after 18:00 UTC but stayed near "shutdown" levels for several hours. Traffic from AS396986 (ByteDance) showed a similar trend.</p></li><li><p><b>January 20, 06:00 UTC (01:00 ET):</b> A short-lived spike in DNS traffic for TikTok-related domains occurred, with traffic still 25% below the previous week.</p></li><li><p><b>January 20, 14:00–15:00 UTC (09:00–10:00 ET):</b> DNS traffic picked up, moving from 27% to 18% below pre-shutdown levels.</p></li><li><p><b>January 20, 17:00 UTC (12:00 ET):</b> During Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony, DNS traffic increased to 12% below pre-shutdown levels, with a trend of continued growth, reaching 10% below previous levels at 18:00 UTC (13:00 ET).</p></li><li><p><b>January 21, 05:00 UTC (00:00 ET):</b> DNS traffic was 7% below pre-shutdown levels.</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5P0HXhOaJtBClOnZyAifNx/d66b69eb511bf0670d9136a0da4f74cc/image6.png" />
          </figure><p>On January 19, around 17:30 UTC (12:30 ET), TikTok released a <a href="https://x.com/TikTokPolicy/status/1881030712188346459"><u>statement</u></a>: “In agreement with our service providers, TikTok is in the process of restoring service. We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties.” A message indicating the TikTok ban was over appeared for US users (image on the left). However, a few hours later, some users reported difficulties accessing the app (image on the right).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3nI5tzedgXiQOpj9UJYAN5/5a2e1b0ad470807dc475f8f23e65744a/Screenshot_2025-01-21_at_13.49.55.png" />
          </figure><p>Analyzing data from <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a>-level data, traffic from TikTok owner ByteDance’s network (AS396986) in the US to Cloudflare experienced a sharp decline, dropping by as much as 95% after 03:30 UTC on January 19 (22:30 ET on January 18).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4fgbhrtt4ROVLvshup0lG2/f27c0cd29e6320deac0c7dcfac5877b8/image4.png" />
          </figure><p>Our data shows that traffic within ByteDance’s network (AS396986) never fully recovered, remaining around 80% below pre-shutdown levels. This suggests that ByteDance may have used other solutions after the shutdown.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Alternatives like RedNote (Xiaohongshu) </h2>
      <a href="#alternatives-like-rednote-xiaohongshu">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As mentioned <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tiktok-ban-traffic-decline-alternatives-rednote/"><u>previously</u></a>, DNS traffic in the US for TikTok alternatives, driven by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaohongshu"><u>RedNote</u></a> (Xiaohongshu or Little Red Book), has been steadily increasing since January 13. It surged on January 19 by up to 74% around 04:00 UTC (23:00 ET on January 18) compared to the previous week, with lower growth seen later that day in the US (around 52% at 17:00 UTC (12:00 ET)). Traffic subsequently declined, and was only 17% higher than the previous week after TikTok announced it was beginning to restore its services in the US around 22:00 UTC (17:00 ET), and it lost even more growth momentum after that.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4nXqvN8EE0kvvnO2h1t5c6/c1394571b7ac3f833d48ecc25b0ec7b8/image2.png" />
          </figure><p>Daily DNS traffic in the US for TikTok alternatives has been rising since January 13, reaching 116% higher than the previous week on January 15. On Sunday, January 19, the day of the TikTok ban, it peaked with a 291% increase compared to the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4OxdAjwocA13LmKIWcZME6/6acd7370c818dd6fa133015998fdd03d/image12.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>RedNote impacting other countries</h2>
      <a href="#rednote-impacting-other-countries">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>DNS traffic for TikTok alternatives, driven by RedNote, has also been increasing in other countries, with a noticeable rise in daily DNS traffic to these platforms. Below is the breakdown of the most impacted countries, with a few updates from our most recent <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tiktok-ban-traffic-decline-alternatives-rednote/#rednote-impacting-other-countries"><u>blog post</u></a>. We highlight the peak day of DNS traffic and the percentage growth compared to the previous week.</p><ul><li><p>Mexico (+1200% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Brazil (+185% on January 20)</p></li><li><p>France (+165% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Germany (+142% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Canada (+119% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Spain (+106% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Portugal (+97% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>The UK (+86% on January 19)</p></li><li><p>Australia (+19% on January 15)</p></li><li><p>Japan (+18% on January 18)</p></li></ul><p>(Note: In many cases, DNS traffic had been growing for more than a week, so countries with recent growth may show higher percentages.)</p><p>Those trends are consistent with apps like RedNote rising on top of the Android and iOS App Stores, according to <a href="http://data.ai"><u>Data.ai</u></a>.</p><p>The rapid increases in DNS traffic can be clearly seen in the graphs below:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/619Z2yoZlVuATOgN3DHBXX/6d3266656dfcea4cce601a2a4b6306bb/image10.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/71fJCQSX0K7aG072m6muva/3c96f32a6be1595cbeb9d03249baac86/image11.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6RBoRKMmKva2E1pHEeQytf/6e98cd7586370e34af8b73814a2718e4/image8.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4aFxiYyzMD8w1JugtBLVvx/e824cb4c4f2d4beb8fcdcfe01ed3393a/image7.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/28NKyTWZ1L0YWObIBlfiSv/f0d2e14ec39a90e20751f58ef4b953b9/image13.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7u3ekAZgdlOMkmyvpAvxZx/6c5b8fdb1fe590cc67498cf41d7907fb/image5.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6vFqDPx17F2LjgUDA922px/dabce8ce69fae17779241aa69b47db4c/image1.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4BalkDrhzcYMfgikD3qNSB/6afae6e46ffc3feff41fbb129c4b5408/image15.png" />
          </figure><p>If you’re interested in more trends and insights about the Internet, check out <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. Follow us on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky).</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[TikTok]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">17jSeXT3kNCEM1V3rVeCL3</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[TikTok ban takes hold: data reveals sharp traffic decline and rapid shift to alternatives]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/tiktok-ban-traffic-decline-alternatives-rednote/</link>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ On January 19, 2025, ByteDance shut down access to TikTok and other owned/operated apps for US users, causing an 85% traffic plunge and a rapid shift to alternatives like RedNote. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The United States ban on TikTok went into effect on January 19, 2025, and our data showed a clear impact starting after 03:30 UTC (10:30 PM ET on January 18, 2025). The ban was part of the "<a href="https://www.congress.gov/118/plaws/publ50/PLAW-118publ50.pdf"><u>Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act</u></a>," proposed in Congress, which ordered ByteDance to divest due to alleged security concerns. The bill was signed into law by Congress and President Biden in April 2024, and was upheld by the Supreme Court.</p><p>Aggregated data from our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 DNS resolver</u></a> shows — as we’ve posted <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1880890502364672216"><u>on X</u></a> — that the TikTok shutdown in the US began to impact DNS traffic to TikTok-related domains on January 19, just after 03:30 UTC (22:30 ET on January 18). This includes DNS traffic not only for TikTok, but also for other ByteDance-owned platforms, such as the CapCut video editor. Traffic dropped by as much as 85% compared to the previous week and showed signs of further decline in the following hours.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4y2Pqb3NMy3PtkKR9njnZk/eadf128533b1979efff2c4a4bebd63aa/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.00.11.png" />
          </figure><p>Around that time, a message indicating the TikTok ban began appearing for US users.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Y49JNNy1mrt02mC8GZ7CH/039f7c1e6c11a33b5edc6f967d805771/GhoGzFfWsAApInt.png" />
          </figure><p>Analyzing data from <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous systems or networks</u></a>, traffic from TikTok owner ByteDance’s network (AS396986) in the US to Cloudflare experienced a sharp decline, dropping by as much as 95% after 03:30 UTC (22:30 ET).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/20dtSdJ9V7F25P4mFM8IC7/578f56a58edbefd73f35cd61187ddceb/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_10.10.14.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Alternatives like RedNote (Xiaohongshu) surge in the US</h2>
      <a href="#alternatives-like-rednote-xiaohongshu-surge-in-the-us">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>DNS traffic in the US for TikTok alternatives, driven by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaohongshu"><u>RedNote</u></a> (Xiaohongshu or Little Red Book), has been steadily growing since January 13. It surged on January 19 by as much as 74% around 04:00 UTC (23:00 ET on January 18) compared to the previous week, with growth being less intensive during nighttime in the US (around 22%).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2BFopXEWaqXVYhZhlg06dv/a66426a2d7fb91be0012a1118e322a41/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.12.04.png" />
          </figure><p>Daily DNS traffic in the US for TikTok alternatives has increased since January 13, reaching as much as 116% growth on January 15. Sunday, January 19, is on track to surpass that growth.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3nhJxzFWyqzXd1rAVagznf/3e1ac444ed40ce85b0e84946f3dc7c06/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.17.45.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>RedNote impacting other countries</h2>
      <a href="#rednote-impacting-other-countries">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>DNS traffic for TikTok alternatives, driven by RedNote, has been growing in the last few days, and not only in the US. </p><p>The other countries where we observed a clear increase in daily DNS traffic to TikTok alternatives were Mexico (a 500% increase on January 18), Canada (68% on January 18), the UK (53% on January 18), Germany (110% on January 18), and France (75% on January 18). These increases are shown in the graphs below:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/nZTi56Jb50MNTHrc7EuId/9ecd46b673cb8f578b13b214627e9bdb/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.24.01.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1LeAwtSaNvpqtmy1y2myZ0/a8d613889f8d5ff21b5ad8f85abde89e/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.25.16.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3hJI9YsojdQJykKQBszA4A/927d1cdcf4558128a284e6237632d37d/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.24.42.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7uTV1uX8aDGP2gdDxyjhx5/3e13693564c41a100338716c6dc466f1/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_14.24.20.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7DkqD8rlSxzTFPjwAGBdx9/39df5d9f89515cf65eca94faf631217d/Screenshot_2025-01-19_at_15.53.38.png" />
          </figure><p>Those trends are consistent with apps like RedNote rising on top of the Android and iOS App Stores, according to <a href="http://data.ai"><u>Data.ai</u></a>.</p><p>President-elect Donald Trump <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-likely-give-tiktok-90-day-extension-avoid-ban-rcna188258"><u>indicated</u></a> on January 18 that he plans to grant TikTok a 90-day extension following his inauguration on Monday, January 20, 2025.</p><p>We will continue monitoring the TikTok ban and share updates through a new blog post or on <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky).</p><p>——
<a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1881389924735398382"><u><b>UPDATE</b></u></a><u><b>, January 20, 2025, 17:00 UTC:</b></u></p><p>On Sunday, January 19, 2025, around 17:30 UTC (12:30 ET), after 14 hours of the shutdown, TikTok announced it was beginning service restoration following assurances from Donald Trump. DNS traffic began to recover slightly after 18:00 but remained near "shutdown" levels for several hours, with traffic from AS396986 (ByteDance) showing a similar trend.</p><p>As of Monday, January 20, 2025, TikTok-related domains in the U.S. remain below pre-shutdown levels. Despite some fluctuations overnight, DNS traffic to those domains has been recovering and at 17:00 UTC (11:00 AM ET) is already only 14% lower than the same time last week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6JJnmu9FCbN2bRLHbLpISb/cb96d309cb1a9f0538f779fa187aad66/Screenshot_2025-01-20_at_17.09.36.png" />
          </figure><p>
</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[TikTok]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2SBjZFXkq8YOFgTPaQMyPI</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[When the world logs off: Christmas, New Year’s, and the Internet’s holiday rhythm]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/when-the-world-logs-off-christmas-new-years-and-the-internets-holiday-rhythm/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ From Christmas Eve dinners in Europe to New Year’s Eve countdowns in Asia, Cloudflare data reveals how global festivities have typically shaped Internet usage and cultural rhythms ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>As January approaches and the year comes to a close, distinct changes in global Internet usage emerge. Year-end traditions — ranging from Christmas feasts to New Year’s Eve (NYE) countdowns — shape online behavior across continents and cultures. Looking back at Christmas and NYE 2023 offers insights into how these trends may repeat this year, and by January 2025, we’ll be able to directly compare patterns. Examining data from 50 countries and regions reveals how people celebrated in 2023-2024, providing a timely reminder of typical holiday trends.</p><p>With Cloudflare’s global reach, we observe planet-wide and local Internet habits during the holiday season. In the past, unintended trends during Christmas and New Year’s Eve have surfaced through our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/outage-center"><u>Outage Center</u></a>, which uses automatic traffic anomaly alerts to detect Internet outages or unusual patterns. In the 2023 <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/outage-center?dateStart=2023-12-21&amp;dateEnd=2024-01-02"><u>overview below</u></a>, traffic dropped enough on those days to trigger dozens of anomaly alerts (orange and pink bubbles):</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6pPt1Ccp2AVqdhCqhOsEEk/424f5cddd931ae86a5a2e21dbabb2eda/image6.png" />
          </figure><p>While Christmas dominates in many regions, other cultural and religious holidays — like Hanukkah or regional festivities — shape online rhythms in places where Western traditions are less central.</p><p>In countries and regions where Christmas is deeply rooted, Internet traffic slows during Christmas Eve dinners, midnight masses, morning gift exchanges, and Christmas Day lunches.</p><p>This blog post focuses exclusively on non-bot-related Internet traffic requests, filtering out automated activity to provide a clearer view of genuine human behavior during the holiday season. Before going into location-specific perspectives, here’s a global hourly view of Internet traffic during Christmas and New Year’s Eve 2023 from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;loc=US&amp;timeCompare=1&amp;dt=2023-12-18_2024-01-02"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>, highlighting notable drops (in UTC, so it captures impacts across more days due to time zones spanning over 23 hours, from New Zealand to Hawaii in the US):</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2K08u0Q3BgqtwNAQEZCinh/d1eead7068ce053173fa2aca9fb031c9/image5.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Global Christmas and New Year’s Eve daily trends</h2>
      <a href="#global-christmas-and-new-years-eve-daily-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Let’s start with a ranking of countries and regions and their top low-traffic holiday dates, showing each day’s percentage drop. Many locations like the US see clear dips on December 24 and 25 as people celebrate Christmas Eve and Christmas Day offline, and some show smaller declines (compared to Christmas) around December 31 as the New Year approaches. Still, the exact order and magnitude differ, reflecting cultural nuances — some nations experience greater drops on Christmas Eve, others on Christmas Day, and others signal unique patterns tied to New Year’s Eve or January 1 celebrations.</p><p>In the next table, locations are listed first (in the left column) by those with the lowest traffic on December 24 (and the highest percentage of traffic drop), followed by December 25, and finally December 31 (in the right column).</p><p><b>Top days with the lowest Internet traffic in December 2023 - January 2024</b></p><p>(with respective percentage drops, if any, from the previous week)</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Denmark</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-35%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-11%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>South Africa</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-27%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-15%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-5%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Norway</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-32%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-12%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>United Kingdom</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-26%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-19%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Portugal</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-32%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-24%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Italy</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-25%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-25%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Poland</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-31%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-21%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Australia</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-25%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-15%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-1%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Spain</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-28%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-25%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Ireland</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-24%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-22%)</p><p>#3 December 23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Sweden</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-26%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-6%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>New Zealand</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-22%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-8%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-4%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Chile</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-23%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-24%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-3%)</p></td><td><p><b>Canada</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-19%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-15%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Finland</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-23%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-16%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Nigeria</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-18%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-19%)</p><p>#3 January 1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>France</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-22%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-19%)</p><p>#3 December 23</p></td><td><p><b>Philippines</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-16%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-7%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Germany</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-21%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-9%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Hong Kong</b></p><p>#1 December 25 (-9%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-6%)</p><p>#3 December 23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Mexico</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-21%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-19%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Belgium</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-1%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-20%)</p><p>#3 December 25 (-17%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Romania</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-20%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-14%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-3%)</p></td><td><p><b>Indonesia</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-1%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-7%)</p><p>#3 December 24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>United States</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-16%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-21%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Netherlands</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-10%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-10%)</p><p>#3 December 25 (-20%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Brazil</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-14%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-26%)</p><p>#3 December 31</p></td><td><p><b>Ukraine</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-10%)</p><p>#2 December 24 (-5%)</p><p>#3 December 30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Colombia</b></p><p>#1 December 24 (-14%)</p><p>#2 December 25 (-26%)</p><p>#3 December 31 (-4%)</p></td><td><p><b>Thailand</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-6%)</p><p>#2 January 1 (-2%)</p><p>#3 December 25 (-2%) </p></td></tr></table><p>The data shows that in many European countries — such as Denmark, Norway, the United Kingdom, Portugal, Italy, Poland, Spain, Ireland, Sweden, Finland, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Romania — Christmas Eve (December24) and Christmas Day (December25) consistently register the biggest drops in Internet traffic. These dips suggest that in much of Europe, Christmas traditions take people firmly offline, whether it’s for family gatherings, festive meals, or religious observances. Outside Europe, similar patterns appear in predominantly Christian-influenced regions, including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States, and several Latin American countries (like Brazil, Chile, and Colombia), confirming that the holiday’s cultural importance is mirrored in their online habits.</p><p>In contrast, locations less influenced by Western Christmas traditions, such as those in Asia, show subtler or different patterns. For example, Hong Kong and the Philippines do show declines in traffic, reflecting a hybrid of local and global influences, while places like Thailand and Indonesia present smaller dips on Christmas compared to other days or emphasize different holidays altogether. These variations highlight that while Christmas exerts a strong pull offline in many parts of the world, its impact on Internet usage is shaped by local cultural contexts.</p><p>As an example, here’s the US perspective from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;loc=US&amp;timeCompare=1&amp;dt=2023-12-18_2024-01-02"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>, where the drop in traffic during Christmas and New Year 2023 is evident:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Z2ODYM1L5vlBdZHhEdq4W/84b2144c586b01db3e3e99bb3bd05bc6/image3.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Where Christmas isn’t central</h2>
      <a href="#where-christmas-isnt-central">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Not every country’s December revolves around Christmas. In Israel, for example, Hanukkah’s timing changes year to year, influencing when people log off. In 2023, Hanukkah started on December 7, leading to an 8% traffic drop that day and 7% on the following days through December 10. Interestingly, in some years like 2024, Hanukkah begins closer to December 25, potentially overlapping with Western Christmas.</p><p><b>Countries where Christmas didn’t have a clear impact</b></p><table><tr><td><p><b>Turkey</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-18%)</p><p>#2 December 29</p><p>#3 December 30</p></td><td><p><b>Israel</b></p><p>#1 December 29</p><p>#2 January 5</p><p>#3 December 30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Japan</b></p><p>#1 December 31 (-8%)</p><p>#2 January 1</p><p>#3 December 30 — December 24 with -3%</p></td><td><p><b>Vietnam</b></p><p>#1 January 1 (-7%)</p><p>#2 December 31 (-3%)</p><p>#3 January 2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Russia</b></p><p>#1 December31 (-23%)</p><p>#2 January 1 (-15%)</p><p>#3 December 30</p></td><td><p><b>Singapore</b></p><p>#1 December 16</p><p>#2 December 17</p><p>#3 December 18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>India</b></p><p>#1 December 17</p><p>#2 December 16</p><p>#3 December 24</p></td><td><p><b>Bangladesh</b></p><p>#1 December 15</p><p>#2 December 16</p><p>#3 December 18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Saudi Arabia</b></p><p>#1 January 5</p><p>#2 January 6</p><p>#3 January 8</p></td><td><p><b>China</b></p><p>#1 December 19</p><p>#2 December 15</p><p>#3 December 18</p></td></tr></table><p>Now, let’s focus on a more granular perspective of these trends, showing the impact of Christmas dinners and lunches, and also New Year’s Eve drops in traffic.</p><p><i>Note: Unless otherwise noted, all times used in this blog post are local ones; in countries with several timezones, we’re using the timezone where more people live (for the US, Eastern time is used).</i></p>
    <div>
      <h2>A more granular perspective of Christmas: offline feasts and morning quiet</h2>
      <a href="#a-more-granular-perspective-of-christmas-offline-feasts-and-morning-quiet">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/AnOIfryr3c8zSAc23SRKD/f3ee2dd0ed6f8d4f54a951663e2916e7/image4.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Europe</h3>
      <a href="#europe">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In Europe, Christmas traditions dominate, leading to the most significant Internet traffic drops. Christmas Eve dinner is a near-universal offline moment, with countries like Spain (-70% at 21:45), Portugal (-70% at 20:30), and Denmark (-68% at 19:45) experiencing the steepest declines. On Christmas Day, mornings are quieter as people relax or attend religious services, while festive lunches drive further drops, with traffic down 43% at 13:45 in Portugal and 44% at 07:15 in France.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Americas</h3>
      <a href="#americas">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In the Americas, holiday patterns reflect a mix of cultural traditions. In the United States, Christmas Eve traffic drops by 29% at 20:15, aligning with evening family gatherings, and Christmas Day sees a 32% decline at 09:15, reflecting quieter mornings.</p><p>In Latin America, Christmas Eve (Nochebuena) takes center stage, with significant traffic declines aligning with late-night traditions like the Midnight Toast (in <a href="https://christmasenthusiasts.co.uk/classic-traditions/how-do-people-celebrate-christmas-in-the-southern-hemisphere-where-its-summer"><u>Argentina</u></a>, the late-night feast is quite popular) and Misa de Gallo (Midnight Mass). For example:</p><ul><li><p>Colombia: -48% at 21:45</p></li><li><p>Argentina: -58% at 22:00; -67% at midnight</p></li><li><p>Chile: -64% at 22:45</p></li><li><p>Mexico: -50% at 21:45</p></li><li><p>Brazil: -22% at 21:45</p></li></ul><p>These late-night traffic dips highlight the region’s emphasis on midnight celebrations, family feasts, and religious observances.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Asia Pacific</h3>
      <a href="#asia-pacific">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Asian locations influenced by Western traditions, such as the Philippines and Hong Kong, experience moderate Christmas dips but shift focus to New Year’s celebrations — more on NYE below.</p><p>In the Southern Hemisphere, Australia and New Zealand experience their steepest traffic drops during Christmas lunch, with Australia seeing a 43% decrease at 13:45 and New Zealand recording a 42% decline.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Middle East and Africa</h3>
      <a href="#middle-east-and-africa">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In regions less influenced by Christmas, holiday traffic patterns vary significantly. For example, Nigeria sees a 26% drop at lunchtime on Christmas Day, while South Africa records a 37% decline at 14:15, reflecting offline family gatherings.</p><p>In predominantly non-Christian countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia, December 24-25 does not show significant dips; instead, other cultural holidays drive offline moments. For example, as we’ve noted, Israel experienced up to an 8% drop in 2023 during Hanukkah, particularly in the first four days after December 7. In <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/easter-passover-ramadan-internet-trends-2023/"><u>previous blog posts</u></a>, we have shown how events like <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-ramadan-shows-up-in-internet-trends/"><u>Ramadan</u></a> clearly impact Internet traffic in countries with large Muslim populations. One example from our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ae?compareWith=ID&amp;cf_history_state=%7B%22guid%22%3A%22C255D9FF78CD46CDA4F76812EA68C350%22%2C%22historyId%22%3A15%2C%22targetId%22%3A%2211B31B8E5374713A1265DF95F60D0530%22%7D#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Year in Review 2024</u></a> highlights Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates, where traffic dropped during Eid al-Fitr, the festival marking the end of Ramadan (April 9-10, 2024).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2NCDJ1EQZaBbqAn5KKeN7s/1fe50400f25c144f24292bfbf4fe821e/image2.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>The Boxing Day revival</h3>
      <a href="#the-boxing-day-revival">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Boxing Day on December 26 marks a significant digital rebound in countries like the UK, Canada, Australia (where there is a higher increase from the previous week, with daily traffic growing 9%), and New Zealand, as people return online after the Christmas break. Traditionally associated with charitable activities, family gatherings, and shopping, the day sees traffic spikes across these regions:</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>December 26 increase in daily traffic</b></p></td><td><p><b>Higher traffic increase on December 26</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>+9%</p></td><td><p>December 26; 09:30: +20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>+2%</p></td><td><p>December 26; 13:00: +16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>+1%</p></td><td><p>December 26, 08:15: +19%</p></td></tr></table><p>Here is the list of locations that saw a clear drop in traffic on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day morning or lunch. We selected the time (morning or lunch) with the bigger drop compared to the previous week for further analysis. The list is ordered by the Christmas Eve dinner drop. Countries like Russia (where <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/59905614"><u>Orthodox Christians</u></a> celebrate Christmas later, on January 7), Japan, China, Indonesia, Turkey, Israel, Thailand, Egypt, Singapore, Vietnam, and Bangladesh showed no impact during Christmas Eve dinner or Christmas Day morning or lunch.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Location</b></p></td><td><p><b>Christmas Eve Dinner Drop</b></p></td><td><p><b>Christmas Day Morning/Lunch Drop</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>-70% at 21:45</p></td><td><p>-51% at 08:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>-70% at 20:30</p></td><td><p>-43% at 13:45 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Denmark</p></td><td><p>-68% at 19:45</p></td><td><p>-43% at 06:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>-64% at 22:45; (-65% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-49% at 09:00 (morning) </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway</p></td><td><p>-63% at 18:45</p></td><td><p>-50% at 06:45 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>-60% at 18:15</p></td><td><p>-43% at 06:30 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>-59% at 17:15</p></td><td><p>-51% at 07:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>-58% at 22:00 (-67% at 00:00, December 25)</p></td><td><p>-52% at 09:00 (morning) </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>-55% at 21:15</p></td><td><p>-44% at 07:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>-55% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-44% at 07:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>-50% at 21:45</p></td><td><p>-38% at 08:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>-50% at 20:15</p></td><td><p>-46% at 07:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>-50% at 19:45</p></td><td><p>-46% at 06:30 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>-50% at 19:15</p></td><td><p>-42% at 06:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>-49% at 18:00</p></td><td><p>-26% at 12:30 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>-48% at 21:45</p></td><td><p>-49% at 08:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>-47% at 19:15</p></td><td><p>-36% at 07:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>-47% at 16:30</p></td><td><p>-36% at 07:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finland</p></td><td><p>-42% at 17:45</p></td><td><p>-42% at 08:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>-40% at 18:15</p></td><td><p>-36% at 15:15 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>-37% at 19:00</p></td><td><p>-37% at 14:15 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>-34% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-34% at 06:30 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-34% at 18:00</p></td><td><p>-38% at 14:45 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-32% at 20:30</p></td><td><p>-31% at 09:30 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>-30% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-35% at 06:45 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>-29% at 20:15</p></td><td><p>-32% at 09:15 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>-23% at 20:45</p></td><td><p>-43% at 13:45 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Zealand</p></td><td><p>-23% at 18:30</p></td><td><p>-42% at 13:15 (lunch)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>-22% at 21:45</p></td><td><p>-42% at 08:00 (morning)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>-22% at 21:30</p></td><td><p>-29% at 06:45 (morning)</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h2>New Year’s Eve: A planetary offline moment</h2>
      <a href="#new-years-eve-a-planetary-offline-moment">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6fK4TEIFANRI6YxNUH6toS/e2ea778748511440f8a4f2103519c651/image1.png" />
          </figure><p>Midnight, December 31 is a shared offline moment worldwide, as people step away from their screens to celebrate. To provide a more accurate assessment of New Year’s Eve’s impact, we compare traffic at 00:00 on January 1 with 00:00 on December 18, avoiding distortions caused by Christmas-related patterns. This approach highlights the distinct drop in Internet activity due to New Year’s celebrations.</p><p>Across Europe, countries like Portugal (-60%) and Romania (-60%) see dramatic traffic drops, reflecting widespread offline gatherings. Spain (-56%) and Germany (-49%) also experience steep declines, emphasizing the importance of this tradition across the region. Even Northern Europe mirrors this trend, with Denmark (-41%), Norway (-39%), and Sweden (-29%) showing significant dips.</p><p>In the Americas, this offline moment is particularly pronounced in Latin America, where family and communal gatherings dominate. Argentina (-66%) and Chile (-74%) lead the region, with Brazil (-46%) and Colombia (-44%) following closely. In North America, the impact is less dramatic due to time zone variations — in this case, with millions of people spread out in distinct time zones. Canada records a 14% drop, and the United States shows a modest 12% decline compared to December 18.</p><p>In Asia and the Pacific, New Year’s Eve celebrations heavily influence Internet trends. Thailand saw a 31% drop, Indonesia 23%, and Japan 16%, also reflecting this region’s focus on communal gatherings and celebrations. Australia (-21%) and New Zealand (-11%), among the first countries to welcome the New Year, also show noticeable declines as midnight festivities take center stage.</p><p>In the Middle East and Africa, Turkey (-23%), South Africa (-32%), and Nigeria (-15%) exhibit significant offline engagement at midnight. Israel records a smaller but notable 6% dip before midnight, reflecting localized variations in celebration styles.</p><p>Of course, this offline intermission doesn’t last long. After a few hours, people return to their devices. France sees a 37% surge at 3:15 on January 1, while Turkey experiences a 36% upswing in the early hours.</p><p>Next, we present the list of locations with clear drops in traffic at midnight on New Year’s Eve, compared to December 18, ordered by percentage of drop. </p><table><tr><td><p><b>Locations</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 1, 00:00 drop compared to December 18</b></p></td><td><p><b>Locations</b></p></td><td><p><b>January 1, 00:00 drop compared to December 18</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chile</p></td><td><p>-74%</p></td><td><p>Thailand</p></td><td><p>-31%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Argentina</p></td><td><p>-66%</p></td><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>-30%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>-60%</p></td><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>-29%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>-60%</p></td><td><p>Vietnam</p></td><td><p>-27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>-56%</p></td><td><p>United Kingdom</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>-49%</p></td><td><p>Ukraine</p></td><td><p>-25%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brazil</p></td><td><p>-46%</p></td><td><p>Indonesia</p></td><td><p>-23%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mexico</p></td><td><p>-44%</p></td><td><p>Turkey</p></td><td><p>-23%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colombia</p></td><td><p>-44%</p></td><td><p>Australia</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Philippines</p></td><td><p>-43%</p></td><td><p>Hong Kong</p></td><td><p>-21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>-42%</p></td><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>-19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>-41%</p></td><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>-17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Denmark</p></td><td><p>-41%</p></td><td><p>Japan</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>-40%</p></td><td><p>South Korea</p></td><td><p>-16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>-39%</p></td><td><p>Nigeria</p></td><td><p>-15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway</p></td><td><p>-39%</p></td><td><p>Canada</p></td><td><p>-14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>-33%</p></td><td><p>Finland</p></td><td><p>-14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russia</p></td><td><p>-32%</p></td><td><p>Singapore</p></td><td><p>-13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>-32%</p></td><td><p>United States</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Africa</p></td><td><p>-32%</p></td><td><p>China</p></td><td><p>-12%</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion: A mosaic of traditions and digital habits</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion-a-mosaic-of-traditions-and-digital-habits">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>What emerges from these patterns is a rich tapestry of cultural habits. While Christmas Eve and Day are central offline moments in Europe and the Americas, other regions mark their quiet days on different dates, shaped by unique holidays and customs. The insights from 50 countries and regions confirm how cultural traditions guide when people step away from screens.</p><p>As the Gregorian calendar year comes to a close, the universal appeal of stepping offline becomes clear. Whether raising glasses at the stroke of midnight, exchanging greetings, or lighting candles for festivals like Hanukkah, these moments remind us that while the Internet connects billions, cultural rhythms still shape our relationship with technology. Whether feasting with loved ones or counting down to a new year, humans everywhere find reasons to unplug — if only for a moment.</p><p>If you’re interested in more trends and insights about the Internet, check out <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. Follow us on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky), or contact us via email.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5hrEiGd7frxGgAirAdHCM0</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Global elections in 2024: Internet traffic and cyber threat trends]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/elections-2024-internet/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ In 2024, as elections took place across over 60 countries, the Internet became both a battleground for cyberattacks and a vital platform for democratic engagement. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Elections define the course of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_democracy#/media/File:Age_of_democracies_at_the_end_of_2015,_OWID.svg"><u>democracies</u></a> (even as there are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_democracy#/media/File:Electoral_democracies.svg"><u>several </u></a>types of democracies), and 2024 was a landmark year, with over 60 countries — plus the European Union — holding national elections, impacting half the world’s population. As highlighted in <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/12/11/global-elections-in-2024-what-we-learned-in-a-year-of-political-disruption/"><u>Pew Research’s global elections report</u></a>, this was a year of “political disruption,” where the Internet was a relevant stage for both democratic engagement and cyber threats.</p><p>At Cloudflare, with our presence in <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/network/"><u>over 330 cities and 120 countries and interconnection with 12,500 networks</u></a>, we’ve witnessed firsthand the digital impact of these elections. From monitoring Internet traffic patterns to mitigating cyberattacks, we’ve observed trends that reveal how elections increasingly play out online. As detailed in our just-published <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/impact/"><u>Cloudflare Impact report</u></a>, we’ve also worked to protect media outlets, political campaigns, and help elections worldwide.</p><p>Here’s the map of countries with national elections that took place in 2024, from our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>elections report</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3lto8GbhqRNphtxGcSipqj/9422932d5766cd35a050b499161c874f/BLOG-2648_2.png" />
          </figure><p>
We’ve been monitoring 2024 elections worldwide on our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/election-security/"><u>blog</u></a> and in the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>2024 Election Insights report</u></a> available on <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>.</p><p>In terms of Internet patterns, we’ve observed how cyber activity in 2024 continues to intersect with real-world events. Online attacks are clearly a significant part of elections, even when unsuccessful in disrupting candidates or election-related websites due to strong protections. Additionally, Internet traffic patterns often vary on election day depending on the country, and government-directed <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-outages"><u>Internet shutdowns</u></a> continue, including ones related to elections. Email activity is also influenced, especially for more popular candidates in “<a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/12/11/global-elections-in-2024-what-we-learned-in-a-year-of-political-disruption/"><u>polarized battles</u></a>.”</p><p>Let’s start our review with attacks. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Rising threats: political and election-related cyberattacks in 2024</h2>
      <a href="#rising-threats-political-and-election-related-cyberattacks-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>During 2024, elections saw a rise in DDoS attacks targeting political campaigns, parties, and election infrastructure.</p><p>In the <b>United States</b>, over 6 billion malicious requests were blocked between November 1-6. A set of DDoS attacks leading up to Election Day on November 5 targeted one of the campaigns with multiple days of attacks, peaking at 700,000 requests per second and sustaining 8 Gbps during major strikes. Key attack tactics included cache-busting, geodiverse patterns, and randomized user agents.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2LUqmbf6tgYWBxAUhux8tf/401681b4b325ff8a90acae824060cd32/BLOG-2648_3.png" />
          </figure><p>State and local websites also faced increased threats, with 290 million malicious requests blocked since September under Cloudflare’s Athenian Project. Compared to 2020, attacks in 2024 were far more intense, underscoring the growing need for robust cybersecurity to protect elections from disruption.</p><p>In <b>France</b>, DDoS attacks plagued multiple political parties, with peaks reaching 96,000 requests per second (rps) on election day, July 7. Additional details are available in our related <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/2024-french-elections-political-cyber-attacks-and-internet-traffic-shifts/"><u>blog post</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2vXeTFoMMMprBcFQHtGT4E/d799e896740ebd74a2803e6d21e6b1d1/BLOG-2648_4.png" />
          </figure><p>In the <b>United Kingdom</b>, DDoS attacks targeted political parties, with the most severe incident affecting a campaign website, reaching 156,000 rps shortly after the results were announced on election day. Additional details are available in our related <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/uk-election-day-2024-traffic-trends-and-attacks-on-political-parties/"><u>blog post</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/43DeCSFeJHsPMK3MqgGhMJ/b0cf8050e2751e4fc2cb745ccb93f839/BLOG-2648_5.png" />
          </figure><p>During the European parliamentary elections in early June, cyberattacks targeted several political websites around election days. Notably, a significant DDoS attack focused on two politically-related websites in the <b>Netherlands</b> on June 5–6 (with June 6 being election day), peaking at 73,000 rps.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1Z5F68CqmuIftAd7mNyzht/e5181cdf2fc64bd2f5b3c3a61fbf0374/BLOG-2648_6.png" />
          </figure><p>In <b>Romania</b>, the weeks leading up to the election cycle culminating in the December 1 parliamentary elections saw DDoS attacks targeting political party websites and news organizations.</p><p>In <b>South Africa</b>, where the general election took place on May 29, there was a relevant DDoS attack in the weeks leading up to the election, targeting a major news site within the country for several days, with a peak on May 7 of 54,000 requests per second.</p><p>In <b>Portugal</b>, several DDoS attacks targeted political party websites on election day, March 10, particularly after polling stations closed. One political party’s websites experienced a peak of 69,000 rps on May 11 at 00:50 UTC.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3Bh3PXP8WCMOz2hW1ndHJO/84f89609bd8d232104ee682ed04d5fe8/BLOG-2648_7.png" />
          </figure><p>In <b>Taiwan</b>, a local fact-checking website faced a DDoS attack three days before the election, on January 10.</p><p>In <b>Japan</b>, a DDoS attack targeted a website used to report scams and misinformation a week before the October 27 election.</p><p>While some of these rates may seem small to Cloudflare, they can be devastating for websites not well-protected against such high levels of traffic. DDoS attacks not only overwhelm systems but also serve, if successful, as a distraction for IT teams while attackers attempt other types of breaches.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Election-related Internet shutdowns </h3>
      <a href="#election-related-internet-shutdowns">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Several times in 2024, election-related Internet shutdowns were imposed by authorities for various reasons, such as in the Comoros and Pakistan.</p><p><b>Comoros</b>, a small archipelago country in Southeastern Africa with a population of less than 1 million, held presidential elections on January 14, which led to <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-68027892"><u>protests</u></a> against the re-election of President Azali Assoumani. Authorities shut down the Internet on January 17, causing a <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1748326986936635764"><u>50%</u></a> drop in traffic compared to the previous week, lasting for two days.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/72ba6O4SEVjDesw4W9hUTP/7a5e06d815f8dcefc91599d030ef5e99/BLOG-2648_8.png" />
          </figure><p><b>Pakistan’s</b> general election day on February 8 was marked by <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q1-2024-internet-disruption-summary/#pakistan"><u>an Internet shutdown targeting mobile networks</u></a>. The outage began around 02:00 UTC, reducing Internet traffic by 50% compared to the previous week. Traffic only began recovering after 15:00, highlighting the severe impact of government-initiated shutdowns on Internet connectivity.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7J1emwVOlzOXIqgQicFF0j/76b7410baba969406a138a9a2ce444d9/BLOG-2648_9.png" />
          </figure><p>In <b>Mauritius</b>, an island nation in the Indian Ocean with under 2 million residents, the <a href="https://apnews.com/article/mauritius-social-media-suspension-elections-pravind-jugnauth-2e4e13fcd2ab37c32f85e4d042726022"><u>government suspended access to social media</u></a> platforms from November 1 to November 11 ahead of the November 10 parliamentary elections. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Other election-related Internet traffic trends </h2>
      <a href="#other-election-related-internet-traffic-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Election-day Internet traffic patterns often reflect a country’s dominant device usage, with mobile-first nations like Indonesia, Mozambique, and Ghana experiencing noticeable traffic drops after polling stations closed. While mobile-friendly countries generally see steady or higher weekend traffic compared to desktop-focused regions like Europe and the Americas, no consistent trend emerged linking device preference to overall election-day traffic increases or decreases.</p><p>Here’s a world map from our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/"><u>Year in Review 2024</u></a> showing countries where mobile (purple) or desktop (green) dominates Internet traffic.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/PkHEsQJb6AQXtjWkRYfXP/f3d1c9d2d5190f9bd76cbbb1491b3e05/BLOG-2648_10.png" />
          </figure><p>Now, let’s explore a selection of relevant elections with Internet traffic impacts, ordered by election dates:</p><p><b>Taiwan (January 13)
</b>Taiwan’s presidential election saw traffic drop slightly during polling hours, especially in the morning with an 8% drop. Traffic returned to usual levels after 17:00 local time. Post-election, traffic rose by 5% the next morning compared to the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6C1idfrGkUZFDdZY8NJXm4/4cc00af6e267508a622505fccac9571a/BLOG-2648_11.png" />
          </figure><p><b>Finland (January 28)
</b>On January 28, Finland held its presidential election. Internet traffic dropped by 24% at 11:00 local time, coinciding with higher voter turnout in the morning. A second noticeable drop of 13% occurred at 20:00 when polling stations closed and TV stations broadcast initial projections, though traffic was slightly higher than usual afterward.</p><p><b>Indonesia (February 14) 
</b>Indonesia held its general election on February 14. With over 200 million voters spread across 17,000 islands, it likely had the highest number of voters on a single day, unlike India’s multi-week election. During polling hours (08:00 to 13:00 local time), Internet traffic dropped by up to 15%. Traffic remained lower than the previous week for the rest of the day, with drops ranging from 8% to 16% throughout the night. Mobile device usage surged to 77%, the highest of the year, reflecting Indonesia’s mobile-first Internet culture. Traffic recovered the next morning, surpassing the previous week’s levels.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6GW0q1qUfbJcPbFjd21Vv/965626dabdc6ca4e3eb9e961cdec858a/BLOG-2648_12.png" />
          </figure><p><b>Portugal (March 10)
</b>Portugal’s parliamentary election on March 10 saw a sharp 16% traffic drop at 20:00 local time when TV stations began broadcasting projections. Traffic picked up after that and remained stable during the day.</p><p><b>Russia (March 17)
</b>Russia’s presidential election showed steady Internet traffic throughout the day but experienced a 7% decrease after polls closed as results and reactions were broadcast on TV. Unlike other countries, where post-election traffic surges are common, Russia’s pattern reflects the strong influence of broadcast media on election coverage.</p><p><b>South Korea (April 10)
</b>South Korea held legislative elections on April 10. Traffic was higher than usual before 05:00 local time but dropped 14% by 07:15 after polling stations opened at 06:00. By 11:45, traffic had rebounded above typical levels. After polling stations closed at 18:00, traffic dropped again, with a 7% decline compared to the previous week.</p><p><b>India (April 19–June 1) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-insights-on-2024-elections-in-the-netherlands-south-africa-iceland-india-and-mexico/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
India’s seven-phase general election saw significant Internet traffic fluctuations. May 7 recorded the largest nationwide traffic dip of 6%, with populous states like Uttar Pradesh seeing a 9% drop and Maharashtra experiencing a 17% decline. On the final election day (June 1), mobile device usage peaked at 68%, the highest of the year. These patterns underscore India’s mobile-first Internet habits and its diverse election timelines.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3G1p1RGYaAJy2t85MQkOmf/1b9e666380db8ca6cb5a241092466e3f/BLOG-2648_13.png" />
          </figure><p><b>North Macedonia (April 24 &amp; May 8)
</b>North Macedonia’s two-round presidential election featured a 56% traffic increase after 11:00 local time on May 8, sustained throughout the day. Similar, albeit smaller, trends were observed during the first round on April 24.</p><p><b>Panama (May 5)
</b>On May 5, Panama’s presidential and parliamentary election day, Internet traffic dropped significantly while voting stations were open, with a 23% decrease in the afternoon and 25% lower traffic at 21:30 local time as results were announced. Traffic picked up after that.</p><p><b>South Africa (May 29) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-insights-on-2024-elections-in-the-netherlands-south-africa-iceland-india-and-mexico/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
On May 29, South Africa’s general election saw Internet traffic decrease by 16% at 05:45 and remain lower throughout polling hours. Traffic surged by 25% the night before the election, peaking at midnight. Post-election, traffic increased by up to 12% early on May 30, highlighting the transition from offline to online engagement.</p><p><b>Mexico (June 2) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-insights-on-2024-elections-in-the-netherlands-south-africa-iceland-india-and-mexico/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
Mexico’s general election on June 2 saw a 3% daily traffic drop, with hourly dips of up to 11% during polling hours (08:00–20:00 local time). Traffic surged by 14% at 01:30 the following day as results were announced, peaking at 8% above the previous week by 22:00 local time.</p><p><b>Iceland (June 1)
</b>Iceland’s presidential election on June 1 saw minor Internet traffic drops, including a 12% dip between 14:00 and 16:00 local time, but traffic increased at night by as much as 11% at 20:00. The day after, traffic rose by 26% compared to the previous week. Iceland elected Halla Tómasdóttir as its second female president.</p><p><b>European Union (June 6–9) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-the-2024-eu-election-internet-traffic-trends-and-cybersecurity-insights/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
The 2024 European Parliament elections showed notable Internet traffic shifts and cybersecurity challenges. The Czech Republic and Slovakia experienced traffic drops of over 10%, while Finland and Ireland saw moderate declines. Key speeches, such as Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo’s resignation and French President Macron’s snap election announcement, also caused traffic fluctuations.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7s9Gc0c394zNszAUuc23Jb/e63c55e6477c875b8427469b881f0ec8/BLOG-2648_14.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Source: Cloudflare; created with Datawrapper</i></sup></p><p><b>Iran (June 28)
</b>Iran’s presidential election saw significant traffic fluctuations, with traffic falling by 16% after 17:30 local time. Extended polling hours (including at night) led to continued drops, falling to 24% lower by 22:30. After midnight, traffic rebounded, showing a 13% increase compared to the previous week.</p><p><b>France (June 30 &amp; July 7) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/2024-french-elections-political-cyber-attacks-and-internet-traffic-shifts/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
France’s legislative elections brought significant Internet and cybersecurity activity. On July 7, Internet traffic dropped 16% at 20:00 local time as polling stations closed and TV broadcasts announced results. Mobile device usage surged to 58%, and DNS traffic to news outlets spiked by 250% during the first round and by 244% on runoff day, reflecting heightened public interest.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3X3WZo3RMQu9944oUtc23V/2e2c61c3cc0d77045ff8fcd7ff0af8e2/BLOG-2648_15.png" />
          </figure><p><b>United Kingdom (July 4) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/uk-election-day-2024-traffic-trends-and-attacks-on-political-parties/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
The UK’s general election on July 4 saw the Labour Party win a majority after 14 years of Conservative rule. Internet traffic declined slightly during voting hours, with a 2% drop at noon, before surging in the evening as results were announced. Northern Ireland experienced the sharpest traffic drop (10%), compared to 6% in Scotland and 5% in Wales. DNS traffic to election-related domains peaked with increases of 600% at 22:00 and 671% at 04:00 the following day.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1O4VzkC2RZXUoSiaULXHir/b74a889b506a40ba0ff8f5894055b0b0/BLOG-2648_16.png" />
          </figure><p><b>Sri Lanka (September 21)
</b>Sri Lanka’s presidential election caused a 9% morning traffic dip and an 18% post-election surge after polls closed. Results triggered a 109% traffic increase at 03:00 local time on September 22.</p><p><b>Tunisia (October 6)
</b>Tunisia’s presidential election saw a 15% traffic dip at 17:00, followed by a 13% decline at 19:30 when results started arriving. The steady traffic decrease highlights the evening focus on offline engagement and result tracking.</p><p><b>Mozambique (October 9)
</b>Mozambique’s election drove an Internet traffic drop throughout the day, falling as much as 51% by 20:30 local time, and continuing lower than usual after that. A post-election surge of 16% occurred at 01:30. The election, held on a public holiday, resulted in a 31% daily traffic drop compared to the previous week.</p><p><b>Georgia (October 26)
</b>When Georgia held its parliamentary election on October 26, Internet traffic was 11% higher than the previous week, peaking at 67% above normal around 23:00 when results were announced. Unlike other countries, traffic only dipped slightly (2%) in the afternoon during polling hours.</p><p><b>Japan (October 27)
</b>Japan’s House of Representatives election saw Internet traffic decrease by 4% at 20:00 after polling stations closed, but it rose later in the evening.</p><p><b>Botswana (October 30)
</b>A traffic drop was observed throughout the day of Botswana’s general election, with a 42% decrease around 21:30 local time compared to the previous week.</p><p><b>United States (November 5) - </b><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/"><b><u>related blog post</u></b></a>
The US elections saw a 15% spike in Internet traffic, particularly after polls closed, with the Midwest leading. There were also specific spikes related to key moments during election night, as the next chart shows: </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1pSMZDroAQWViUyhwvvLEs/ccb47a566c67069350ca19ef6b241ce6/BLOG-2648_17.png" />
          </figure><p>DNS traffic surged by 756% to polling services and 325% to news sites. As highlighted in our recent <a href="https://cfl.re/4ipIdhZ"><u>Internet Services Year in Review blog post</u></a>, the US election also boosted DNS traffic and ranking positions for CNN, Fox News, and The New York Times, underscoring the Internet’s critical role during major political events.</p><p>In the US, beyond <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/"><u>election day</u></a>, we also reported in 2024 on trends surrounding the first <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-first-2024-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic-and-security-trends"><u>Biden vs. Trump debate</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-during-the-2024-us-republican-national-convention"><u>attempted assassination of Trump and the Republican National Convention</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-security-trends-2024-us-democratic-convention"><u>Democratic National Convention</u></a>, and the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-harris-trump-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic"><u>Harris-Trump presidential debate</u></a>.</p><p><b>Ghana (December 7)
</b>Ghana’s general election caused mid-morning traffic drops of 11%, followed by declines of 13% and 14% after polling stations closed at 17:00. These patterns indicate offline focus during results announcements.</p><p><b>Romania (December 1)
</b>Romania’s parliamentary election showed minimal traffic fluctuations during the day, though its November 24 presidential election remains disputed.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Email perspectives on the US presidential election</h2>
      <a href="#email-perspectives-on-the-us-presidential-election">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>From a cybersecurity perspective, trending <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/paris-2024-olympics-recap"><u>events</u></a>, topics, and individuals often attract more emails, including malicious, phishing, and spam messages. In our analysis <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/"><u>earlier</u></a> this year, we focused on the US presidential elections and the two major party candidates.</p><p>From June 1 to November 5, 2024, Cloudflare processed over 19 million emails mentioning "Donald Trump" or "Kamala Harris," with Trump appearing more frequently and in higher rates of spam (12%) and malicious emails (1.3%) compared to Harris (0.6% spam, 0.2% malicious). Nearly half were sent after September, with a surge in the final 10 campaign days.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6uAzBIxewULmhPPjNaWLYu/4464d2e3953d3a527651d78252f8aa8b/BLOG-2648_18.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion: the election cycle doesn’t stop</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion-the-election-cycle-doesnt-stop">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As a global election year, 2024 underscored how deeply the Internet is woven into the democratic process, serving both as a tool for engagement and a target for disruption. From relevant DDoS attacks to government-imposed Internet shutdowns, the challenges faced during these elections reflect a growing need for robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard critical infrastructure and ensure free, fair electoral processes.</p><p>In this context, Germany has announced an anticipated <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_German_federal_election"><u>federal election for February 23, 2025</u></a>, following the collapse of its governing coalition during the 2024 government crisis. This snap election joins others in France and the UK, reflecting a growing trend of political instability requiring urgent electoral responses.</p><p>Looking ahead, the increasing frequency and complexity of cyber threats, such as DDoS attacks on campaigns and election infrastructure, demand proactive defenses. Shutdowns like those in Pakistan and Comoros, along with surges in phishing and misinformation, highlight the need for closer collaboration between governments, technology providers, and civil society to safeguard democracy in the digital era.</p><p>If you want to follow more trends and insights about the Internet and elections in particular, you can check <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>, and more specifically our new <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>2024 Elections Insights</u></a> report.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Network Services]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">20PQRE3QVidqRIeb9OYby8</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Cloudflare 2024 Year in Review]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ The 2024 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review is our fifth annual review of Internet trends and patterns at both a global and country/region level. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024">2024 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review</a> is our fifth annual review of Internet trends and patterns observed throughout the year at both a global and country/region level across a variety of metrics. In this year’s review, we have added several new traffic, adoption, connectivity, and email security metrics, as well as the ability to do year-over-year and geographic comparisons for selected metrics. </p><p>Below, we present a summary of key findings, and then explore them in more detail in subsequent sections.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Key Findings</h2>
      <a href="#key-findings">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
    <div>
      <h3>Traffic</h3>
      <a href="#traffic">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Global Internet traffic grew 17.2% in 2024. <a href="#global-internet-traffic-grew-17-2-in-2024"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Google maintained its position as the most popular Internet service overall. OpenAI remained at the top of the Generative AI category. Binance remained at the top of the Cryptocurrency category. WhatsApp remained the top Messaging platform, and Facebook remained the top Social Media site. <a href="#google-maintained-its-position-as-the-most-popular-internet-service-openai-binance-whatsapp-and-facebook-led-their-respective-categories"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Global traffic from Starlink grew 3.3x in 2024, in line with last year’s growth rate. After initiating service in Malawi in July 2023, Starlink traffic from that country grew 38x in 2024. As Starlink added new markets, we saw traffic grow rapidly in those locations. <a href="#global-traffic-from-starlink-grew-3-3x-in-2024-in-line-with-last-years-growth-rate-after-initiating-service-in-malawi-in-july-2023-starlink-traffic-from-that-country-grew-38x-in-2024"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Googlebot, Google’s web crawler, was responsible for the highest volume of request traffic to Cloudflare in 2024, as it retrieved content from millions of Cloudflare customer sites for search indexing. <a href="#google-maintained-its-position-as-the-most-popular-internet-service-openai-binance-whatsapp-and-facebook-led-their-respective-categories"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Traffic from ByteDance’s AI crawler (Bytespider) gradually declined over the course of 2024. Anthropic’s AI crawler (ClaudeBot) first started showing signs of ongoing crawling activity in April, then declined after an initial peak in May &amp; June. <a href="#among-ai-bots-and-crawlers-bytespider-bytedance-traffic-gradually-declined-over-the-course-of-2024-while-claudebot-anthropic-was-more-active-during-the-back-half-of-the-year"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>13.0% of TLS 1.3 traffic is using post-quantum encryption. <a href="#13-0-of-tls-1-3-traffic-is-using-post-quantum-encryption"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Adoption &amp; Usage</h3>
      <a href="#adoption-usage">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>Globally, nearly one-third of mobile device traffic was from Apple iOS devices. Android had a &gt;90% share of mobile device traffic in 29 countries/regions; peak iOS mobile device traffic share was over 60% in eight countries/regions. <a href="#globally-nearly-one-third-of-mobile-device-traffic-was-from-apple-ios-devices-android-had-a-90-share-of-mobile-device-traffic-in-29-countries-regions-peak-ios-mobile-device-traffic-share-was-over-60-in-eight-countries-regions"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Globally, nearly half of web requests used HTTP/2, with 20.5% using HTTP/3. Usage of both versions was up slightly from 2023. <a href="#globally-nearly-half-of-web-requests-used-http-2-with-20-5-using-http-3"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>React, PHP, and jQuery were among the most popular technologies used to build websites, while HubSpot, Google, and WordPress were among the most popular vendors of supporting services and platforms. <a href="#react-php-and-jquery-were-among-the-most-popular-technologies-used-to-build-websites-while-hubspot-google-and-wordpress-were-among-the-most-popular-vendors-of-supporting-services-and-platforms"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Go surpassed NodeJS as the most popular language used for making automated API requests. <a href="#go-surpassed-nodejs-as-the-most-popular-language-used-for-making-automated-api-requests"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Google is far and away the most popular search engine globally, across all platforms. On mobile devices and operating systems, Baidu is a distant second. Bing is a distant second across desktop and Windows devices, with DuckDuckGo second most popular on macOS. Shares vary by platform and country/region. <a href="#google-is-the-most-popular-search-engine-globally-across-all-platforms-on-mobile-devices-os-baidu-is-a-distant-second-bing-is-a-distant-second-across-desktop-and-windows-devices-with-duckduckgo-second-most-popular-on-macos"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Google Chrome is far and away the most popular browser overall. While this is also true on macOS devices, Safari usage is well ahead of Chrome on iOS devices. On Windows, Edge is the second most popular browser as it comes preinstalled and is the initial default. <a href="#google-chrome-is-the-most-popular-browser-overall-while-also-true-on-macos-devices-safari-usage-is-well-ahead-of-chrome-on-ios-devices-on-windows-edge-is-the-second-most-popular-browser"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Connectivity</h3>
      <a href="#connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>225 major Internet disruptions were observed globally in 2024, with many due to government-directed regional and national shutdowns of Internet connectivity. Cable cuts and power outages were also leading causes. <a href="#225-major-internet-outages-were-observed-around-the-world-in-2024-with-many-due-to-government-directed-regional-and-national-shutdowns-of-internet-connectivity"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Aggregated across 2024, 28.5% of IPv6-capable requests were made over IPv6. India and Malaysia were the strongest countries, at 68.9% and 59.6% IPv6 adoption respectively. <a href="#globally-nearly-half-of-web-requests-used-http-2-with-20-5-using-http-3"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>The top 10 countries ranked by Internet speed all had average download speeds above 200 Mbps. Spain was consistently among the top locations across the measured Internet quality metrics. <a href="#the-top-10-countries-ranked-by-internet-speed-all-had-average-download-speeds-above-200-mbps-spain-was-consistently-among-the-top-locations-across-measured-internet-quality-metrics"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>41.3% of global traffic comes from mobile devices. In nearly 100 countries/regions, the majority of traffic comes from mobile devices. <a href="#41-3-of-global-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices-in-nearly-100-countries-regions-the-majority-of-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>20.7% of TCP connections are unexpectedly terminated before any useful data can be exchanged. <a href="#20-7-of-tcp-connections-are-unexpectedly-terminated-before-any-useful-data-can-be-exchanged"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Security</h3>
      <a href="#security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>6.5% of global traffic was mitigated by Cloudflare's systems as being potentially malicious or for customer-defined reasons. In the United States, the share of mitigated traffic grew to 5.1%, while in South Korea, it dropped slightly to 8.1%. In 44 countries/regions, over 10% of traffic was mitigated. <a href="#6-5-of-global-traffic-was-mitigated-by-cloudflares-systems-as-being-potentially-malicious-or-for-customer-defined-reasons"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>The United States was responsible for over a third of global bot traffic. Amazon Web Services was responsible for 12.7% of global bot traffic, and 7.8% came from Google. <a href="#the-united-states-was-responsible-for-over-a-third-of-global-bot-traffic-amazon-web-services-was-responsible-for-12-7-of-global-bot-traffic-and-7-8-came-from-google"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Globally, Gambling/Games was the most attacked industry, slightly ahead of 2023’s most targeted industry, Finance. <a href="#globally-gambling-games-was-the-most-attacked-industry-slightly-ahead-of-2023s-most-targeted-industry-finance"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Log4j, a vulnerability discovered in 2021, remains a persistent threat and was actively targeted throughout 2024. <a href="#log4j-remains-a-persistent-threat-and-was-actively-targeted-throughout-2024"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Routing security, measured as the share of RPKI valid routes and the share of covered IP address space, continued to improve globally throughout 2024. We saw a 4.7% increase in RPKI valid IPv4 address space in 2024, and a 6.4% increase in RPKI valid routes in 2024. <a href="#routing-security-measured-as-the-share-of-rpki-valid-routes-and-the-share-of-covered-ip-address-space-continued-to-improve-globally-throughout-2024"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Email Security</h3>
      <a href="#email-security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p>An average of 4.3% of emails were determined to be malicious in 2024, although this figure was likely influenced by spikes observed in March, April, and May. Deceptive links and identity deception were the two most common types of threats found in malicious email messages. <a href="#an-average-of-4-3-of-emails-were-determined-to-be-malicious-in-2024"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li><li><p>Over 99% of the email messages processed by Cloudflare Email Security from the .bar, .rest, and .uno top level domains (TLDs) were found to be either spam or malicious in nature. <a href="#over-99-of-the-email-messages-processed-by-cloudflare-email-security-from-the-bar-rest-and-uno-top-level-domains-tlds-were-found-to-be-either-spam-or-malicious-in-nature"><u>🔗</u></a></p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Introduction</h2>
      <a href="#introduction">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Over the last four years (<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-radar-2020-year-in-review/"><u>2020</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-radar-2021-year-in-review/"><u>2021</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2022-year-in-review/"><u>2022</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/"><u>2023</u></a>), we have aggregated perspectives from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a> into an annual Year In Review, illustrating the Internet’s patterns across multiple areas over the course of that year. The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024"><u>Cloudflare Radar 2024 Year In Review</u></a> microsite continues that tradition, featuring interactive charts, graphs, and maps you can use to explore and compare notable Internet trends observed throughout this past year.</p><p>Cloudflare’s <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/network"><u>network</u></a> currently spans more than 330 cities in over 120 countries/regions, serving an average of over 63 million HTTP(S) requests per second for millions of Internet properties, in addition to handling over 42 million DNS requests per second on average. The resulting data generated by this usage, combined with data from other complementary Cloudflare tools, enables Radar to provide unique near-real time perspectives on the patterns and trends around security, traffic, performance, and usage that we observe across the Internet. </p><p>The 2024 Year In Review is organized into five sections: <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#traffic"><u>Traffic</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#adoption-and-usage"><u>Adoption &amp; Usage</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#connectivity"><u>Connectivity</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#security"><u>Security</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#email-security"><u>Email Security</u></a> and covers the period from January 1 to December 1, 2024. We have incorporated several new metrics this year, including AI bot &amp; crawler traffic, search engine and browser market share, connection tampering, and “most dangerous” top level domains (TLDs). To ensure consistency, we have kept underlying methodologies consistent with previous years’ calculations. Trends for 200 countries/regions are available on the microsite; smaller or less populated locations are excluded due to insufficient data. Some metrics are only shown worldwide, and are not displayed if a country/region is selected. </p><p>Below, we provide an overview of the content contained within the major Year In Review sections (Traffic, Adoption &amp; Usage, Connectivity, Security, and Email Security), along with notable observations and key findings. In addition, we have also published a companion blog post that specifically explores trends seen across <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>Top Internet Services</u></a>.</p><p>The key findings and associated discussion within this post only provide a high-level perspective on the unique insights that can be found in the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024"><u>Year in Review microsite</u></a>. Visit the microsite to explore the various datasets and metrics in more detail, including trends seen in your country/region, how these trends have changed as compared to 2023, and how they compare to other countries/regions of interest. Surveying the Internet from this vantage point provides insights that can inform decisions on everything from an organization’s security posture and IT priorities to product development and strategy. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Traffic trends</h2>
      <a href="#traffic-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4XlL4SnJROa2fArrtUheuo/822ede9708eb6e9aeeebce4331d62140/2627_Graph.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Global Internet traffic grew 17.2% in 2024.</h3>
      <a href="#global-internet-traffic-grew-17-2-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>An inflection point for Internet traffic arguably occurred thirty years ago. The World Wide Web went mainstream in 1994, thanks to the late 1993 <a href="https://cybercultural.com/p/1993-mosaic-launches-and-the-web-is-set-free/"><u>release</u></a> of the <a href="https://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/research/project-highlights/ncsa-mosaic/"><u>NCSA Mosaic</u></a> browser for multiple popular operating systems, which included support for embedded images. In turn, “heavier” (in contrast to text-based) Internet content became the norm, and coupled with the growth in consumption through popular online services and the emerging consumer ISP industry, <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/sp/the-history-and-future-of-internet-traffic"><u>Internet traffic began to rapidly increase</u></a>, and that trend has continued to the present.</p><p>To determine the traffic trends over time for the Year in Review, we use the average daily traffic volume (excluding bot traffic) over the second full calendar week (January 8-15) of 2024 as our baseline. (The second calendar week is used to allow time for people to get back into their “normal” school and work routines after the winter holidays and New Year’s Day. The percent change shown in the traffic trends chart is calculated relative to the baseline value — it does not represent absolute traffic volume for a country/region. The trend line represents a seven-day trailing average, which is used to smooth the sharp changes seen with data at a daily granularity. To compare 2024’s traffic trends with 2023 data and/or other locations, click the “Compare” icon at the upper right of the graph.</p><p>Throughout the first half of 2024, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024?#internet-traffic-growth"><u>worldwide Internet traffic growth</u></a> appeared to be fairly limited, within a percent or two on either side of the baseline value through mid-August. However, at that time growth clearly began to accelerate, climbing consistently through the end of November, growing 17.2% for the year. This trend is similar to those also seen in 2023 and 2022, as we discussed in the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/"><u>2023 Year in Review blog post</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5NjOCs902pW74OQ0bx2usy/58896c0bc06b4a9c819736bde28ed3f4/traffic_-_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2024, worldwide</i></sup></p><p>The West African country of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/gn?previousYear=true"><u>Guinea</u></a> experienced the most significant Internet traffic growth seen in 2024, reaching as much as 350% above baseline. Traffic growth didn’t begin in earnest until late February, and reached an initial peak in early April. It remained between 100% and 200% above baseline until September, when it experienced several multi-week periods of growth. While the September-November periods of traffic growth also occurred in 2023, they peaked at under 90% above baseline.</p><p>The impact of significant Internet outages is also clearly visible when looking at data across the year. Two significant Internet outages in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/cu#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Cuba</u></a> are clearly visible as large drops in traffic in October and November. A reported “complete disconnection” of the national electricity system on the island <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1847325224208891950"><u>occurred on October 18</u></a>, lasting <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1848680148813406474"><u>just over three days</u></a>. Just a couple of weeks later, on November 6, <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1854291286322544752"><u>damage from Hurricane Rafael caused widespread power outages in Cuba</u></a>, resulting in another large drop in Internet traffic. Traffic has remained lower as Cuba’s electrical infrastructure <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar/status/1864263679442567604"><u>continues to struggle</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2rvK8AFYdcJAgQhJQUTiQw/8c4790fd06af8323636878977a9d712c/traffic_-_Cuba.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2024, Cuba</i></sup></p><p>As we frequently discuss in Cloudflare Radar blog and social media posts, government-directed Internet shutdowns occur all too frequently, and the impact of these actions are also clearly visible when looking at long-term traffic data. In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/bd#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Bangladesh</u></a>, the government ordered the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2024-internet-disruption-summary/#bangladesh"><u>shutdown of mobile Internet connectivity</u></a> on July 18, in response to student protests. Shortly after mobile networks were shut down, fixed broadband networks were taken offline as well, resulting in a near complete loss of Internet traffic from the country. Connectivity gradually returned over the course of several days, between July 23-28.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5FvubyG6qMeZ9hv1wgFayl/91d356b23788a8f9cdd970cc7e65f8fc/traffic_-_Bangladesh.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2024, Bangladesh</i></sup></p><p>As we also noted last year, the celebration of major holidays can also have a visible impact on Internet traffic at a country level. For example, in Muslim countries including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ae?compareWith=ID#internet-traffic-growth"><u>Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates</u></a>, the celebration of Eid al-Fitr, the festival marking the end of the fast of Ramadan, is visible as a noticeable drop in traffic around April 9-10. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/aFTFP2banlfW65XkjUIZM/84bfd5db1036da1b4740843575217113/traffic_-_UAE_Indonesia.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Internet traffic trends in 2024, Indonesia and United Arab Emirates</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Google maintained its position as the most popular Internet service. OpenAI, Binance, WhatsApp, and Facebook led their respective categories. </h3>
      <a href="#google-maintained-its-position-as-the-most-popular-internet-service-openai-binance-whatsapp-and-facebook-led-their-respective-categories">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Over the last several years, the Year In Review has ranked the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>most popular Internet services</u></a>. These rankings cover an “overall” perspective, as well as a dozen more specific categories, based on analysis of anonymized query data of traffic to our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 public DNS resolver</u></a> from millions of users around the world. For the purposes of these rankings, domains that belong to a single Internet service are grouped together.</p><p>Google once again held the top spot overall, supported by its broad portfolio of services, as well as the popularity of the Android mobile operating system (more on that <a href="#globally-nearly-one-third-of-mobile-device-traffic-was-from-apple-ios-devices-android-had-a-90-share-of-mobile-device-traffic-in-29-countries-regions-peak-ios-mobile-device-traffic-share-was-over-60-in-eight-countries-regions"><u>below</u></a>). Meta properties Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp also held spots in the top 10.</p><p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/what-is-generative-ai/"><u>Generative AI</u></a> continued to grow in popularity throughout 2024, and in this category, OpenAI again held the top spot, building on the continued success and popularity of ChatGPT. Within Social Media, the top five remained consistent with 2023’s and 2022’s ranking, including Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, X, and Snapchat.</p><p>These categorical rankings, as well as trends seen by specific services, are explored in more detail in a separate blog post, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><i><u>From ChatGPT to Temu: ranking top Internet services in 2024</u></i></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Global traffic from Starlink grew 3.3x in 2024, in line with last year’s growth rate. After initiating service in Malawi in July 2023, Starlink traffic from that country grew 38x in 2024.</h3>
      <a href="#global-traffic-from-starlink-grew-3-3x-in-2024-in-line-with-last-years-growth-rate-after-initiating-service-in-malawi-in-july-2023-starlink-traffic-from-that-country-grew-38x-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>SpaceX’s Starlink continues to be the leading satellite Internet service provider, bringing connectivity to unserved or underserved areas. In addition to opening up new markets in 2024, Starlink also announced relationships to provide in-flight connectivity to <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/17/spacexs-starlink-has-2500-aircraft-under-contract.html"><u>multiple airlines</u></a>, and on <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1790426484022342081"><u>cruise ships</u></a> and <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1857166233969607123"><u>trains</u></a>, as well as enabling subscribers to roam with their subscription using the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/11/24196294/starlink-mini-available-us-price-specs"><u>Starlink Mini</u></a>.</p><p>We analyzed aggregate Cloudflare traffic volumes associated with Starlink's primary <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a> (<a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as14593"><u>AS14593</u></a>) to track the growth in usage of the service throughout 2024. Similar to the traffic trends discussed above, the request volume shown on the trend line in the chart represents a seven-day trailing average. Comparisons with 2023 data can be shown by clicking the “Compare” icon at the upper right of the graph. Within comparative views, the lines are scaled to the maximum value shown.</p><p>On a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#starlink-traffic.trends"><u>worldwide</u></a> basis, steady, consistent growth was seen across the year, though it accelerates throughout November. This acceleration may have been driven by traffic associated with customer-specific large software updates. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6Dy2qt4O5b3MCswkckhELA/aa29c7235497bed8c985aa9dd9b63477/traffic_-_Starlink_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth worldwide in 2024</i></sup></p><p>In many locations, there is pent-up demand for “alternative” connectivity providers such as Starlink, and in these countries/regions, we see rapid traffic growth when service becomes available, such as in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/zw#starlink-traffic.trends"><u>Zimbabwe</u></a>. Service availability was <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1832392080481563037"><u>announced on September 7</u></a>, and traffic from the country began to grow rapidly almost immediately thereafter.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1aLywcrB5w88flsDyK1R1q/1039d989e19dc566cf5f62e60f3f1886/traffic_-_Starlink_Zimbabwe.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth in Zimbabwe in 2024</i></sup></p><p>In new markets, traffic growth continues after that initial increase. For example Starlink service became available in Malawi <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1683897037639790592"><u>in July 2023</u></a>, and throughout 2024, Starlink traffic from the country grew 38x. While <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/mw#starlink-traffic.trends"><u>Malawi’s 38x increase</u></a> is impressive, other countries also experienced significant growth. In the Eastern European country of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ge#starlink-traffic.trends"><u>Georgia</u></a>, <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1719581885200998485"><u>service became available on November 1, 2023</u></a>. After a slow ramp, traffic began to take off growing over 100x through 2024. In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/py#starlink-traffic.trends"><u>Paraguay</u></a>, <a href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1737914318522581489"><u>service availability was announced on December 21</u></a>, and began to grow at the beginning of January, registering an increase of over 900x across the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6AXOON7CO7XgnWSNnezoiF/bd56192d682c574a2d242845bb0eda16/traffic_-_Starlink_Malawi.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Starlink traffic growth in Malawi in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Googlebot was responsible for the highest volume of request traffic to Cloudflare in 2024 as it retrieved content from millions of Cloudflare customer sites for search indexing. </h3>
      <a href="#googlebot-was-responsible-for-the-highest-volume-of-request-traffic-to-cloudflare-in-2024-as-it-retrieved-content-from-millions-of-cloudflare-customer-sites-for-search-indexing">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare Radar shows users Internet traffic trends over a selected period of time, but at a country/region or network level. However, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/#googlebot-was-responsible-for-the-highest-volume-of-request-traffic-to-cloudflare-in-2023"><u>as we did in 2023</u></a>, we again wanted to look at the traffic Cloudflare saw over the course of the full year from the entire IPv4 Internet. To do so, we can use <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_curve"><u>Hilbert curves</u></a>, which allow us to visualize a sequence of IPv4 addresses in a two-dimensional pattern that keeps nearby IP addresses close to each other, making them <a href="https://xkcd.com/195/"><u>useful</u></a> for surveying the Internet's IPv4 address space.</p><p>Using a Hilbert curve, we can <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#ipv4-traffic-distribution"><u>visualize aggregated IPv4 request traffic to Cloudflare</u></a> from January 1 through December 1, 2024. Within the visualization, we aggregate IPv4 addresses at a <a href="https://www.ripe.net/about-us/press-centre/IPv4CIDRChart_2015.pdf"><u>/20</u></a> level, meaning that at the highest zoom level, each square represents traffic from 4,096 IPv4 addresses. This aggregation is done to keep the amount of data used for the visualization manageable. (While we would like to create a similar visualization for IPv6 traffic, the enormity of the full IPv6 address space would make associated traffic very <a href="https://observablehq.com/@vasturiano/hilbert-map-of-ipv6-address-space"><u>hard to see</u></a> in such a visualization, especially as such a small amount has been <a href="https://www.iana.org/numbers/allocations/"><u>allocated for assignment by the Regional Internet Registries</u></a>.)</p><p>Within the visualization, IP addresses are grouped by ownership, and for much of the IP address space shown there, a mouseover at the default zoom level will show the <a href="https://www.nro.net/about/rirs/"><u>Regional Internet Registry (RIR)</u></a> that the address block belongs to. However, there are also a number of blocks that were assigned prior to the existence of the RIR system, and for these, they are labeled with the name of the organization that owns them. Progressive zooming ultimately shows the autonomous system and country/region that the IP address block is associated with, as well as its share of traffic relative to the maximum. (If a country/region is selected, only the IP address blocks associated with that location are visible.) Overall traffic shares are indicated by shading based on a color scale, and although a number of large unshaded blocks are visible, this does not necessarily mean that the associated address space is unused, but rather that it may be used in a way that does not generate traffic to Cloudflare.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6gtrL1H2gUjSKH7AMSabgM/361d38f34860258449a914e26519a4b4/traffic_-_Hilbert_curve.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Hilbert curve showing aggregated 2024 traffic to Cloudflare across the IPv4 Internet</i></sup></p><p>Warmer orange/red shading within the visualization represents areas of higher request volume, and buried within one of those areas is the IP address block that had the maximum request volume to Cloudflare during 2024. As it was in 2023, this address block was <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/prefix/66.249.64.0/20"><u>66.249.64.0/20</u></a>, which belongs to Google, and is <a href="https://developers.google.com/static/search/apis/ipranges/googlebot.json"><u>one of several</u></a> used by the <a href="https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/googlebot"><u>Googlebot</u></a> web crawler to retrieve content for search indexing. This use of that address space is a likely explanation for the high request volume, given the number of web properties on Cloudflare’s network.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/g5rQhT7r4DsgpzYdMT3QT/0d6809d96791ee7165ada170d24156e3/traffic_-_Hilbert_curve_Googlebot.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Zoomed Hilbert curve view showing the IPv4 address block that generated the highest volume of requests</i></sup></p><p>In addition to Google, owners of other prefixes in the top 20 include Alibaba, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple. To explore the IPv4 Internet in more detail, we encourage you to go to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/#ipv4-traffic-distribution"><u>the Year in Review microsite</u></a> and explore it by dragging and zooming to move around IPv4 address space.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Among AI bots and crawlers, Bytespider (ByteDance) traffic gradually declined over the course of 2024, while ClaudeBot (Anthropic) was more active during the back half of the year.</h3>
      <a href="#among-ai-bots-and-crawlers-bytespider-bytedance-traffic-gradually-declined-over-the-course-of-2024-while-claudebot-anthropic-was-more-active-during-the-back-half-of-the-year">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/how-to-block-ai-crawlers/">AI bots and crawlers</a> have been in the news throughout 2024 as they voraciously consume content to train ever-evolving models. Controversy has followed them, as not all bots and crawlers respect content owner directives to restrict crawling activity. In July, Cloudflare enabled customers to <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/declaring-your-aindependence-block-ai-bots-scrapers-and-crawlers-with-a-single-click/"><u>block these bots and crawlers with a single click</u></a>, and during Birthday Week <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-ai-audit-control-ai-content-crawlers/"><u>we introduced AI Audit</u></a> to give website owners even more visibility into and control over how AI platforms access their content. </p><p>Tracking traffic trends for AI bots can help us better understand their activity over time — observing which are the most aggressive and have the highest volume of requests, which perform crawls on a regular basis, etc. The new <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic#ai-bot-crawler-traffic"><u>AI bot &amp; crawler traffic graph on Radar’s Traffic page</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/bringing-ai-to-cloudflare/#ai-bot-traffic-insights-on-cloudflare-radar"><u>launched in September</u></a>, provides insight into these traffic trends gathered over the selected time period for the top known AI bots. </p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#ai-bot-and-crawler-traffic"><u>Looking at traffic trends</u></a> from two of those bots, we can see some interesting patterns. <a href="https://darkvisitors.com/agents/bytespider"><u>Bytespider</u></a> is a crawler operated by ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, and is reportedly used to download training data for ByteDance’s Large Language Models (LLMs). Bytespider’s crawling activity trended generally downwards over the course of 2024, with end-of-November activity approximately 80-85% lower than that seen at the start of the year. <a href="https://darkvisitors.com/agents/claudebot"><u>ClaudeBot</u></a> is Anthropic’s crawler, which downloads training data for its LLMs that power AI products like Claude. Traffic from ClaudeBot appeared to be mostly non-existent through mid-April, except for some small spikes that possibly represent test runs. Traffic became more consistently non-zero starting in late April, but after an early spike, trailed off through the remainder of the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7cm0SG0GC36Z3dFu3A6p3J/10a6e32a469984b2083ee0c2ed743d53/traffic_-_AI_bots_--_NEW.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Traffic trends for AI crawlers Bytespider and ClaudeBot in 2024</i></sup></p><p>Traffic trends for the full list of AI bots &amp; crawlers can be found in the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=ai.bots&amp;dt=2024-01-01_2024-12-31"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>13.0% of TLS 1.3 traffic is using post-quantum encryption.</h3>
      <a href="#13-0-of-tls-1-3-traffic-is-using-post-quantum-encryption">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The term “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography"><u>post-quantum</u></a>” refers to a new set of cryptographic techniques designed to protect data from adversaries that have the ability to capture and store current data for decryption by sufficiently powerful quantum computers in the future. The Cloudflare Research team has been <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/sidh-go/"><u>exploring post-quantum cryptography since 2017</u></a>.</p><p>In October 2022, we enabled <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-for-all/"><u>post-quantum key agreement</u></a> on our network by default, but use of it requires that browsers and clients support it as well. In 2024, Google's <a href="https://developer.chrome.com/release-notes/124"><u>Chrome 124</u></a> enabled it by default on April 17, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#post-quantum-encryption"><u>adoption grew rapidly following that release</u></a>, increasing from just over 2% of requests to around 12% within a month, and ended November at 13%. We expect that adoption will continue to grow into and during 2025 due to support in other Chromium-based browsers, growing default support in Mozilla Firefox, and initial testing in Apple Safari.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4ipRtCowVftgad37ht9uMF/68958f72a47bbc179959c2d7ac6cdd72/traffic_-_post-quantum_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Growth trends in post-quantum encrypted TLS 1.3 traffic during 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Adoption &amp; Usage insights</h2>
      <a href="#adoption-usage-insights">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/177RCO2sEvFJJeJeCBzZim/68acfcc309c57ef2027e9291a5f76d2f/2627_Shield.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Globally, nearly one-third of mobile device traffic was from Apple iOS devices. Android had a &gt;90% share of mobile device traffic in 29 countries/regions; peak iOS mobile device traffic share was over 60% in eight countries/regions.</h3>
      <a href="#globally-nearly-one-third-of-mobile-device-traffic-was-from-apple-ios-devices-android-had-a-90-share-of-mobile-device-traffic-in-29-countries-regions-peak-ios-mobile-device-traffic-share-was-over-60-in-eight-countries-regions">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The two leading mobile device operating systems globally are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS"><u>Apple’s iOS</u></a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)"><u>Google’s Android</u></a>, and by analyzing information in the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>user agent</u></a> reported with each request, we can get insight into the distribution of traffic by client operating system throughout the year. Again, we found that Android is responsible for the majority of mobile device traffic when aggregated globally, due to the wide distribution of price points, form factors, and capabilities.</p><p>Similar to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#ios-vs-android"><u>2023’s findings</u></a>, Android was once again <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#ios-vs-android"><u>responsible for just over two-thirds of mobile device traffic</u></a>. Looking at the top countries for Android traffic, we find a greater than 95% share in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/sd#ios-vs-android"><u>Sudan</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/bd#ios-vs-android"><u>Bangladesh</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/tm#ios-vs-android"><u>Turkmenistan</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/mw#ios-vs-android"><u>Malawi</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/pg#ios-vs-android"><u>Papua New Guinea</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/sy#ios-vs-android"><u>Syria</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ye#ios-vs-android"><u>Yemen</u></a>, up from just two countries in 2023. Similar to last year, we again found that countries/regions with higher levels of Android usage are largely in Africa, Oceania/Asia, and South America, and that many have lower levels of <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gross-national-income-per-capita?tab=table"><u>gross national income per capita</u></a>. In these countries/regions, the availability of lower priced “budget” Android devices supports increased adoption.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/9bsuRwzYBybYpOiKqwLja/cbdafb60eab1913a91ec916899d1e807/connectivity_-_mobile_desktop.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global distribution of mobile device traffic by operating system in 2024</i></sup></p><p>In contrast, iOS adoption tops out in the 65% range in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/je#ios-vs-android"><u>Jersey</u></a>, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/fo#ios-vs-android"><u>Faroe Islands</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/gg#ios-vs-android"><u>Guernsey</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/dk#ios-vs-android"><u>Denmark</u></a>. Adoption rates of 50% or more were seen in a total of 26 countries/regions, including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/no#ios-vs-android"><u>Norway</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/se#ios-vs-android"><u>Sweden</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/au#ios-vs-android"><u>Australia</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/jp#ios-vs-android"><u>Japan</u></a>, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/us#ios-vs-android"><u>United States</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ca#ios-vs-android"><u>Canada</u></a>. These locations likely have a greater ability to afford higher priced devices, owing to their comparatively higher gross national income per capita.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/QCfjlx0TgEotwU2wPm0hE/af1359f249aec86894b681249fe7ee70/adoption_-_Android_iOS_top_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Countries/regions with the largest share of iOS traffic in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Globally, nearly half of web requests used HTTP/2, with 20.5% using HTTP/3.</h3>
      <a href="#globally-nearly-half-of-web-requests-used-http-2-with-20-5-using-http-3">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol) is the core protocol that the web relies upon. <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1945"><u>HTTP/1.0</u></a> was first standardized in 1996, <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.html"><u>HTTP/1.1</u></a> in 1999, and <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7540.html"><u>HTTP/2</u></a> in 2015. The most recent version, <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9114.html"><u>HTTP/3</u></a>, was completed in 2022, and runs on top of a new transport protocol known as <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-road-to-quic/"><u>QUIC</u></a>. By running on top of QUIC, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/performance/what-is-http3/"><u>HTTP/3</u></a> can deliver improved performance by mitigating the effects of packet loss and network changes, as well as establishing connections more quickly. HTTP/3 also provides encryption by default, which mitigates the risk of attacks. </p><p>Current versions of desktop and mobile Google Chrome (and Chromium-based variants), Mozilla Firefox, and Apple Safari <a href="https://caniuse.com/?search=http%2F3"><u>all support HTTP/3 by default</u></a>. Cloudflare makes HTTP/3 <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/speed/optimization/protocol/http3/"><u>available for free</u></a> to all of our customers, although not every customer chooses to enable it.</p><p>Analysis of the HTTP version negotiated for each request provides insight into the distribution of traffic by the various versions of the protocol aggregated across the year. (“HTTP/1.x” aggregates requests made over HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1.) At a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#http-versions"><u>global</u></a> level, 20.5% of requests in 2024 were made using HTTP/3. Another 29.9% of requests were made over the older HTTP/1.x versions, while HTTP/2 remained dominant, accounting for the remaining 49.6%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/r7KQkjdsXXEtxHoEkFQbO/efb19d1bbd58bef3d657b96555d70103/adoption_-_HTTP_versions_global.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global distribution of traffic by HTTP version in 2024</i></sup></p><p>Looking at version distribution geographically, we found eight countries/regions sending more than a third of their requests over HTTP/3, with <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/re#http-versions"><u>Reunion</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/lk#http-versions"><u>Sri Lanka</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/mn#http-versions"><u>Mongolia</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/gr#http-versions"><u>Greece</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/mk#http-versions"><u>North Macedonia</u></a> comprising the top five as shown below. Eight other countries/regions, including <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ir#http-versions"><u>Iran</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ie#http-versions"><u>Ireland</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/hk#http-versions"><u>Hong Kong</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/cn#http-versions"><u>China</u></a>, sent more than half of their requests over HTTP/1.x throughout 2024. More than half of requests were made over HTTP/2 in a total of 147 countries/regions.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Zq4mMgbvw6jT6pb6LLdF7/401b98731302233b6f9674e74196e819/adoption_-_HTTP_versions_top_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Countries/regions with the largest shares of HTTP/3 traffic in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>React, PHP, and jQuery were among the most popular technologies used to build websites, while Hubspot, Google, and WordPress were among the most popular vendors of supporting services and platforms.</h3>
      <a href="#react-php-and-jquery-were-among-the-most-popular-technologies-used-to-build-websites-while-hubspot-google-and-wordpress-were-among-the-most-popular-vendors-of-supporting-services-and-platforms">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Modern websites and applications are extremely complex, built on and integrating on a mix of frameworks, platforms, services, and tools. In order to deliver a seamless user experience, developers must ensure that all of these components happily coexist with each other. Using <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan"><u>Cloudflare Radar’s URL Scanner</u></a>, we again scanned websites associated with the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains"><u>top 5000 domains</u></a> to identify the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#website-technologies"><u>most popular technologies and services</u></a> used across a dozen different categories. </p><p>In looking at core technologies used to build websites, <a href="https://react.dev/"><u>React</u></a> had a commanding lead over <a href="https://vuejs.org/"><u>Vue.js</u></a> and other JavaScript frameworks, <a href="https://www.php.net/"><u>PHP</u></a> was the most popular programming technology, and <a href="https://jquery.com/"><u>jQuery</u></a>’s share was 10x other popular JavaScript libraries.</p><p>Third-party services and platforms are also used by websites and applications to support things like analytics, content management, and marketing automation. Google Analytics remained the most widely used analytics provider, WordPress had a greater than 50% share among content management systems, and for marketing automation providers, category leader HubSpot had nearly twice the usage share of Marketo and MailChimp.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2fJS1OpqRlVCsZ9VOXdU89/c01320ff9d20da4ad2471de780a86033/adoption_-_top_website_technologies.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Top website technologies, JavaScript frameworks category in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Go surpassed NodeJS as the most popular language used for making automated API requests.</h3>
      <a href="#go-surpassed-nodejs-as-the-most-popular-language-used-for-making-automated-api-requests">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Many dynamic websites and applications are built on <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/2024-api-security-report/"><u>automated API calls</u></a>, and we can use our unique visibility into Web traffic to identify the top languages these API clients are written in. Applying heuristics to API-related requests determined to not be coming from a person using a browser or native mobile application helps us to identify the language used to build the API client.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#api-client-language-popularity"><u>Our analysis</u></a> found that almost 12% of automated API requests are made by <a href="https://go.dev/"><u>Go</u></a>-based clients, with <a href="https://nodejs.org/en/"><u>NodeJS</u></a>, <a href="https://www.python.org/"><u>Python</u></a>, <a href="https://www.java.com/"><u>Java</u></a>, and <a href="https://dotnet.microsoft.com/"><u>.NET</u></a> holding smaller shares. Compared to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#api-client-language-popularity"><u>2023</u></a>, Go’s share increased by approximately 40%, allowing it to capture the top spot, while NodeJS’s share fell by just over 30%. Python and Java also saw their shares increase, while .NET’s fell.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7oq8vCSsDq57HNYCbEV59n/9373b727f7f7da45be317ba34d23dcab/adoption_-_api_client_languages.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Most popular API client languages in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Google is the most popular search engine globally, across all platforms. On mobile devices/OS, Baidu is a distant second. Bing is a distant second across desktop and Windows devices, with DuckDuckGo second most popular on macOS. </h3>
      <a href="#google-is-the-most-popular-search-engine-globally-across-all-platforms-on-mobile-devices-os-baidu-is-a-distant-second-bing-is-a-distant-second-across-desktop-and-windows-devices-with-duckduckgo-second-most-popular-on-macos">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Protecting and accelerating websites and applications for millions of customers, Cloudflare is in a unique position to measure search engine market share data. Our methodology uses HTTP’s <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referer"><u>referer header</u></a> to identify the search engine sending traffic to customer sites and applications. The market share data is presented as an overall aggregate, as well as broken out by device type and operating system. (Device type and operating system data is derived from the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> and <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints"><u>Client Hints</u></a> headers accompanying a content request.)</p><p>Aggregated at a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#search-engine-market-share"><u>global</u></a> level, Google referred the most traffic to Cloudflare customers, with a greater than 88% share across 2024. Yandex, Baidu, Bing, and DuckDuckGo round out the top five, all with single digit percentage shares. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7bwTSu9NktZ9chotEmTQhs/fd231b3f13fe4709ca7480546276d2e0/adoption_-_search_engine_overall_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall worldwide search engine market share in 2024</i></sup></p><p>However, when drilling down by location or platform, differences are apparent in the top search engines and their shares. For example, in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/kr#search-engine-market-share"><u>South Korea</u></a>, Google is responsible for only two-thirds of referrals, while local platform <a href="https://www.naver.com/"><u>Naver</u></a> drives 29.2%, with local portal <a href="https://www.daum.net/"><u>Daum</u></a> also in the top five at 1.3%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/rxOIPPwpJSt73X1GXH8t4/5597fd261ec7fda2cf357c70479be13f/adoption_-_search_engine_overall_South_Korea.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall search engine market share in South Korea in 2024</i></sup></p><p>Google’s dominance is also blunted a bit on Windows devices, where it drives only 80% of referrals globally. Unsurprisingly, Bing holds the second spot for Windows users, with a 10.4% share. Yandex, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo round out the top 5, all with shares below 5%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4sKOs50fTPbchv55J7gQrM/1ce8b0c1287bbd5b35d9e987e2061207/adoption_-_search_engine_overall_worldwide_Windows.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall worldwide search engine market share for Windows devices in 2024</i></sup></p><p>For additional details, including search engines aggregated under “Other”, please refer to the quarterly <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/search-engines"><u>Search Engine Referral Reports</u></a> on Cloudflare Radar.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Google Chrome is the most popular browser overall. While also true on MacOS devices, Safari usage is well ahead of Chrome on iOS devices. On Windows, Edge is the second most popular browser. </h3>
      <a href="#google-chrome-is-the-most-popular-browser-overall-while-also-true-on-macos-devices-safari-usage-is-well-ahead-of-chrome-on-ios-devices-on-windows-edge-is-the-second-most-popular-browser">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Similar to our ability to measure search engine market share, Cloudflare is also in a unique position to measure browser market share. Our methodology uses information from the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent"><u>User-Agent</u></a> and <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints"><u>Client Hints</u></a> headers to identify the browser making content requests, along with the associated operating system. Browser market share data is presented as an overall aggregate, as well as broken out by device type and operating system. Note that the shares of browsers available on both desktop and mobile devices, such as Chrome or Safari, are presented in aggregate.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#browser-market-share"><u>Globally</u></a>, we found that 65.8% of requests came from Google’s Chrome browser across 2024, and that just 15.5% came from Apple’s Safari browser. Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, and the <a href="https://www.samsung.com/us/support/owners/app/samsung-internet"><u>Samsung Internet browser</u></a> rounded out the top five, all with shares below 10%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1bEuEbqSrAqe57gnBTeL6c/4426dc0dbc8869d05344433535e0698a/adoption_-_browser_overall_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall worldwide web browser market share in 2024</i></sup></p><p>Similar to the search engine statistics discussed above, differences are clearly visible when drilling down by location or platform. In some countries where iOS holds a larger market share than Android, Chrome remains the leading browser, but by a much lower margin. For example, in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/se#browser-market-share"><u>Sweden</u></a>, Chrome’s share fell to 56.2%, while Safari’s increased to 22.5%. In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/no#browser-market-share"><u>Norway</u></a>, Chrome fell to just 50%, while Safari grew to 25.6%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Dkt8A1HuUpg61G8GYkEXs/5c2649e96d2959a2606afa9d932d5b82/adoption_-_browser_overall_Norway.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall web browser market share in Norway in 2024</i></sup></p><p>As the default browser on devices running iOS, Apple Safari was the most popular browser for iOS devices, commanding an 81.7% market share across the year, with Chrome at just 16.1%. And despite being the preinstalled default browser on Windows devices, Edge held just a 17.3% share, in comparison to Chrome’s 68.5%</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5Hvnf7VPBuVTjba0P1bGRU/6d6e31c609a54c8248afe120576210aa/adoption_-_browser_overall_worldwide_iOS.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Overall worldwide web browser market share for iOS devices in 2024</i></sup></p><p>For additional details, including browsers aggregated under “Other”, please refer to the quarterly <u>Browser Market Share Reports</u> on Cloudflare Radar.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Connectivity</h2>
      <a href="#connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7xC8lBdDHpahlvkJrf1nI9/7b050dc62c1628e3a5ab3a9418e572d3/2627_Rocket.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>225 major Internet outages were observed around the world in 2024, with many due to government-directed regional and national shutdowns of Internet connectivity.</h3>
      <a href="#225-major-internet-outages-were-observed-around-the-world-in-2024-with-many-due-to-government-directed-regional-and-national-shutdowns-of-internet-connectivity">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Throughout 2024, as we have over the last several years, we have written frequently about observed Internet outages, whether due to <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/east-african-internet-connectivity-again-impacted-by-submarine-cable-cuts"><u>cable cuts</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/impact-of-verizons-september-30-outage-on-internet-traffic/"><u>unspecified technical issues</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/syria-iraq-algeria-exam-internet-shutdown"><u>government-directed shutdowns</u></a>, or a number of other reasons covered in our quarterly summary posts (<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q1-2024-internet-disruption-summary"><u>Q1</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q2-2024-internet-disruption-summary"><u>Q2</u></a>, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2024-internet-disruption-summary"><u>Q3</u></a>). The impacts of these outages can be significant, including significant economic losses and severely limited communications. The <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/outage-center"><u>Cloudflare Radar Outage Center</u></a> tracks these Internet outages, and uses Cloudflare traffic data for insights into their scope and duration.</p><p>Some of the outages seen through the year were short-lived, lasting just a few hours, while others stretched on for days or weeks. In the latter category, an Internet outage in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2024-internet-disruption-summary/#haiti"><u>Haiti</u></a> dragged on for eight days in September because repair crews were barred from accessing a damaged submarine cable due to a business dispute, while shutdowns of mobile and fixed Internet providers in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2024-internet-disruption-summary/#bangladesh"><u>Bangladesh</u></a> lasted for approximately 10 days in July. In the former category, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/q3-2024-internet-disruption-summary/#iraqi-kurdistan"><u>Iraq</u></a> frequently experienced multi-hour nationwide Internet shutdowns intended to prevent cheating on academic exams — these contribute to the clustering visible in the timeline during June, July, August, and September.</p><p>Within the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-outages"><u>timeline</u></a> on the Year in Review microsite, hovering over a dot will display metadata about that outage, and clicking on it will open a page with additional information. Below the map and timeline, we have added a bar graph illustrating the recorded reasons associated with the observed outages. In 2024, over half were due to government-directed shutdowns. If a country/region is selected, only outages and reasons for that country/region will be displayed.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/VDxaH2IkD28RXrcStCn8j/39ce7ad40f6a3d59e155ff09664f80e0/connectivity_-_Internet_outage_map.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Over 200 Internet outages were observed around the world during 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Aggregated across 2024, 28.5% of IPv6-capable requests were made over IPv6. India and Malaysia were the strongest countries, at 68.9% and 59.6% IPv6 adoption respectively.</h3>
      <a href="#aggregated-across-2024-28-5-of-ipv6-capable-requests-were-made-over-ipv6-india-and-malaysia-were-the-strongest-countries-at-68-9-and-59-6-ipv6-adoption-respectively">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The IPv4 protocol still used by many Internet-connected devices was developed in the 1970s, and was never meant to handle the vast and growing scale of the modern Internet. An <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1883"><u>initial specification for its successor</u></a>, IPv6, was published in December 1995, evolving to a <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2460"><u>draft standard</u></a> three years later, offering an expanded address space intended to better support the expected growth in the number of Internet-connected devices. At this point, available IPv4 space has long since been <a href="https://ipv4.potaroo.net/"><u>exhausted</u></a>, and connectivity providers use solutions like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation"><u>Network Address Translation</u></a> to stretch limited IPv4 resources. Hungry for IPv4 address space as their businesses and infrastructure grow, cloud and hosting providers are acquiring blocks of IPv4 address space for <a href="https://auctions.ipv4.global/"><u>as much as \$30 - \$50 per address</u></a>. </p><p>Cloudflare has been a vocal and active advocate for IPv6 since 2011, when we announced our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cloudflares-automatic-ipv6-gatewa/"><u>Automatic IPv6 Gateway</u></a>, which enabled free IPv6 support for all of our customers. In 2014, we enabled <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/i-joined-cloudflare-on-monday-along-with-5-000-others"><u>IPv6 support by default for all of our customers</u></a>, but not all customers choose to keep it enabled for a variety of reasons. Note that server-side support is only half of the equation for driving IPv6 adoption, as end user connections need to support it as well. (In reality, it is a bit more complex than that, but server and client side support across applications, operating systems, and network environments are the two primary requirements. From a network perspective, implementing IPv6 also brings a number of other <a href="https://www.catchpoint.com/benefits-of-ipv6"><u>benefits</u></a>.) By analyzing the IP version used for each request made to Cloudflare, aggregated throughout the year, we can get insight into the distribution of traffic by the various versions of the protocol.</p><p>At a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#ipv6-adoption"><u>global</u></a> level, 28.5% of IPv6-capable (“<a href="https://www.techopedia.com/definition/19025/dual-stack-network"><u>dual-stack</u></a>”) requests were made over IPv6, up from 26.4% in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024?previousYear=true"><u>2023</u></a>. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/in#ipv6-adoption"><u>India</u></a> was again the country with the highest level of IPv6 adoption, at 68.9%, carried in large part by <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage/as55836?dateStart=2024-01-01&amp;dateEnd=2024-12-01"><u>94% IPv6 adoption at Reliance Jio</u></a>, one of the country’s largest Internet service providers. India was followed closely by <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/my#ipv6-adoption"><u>Malaysia</u></a>, where 59.6% of dual-stacked requests were made over IPv6 during 2024, thanks to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;groupBy=ases&amp;loc=MY&amp;dt=14d&amp;metric=ip_version%2FIPv6"><u>strong IPv6 adoption rates across leading Internet providers</u></a> within the country. IPv6 adoption in India was up from 66% in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/in?previousYear=true#ipv6-adoption"><u>2023</u></a>, and in Malaysia, it was up from 57.3% <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/my?previousYear=true#ipv6-adoption"><u>last year</u></a>. <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/sa#ipv6-adoption"><u>Saudi Arabia</u></a> was the only other country with an IPv6 adoption rate above 50% this year, at 51.8%, whereas that list also included <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023/vn#ipv6-adoption"><u>Vietnam</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023/gr#ipv6-adoption"><u>Greece</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023/fr#ipv6-adoption"><u>France</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023/uy#ipv6-adoption"><u>Uruguay</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023/th#ipv6-adoption"><u>Thailand</u></a> in 2023. Thirty four countries/regions, including many in Africa, still have IPv6 adoption rates below 1%, while a total of 96 countries/regions have adoption rates below 10%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/48L0qRLujnWQRuJ8ZMa8Ed/ac5209577812dd556d275279d4740041/connectivity_-_IPv6_adoption.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global distribution of traffic by IP version in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/NjeXm7lfs7ZGM3Gn5ToZM/3b401894664cb22347db1a8d8a2bfdc8/connectivity_-_IPv6_adoption_top_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Countries/regions with the largest shares of IPv6 traffic in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>The top 10 countries ranked by Internet speed all had average download speeds above 200 Mbps. Spain was consistently among the top locations across measured Internet quality metrics.</h3>
      <a href="#the-top-10-countries-ranked-by-internet-speed-all-had-average-download-speeds-above-200-mbps-spain-was-consistently-among-the-top-locations-across-measured-internet-quality-metrics">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As more and more of our everyday lives move online, including entertainment, work, education, finance, shopping, and even basic social and personal interaction, the quality of our Internet connections is arguably more important than ever, necessitating higher connection speeds and lower latency. Although Internet providers continue to evolve their service portfolios to offer increased connection speeds and reduced latency in order to support growth in use cases like videoconferencing, live streaming, and online gaming, consumer adoption is often mixed due to cost, availability, or other issues. By aggregating the results of <a href="https://speed.cloudflare.com/"><u>speed.cloudflare.com</u></a> tests taken during 2024, we can get a geographic perspective on <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/glossary/#connection-quality"><u>connection quality</u></a> metrics including average download and upload speeds, and average idle and loaded latencies, as well as the distribution of the measurements.</p><p>In <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-quality"><u>2024</u></a>, Spain was a leader in download speed (292.6 Mbps) and upload speed (192.6 Mbps) metrics, and placed second globally for loaded latency (78.6 ms). (Loaded latency is the round-trip time when data-heavy applications are being used on the network.) Spain’s leadership in these connection quality metrics is supported by the strong progress that the country has made <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/106695"><u>towards achieving the EU’s “Digital Decade” objectives</u></a>, including fixed very high capacity network (VHCN) deployment, fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) coverage, and 5G coverage with the latter two <a href="https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/spain-digital-economy"><u>reaching</u></a> 95.2% and 92.3% respectively. High speed fiber broadband connections are also relatively affordable, with research showing major providers offering 100 Mbps, 300 Mbps, 600 Mbps, and 1 Gbps packages, with the latter priced between €30 and €46 per month. The figures below for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/es#internet-quality"><u>Spain</u></a> show the largest clusters of speed measurements around the 100 Mbps mark, with slight bumps also visible around 300 Mbps, suggesting that the former package has the highest subscription rate, followed by the latter. Further, they show these connections are also relatively low latency, with 87% of idle latency measurements below 50 ms and 65% of loaded latency measurements below 100 ms, providing users with good <a href="https://www.screenbeam.com/wifihelp/wifibooster/how-to-reduce-latency-or-lag-in-gaming-2/#:~:text=Latency%20is%20measured%20in%20milliseconds,%2C%2020%2D40ms%20is%20optimal."><u>gaming</u></a> and <a href="https://www.haivision.com/glossary/video-latency/#:~:text=Low%20latency%20is%20typically%20defined,and%20streaming%20previously%20recorded%20events."><u>videoconferencing/streaming</u></a> experiences.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/51PcbNyPpAQX79gYg0SxIU/a784aaadd65822d3384f1463570a6129/connectivity_-_Spain_bandwidth.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Measured download/upload speed distribution in Spain in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3Refsg6ctWdHNzscsoIDDF/75da3336fa1e31fd71a2188787944a57/connectivity_-_Spain_latency.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Measured idle/loaded latency distribution in Spain in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>41.3% of global traffic comes from mobile devices. In nearly 100 countries/regions, the majority of traffic comes from mobile devices.</h3>
      <a href="#41-3-of-global-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices-in-nearly-100-countries-regions-the-majority-of-traffic-comes-from-mobile-devices">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>With approximately <a href="https://www.statista.com/topics/840/smartphones/#topicOverview"><u>70% of the world’s population using smartphones</u></a>, and <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/"><u>91% of Americans owning a smartphone</u></a>, these mobile devices have become an integral part of both our personal and professional lives, providing us with Internet access from nearly any place at any time. In some countries/regions, mobile devices primarily connect to the Internet via Wi-Fi, while other countries/regions are “mobile first”, where 4G/5G services are the primary means of Internet access.</p><p>Analysis of information contained with the user agent reported with each request to Cloudflare enables us to categorize it as coming from a mobile, desktop, or other type of device. Aggregating this categorization throughout the year at a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>global</u></a> level, we found that 41.3% of traffic came from mobile devices, with 58.7% coming from desktop devices such as laptops and “classic” PCs. These traffic shares were in line with those measured in both <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>2023</u></a> and 2022, suggesting that mobile device usage has achieved a “steady state”. Over 77% of traffic came from mobile devices in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/sd#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Sudan</u></a>, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/cu#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Cuba</u></a>, and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/sy#mobile-vs-desktop"><u>Syria</u></a>, making them the countries/regions with the largest mobile device traffic share in 2024. Other countries/regions that had more than 50% of traffic come from mobile devices were concentrated in the Middle East/Africa, the Asia Pacific region, and South/Central America. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/9bsuRwzYBybYpOiKqwLja/cbdafb60eab1913a91ec916899d1e807/connectivity_-_mobile_desktop.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global distribution of traffic by device type in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/KRujuREGMTBvLHVAHonuU/ad575fdd822ee3ee0bcabd41a96ef736/connectivity_-_mobile_desktop_top_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Countries/regions with the largest shares of mobile device usage in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>20.7% of TCP connections are unexpectedly terminated before any useful data can be exchanged.</h3>
      <a href="#20-7-of-tcp-connections-are-unexpectedly-terminated-before-any-useful-data-can-be-exchanged">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare is in a unique position to help measure the health and behaviors of Internet networks around the world. One way we do this is passively measuring rates of connections to Cloudflare that appear <i>anomalous</i>, meaning that they are unexpectedly terminated before any useful data exchange occurs. The underlying causes of connection anomalies are varied and range from DoS attacks to quirky client behavior to third-party connection tampering (e.g., when a network monitors and selectively disrupts connections to filter content).</p><p>Connection anomalies are symptoms — visible signs that “something abnormal” is happening in a network, but the underlying root cause is not always clear from the outset. However, we can gain a better understanding by incorporating previously-reported network behaviors, active measurements and on-the-ground reports, and macro trends across networks. Additional details on such analysis can be found in the blog posts <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/connection-tampering/"><i><u>A global assessment of third-party connection tampering</u></i></a> and<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"> <i><u>Bringing insights into TCP resets and timeouts to Cloudflare Radar</u></i></a>.</p><p>Insights into TCP connection anomalies were <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tcp-resets-timeouts/"><u>launched on Cloudflare Radar</u></a> in September, with the plot lines in the associated graph corresponding to the stage of the TCP connection in which the connection anomalously closed (using shorthand, the first three messages we typically receive from the client in a TCP connection are “SYN” and “ACK” packets to establish a connection, and then a “PSH” packet indicating the requested resource). In aggregate <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#tcp-connection-anomalies"><u>globally</u></a>, over 20% of connections to Cloudflare were terminated unexpectedly, with the largest share (nearly half) being closed “Post SYN” — that is, after our server has received a client’s SYN packet, but before we have received a subsequent acknowledgement (ACK) from the client or any useful data that would follow the acknowledgement. These terminations can often be attributed to DoS attacks or Internet scanning. Post-ACK (3.1% globally) and Post-PSH (1.4% globally) anomalies are more often associated with connection tampering, especially when they occur at high rates in specific networks.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/11XcEAXkMgOhytTbCsf21J/159fa2459ebc6b9c268bd5d8455213ba/connectivity_-_TCP_connection_anomalies.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Trends in TCP connection anomalies by stage in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Security</h2>
      <a href="#security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4CkCPZHGlR8gQQQrXt0b5H/cfd3faabbe406fd348b8751825bc43e5/2627_Shield_Globe.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>6.5% of global traffic was mitigated by Cloudflare's systems as being potentially malicious or for customer-defined reasons.</h3>
      <a href="#6-5-of-global-traffic-was-mitigated-by-cloudflares-systems-as-being-potentially-malicious-or-for-customer-defined-reasons">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>To <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/products/zero-trust/threat-defense/"><u>protect customers from threats</u></a> posed by malicious bots used to attack websites and applications, Cloudflare mitigates this attack traffic using <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>DDoS</u></a> mitigation techniques or <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/managed-rules/"><u>Web Application Firewall (WAF) Managed Rules</u></a>. For a variety of other reasons, customers may also want Cloudflare to mitigate traffic using techniques like <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/rate-limiting-rules/"><u>rate-limiting</u></a> requests, or <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/tools/ip-access-rules/"><u>blocking all traffic from a given location</u></a>, even if it isn’t malicious. Analyzing traffic to Cloudflare’s network throughout 2024, we looked at the overall share that was mitigated for any reason, as well as the share that was blocked as a DDoS attack or by WAF Managed Rules. </p><p>In 2024, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#mitigated-traffic"><u>6.5% of global traffic was mitigated</u></a>, up almost one percentage point from <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#mitigated-traffic"><u>2023</u></a>. Just 3.2% was mitigated as a DDoS attack, or by WAF Managed Rules, a rate slightly higher than in 2023. More than 10% of the traffic originating from 44 countries/regions had mitigations generally applied, while DDoS/WAF mitigations were applied to more than 10% of the traffic originating from just seven countries/regions.</p><p>At a country/region level, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/al?#mitigated-traffic"><u>Albania</u></a> had one of the highest mitigated traffic shares throughout the year, at 42.9%, while <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/ly#mitigated-traffic"><u>Libya</u></a> had one of the highest shares of traffic that was mitigated as a DDoS attack or by WAF Managed Rules, at 19.2%. In <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/#just-under-6-of-global-traffic-was-mitigated-by-cloudflares-systems-as-being-potentially-malicious-or-for-customer-defined-reasons-in-the-united-states-3-65-of-traffic-was-mitigated-while-in-south-korea-it-was-8-36"><u>2023’s Year in Review blog post</u></a>, we highlighted the United States and Korea. This year, the share of mitigated traffic grew to 5.0% in the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/us?#mitigated-traffic"><u>United States</u></a> (up from 3.65% in 2023), while in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/kr?#mitigated-traffic"><u>South Korea</u></a>, it dropped slightly to 8.1%, down from 8.36%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3GJ5r18m6Tpor4n2scVRQ5/cc85d08dc2aa496d677d8bfc9439417d/security_-_mitigated_traffic_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Trends in mitigated traffic worldwide in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>The United States was responsible for over a third of global bot traffic. Amazon Web Services was responsible for 12.7% of global bot traffic, and 7.8% came from Google.</h3>
      <a href="#the-united-states-was-responsible-for-over-a-third-of-global-bot-traffic-amazon-web-services-was-responsible-for-12-7-of-global-bot-traffic-and-7-8-came-from-google">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/bots/what-is-a-bot/"><u>Bot</u></a> traffic describes any non-human Internet traffic, and by monitoring traffic suspected to be from bots site and application owners can spot and, if necessary, block potentially malicious activity. However, not all bots are malicious — bots can also be helpful, and Cloudflare maintains a list of <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic/verified-bots"><u>verified bots</u></a> that includes those used for things like search engine indexing, performance testing, and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/application-services/solutions/app-performance-monitoring/"><u>availability monitoring</u></a>. Regardless of intent, we analyzed where bot traffic was originating from in 2024, using the IP address of a request to identify the network (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a>) and country/region associated with the bot making the request. Cloud platforms remained among the leading sources of bot traffic due to a number of factors. These include the ease of using automated tools to quickly provision compute resources, the relatively low cost of using these compute resources in an ephemeral manner, the broadly distributed geographic footprint of cloud platforms, and the platforms’ high-bandwidth Internet connectivity.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#bot-traffic-sources"><u>Globally</u></a>, we found that 68.5% of observed bot traffic came from the top 10 countries in 2024, with the United States responsible for half of that total, over 5x the share of second place Germany. (In comparison to 2023, the US share was up slightly, while Germany’s was down slightly.) Among cloud platforms that originate bot traffic, Amazon Web Services was responsible for 12.7% of global bot traffic, and 7.8% came from Google. Microsoft, Hetzner, Digital Ocean, and OVH all also contributed more than a percent each.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3qlyS355w5LDtoBDtb1qXE/8354c2b07c0af46121a0c667e6d687e4/security_-_bot_distribution_by_source_country.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global bot traffic distribution by source country in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6euMUlCDcfOInLiCpssg2t/54eb345624346f24ab984bbe6b1c9f67/security_-_bot_distribution_by_source_network.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global bot traffic distribution by source network in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Globally, Gambling/Games was the most attacked industry, slightly ahead of 2023’s most targeted industry, Finance.</h3>
      <a href="#globally-gambling-games-was-the-most-attacked-industry-slightly-ahead-of-2023s-most-targeted-industry-finance">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The industries targeted by attacks often shift over time, depending on the intent of the attackers. They may be trying to cause financial harm by attacking ecommerce sites during a busy shopping period, gain an advantage against opponents by attacking an online game, or make a political statement by attacking government-related sites. To identify industry-targeted attack activity during 2024, we analyzed mitigated traffic for customers that had an associated industry and vertical within their customer record. Mitigated traffic was aggregated weekly by source country/region across 19 target industries.</p><p>Companies in the Gambling/Games industry were, in aggregate, the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#most-attacked-industries"><u>most attacked during 2024</u></a>, with 6.6% of global mitigated traffic targeting the industry. The industry was slightly ahead of Finance, which led 2023’s aggregate list. (Both industries are shown at 6.6% in the Summary view due to rounding.)  Gambling/Games sites saw the largest shares of mitigated traffic in January and the first week of February, possibly related to National Football League playoffs in the United States, heading into the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/super-bowl-lviii/"><u>Super Bowl</u></a>.</p><p>Attacks targeting Finance organizations were most active in May, reaching a peak of 15.3% of mitigated traffic the week of May 13. This is in line with the figure in our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/ddos-2024-q2#id-9-top-attacked-industries"><i><u>DDoS threat report for Q2 2024</u></i></a> that shows that Financial Services was the most attacked industry by request volume during the quarter in South America and the Middle East region.</p><p>As we have seen in the past, peak attack activity varied by industry on a weekly basis. The highest peaks for the year were seen in attacks targeting People &amp; Society organizations (19.6% of mitigated traffic, week of January 1), the Autos &amp; Vehicles industry (29.7% of mitigated traffic, week of January 15), and the Real Estate industry (27.5% of mitigated traffic, week of August 26).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4qjMffdMn6uV7OEFhE5l0F/397672a455b62f712946e30130969657/security_-_targeted_industries.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global mitigated traffic share by industry in 2024, summary view</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Log4j remains a persistent threat and was actively targeted throughout 2024.</h3>
      <a href="#log4j-remains-a-persistent-threat-and-was-actively-targeted-throughout-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In December 2021, we published a <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/log4j/"><u>series of blog posts about the Log4j vulnerability</u></a>, highlighting the threat that it posed, our observations of attempted exploitation, and the steps we took to protect customers. Two years on, in our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/"><u>2023 Year in Review</u></a>, we <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review/#even-as-an-older-vulnerability-log4j-remained-a-top-target-for-attacks-during-2023-however-http-2-rapid-reset-emerged-as-a-significant-new-vulnerability-beginning-with-a-flurry-of-record-breaking-attacks"><u>noted</u></a> that even as an older vulnerability, Log4j remained a top target for attacks during 2023, with related attack activity significantly higher than other commonly exploited vulnerabilities.</p><p>In 2024, three years after the initial Log4j disclosure, we found that Log4j remains an active threat. This year, we compared normalized daily attack activity for Log4j with attack activity for Atlassian Confluence Code Injection, a vulnerability we <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023#commonly-exploited-vulnerabilities"><u>examined in the 2023 Year in Review</u></a>, as well as aggregated daily attack activity for multiple <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures"><u>CVEs</u></a> related to <a href="https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/115.html"><u>Authentication Bypass</u></a> and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/security/what-is-remote-code-execution/"><u>Remote Code Execution</u></a> vulnerabilities published in 2024.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#commonly-exploited-vulnerabilities"><u>Log4j attack activity</u></a> appeared to trend generally upwards across the year, with several significant spikes visible during the first half of the year, and then again in October and November. In terms of the difference in activity, Log4j ranges from approximately 4x to over 20x the activity seen for Atlassian Confluence Code Injection, and as much as 100x the aggregated activity seen for Authentication Bypass or Remote Code Injection vulnerabilities.  </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2YdyQ3qMUh10zLAHLefcdU/8a723a1970652c293a1f6c59efe51a99/security_-_vulnerabilities_Log4J.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global attack activity trends for commonly exploited vulnerabilities in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Routing security, measured as the share of RPKI valid routes and the share of covered IP address space, continued to improve globally throughout 2024. </h3>
      <a href="#routing-security-measured-as-the-share-of-rpki-valid-routes-and-the-share-of-covered-ip-address-space-continued-to-improve-globally-throughout-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As the routing protocol that underpins the Internet, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/what-is-bgp/"><u>Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)</u></a> communicates routes between networks, enabling traffic to flow between source and destination. BGP, however, relies on trust between networks, and incorrect information shared between peers, whether or not it was shared intentionally, can send traffic to the wrong place, potentially with <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/bgp-leaks-and-crypto-currencies/"><u>malicious results</u></a>. <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki/"><u>Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)</u></a> is a cryptographic method of signing records that associate a BGP route announcement with the correct originating autonomous system (AS) number, providing a way of ensuring that the information being shared originally came from a network that is allowed to do so. (It is important to note that this is only half of the challenge of implementing routing security, because network providers also need to validate these signatures and filter out invalid announcements to prevent sharing them further.)</p><p>Cloudflare has long been an advocate for routing security, including being a founding participant in the <a href="https://www.manrs.org/2020/03/new-category-of-cdns-and-cloud-providers-join-manrs-to-improve-routing-security/"><u>MANRS CDN and Cloud Programme</u></a> and providing a <a href="https://isbgpsafeyet.com/"><u>public tool</u></a> that enables users to test whether their Internet provider has implemented BGP safely. Building on insights available in the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing"><u>Routing page</u></a> on Cloudflare Radar, we analyzed data from <a href="https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/"><u>RIPE NCC's RPKI daily archive</u></a> to determine the share of RPKI valid routes (as opposed to those route announcements that are <a href="https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/help.html"><u>invalid or whose status is unknown</u></a>) and how that share has changed over the course of 2024, as well as determining the share of IP address space covered by valid routes. The latter metric is of interest because a route announcement covering a significant amount of IP address space (millions of IPv4 addresses, for example) has a greater potential impact than an announcement covering a small block of IP address space (hundreds of IPv4 addresses, for example).</p><p>At a <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#routing-security"><u>global</u></a> level during 2024, we saw a 6.4 percentage point increase (from 43.4% to 49.8%) in valid IPv4 routes, and a 3.2 percentage point increase (from 53.7% to 56.9%) in valid IPv6 routes. Given the trajectory, it is likely that over half of IPv4 routes will be RPKI valid by the end of calendar year 2024. Looking at the global share of IP address space covered by valid routes, we saw a 4.7 percentage point increase (from 38.9% to 43.6%) for IPv4, and a 3.3 percentage point increase (from 57.6% to 60.9%) for IPv6.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2ojjIa2U45vvsbha8v6ITk/2c61631ded62b80481d47e1da8a5d2cc/security_-_routing_global_valid_routes.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Shares of global RPKI valid routing entries by IP version in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2rCCmsaqULazLsBgoXZLLC/9aa265e9658d71bd7ee113423c6945ca/security_-_routing_global_valid_ip_address_space.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Shares of globally announced IP address space covered by RPKI valid routes in 2024</i></sup></p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/es#routing-security"><u>Spain</u></a> started 2024 with less than half of its routes (both IPv4 and IPv6) RPKI valid. However, the share of valid routes grew significantly on February 15, when <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as12479"><u>AS12479 (Orange Espagne)</u></a> signed records associated with 98% of their IP address prefixes that were previously in an <a href="https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/rpki/bgp-origin-validation/"><u>“unknown” (or NotFound) state of RPKI validity</u></a>, thus converting these prefixes from unknown to valid. That drove an immediate increase for IPv4 to 76%, reaching 81% validity by December 1, and an immediate increase for IPv6 to 91%, reaching 92.9% validity by December 1. A notable change in covered IP address space was observed in <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024/cm#routing-security"><u>Cameroon</u></a>, where covered IPv4 space more than doubled at the end of January, growing from 32% to 82%. This was due to <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as36912"><u>AS36912 (Orange Cameroun)</u></a> signing records associated with all of their IPv4 address prefixes, changing the associated IP address space to RPKI valid. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5e7SUVIju8fidAEBkIOSq4/2085f3237411eca0816a3d2862e9e3df/security_-_routing_Spain_valid_routes.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>IPv4 and IPv6 shares of RPKI valid routes for Spain in 2024</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/G9adlberrdCmDnB3MupQa/6c866261fc478334673115d6dd01fd76/security_-_routing_Cameroon_valid_ipv4_address_space.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Share of IPv4 address space covered by RPKI valid routes for Cameroon in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Email Security</h2>
      <a href="#email-security">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7vC1TSUDDHpepgs2Yv3Lpx/eb43b5c0a203d7ec0a74939c23684ae5/2627_Shield_Plane.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>An average of 4.3% of emails were determined to be malicious in 2024. </h3>
      <a href="#an-average-of-4-3-of-emails-were-determined-to-be-malicious-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Despite the growing enterprise use of collaboration/messaging apps, email remains an important business application and is a very attractive entry point into enterprise networks for attackers. Attackers will send targeted malicious emails that attempt to impersonate an otherwise legitimate sender (such as a corporate executive), that try to get the user to click on a deceptive link, or that contain a dangerous attachment, among other types of threats. <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/zero-trust/products/email-security/"><u>Cloudflare Email Security</u></a> protects customers from email-based attacks, including those carried out through targeted malicious email messages. During<a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#malicious-emails"><u> 2024</u></a>, an average of 4.3% of emails analyzed by Cloudflare were found to be malicious. Aggregated at a weekly level, spikes above 14% were seen in late March, early April, and mid-May. We believe that these spikes were related to targeted “backscatter” attacks, where the attacker flooded a target with undeliverable messages, which then bounced the messages to the victim, whose email had been set as the reply-to: address.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/693EaEyePShBH8CZ7cZWv1/c08e0acd6f8a6a15b730b1cd90bf6283/email_-_malicious_worldwide.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global malicious email share trends in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Deceptive links and identity deception were the two most common types of threats found in malicious email messages. </h3>
      <a href="#deceptive-links-and-identity-deception-were-the-two-most-common-types-of-threats-found-in-malicious-email-messages">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Attackers use a variety of techniques, which we refer to as threat categories, when they use malicious email messages as an attack vector. These categories are defined and explored in detail in our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/2023-phishing-report/"><u>phishing threats report</u></a>. In our analysis of malicious emails, we have found that such messages may contain multiple types of threats. In reviewing a weekly aggregation of threat activity trends for these categories, we found that, <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#top-email-threats"><u>averaged across 2024</u></a>, 42.9% of malicious email messages contained deceptive links, with the share reaching 70% at times throughout the year. Activity for this thread category was spiky, with low points seen in the March to May timeframe, and a general downward trend visible from July through November.</p><p>Identity deception was a similarly active threat category, with such threats also found in up to 70% of analyzed emails several weeks throughout the year. Averaged across 2024, 35.1% of emails contained attempted identity deception. The activity pattern for this threat category appears to be somewhat similar to deceptive links, with a number of the peaks and valleys occurring during the same weeks. At times, identity deception was a more prevalent threat in analyzed emails than deceptive links, as seen in the graph below.</p><p>Among other threat categories, extortion saw the most significant change throughout the year. After being found in 86% of malicious emails during the first week of January, its share gradually trended lower throughout the year, finishing November under 10%.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/47EGZSEcRbUY67bsnYTSip/81ce3c89beefe1ddbe66f68710366c87/email_-_threat_category.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Global malicious email threat category trends for Deceptive Links and Identity Deception in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h3>Over 99% of the email messages processed by Cloudflare Email Security from the .bar, .rest, and .uno top level domains (TLDs) were found to be either spam or malicious in nature.</h3>
      <a href="#over-99-of-the-email-messages-processed-by-cloudflare-email-security-from-the-bar-rest-and-uno-top-level-domains-tlds-were-found-to-be-either-spam-or-malicious-in-nature">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In March 2024, we <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/email-security-insights-on-cloudflare-radar/"><u>launched a set of email security insights on Cloudflare Radar</u></a>, including visibility into so-called “dangerous domains” — those top level domains (TLDs) that were found to be the sources of the most spam or malicious email among messages analyzed by Cloudflare Email Security. The analysis is based on the sending domain’s TLD, found in the <code>From</code>: header of an email message. For example, if a message came from <code>sender@example.com</code>, then <code>example.com</code> is the sending domain, and .com is the associated TLD.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024?#most-observed-tlds"><u>In aggregate across 2024</u></a>, we found that the <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.bar"><code><u>.bar</u></code></a>, <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.rest"><code><u>.rest</u></code></a>, and <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.uno"><code><u>.uno</u></code></a> TLDs were the “most dangerous”, each with over 99% of analyzed email messages characterized as either spam or malicious. (These TLDs are all at least a decade old, and each sees at least some usage, with <a href="https://research.domaintools.com/statistics/tld-counts/"><u>between 20,000 and 60,000 registered domain names</u></a>.)  Sorting by malicious email share, the <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.ws"><code><u>.ws</u></code></a> ccTLD (country code top level domain) belonging to Western Samoa came out on top, with over 90% of analyzed emails categorized as malicious. Sorting by spam email share, <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.quest"><code><u>.quest</u></code></a> is the biggest offender, with over 88% of emails originating from associated domains characterized as spam.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/30rfi3V9NkY31itUpHQ9is/d1cbb9fce0ecf5a1c3a237f2694c5a13/email_-_dangerous_tlds.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>TLDs originating the largest total shares of malicious and spam email in 2024</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The Internet is an amazingly complex and dynamic organism, constantly changing, growing, and evolving.</p><p>With the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024"><u>Cloudflare Radar 2024 Year In Review</u></a>, we are providing insights into the change, growth, and evolution that we have measured and observed throughout the year. Trend graphs, maps, tables, and summary statistics provide our unique perspectives on Internet traffic, Internet quality, and Internet security, and how key metrics across these areas vary around the world and over time.</p><p>We strongly encourage you to visit the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024"><u>Cloudflare Radar 2024 Year In Review microsite</u></a> and explore the trends for your country/region, and to consider how they impact your organization so that you are appropriately prepared for 2025. In addition, for insights into the top Internet services across multiple industry categories, we encourage you to read the companion Year in Review blog post, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/"><i><u>From ChatGPT to Temu: ranking top Internet services in 2024</u></i></a>.</p><p>If you have any questions, you can contact the Cloudflare Radar team at radar@cloudflare.com or on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky).</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Acknowledgements</h2>
      <a href="#acknowledgements">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As it is every year, it truly is a team effort to produce the data, microsite, and content for our annual Year in Review, and I’d like to acknowledge those team members that contributed to this year’s effort. Thank you to: Jorge Pacheco, Sabina Zejnilovic, Carlos Azevedo, Mingwei Zhang (Data Analysis); André Jesus, Nuno Pereira (Front End Development); João Tomé (Most popular Internet services); Jackie Dutton, Kari Linder, Guille Lasarte (Communications); Eunice Giles (Brand Design); Jason Kincaid (blog editing); and Paula Tavares (Engineering Management), as well as countless other colleagues for their answers, edits, support, and ideas.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Outage]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Quality]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4oLkLHLIZ1vibq8dtPJP6F</guid>
            <dc:creator>David Belson</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[From ChatGPT to Temu: ranking top Internet services in 2024]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review-internet-services/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ The 2024 popular Internet services landscape highlights rising generative AI, e-commerce shifts, and the continued dominance of platforms like Google and Facebook, as revealed by Cloudflare’s rankings ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p></p><p>Since the late 1990s, millions have relied on the Internet for searching, communicating, shopping, and working, though 2.6 billion people (about 31% of the <a href="https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2024_wpp_2024_advance_unedited_0.pdf"><u>global population</u></a>) <a href="https://time.com/7094574/x-taara/"><u>still lack Internet access</u></a>. Over the years, use of the Internet has evolved from email and static sites to social media, streaming, e-commerce, cloud tools, and more recently AI chatbots, reflecting its constant adaptation to users' needs. This post explores how people interacted online in 2024, based on Cloudflare’s observations and a review of the year’s <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-1.1.1.1/"><u>DNS</u></a> trends.</p><p>Building on similar reports we’ve done over the past several years, we have compiled a ranking of the top Internet properties of 2024, with the same categories included in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>2023</u></a>, including Generative AI. In addition to our <b>overall</b> ranking, we chose 9 categories to focus on:</p><ol><li><p><a href="#ready-to-face-the-generative-ai-era"><b><u>Generative AI</u></b></a></p></li><li><p><a href="#social-media-snapchat-closing-in-on-x"><b><u>Social Media</u></b></a></p></li><li><p><a href="#e-commerce-temu-means-growth"><b><u>Ecommerce</u></b></a><b></b></p></li><li><p><a href="#video-streaming-youtube-and-netflix-remain-uncontested-leaders"><b><u>Video Streaming</u></b></a></p></li><li><p><a href="#the-news-globo-and-bbc-global-perspectives"><b><u>News</u></b></a></p></li><li><p><a href="#messaging-whatsapp-rules-telegram-rises"><b><u>Messaging</u></b></a><b></b></p></li><li><p><a href="#metaverse-gaming-roblox-leads-steam-grows-oculus-is-out"><b><u>Metaverse &amp; Gaming</u></b></a><b></b></p></li><li><p><a href="#financial-services-stripe-keeps-lead-black-friday-impact"><b><u>Financial Services</u></b></a><b></b></p></li><li><p><a href="#crypto-binance-is-back-and-the-impact-of-us-elections"><b><u>Cryptocurrency Services</u></b></a></p></li></ol><p>As we have done since <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2022-year-in-review/"><u>2022</u></a>, our analysis uses anonymized DNS query data from our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> public <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-1.1.1.1/"><u>DNS resolver</u></a>, used by millions globally. We aggregate domains for each service (e.g., twitter.com, t.co, and x.com for X) and identify the sites that provide services to humans, thus excluding technical domains like root-servers.net. Rankings reflect relative popularity within categories, not absolute traffic. Therefore, a drop in rank doesn’t always indicate less traffic to a specific Internet service — it may simply reflect increased competition from other services, leading to a change in rank.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024?#internet-services"><u>This part</u></a> of the 2024 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review highlights shifts in Internet services, with rising platforms like Temu, GitHub Copilot, and WeChat reflecting changing user preferences. ChatGPT (OpenAI) also played a more prominent role in the generative AI space and in our Overall ranking, nearly reaching the Top 50. Major events like the Paris Olympics and US elections influenced rankings as well, boosting Olympics-related sites and news platforms like CNN and Fox News.</p><p>This year, we’re also including a by-country/region perspective on the most popular Internet services for the first time, showing the Top 10 Overall for 132 countries/regions. At the bottom of this post, we highlight trends found in this localized data, including how ChatGPT performed best in Singapore.</p><p>Keep reading for a detailed look at the evolution of trends throughout the year. For more, visit our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>2024 Cloudflare Radar Year in Review microsite</u></a>. Along with the lists of most popular Internet services, the Year in Review microsite and its <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/"><u>associated blog post</u></a> explore a number of additional metrics.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Google is again #1. Facebook, Apple and TikTok follow</h2>
      <a href="#google-is-again-1-facebook-apple-and-tiktok-follow">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Since <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/popular-domains-year-in-review-2021/"><u>2021</u></a>, we’ve started our review of rankings with an Overall Top 10 list, showcasing the most popular Internet services globally based on DNS traffic from our 1.1.1.1 resolver. Unsurprisingly, Google (including services like Google Maps and Google Calendar) remained the #1 Internet service in 2024. Since introducing our ranking method <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2022-year-in-review/"><u>two years ago</u></a>, no other service has come close to challenging Google’s top spot. It’s important to note that Apple and Microsoft are similar to Google in that their main domains (apple.com or microsoft.com) are used for many different services. We include other services separately, such as Outlook or iCloud, which use their own specific domains.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 most popular Internet services in 2024, overall</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-most-popular-internet-services-in-2024-overall">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Google</p></li><li><p>Facebook</p></li><li><p>Apple</p></li><li><p>TikTok</p></li><li><p>Amazon Web Services</p></li><li><p>Microsoft</p></li><li><p>Instagram</p></li><li><p>YouTube</p></li><li><p>Amazon</p></li><li><p>WhatsApp</p></li></ol><p>Beyond Google, Facebook consistently held the #2 spot throughout 2024. Last year, it competed with Apple for that position. Apple, which uses domains like apple.com for services related to its software and devices, was generally #3. However, TikTok challenged that position on several days since late August. Amazon Web Services (AWS), differentiated from Amazon by domains like amazonaws.com, performed better this year compared to 2023. It held the #5 spot but often traded places with Microsoft during the year.</p><p>Instagram also rose in the rankings. It was around #8 in 2023 and steadily improved. Now, it holds the #7 spot, ahead of YouTube.</p><p>Amazon remained at #9 for most of the year, the same as in 2023. WhatsApp, owned by Meta, appeared in the Top 10 for the first time, taking the #10 spot.</p><p>Close to the Top 10 were Apple’s iCloud, Netflix (which performs better on weekends), and Microsoft’s Outlook.</p><p>In the chart below, you can follow the evolution of the top Internet services in our Overall ranking throughout the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6x6pJNS7XzCpeIQzilXnry/a3ec9f3a9ce6072fe9a4edb0973bc38c/unnamed.png" />
          </figure><p>In 2022, X (then known as Twitter) ranked as high as #10 in our overall ranking and was close to Instagram. It never reached the top 10 in 2023, and in 2024, X dropped further, to #14 or #15. More on X’s performance in the <a href="#social-media-snapchat-closing-in-on-x"><u>Social Media category below</u></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Ready to face the Generative AI era?</h2>
      <a href="#ready-to-face-the-generative-ai-era">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Generative AI gained global attention in late 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT, and became a global phenomenon <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2023-year-in-review-internet-services/"><u>during 2023</u></a>. By 2024, ChatGPT (OpenAI) continues to be by far the most popular service in this category, which includes chatbots, coding bots, and more. Other generative AI services had more stable rankings compared to 2023.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 Generative AI services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-generative-ai-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>ChatGPT (OpenAI)</p></li><li><p>Character.AI</p></li><li><p>Codeium</p></li><li><p>QuillBot</p></li><li><p>Claude (Anthropic)</p></li><li><p>Perplexity</p></li><li><p>GitHub Copilot</p></li><li><p>Wordtune</p></li><li><p>Poe</p></li><li><p>Tabnine</p></li></ol><p>Significant changes occurred below ChatGPT’s first place ranking throughout the year. Character.AI, an AI-driven chatbot platform, maintained a strong #2 position, staying ahead of Codeium, a code-generation AI tool that has improved its position since June, and Quillbot, an AI writing and paraphrasing tool.</p><p>Claude, the AI chatbot from Anthropic, rose in the rankings, particularly after March 4, when the new model, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-family"><u>Claude 3</u></a>, was introduced, and again later <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-europe"><u>in May</u></a> when it became available in Europe. It reached #5 in June. Perplexity, an AI-driven search and Q&amp;A platform, started the year outside the Top 10 but ended close to Claude. It surpassed Claude for the first time on November 6, 2024, the day after the U.S. elections, reaching #6.</p><p>This next chart shows movement among the Generative AI services that were more popular later in the year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4VnUCNBk5TJdBvufqgumm7/6407dd6b978259bc4d962045245e2658/unnamed__1_.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>GitHub Copilot’s rise to the Top 10</h2>
      <a href="#github-copilots-rise-to-the-top-10">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Several new players entered the Top 10 AI rankings in 2024, showing strong growth. GitHub Copilot, an AI-powered coding assistant, experienced the fastest rise, entering the Top 10 in September (after reaching the Top 20 in June) and staying mostly between #5 and #3 by November, as the next chart shows. Similarly, Suno AI, an AI-powered audio and music generation platform, entered the Top 10 in April, briefly dropped out, but stabilized between #6 and #10 after October — in November, it ranked #6 on weekends.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/41xZ0xKeuMrn7lpy9D4OUx/2fff166b62c58c2f71036befec3025d5/BLOG-1033_4.png" />
          </figure><p>Some platforms lost ground in the rankings. Wordtune, an AI writing assistant, peaked at #4 during mid-year but declined afterward. Tabnine, another AI-powered coding assistant, held the #5 spot for months but slipped after July. In contrast, Sider AI, a coding assistant, entered the Top 20 in March and finished the year around #12. Poe, an AI chatbot platform, ranked #5 in 2023 and between #5 and #6 before June, but ended 2024 moving around #10, performing better during weekends.</p><p>Google Gemini, Google’s AI assistant and model, performed better on weekdays and started the year ranking between #7 and #10, but dropped out of the Top 10 after July as newer AI platforms gained momentum. Hugging Face, an open-source AI and machine learning platform, mostly fluctuated between #7 and #9 during the year, peaking at #4 on August 18 around the time <a href="https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=text-to-image"><u>several models</u></a> were updated, and and as it reached its milestone of <a href="https://x.com/huggingface/status/1825620479895547992"><u>5 million</u></a> users. However, it fell out of the Top 10 by September.</p><p>Midjourney, an AI-powered platform for generating images, performed well until June, when it was close to the Top 10. Additionally, the OpenAI API ranked #18 in the Generative AI category on May 14-15, coinciding with OpenAI’s announcement of GPT-4o <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-and-more-tools-to-chatgpt-free/"><u>availability</u></a>, including in the API.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>ChatGPT’s growth to the Top 50 of our Overall category</h2>
      <a href="#chatgpts-growth-to-the-top-50-of-our-overall-category">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Notable trends that we observed when looking at trends for Generative AI services within our larger Overall ranking include:</p><ul><li><p>ChatGPT continued its growth in 2024, similar to 2023. In early 2023, it ranked around #200 and ended the year near the top 100. In 2024, it started close to the top 100, reached the top 60 in May with the <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-and-more-tools-to-chatgpt-free/"><u>release of the 4o model</u></a>, and has been near the top 50 since September, aligning with the return of workers and students to their routines. It ranks higher on weekdays, averaging #56, and drops on weekends.</p></li><li><p>Comparing ChatGPT with other known and non-AI related websites, by late November, ChatGPT ranked ahead of Weather.com, Temu, eBay, Telegram, Google Calendar, and Prime Video, but trailed Disney Plus</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6Z1fGk8wyn890pveYDe13n/99b0def62c6c4c0f31445c584ab195ea/BLOG-1033_5.png" />
          </figure><p>Character.ai also showed a clear growth trend in our Overall ranking, from outside the top 200 earlier in the year, to above #180 after July, performing better in August, reaching as high as #161. The AI-driven chatbot platform performed better on weekends than on weekdays, the opposite of ChatGPT.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7J8T8Xwg6KTfMwOl9OBvcP/bf9c5644d28052f3cd40c0b871f42d5c/BLOG-1033_6.png" />
          </figure><ul><li><p>Codeium entered the top 300 in July. It ranked higher on weekdays than weekends.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Social media: Snapchat closing in on X</h2>
      <a href="#social-media-snapchat-closing-in-on-x">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>According to <a href="https://datareportal.com/social-media-users"><u>Kepios</u></a>, there are an estimated 5.22 billion social media users worldwide in 2024 (up from 4.95 billion last year), representing 63.8% of the global population. Social media continues to play a major role in daily life, serving as a key platform for communication, information, and attention.</p><p>Once again, social media giants like Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram dominate, ranking among the top 10 most popular Internet services overall.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 Social Media services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-social-media-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Facebook</p></li><li><p>TikTok</p></li><li><p>Instagram</p></li><li><p>X</p></li><li><p>Snapchat</p></li><li><p>LinkedIn</p></li><li><p>Discord</p></li><li><p>Kwai</p></li><li><p>Pinterest</p></li><li><p>Reddit</p></li></ol><p>In the Social Media category rankings, the top seven remain unchanged from last year. However, there are notable developments in this category. In 2022, X briefly challenged Instagram for the #3 spot during a few days. Since 2023, X has held a solid #4 position, with Snapchat closing in and reaching #4 for the first time on several days in September and October.</p><p>LinkedIn stayed steady at #6, followed by Discord. Kwai, a Chinese video app popular in Brazil (with 60 million <a href="https://valorinternational.globo.com/business/news/2024/04/16/tiktok-rival-prepares-expansion-in-brazil.ghtml"><u>reported</u></a> users) and other countries, rose from #10 last year to #8. Further down the list, Pinterest kept its #9 rank, while Reddit, previously #8 in 2023, dropped to #10 this year, but peaked at #7 on November 26, just before Black Friday and Thanksgiving in the US. Here’s the Social Media Top 10 chart for 2024:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6yVlAeKVHUuty7yOenw6Zc/01ed16245eb54109bc64360df1fb69c3/unnamed__2_.png" />
          </figure><p>Our global ranking also highlights several non-Western platforms in the Top 20. These include Douyin (#11), the Chinese version of TikTok; VK (#12), often referred to as the Russian Facebook; and TikTok rivals <a href="https://www.ipsos.com/en-id/uncovering-growth-short-video-indonesia"><u>popular in Southeast Asia</u></a> SnackVideo (#13) by Chinese <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuaishou"><u>Kuaishou</u></a> (that also owns Kwai). OnlyFans appeared consistently in the Top 20 starting in September, ranking around #18 and surpassing Tumblr by late November.</p><p>The #18 spot was briefly held by X alternative Threads (by Instagram) in late September and by Bluesky starting November 18. Mastodon-related servers reached as high as #19 for several days since late August. Here’s a look at X (on top) and its alternatives in this category:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5H4FGA8SrEEAaqqOXdSNTM/f84622ade5bb280d07b23cc1c3b648e7/BLOG-1033_8.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Alternatives to X: Bluesky, Threads, and Mastodon</h2>
      <a href="#alternatives-to-x-bluesky-threads-and-mastodon">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Let’s move beyond the Social Media category to see how these platforms performed in our Overall ranking, where bigger shifts between services are evident.</p><p>As we’ve seen, Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon (via an aggregation of popular <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(social_network)"><u>servers</u></a>) didn’t break into the Top 10 of the Social Media category. However, in the Overall ranking, Mastodon servers, bundled together, consistently ranked between #208 and #248, performing better on weekends.</p><p>Bluesky entered the Top 250 in September 2024, and gained additional attention after the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesky#Post-election_growth"><u>US elections</u></a>. It rose sharply after November 14, peaking at #193 on November 20, and has since stabilized around #220. </p><p>Threads entered the Top 250 in August 2024, peaking at #183 on September 24 before dropping out in October. In 2023, Threads peaked at #227 in early July but fell out of the Top 250 by late August. It’s worth noting that Threads also uses Instagram’s cdninstagram.com for images and videos, which may influence Threads position in our DNS rankings (that said, Instagram wasn’t impacted by Threads appearance in our rankings).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5FPuxB6AVFEDyotkayVGYw/cc7b8b2a0ddfc0e6e5975d73028b6acd/BLOG-1033_9.png" />
          </figure><p>Here are some other trends we observed among social media apps, and how they did in our Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Instagram</b>’s best day (#6 in the Overall ranking) was August 5, 2024, coinciding with the week the app was <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkey-meet-instagram-officials-after-access-ban-minister-says-2024-08-05/"><u>banned in Turkey</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>X</b>’s best day of the year in our ranking was April 14, when it reached #12. This coincided with Arsenal losing the top position in the English football/soccer <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League"><u>Premier League</u></a> (the <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13980099/Premier-League-watched-league-world-study-finds.html"><u>most-watched sports league in the world</u></a>) to Manchester City, which went on to win its fourth title in a row. Last year, we noted how football/soccer in England impacted X’s ranking. X also reached #13 on August 9 and 10, during the final weekend of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Summer_Olympics"><u>Paris 2024 Olympics</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>X</b> performed better on weekdays, while <b>LinkedIn</b> ranked higher between Mondays and Wednesdays. <b>Snapchat</b> and <b>Discord</b> performed better on weekends.</p></li><li><p><b>Reddit</b> consistently stayed in our Top 50 in 2024, showing growth from around #45 to #40 by November, with a peak at #38 on November 26. It performed better between Mondays and Wednesdays.</p></li><li><p><b>Quora</b> displayed a downward trend in our ranking, dropping from around #140 to #160. It performed better between Mondays and Wednesdays. </p></li><li><p><b>Tinder</b>, which performs better on Sundays, started the year around #150 but eventually dropped below #160.</p></li><li><p><b>Tumblr</b> followed a similar pattern, dropping out of the Top 200, where it was in early 2024, to outside the ranking entirely since September. Tumblr performed better on weekends.</p></li><li><p><b>OnlyFans</b> showed growth in our Overall ranking, sitting around the Top 220 with a peak at #213 on December 1. It performed better on weekends.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>E-commerce: Temu means growth</h2>
      <a href="#e-commerce-temu-means-growth">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The importance of e-commerce continues to grow, as highlighted in our recent <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/from-deals-to-ddos-exploring-cyber-week-2024-internet-trends"><u>Cyber Week 2024 blog post</u></a>. Amazon leads the category, followed by Taobao, the Chinese marketplace, holding a steady #2 spot as it also did in 2023. New to #3 is AliExpress, the global online retail giant from China.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 E-commerce services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-e-commerce-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Amazon</p></li><li><p>Taobao</p></li><li><p>AliExpress</p></li><li><p>Shopify</p></li><li><p>Temu</p></li><li><p>Alibaba</p></li><li><p>eBay</p></li><li><p>Shein</p></li><li><p>Mercado Libre</p></li><li><p>Wildberries (RU)</p></li></ol><p>Compared to 2023, eBay lost its #3 spot globally and dropped down to #7, despite starting 2024 at #3 for several days. AliExpress claimed #3, followed by Shopify (#4), the Canadian platform hosting numerous online stores, and Temu (#5). Temu, the low-cost, fast-fashion marketplace launched in the US in September 2022, ended 2023 at #7 but rose to #5 in 2024, occasionally reaching #4 since August. Alibaba dropped to #6 in September.</p><p>Shein, the Chinese fast-fashion brand, continued its growth and overtook Mercado Libre (#8) in November. A surprise this year was Wildberries, often called Russia’s “Amazon,”  that has been <a href="https://tech.news.am/eng/news/499/wildberries-starts-direct-sales-of-products-from-armenia-to-other-countries.html"><u>expanding</u></a> to several neighboring countries (including some in <a href="https://ecommercenews.eu/wildberries-launches-in-france-italy-and-spain/"><u>Europe</u></a>). It climbed to #10 in September, surpassing OLX (which held #10 for several months), Rakuten, and Lazada.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/25LFh2rFpp3eaVXVdK4Qfm/ccbe39b79da5808f45043945defe7001/BLOG-1033_10.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>The Black Friday overall effect</h2>
      <a href="#the-black-friday-overall-effect">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Looking at how e-commerce sites performed in our Overall ranking, we observed the following trends:</p><ul><li><p><b>Amazon</b> fluctuated between #9 and #10 after October, returning to #9 on November 30 and December 1, during the Black Friday weekend. It often performed better on weekends.</p></li><li><p><b>Shopify</b>’s best day of the year was Black Friday, November 29, when it reached #55. The global e-commerce platform performed better during weekdays.</p></li><li><p><b>Temu</b>, known for low-cost products, started 2024 outside the Top 100 but climbed into the Top 70 by year-end. It performed best in late October and early November, peaking at #63, with a Black Friday spike to #65.</p></li><li><p><b>Shein</b>, the Chinese fast-fashion brand, showed growth, nearing the Top 100 in early 2024 before dropping to the Top 140 between June and October. It rebounded in November, peaking at #83 on Black Friday. A similar trend was observed in 2023, when it ended the year around the Top 120. Here’s the comparison between recent players Temu and Shein:</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/33EruzBOGpz5dMKVae9i5F/4a4d04afdd014db124e5531309eb475e/BLOG-1033_11.png" />
          </figure><ul><li><p><b>eBay</b> consistently ranked between #72 and #80, peaking at #62 on October 5-6 and again in late November, just before Black Friday. It often performed better on weekends.</p></li><li><p><b>Mercado Libre</b>, the Latin American marketplace, had its best day on Black Friday, November 29, reaching #100.</p></li><li><p><b>Adidas</b> entered the Top 250, ranking #232 on Black Friday, November 29.</p></li><li><p><b>Target</b> performed well in November, peaking at #133 on November 27, the day before Thanksgiving in the US, and at #127 on December 1. It often performed better on Sundays.</p></li><li><p><b>Walmart</b> improved its performance from September onward, with its best days on November 25-26, reaching #150.</p></li><li><p><b>Ikea</b>, the Swedish furniture retailer, peaked at #247 on June 29.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Video streaming: YouTube and Netflix remain uncontested leaders</h2>
      <a href="#video-streaming-youtube-and-netflix-remain-uncontested-leaders">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The relevance of video streaming platforms shows no signs of fading. In 2024, the Top 3 rankings stayed unchanged from 2023, with YouTube firmly holding the #1 spot, followed by Netflix. Among paid streaming services, Netflix leads, trailed by Disney Plus and Amazon Prime Video. Other paid streaming services are outside the Top 10, including, in ranked order: HBO/Max, Hulu, Peacock, and Paramount Plus.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 — Video streaming services 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-video-streaming-services-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>YouTube</p></li><li><p>Netflix</p></li><li><p>Twitch</p></li><li><p>Roku</p></li><li><p>Disney Plus</p></li><li><p>Amazon Prime Video</p></li><li><p>Vimeo</p></li><li><p>Plex.TV</p></li><li><p>Pluto TV</p></li><li><p> Bigo Live</p></li></ol><p>Twitch, a live-streaming platform for gaming, kept the #3 spot, as it did in 2023 and 2022. Roku, a digital media player that also offers streaming services, ranked #4, maintaining its position from last year. Similarly, Disney Plus (#5) and Amazon Prime Video (#6) held their spots, while Hulu dropped out of the Top 10.</p><p>The creative video platform Vimeo showed clear popularity growth since May, followed by recent players like Plex TV, a media platform with streaming that performed better starting in October, and Pluto TV, a free ad-supported streaming service that also showed growth throughout the year. Bigo Live, a live-streaming social platform, entered the Top 10 rankings in May. </p><p>Next, the Top 10 overtime perspective:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3WIn3kVYqJqUvd4QTzHTem/94c6c99cce6fce1ac253dc326857d3c5/BLOG-1033_12.png" />
          </figure><p>Throughout the year, Disney Plus occasionally challenged Roku, especially on weekends, a trend similar to what was observed in 2023.</p><p>Looking at how video streaming services performed in our Overall ranking, we found:</p><ul><li><p><b>Netflix</b> consistently ranked #12 on most weekends, particularly Sundays, through late May and resumed the same trend after August. Netflix, Disney Plus, Prime Video, and HBO/Max were more popular on weekends, especially Sundays.</p></li><li><p><b>Disney Plus</b> ranged between #50 and #60, with a strong start to the year and a spike to #51 on September 22, coinciding with the premiere of the new Marvel show <a href="https://screenrant.com/agatha-all-along-tv-review/"><u>Agatha All Along</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Prime Video</b> had its best day in the rankings on May 25, at #56, the day the movie <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/amazon-prime-video-schedule-may-200600787.html"><u>Bombshell</u></a> with Nicole Kidman premiered on the platform.</p></li><li><p><b>HBO/Max</b> was consistently around the Top 100 until August. but dropped out after October.</p></li><li><p><b>Peacock</b> had an inconsistent presence in the Top 250 but reappeared in late July during the Paris 2024 Olympics, reaching #176 on July 28. That was one of the busiest days for Olympic events, as detailed in our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/paris-2024-olympics-recap/"><u>blog post on the event</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Paramount Plus</b> was mostly outside the Top 250 this year but peaked at #216 on February 11, the day of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_LVIII"><u>Super Bowl</u></a>, which the platform streamed.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>The News: Globo and BBC global perspectives</h2>
      <a href="#the-news-globo-and-bbc-global-perspectives">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>News organizations are vital for keeping the public informed, especially during crises. With that in mind, this ranking of news services, some of which are well-established news outlets while others are news aggregators, also highlights a few newsworthy trends.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 News services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-news-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Globo</p></li><li><p>BBC</p></li><li><p>NY Times</p></li><li><p>CNN</p></li><li><p>Fox News</p></li><li><p>Google News</p></li><li><p>Yahoo Finance</p></li><li><p>Daily Mail</p></li><li><p>RT</p></li><li><p>NewsBreak</p></li></ol><p>This year’s rankings in the news category mirrored 2023 at the top. Globo, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupo_Globo"><u>Brazilian media giant</u></a> — one of the largest in Latin America and globally — encompassing radio, TV, newspapers, and magazines, stayed #1, followed by the British BBC at #2, that operates <a href="https://www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/whatwedo/worldservice"><u>globally and in 42 languages</u></a>. </p><p>The New York Times rose to #3 this year (it was #5 in 2023), overtaking CNN (#4) and Fox News (#5), which dropped from its position at #3 in 2023 and this year came behind CNN.</p><p>Several prominent outlets, such as the Washington Post, The Guardian, NPR, and the Wall Street Journal, fell out of the Top 10 this year. These outlets had higher rankings in late 2023 following the start of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Hamas-led_attack_on_Israel"><u>Hamas-Israel conflict</u></a> on October 7. News aggregators gained prominence, with Google News (#6) and also Yahoo Finance (#7), focused on financial news (and that came in front of Yahoo News), and NewsBreak (#10), a US-based local news app, entering the Top 10. </p><p>The British Daily Mail, which has also <a href="https://podnews.net/update/mail-podcasts-us"><u>expanded</u></a> its focus <a href="https://x.com/DailyMail"><u>to the US</u></a> and <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/auhome/index.html"><u>Australia</u></a>, ranked #8, followed by RT, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)"><u>Russian news TV network</u></a> with a global presence. RT <a href="https://x.com/rtnoticias_br"><u>launched</u></a> its Brazil/Portuguese version in late 2023 and was recently highlighted in a <a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/09/25/nx-s1-5114246/russia-today-rt-election-influence-tenet-indictment"><u>report</u></a> and an <a href="https://www.state.gov/alerting-the-world-to-rts-global-covert-activities/"><u>alert</u></a> from the US Department of State regarding its global operations.</p><p>The US elections impacted rankings. CNN climbed to #2 on November 5, election day, and reached #1 on November 6, while Fox News peaked at #3. NBC News also improved, reaching #11 on November 5 and #7 the following day. Associated Press ranked #8 on November 5 as well. Here’s the News ranking:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1VrN4qkmRQbWpEgNpVf9xF/bcb5455da83adc008d4b03ebbb36de01/BLOG-1033_13.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>US elections, attacks and protests</h2>
      <a href="#us-elections-attacks-and-protests">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Notable news trends we identified in our larger Overall ranking include:</p><ul><li><p>As we’ve seen in the News category, the US elections on November 5, 2024, caused CNN, Fox News, and others to jump in our rankings. This trend was also evident in the Overall ranking for the following media outlets, listed by performance. November 6 was the best day of 2024 for each:</p><ul><li><p><b>CNN</b>: #105 on November 5; #72 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>Fox News</b>: #153 on November 5; #92 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>BBC</b>: #115 on November 5, and #97 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>NY Times</b>: #149 on November 5; #98 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>NBC News</b>: #160 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>Associated Press</b>: #166 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>Google News</b>: #250 on November 5; #228 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>Wall Street Journal</b>: #241 on November 6</p></li><li><p><b>Washington Post</b>: #245 on November 6</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>In the next chart we show rankings for CNN, Fox News, the BBC, and NY Times:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7Fyn60CqLd0GLhX5xLq9fM/be754873b6a79e7622b3bff5e46c1d9f/BLOG-1033_14.png" />
          </figure><ul><li><p>Brazil made <a href="https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20240225-thousands-of-brazilians-pour-into-streets-to-denounce-coup-probe-against-ex-president-bolsonaro"><u>headlines</u></a> in late February when thousands of <a href="https://oglobo.globo.com/politica/noticia/2024/02/25/apoiadores-de-bolsonaro-ocupam-avenida-paulista-em-ato-convocado-pelo-ex-presidente.ghtml"><u>Bolsonaro supporters protested</u></a> to defend the former president against investigations. During this period, Globo moved up the rankings, reaching #60 on February 24-25, 2024.</p></li><li><p><b>WP</b>, the news aggregator from Poland, had its best day on July 26 (#188), coinciding with <a href="https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/polish-mps-allow-security-forces-to-use-arms-with-impunity/"><u>Polish lawmakers</u></a> voting to allow security forces to use lethal weapons with “<a href="https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/polish-mps-allow-security-forces-to-use-arms-with-impunity/"><u>impunity</u></a>”, particularly at the tense border with Belarus. WP peaked again on November 6 (#180), the day after the US elections, when the result of the election was mentioned in <a href="https://notesfrompoland.com/2024/11/06/polish-opposition-chant-trumps-name-in-parliament-after-us-election-victory/"><u>Poland’s parliament</u></a>. Its third and final peak was on Black Friday, November 29, again at #180.</p></li><li><p><b>Rambler</b>, the Russian news aggregator, peaked at #218 on February 23, 2024, the day after the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocus_City_Hall_attack"><u>Moscow concert hall attack</u></a> and the same day Vladimir Putin <a href="http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73703"><u>addressed the nation</u></a>.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Messaging: WhatsApp rules &amp; Telegram rises</h2>
      <a href="#messaging-whatsapp-rules-telegram-rises">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Messaging remains relevant, especially for <a href="https://internetlab.org.br/en/news/new-research-indicates-that-the-impact-of-information-in-messaging-apps-has-a-deep-connection-with-other-media-habits/"><u>specific</u></a> communication purposes. Apple’s iMessage is excluded from this category because it lacks a unique domain name for traffic analysis. With that in mind, WhatsApp retained its position as the top messaging service in 2024, consistent with 2023 and 2022.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top Messaging services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-messaging-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>WhatsApp</p></li><li><p>QQ</p></li><li><p>Telegram</p></li><li><p>Viber</p></li><li><p>WeChat</p></li><li><p>Signal</p></li><li><p>LINE</p></li><li><p>KakaoTalk</p></li><li><p>eitaa.com</p></li><li><p>Facebook Messenger</p></li></ol><p>Following WhatsApp at #2 is, for the second year in a row, the Chinese service QQ, also known as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent_QQ"><u>Tencent QQ</u></a>, which includes games and mobile payments and is popular in Asia. Telegram, widely used in Eastern Europe and Asia, took the #3 spot from Viber in June. Viber remains popular in Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.</p><p>WeChat rose this year, securing #5 in October and surpassing Signal, which held that position for most of the year but dropped to #6 (the same position in which it ended 2023). LINE from Japan ranked #7, while new entries to the Top 10 included South Korea’s KakaoTalk (#8) and Iran’s eitaa.com (#9), a messaging application, designed for both mobile and desktop platforms, that is popular in Iran and among the Farsi (Persian) language <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_diaspora"><u>diaspora</u></a>.</p><p>Facebook Messenger rounded out the Top 10 at #10.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7zzbNj7yWjrSVKtE7GXKah/83cc0677e91df949d6198727a835f0c7/BLOG-1033_15.png" />
          </figure><p>Here are other messaging trends from our Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>WhatsApp</b>, as noted, performed better this year, growing in popularity since late July, stabilizing at #9 by mid-October, and performing better during weekdays.</p></li><li><p><b>Telegram’s</b> best days were between July 16-18, during developments in the Ukraine war, including the Russian Black Sea Fleet leaving Crimea. Telegram is widely used by <a href="https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/10/24/on-telegram-russian-messengers-of-war_6730371_4.html"><u>thousands of Russian ‘war correspondents,’</u></a> as recently <a href="https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2024/08/26/panic-mounts-on-pro-war-russian-telegram-channels-after-pavel-durov-s-arrest_6721621_13.html"><u>reported</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Eitaa</b>, the Iranian cloud-based messaging app, peaked at #185 in our Overall ranking on April 14, 2024, the day of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2024_Iranian_strikes_against_Israel"><u>Iranian strikes against Israel</u></a>, which we covered in a <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-traffic-analysis-iran-israel-april-attack/"><u>blog post on Internet trends</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>WeChat</b> spiked in our Overall ranking (#116) on July 30, 2024, coinciding with <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-leaders-vow-step-up-policy-support-economy-2024-07-30/"><u>Chinese leaders pledging to tilt stimulus efforts towards consumers</u></a>.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Metaverse &amp; Gaming: Roblox leads, Steam grows, Oculus is out</h2>
      <a href="#metaverse-gaming-roblox-leads-steam-grows-oculus-is-out">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Gaming and metaverse both involve immersing players in other worlds. Leaving concepts aside, we’ve grouped gaming and the metaverse into the same category since 2022. Roblox dominated this category again in 2024, retaining its top spot, followed by Microsoft’s Xbox at #2. Epic Games, the creator of Fortnite, ranked third.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 Metaverse &amp; Gaming services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-metaverse-gaming-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Roblox</p></li><li><p>Xbox/Xbox Live</p></li><li><p>Epic Games/Fortnite</p></li><li><p>Steam</p></li><li><p>PlayStation</p></li><li><p>Electronic Arts</p></li><li><p>Blizzard</p></li><li><p>Riot Games/League of Legends</p></li><li><p>Minecraft</p></li><li><p>Garena</p></li></ol><p>Xbox/Xbox Live held #2 consistently, but Epic Games/Fortnite contested the position earlier in the year and again in November. Steam was a surprise this year, jumping to #4, ahead of PlayStation. It even rose to #2 in late March and early April, coinciding with the launch of a <a href="https://blog.playstation.com/2024/03/25/stellar-blade-demo-arrives-march-29/"><u>new demo</u></a>. Other platforms on the rise included Electronic Arts, Blizzard, and Riot Games/League of Legends.</p><p>Minecraft made the Top 10 at #9, performing best on July 5, 6, and 10, when it reached #7. Garena, the Singaporean game developer and publisher, entered the Top 10 for the first time. Oculus, Meta’s VR headset and metaverse service, dropped out of the Top 10 to #11, after ending 2023 at #5. It performed better earlier in the year (until April) and in late November.</p><p>Here’s the top chart across 2024:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1w3JyOWKJY6oMIGUrwve2A/8f6530eb7dc701bb645a578f66dc034e/BLOG-1033_16.png" />
          </figure><p>Here are other metaverse and gaming trends from our Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Roblox’s</b> best day in 2024 was January 21, when it reached #20. The platform performed better on weekends, especially Sundays, similar to other popular gaming platforms like Xbox/Xbox Live, Epic Games/Fortnite, Steam, and PlayStation.</p></li><li><p><b>Epic Games/Fortnite’s</b> best day was January 1, 2024.</p></li><li><p><b>Xbox/Xbox Live</b> (#37) and <b>PlayStation</b> (#43) had their best day on November 2, 2024, the day before the <a href="https://www.gematsu.com/2024/07/aero-the-acro-bat-rascal-rival-revenge-coming-to-ps5-xbox-series-ps4-xbox-one-and-switch-on-november-1"><u>launch</u></a> of the new version of the classic game <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_the_Acro-Bat"><u>Aero the Acro-Bat: Rascal Rival Revenge</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Steam’s</b> best day was August 24, 2024, during the week of <a href="https://www.si.com/videogames/guides/gamescom-2024-all-publishers-developers"><u>Gamescom</u></a> 2024 in Germany. Several new games were <a href="https://www.pcgamer.com/new-games-2024-upcoming-pc-releases/"><u>released</u></a> that week, including Tactical Breach Wizards and Dustborn.</p></li><li><p><b>Minecraft</b>, celebrating its 15th anniversary in May 2024, had its best days on June 15 (#90), following the release of the <a href="https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/tricky-trials-update-official-release-date"><u>Tricky Trials game update</u></a> by Mojang Studios, and August 17 (#90), coinciding with the release of <a href="https://gamerant.com/minecraft-snapshot-24w33a-bundle-feature-patch-notes/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"><u>Minecraft: Java Edition Snapshot 24w33a</u></a>.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Financial services: Stripe keeps lead, Black Friday impact</h2>
      <a href="#financial-services-stripe-keeps-lead-black-friday-impact">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Financial services cover everything from traditional banking to cryptocurrencies and tax tools. Stripe, the Irish-American payment platform, kept its #1 spot for the second year, after overtaking PayPal in this category in 2023.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 Financial Services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-financial-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Stripe</p></li><li><p>TradingView</p></li><li><p>Alipay</p></li><li><p>PayPal</p></li><li><p>Nubank (BR)</p></li><li><p>Binance</p></li><li><p>Coinbase</p></li><li><p>Banco do Brasil</p></li><li><p>Bradesco Bank</p></li><li><p>Itau</p></li></ol><p>PayPal spent only a few days at #2 and a few others at #3 this year, but ultimately dropped to #4. TradingView, a platform specializing in tools for traders and investors, climbed to #2, followed by AliPay, the Chinese mobile and online payment platform, which secured #3.</p><p>Nubank, the Brazilian <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neobank"><u>neobank</u></a> (only online) and considered to be the most <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-28/nubank-dethrones-itau-to-become-most-valuable-latin-america-bank"><u>valuable</u></a>, <a href="https://www.financemagnates.com/fintech/payments/nubank-sets-sights-on-becoming-latin-americas-largest-fintech/"><u>one of the biggest</u></a> Latin America <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-08/nubank-surpasses-100-million-clients-across-latin-america"><u>financial groups</u></a> and the <a href="https://qz.com/nubank-digital-bank-mexico-latin-america-1851096374"><u>world's biggest digital bank</u></a>, entered the Top 10 at #5, while Binance rose to #6 (up from #8 last year). Binance also peaked at #3 on November 12-13, following the US elections, as Bitcoin reached new highs. In the crypto space, Coinbase joined the Top 10 for the first time.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2Dg1CQsb2cf61l02gzkwjy/10d67fd6e85b2ec9c6a8982135c0affe/BLOG-1033_17.png" />
          </figure><p>Brazil’s <a href="https://coinlaw.io/online-banking-usage-statistics/"><u>growth</u></a> in online banking, <a href="https://seon.io/resources/neobanking-index/"><u>digital banks</u></a>, and <a href="https://www.thunes.com/insights/trends/how-digital-payments-drive-brazils-economic-transformation/"><u>payments</u></a> in Latin America has driven traditional banks to expand their digital presence. In 2024, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, and Itaú performed well and rose into the Top 10, moving more than ever to the online space including in partnership with each other (as detailed in these two (<a href="https://clickpetroleoegas.com.br/bancos-tradicionais-com-os-dias-contados-banco-do-brasil-e-itau-estao-perdendo-terreno-para-os-bancos-digitais/"><u>1</u></a>), (<a href="https://br.cointelegraph.com/news/bradesco-joins-itau-and-banco-do-brasil-to-test-loans-with-rwa-tokens-based-on-cdbs-on-drex"><u>2</u></a>) articles in Portuguese).</p><p>And here’s the crypto perspective in this Financial services category:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2RYeSg7btuzZZKQjg1S9RU/9181d0a9598d27d761004b29e3080c90/BLOG-1033_18.png" />
          </figure><p>Next, we highlight other financial services trends from our Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Stripe’s</b> best days were just before Black Friday, on November 18-19 and November 25, reaching #81 during those days. Stripe performed better on weekends and maintained consistent rankings throughout the year.</p></li><li><p><b>PayPal</b> ranked higher around Black Friday week, peaking at #89 on November 21 and on Black Friday, November 29.</p></li><li><p>Brazilian bank <b>Nubank </b>performed best a few days before Carnival in Brazil (February 10-14), reaching #87 on February 1 and 3 and #92 on February 10. It also ranked well on Black Friday, November 29, peaking at #90.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Crypto: Binance is back (and the impact of US elections)</h2>
      <a href="#crypto-binance-is-back-and-the-impact-of-us-elections">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In addition to our Financial Services category, we evaluated cryptocurrency-related services specifically. Despite a few <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency_bubble#2021%E2%80%932024_crash"><u>crashes over recent years</u></a>, the crypto sector continued to evolve in 2024, experiencing a late-year boom, as we explore below. Binance and Coinbase retained the top two spots, while OKX climbed to #3 this year.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Top 10 Cryptocurrency services in 2024</h3>
      <a href="#top-10-cryptocurrency-services-in-2024">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ol><li><p>Binance</p></li><li><p>Coinbase</p></li><li><p>OKX</p></li><li><p>2miners.com</p></li><li><p>CoinMarketCap</p></li><li><p>Coingecko</p></li><li><p>Bybit</p></li><li><p>Exodus</p></li><li><p>Tonkeeper</p></li><li><p>NiceHash</p></li></ol><p>CoinGecko, a cryptocurrency data platform, dropped to #6, making way for OKX in late August, while new entrant 2miners.com rose to #4. CoinMarketCap ranked #5, followed by several dynamic new entrants in the Top 10:</p><ul><li><p><b>Bybit</b> (#7): A cryptocurrency exchange offering spot and derivatives trading.</p></li><li><p><b>Exodus</b> (#8): A user-friendly, multi-asset cryptocurrency wallet.</p></li><li><p><b>Tonkeeper</b> (#9): A secure wallet for managing Toncoin and related assets.</p></li></ul><p>NiceHash, a platform connecting cryptocurrency miners and buyers, performed better in 2023, but dropped from #5 to #10 this year.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/gsv2DRL58AbAl0wsVtNcy/49a79f64fab898eee1e29a8d893c57bc/BLOG-1033_19.png" />
          </figure><p>The US elections also had an apparent effect on the Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p><b>Binance</b> entered the Top 100 for the first time on September 26, when Bitcoin <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/14124731668666"><u>surged past</u></a> $65,000, driven by positive US employment data and China’s announcement of economic stimulus measures. It peaked at #97 on November 13, following the US elections and Donald Trump’s victory, as <a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/bitcoin-price-90000-charts-9141d469"><u>Bitcoin's price</u></a> surpassed $90,000 for the first time.</p></li><li><p><b>Coinbase’s</b> best day was November 21, reaching #131, as Bitcoin <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/bitcoin-breaks-95000-first-time-optimism-over-trump-crypto-plans-2024-11-21/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"><u>approached</u></a> $100,000 (which it surpassed on December 4, although our ranking only covers up to December 1).</p></li><li><p><b>OKX</b> peaked at #149 on November 22, and <b>CoinMarketCap</b> reached #176 on November 23.</p></li><li><p><b>CoinGecko’s</b> best day was November 11, the week following the US elections, when it climbed to #137.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Other overall trends: Olympics, Tesla, GitHub, and more</h2>
      <a href="#other-overall-trends-olympics-tesla-github-and-more">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Outside the categories we reviewed as part of the Year in Review, several notable trends emerged in our Overall ranking:</p><ul><li><p>The Paris 2024 Summer Olympics (July 26–August 11, 2024) appeared in our Top 250 Overall ranking, with <b>Olympics</b>-related sites debuting on July 27 (#195), the first full day of events. The peak was on July 30 (#177), driven by Léon Marchand’s swimming performances and the US women’s artistic gymnastics medal, as <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/paris-2024-olympics-recap/"><u>detailed in our Olympics blog post</u></a>. The final day in the Top 250 was August 11 (#217).
</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7fw1wyOxSjdFH06m29o3Zv/359cdb5b089f0f2b1949a7e6eb9d46b1/BLOG-1033_20.png" />
          </figure><p></p></li><li><p><b>Spotify</b> ranked between #17 and #18 this year, performing best in October, spending most of the month at #17. However, as our list ends on December 1, we are not tracking the impact of the recently launched Spotify Wrapped.</p></li><li><p><b>Tesla</b> entered the Top 250 after October. Its best day was October 12 (#245), following the Cybercab robotaxi reveal. It also ranked higher on November 17 (#246), after a post-US elections <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/17/stock-futures-open-little-changed-as-traders-await-nvidia-earnings-live-updates.html"><u>stock rally</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>GitHub’s</b> best day was November 8 (#31), coinciding with its <a href="https://github.blog/changelog/2024-11-08-organizations-can-now-enable-2fa-requirement-without-removing-non-compliant-members-ga/"><u>announcement</u></a> of enhanced security protocols, including mandatory <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/access-management/what-is-two-factor-authentication/"><u>two-factor authentication (2FA)</u></a> for organizations.</p></li><li><p><b>NBA</b> appeared in the Top 250 until early March, with its best day on February 4, during <a href="https://champsorchumps.us/scores/nba/february-4-2024?utm_source=chatgpt.com"><u>these games</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Nike</b> ranked only once, on March 26 (#236), during the annual Air Max Day celebration.</p></li><li><p><b>Brazil’s </b>official <b>Judiciary </b>site peaked at #105 on October 6, during the first round of municipal elections.</p></li><li><p><b>Ticketmaster</b> peaked at #169 on October 8, during a <a href="https://colitco.com/ticketmaster-global-outage-australian-f1-fans/"><u>major service disruption</u></a>, followed by October 9 (#170), the day Australian F1 tickets went on sale.</p></li><li><p><b>Intuit’s</b> best day was April 15 (#121), US Tax Day, consistent with <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/us-tax-day-2022-how-leaving-it-to-the-last-day-impacts-tax-sites/"><u>previous years</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Weather.com</b> peaked at #61 between August 4–6, during <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Debby_(2024)"><u>Hurricane Debby</u></a>’s landfall in Florida.</p></li><li><p>The best day for <b>IMDb</b> (the Internet Movie Database)<b> </b>was January 1 (#220).</p></li><li><p><b>Example.com</b>, <a href="https://www.iana.org/help/example-domains"><u>a domain used for documentation purposes</u></a>, ranked between #24 and #56.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Insights by country/region</h2>
      <a href="#insights-by-country-region">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Regarding our newly country/region-specific Popular Internet Services overall lists (available on the Year in Review <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2024#internet-services"><u>microsite</u></a>), we observed that Google ranked #1 in nearly all countries. However, there are other notable highlights we feel are worth sharing:</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Social Media</h3>
      <a href="#social-media">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p><b>TikTok</b> was ranked #1 in Iraq, Kosovo, and Libya, and #2 in over 30 countries/regions across different continents. Examples include Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Belarus, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Palestine, Ukraine, Venezuela, and South Africa.</p></li><li><p><b>Facebook</b> was #1 in Myanmar and #2 in 69 other countries. <a href="https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-censorship-virtual-private-network-facebook-79fb4cc0c3c4317844d0c00b0be1d9d1"><u>Myanmar</u></a>, where the government is known to block several websites, fell to the bottom of <a href="https://thediplomat.com/2024/10/military-ruled-myanmar-falls-to-bottom-of-internet-freedom-ranking/"><u>Freedom House’s Internet freedom ranking this year</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><b>Instagram</b> performed well in several countries, ranking among the top five in 18 countries/regions.</p></li><li><p><b>X</b> showed strong performance in Japan, where it is widely known, ranking #3 in 2024. It also ranked within the top 10 in 23 countries/regions.</p></li><li><p><b>Reddit</b> did not make the Top 10 in any country but performed best in Iceland (#26) and the United States (#28).</p></li><li><p><b>Kwai</b>, the social media platform, performed best in Brazil, ranking #7 overall.</p></li><li><p><b>Snapchat</b> performed well in Iraq and Kosovo (#4) and in Libya, Palestine, and Saudi Arabia (#5).</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>ChatGPT  </h3>
      <a href="#chatgpt">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p><b>ChatGPT</b> did not reach the Top 10 in any country but made it into the Top 50 in 47 countries. It performed best in Singapore (#35), Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka (#36), Switzerland, Taiwan (#37), Ethiopia (#38), Japan, Iceland, and Haiti (#40).</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Video streaming </h3>
      <a href="#video-streaming">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p><b>YouTube</b> ranked in the Top 10 in 113 countries/regions, and reached the Top 5 in countries like Bangladesh (#4), and Armenia, Georgia, Guyana, Kenya, Peru, Qatar, Ukraine, and Uganda (#5).</p></li><li><p><b>Netflix</b> made the Top 10 in 17 countries/regions, performing best in Colombia and Ecuador (#8) and in Bolivia, Chile, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Trinidad and Tobago (#9).</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Messaging </h3>
      <a href="#messaging">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p><b>WhatsApp</b> made the Top 10 in 90 countries/regions and ranked in the Top 5 in over 35, reaching #4 in regions such as Latin America, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, including Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Indonesia, Laos, Peru, Pakistan, Paraguay, Uganda, and Venezuela.</p></li><li><p><b>LINE</b>, the messaging app by Naver, made the Top 10 in Thailand (#8).</p></li><li><p><b>Viber</b>, the messaging service, ranked in the Top 10 in Myanmar (#5), Ukraine (#9), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (#10).</p></li><li><p><b>Zalo.me</b>, the Vietnamese multi-platform messaging app, ranked #6 in Vietnam.</p></li><li><p><b>Yandex</b>, the Russian search engine and portal, ranked highest in Belarus and Russia (#3), as well as in Kazakhstan, Latvia, and Uzbekistan (#5).</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Other trends </h3>
      <a href="#other-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <ul><li><p><b>Yahoo</b> appeared only in Japan’s Top 10.</p></li><li><p><b>Temu</b>, which showed notable growth in 2024, did not feature in the Top 10 in any country/region, but placed in the Top 30 in Oman (#18), Bahrain (#25), Kuwait (#26), the Dominican Republic, and Qatar (#27).</p></li><li><p><b>Roblox</b> appeared in the Top 10 in only three countries/regions: Philippines (#7), Kosovo (#8), and Trinidad and Tobago (#10).</p></li><li><p><b>Wikipedia</b> reached the #10 spot in Bangladesh and Ukraine.</p></li><li><p><b>Microsoft Office 365</b> performed best in Europe, ranking #4 in Slovenia, #5 in Portugal, and #6 in Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, as well as in Australia and New Zealand.</p></li><li><p><b>Microsoft Outlook</b> showed strong performance in Australia (#7), Denmark, New Zealand, and Slovenia (#8).</p></li><li><p><b>Naver</b>, the South Korean platform and search engine, ranked #4 in South Korea.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Wrap up 2024: AI, e-commerce, and crypto tides</h2>
      <a href="#wrap-up-2024-ai-e-commerce-and-crypto-tides">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The Internet continues to shape how we socialize, work, and stay informed. Our 2024 rankings highlight the enduring dominance of platforms like Google, Facebook, and TikTok, alongside the rapid rise of generative AI services like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, with new players like GitHub Copilot and Claude making strides.</p><p>In social media, X shows declining influence, while Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon are carving out niches but remain far from overtaking established platforms. Temu continues to rise in e-commerce, while Shein and AliExpress strengthened their global positions. In cryptocurrency, Binance regained momentum as Bitcoin surged, and newer players entered the scene. Gaming saw Roblox maintain its lead, with Steam experiencing notable growth.</p><p>Events like the Paris 2024 Summer Olympics, US elections, and war-related attacks also shaped Internet trends, emphasizing how global events influence online activity. These trends mirror real-world developments and set the stage for an interconnected, tech-driven future.</p><p>On a final note, creating rankings is a team effort that comes with its own challenges and requires careful attention and frequent updates. We welcome your <a><u>feedback</u></a> and suggestions for new categories to explore in the Year in Review.</p><p><i>(Our data scientist, Sabina Zejnilovic, played a crucial role in gathering the Internet services data.)</i></p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1bFqI2J5pfAs7dEpRp8auV</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[From deals to DDoS: exploring Cyber Week 2024 Internet trends]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/from-deals-to-ddos-exploring-cyber-week-2024-internet-trends/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 20:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ How significant are Cyber Week shopping days on the Internet? Is it a global phenomenon? Does E-commerce interest peak on Black Friday or Cyber Monday, and are attacks increasing during this time?
 ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p></p><p>In 2024, Thanksgiving (November 28), Black Friday (November 29), and Cyber Monday (December 2) significantly impacted Internet traffic, similar to trends seen <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cyber-week-analyzing-internet-traffic-and-e-commerce-trends/"><u>in 2023</u></a> and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/ecommerce/"><u>previous years</u></a>. This year, Thanksgiving in the US drove a 20% drop in daily traffic compared to the previous week, with a notable 33% dip at 15:45 ET. In contrast, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-truth-about-black-friday-and-cyber-monday/">Black Friday and Cyber Monday</a> drove traffic spikes. But how global is this trend, and do attacks increase during Cyber Week?</p><p>At Cloudflare, we manage and protect a substantial amount of traffic for our customers, providing a unique vantage point to analyze traffic and attack patterns across the Internet. This perspective reveals insights like Cyber Monday being the busiest Internet traffic day of 2024 globally, followed by Black Friday, with patterns varying across countries. Notably, global HTTP request volume on Cyber Monday 2024 was 36% higher than 2023, with 5% of that traffic blocked as potential attacks.</p><p>For this analysis, we examined anonymized and aggregated HTTP requests and DNS queries across our <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/network/"><u>network</u></a> to uncover key patterns. Cyber Monday, December 2, was the day with peak traffic, and key findings for that day include:</p><ul><li><p>Cloudflare processed a peak of 99.8 million HTTP requests per second at 15:33 UTC on Cyber Monday, December 2.</p></li><li><p>Cloudflare handled approximately 5.4 trillion daily requests on Cyber Monday, with blocked potential attacks comprising around 5% of all traffic. This was higher than the 5.1 trillion daily requests on Black Friday, where 6% of request traffic consisted of blocked potential attacks.</p></li><li><p>Daily global HTTP request volume on Cyber Monday 2024 (December 2) increased by 36% compared to Cyber Monday 2023. In comparison, Cyber Monday 2023 had shown a 27% increase over Cyber Monday 2022.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h3>Ranking Cyber Week daily Internet traffic</h3>
      <a href="#ranking-cyber-week-daily-internet-traffic">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>This year’s trends, like those observed in previous years, show how Internet traffic typically peaks in late November but tends to drop in December. In 2024, Cyber Monday was again the busiest day for global Internet traffic. However, Black Friday didn’t make the Top 3, as Sunday, December 1, and Tuesday, November 26, saw higher traffic. Black Friday ranked #5, coming behind November 21.

<i>Note: On December 1, 2024, a customer-specific software update event contributed to the increased Internet traffic observed that day, including at the country level.</i></p><p><b>Highest Internet traffic days, worldwide</b></p><p>#1 Cyber Monday, December 2, 2024
#2 Sunday, December 1, the day before Cyber Monday
#3 Tuesday, November 26, 2024</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4G8sPTUjqY8mYlH6NFVoeU/789563dff50c44934d4ad7ecb54d98dd/BLOG-2629_2.png" />
          </figure><p>In the US, the ranking was similar, with Cyber Monday, Sunday, and Black Friday being the busiest days for Internet traffic. On Cyber Monday, traffic was 12% higher than the previous week and 57% higher than Cyber Monday 2023.</p><p><b>Highest Internet traffic days, United States</b></p><p>#1 Cyber Monday, December 2
#2 Sunday, December 1
#3 Black Friday, November 29</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6ZzjADDQv2pI0V1hN6BHdm/d78edc67edeff374944395d3ddca460e/BLOG-2629_3.png" />
          </figure><p>Additionally, most US states show a similar trend, with Cyber Monday generating the most traffic, followed by Sunday, December 1, and Black Friday, November 29. Arizona, West Virginia, and Arkansas saw increases in traffic of over 20% compared to the previous week. Almost all other states experienced traffic increases exceeding 10%, including some of the most populous ones like California (11%), Florida (11%), and New York (11%).</p><p>In looking at just traffic to Shopping and Retail sites based in the US that use Cloudflare, Cyber Monday recorded the highest traffic, followed by Black Friday and the Black Friday weekend. Traffic to these sites increased significantly during Cyber Week, starting on Monday, November 25, with a 7% increase compared to the previous week and a 57% jump compared to the first week of November.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3QqgpSNOssXipkpLAW6s4E/3e974690fe7970cd88d5c70972079e76/BLOG-2629_4.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Black Friday goes mobile, Cyber Monday goes desktop</h3>
      <a href="#black-friday-goes-mobile-cyber-monday-goes-desktop">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>During Thanksgiving Day, mobile usage in the US increased significantly, with mobile device traffic accounting for 51.7% of all traffic, compared to 42.4% the previous week. The trend intensified on Black Friday, with mobile’s share peaking at 51.9% (up from 43.9% the prior Friday) and reaching a similar level on Saturday, November 30, at 52%. However, Cyber Monday saw a shift to desktop use, with mobile device share dropping to 43.4%, lower than the previous Monday. This mirrors a similar trend observed in 2023.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5AzX54zwu2e09FRsMUq9wZ/fa02857b72244dde2500c952cbc03ce2/BLOG-2629_5.jpg" />
          </figure><p>These patterns suggest that Black Friday shopping in the US often involves more out of home/office activities, with people relying on mobile devices for Internet access while on the go, whereas the opposite tends to occur on Cyber Monday, a day when many return to work and school in the US.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>How are other countries impacted by Cyber Week?</h3>
      <a href="#how-are-other-countries-impacted-by-cyber-week">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Internationally, a trend of peak Internet traffic in November is observed in most countries, as highlighted in our <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/year-in-review/2023"><u>2023 Year in Review</u></a>. This trend is likely linked to colder weather in the Northern Hemisphere, where approximately 87% of the world's population resides, as well as holidays and shopping periods, among other factors.</p><p>Here's a table summarizing the November and early December days with the most traffic, where Cyber Week plays a significant role.</p><p><b>Highest Internet traffic days</b></p><table><tr><td><p><b>UK </b></p><p>#1 Black Friday, November 29
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)</p></td><td><p><b>Canada </b></p><p>#1 Cyber Monday, December 2
#2 Black Friday, November 29
#3 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Germany </b></p><p>#1 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#2 Black Friday, November 29
#3 Cyber Monday, December 2</p></td><td><p><b>Mexico </b></p><p>#1 Cyber Monday, December 2
#2 Wednesday, November 27
#3 Tuesday, November 26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>France </b></p><p>#1 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Wednesday, November 27</p></td><td><p><b>Brazil </b></p><p>#1 Tuesday, November 26
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Thursday, November 21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Spain </b></p><p>#1 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Tuesday, November 26</p></td><td><p><b>Australia </b></p><p>#1 Black Friday, November 29
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Egypt </b></p><p>#1 Wednesday, November 27
#2 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#3 Sunday, November 24</p></td><td><p><b>Singapore </b></p><p>#1 Friday, November 22
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Tuesday, November 26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>India</b></p><p>#1 Cyber Monday, December 2
#2 Black Friday, November 29
#3 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)</p></td><td><p><b>Turkey </b></p><p>#1 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#2 Cyber Monday, December 2
#3 Singles’ Day, November 10-11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Saudi Arabia</b></p><p>#1 Sunday, December 1 (Black Friday weekend)
#2 Saturday, November 30 (Black Friday weekend)
#3 Cyber Monday, December 2</p></td><td><p><b>South Africa</b></p><p>#1 Wednesday, November 27
#2 Tuesday, November 26
#3 Black Friday, November 29</p></td></tr></table><p>Countries like the Philippines (where Singles’ Day was the top shopping day again this year), Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Indonesia (where Cyber Monday ranked second this year) show increased traffic in October and November compared to other months. However, they do not exhibit an obvious increase in traffic during Cyber Week.</p><p>As noted earlier, Singles' Day (November 11), a major Asian shopping event, ranked among the Top 3 traffic days in Turkey, the Philippines, and other countries.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>E-commerce DNS trends</h3>
      <a href="#e-commerce-dns-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Aggregated data from our <a href="https://1.1.1.1/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> resolver reveals category-specific DNS traffic growth to E-commerce sites, showing a steady increase throughout November, similar to the overall Internet traffic trends.</p><p>In the US, E-commerce DNS traffic in November 2024 followed a similar pattern compared to 2023. Black Friday (November 29) ranked as the top day for DNS traffic in the E-commerce category, followed closely by Cyber Monday and Tuesday, November 26. This aligns more closely with overall US Internet traffic trends, where Cyber Monday ranked #1.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/68bDaFaskHuHhL7lbrc6lH/93a61b059319548d63178aef3a180746/BLOG-2629_6.png" />
          </figure><p>Also in the E-commerce category, DNS traffic on Black Friday peaked between 15:00 and 18:00 ET (13:00 and 15:00 PT), with an 18% increase at 18:00 ET compared to the previous week. On Cyber Monday, peak traffic occurred later, from 20:00 to 22:00 ET (17:00 to 19:00 PT).</p>
    <div>
      <h3>A glimpse into Europe’s DNS E-commerce trends</h3>
      <a href="#a-glimpse-into-europes-dns-e-commerce-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The UK showed a similar trend in DNS traffic to E-commerce sites, mirroring its Internet traffic patterns, and following the same pattern as 2023. In 2024, Black Friday (November 29) ranked #1, followed by Cyber Monday (December 2), and Thursday, November 21.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1OisG3NKXSi1YULeNV2WuJ/a6c59a5f3855ca52ce42e8a0bd17aa10/BLOG-2629_7.png" />
          </figure><p>In Australia, Saturday, November 30 (the day after Black Friday), was the top day for E-commerce DNS traffic, followed by Cyber Monday and Black Friday. Canada followed a similar trend, with Black Friday ranking highest, followed by Cyber Monday.</p><p>In Germany, the busiest E-commerce day was Thursday, November 21, a week before Black Friday, followed by Black Friday (November 29) and Monday, November 25. Cyber Monday did not make the top three, consistent with 2023.</p><p>In France, Black Friday remained the top E-commerce day, as in 2023, followed by Cyber Monday (December 2) and Thursday, November 21.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Low-cost and second-hand DNS trends</h3>
      <a href="#low-cost-and-second-hand-dns-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Focusing on the US again, so-called “low-cost” E-commerce sites (which include recent entrants like Temu and fast-fashion brands) have become increasingly popular, and experienced more DNS traffic in the days leading up to Black Friday and Thanksgiving, specifically November 26 and 27. Cyber Monday ranked third.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3l4G9lgoQHT58G1lNXa3w3/4db46eac4cf68109caebb0dc7b318ce6/BLOG-2629_8.png" />
          </figure><p>As observed last year, second-hand shopping sites (ones that offer previously used items) in the US gained more momentum and DNS traffic during the two weeks before Black Friday week. Traffic to these sites peaked on November 12, with Cyber Monday coming in as a close second.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1JceMI5mO89BASelSCC5mR/159508fd9719b7dd12fd49ac17b6eda1/BLOG-2629_9.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Growth of cyber threats in November</h3>
      <a href="#growth-of-cyber-threats-in-november">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>DDoS (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>distributed denial-of-service</u></a>) attacks remain a common tactic for disrupting Internet properties. Our data shows that Shopping and Retail sites in the United States protected by Cloudflare experienced a significant rise in DDoS activity on Cyber Monday. On that day, 7% of all traffic in this category was mitigated as DDoS attacks, with an additional 8% flagged as potential threats.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/obd7hqV3x7yk3ced8jatd/897799ea49339c10ef1b145f6af853e2/BLOG-2629_10.png" />
          </figure><p>More broadly, DDoS activity targeting the US in general (not limited to E-commerce) also spiked during Black Friday week. Starting November 24, the share blocked as DDoS attacks rose sharply, peaking at over 2% of all traffic on November 25. Across the entire Cyber Week, there was a 41% increase in blocked DDoS attack requests compared to the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1ubLAzwXHaNtHWtQ0opKUJ/f24fd7577d02f2f06e41cd9ba114abf6/BLOG-2629_11.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Email threat trends around “Black Friday” and “Cyber Monday”</h3>
      <a href="#email-threat-trends-around-black-friday-and-cyber-monday">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>From a cybersecurity perspective, trending events, topics, and individuals often trigger spikes in email traffic, including malicious, phishing, and spam messages. This was evident during the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/paris-2024-olympics-recap"><u>Paris 2024 Olympics</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/"><u>US elections</u></a>, and shopping periods like Black Friday and Cyber Monday. Between November 1 and December 2, 2024, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/zero-trust/products/email-security/"><u>Cloudflare’s Cloud Email Security</u></a> service processed nearly 24 million emails mentioning “Black Friday” or “Cyber Monday” in the subject. Of those, 19.4 million referenced “Black Friday” while 4.2 million mentioned “Cyber Monday”, with 76% (3.2 million) of the Cyber Monday emails sent on December 2, 2024.</p><p>During this period, “Black Friday” emails were not only higher volume but also showed higher percentages of spam (10.8%) and malicious content (0.9%) compared to emails mentioning “Cyber Monday” in the subject, which had 1.8% spam and 0.2% malicious content.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/784OwCfNZFbdaUhoCOCMPx/8971151a589b675282e5c0a2e46d134c/BLOG-2629_12.png" />
          </figure><p>In the next chart, we focus on emails with “Black Friday” in the subject, given that it generated the highest percentage of spam and malicious emails. Spam emails peaked in mid-November, making up 29% of all emails, and reached 26% on Cyber Monday. Malicious email percentages were also higher in mid-November, with 3% recorded on November 14, before Black Friday week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5rRnecwHJC8wZwGDEdXykj/5c0ccc3f9632559a652608f591bb06b3/BLOG-2629_13.png" />
          </figure><p>The busiest day for “Black Friday” emails was November 29, Black Friday itself, with 4.1 million emails, followed by Saturday, November 30 (1.5 million), and Wednesday, November 27 (1.4 million).</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/228hSbCBGoB371gPY9qOEu/5a961924d4df9026ec6ba124b33e9bcd/BLOG-2629_14.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>Wrap up</h3>
      <a href="#wrap-up">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Internet traffic trends during Black Friday and Cyber Monday show varying patterns globally and regionally. Cyber Monday leads in traffic overall, followed closely by Black Friday. While the US and Canada share similar trends, countries like the UK, Germany, and Australia saw traffic higher on Black Friday than Cyber Monday. In most countries, activity also increased in the days leading up to Black Friday.</p><p>On the cybersecurity front, DDoS attacks were more noticeable during Cyber Week in 2024, especially targeting shopping-related sites.</p><p>If you’re interested in more trends and insights about the Internet, check out <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>. Follow us on social media at <a href="https://twitter.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky), or contact us via email.</p><p>​​Happy Holidays from everyone at Cloudflare!</p><p>
</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">6dyAchgukCJiXildEHYa23</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Bigger and badder: how DDoS attack sizes have evolved over the last decade]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/bigger-and-badder-how-ddos-attack-sizes-have-evolved-over-the-last-decade/</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ If we plot the metrics associated with large DDoS attacks observed in the last 10 years, does it show a straight, steady increase in an exponential curve that keeps becoming steeper, or is it closer to a linear growth? Our analysis found the growth is not linear but rather is exponential, with the slope varying depending on the metric (rps, pps or bps).  ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>Distributed Denial of Service</u></a> (DDoS) attacks are cyberattacks that aim to overwhelm and disrupt online services, making them inaccessible to users. By leveraging a network of distributed devices, DDoS attacks flood the target system with excessive requests, consuming its bandwidth or exhausting compute resources to the point of failure. These attacks can be highly effective against unprotected sites and relatively inexpensive for attackers to launch. Despite being one of the oldest types of attacks, DDoS attacks remain a constant threat, often targeting well-known or high traffic websites, services, or critical infrastructure. Cloudflare has mitigated over 14.5 million DDoS attacks since the start of 2024 — an average of 2,200 DDoS attacks per hour. (Our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-for-2024-q3/"><u>DDoS Threat Report for Q3 2024</u></a> contains additional related statistics).</p><p>If we look at the metrics associated with large attacks mitigated in the last 10 years, does the graph show a steady increase in an exponential curve that keeps getting steeper, especially over the last few years, or is it closer to linear growth? We found that the growth is not linear, but rather is exponential, with the slope dependent on the metric we are looking at.</p><p>Why is this question interesting? Simple. The answer to it provides valuable insights into the evolving strategies of attackers, the sophistication of their tools, and the readiness of defense mechanisms. </p><p>As an example, an upward curve of the number of requests per second (rps) suggests that the attackers are changing something on their side that enables them to generate larger volumes of requests. This is an insight that prompts us to investigate more and look at other data to understand if anything new is happening.</p><p>For instance, at one of those moments, we looked at the source of the traffic and saw a shift from subscriber/enterprise IP address space (suggesting IoT) to cloud provider IP address space (suggesting VMs), and realized there was a shift in the type and capabilities of devices used by attackers. </p><p>As another example: when the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/"><u>HTTP/2 Rapid Reset</u></a> attack happened, the record number of requests per second seen at that time suggested that a new technique was being employed by attackers, prompting us to swiftly investigate what was being executed and adapt our defenses.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Defining individual attacks</h2>
      <a href="#defining-individual-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Delimiting an individual attack in time is surprisingly blurry. First of all, an attack analysis can provide inconsistent observations at different layers of the <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ddos/glossary/open-systems-interconnection-model-osi/"><u>OSI model</u></a>. The footprint seen at all these different layers may tell different stories for the same attack. There are, however, some variables that together can allow us to create a fingerprint and enable us to group a set of events, establishing that they are part of the same individual attack. Examples include: </p><ul><li><p>Do we see the same <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/security/glossary/attack-vector/"><u>attack vector(s)</u></a> being used across this set of events?</p></li><li><p>Are all the attack events focused on the same target(s)?</p></li><li><p>Do the payloads on events share the same signature? (Specific data payloads or request types unique to certain types of attacks or botnets, like Mirai, which may use distinctive HTTP request headers or packet structures).</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>DDoS attack sizes </h2>
      <a href="#ddos-attack-sizes">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Before we dive into a growth analysis of DDoS attacks over the last 10 years, let's take a step back and have a look at the metrics typically used to measure them: requests per second (rps), packets per second (pps), and bits per second (bps). Each metric captures a different aspect of the attack's scale and impact.</p><ul><li><p><b>Requests per second (rps)</b>: Measures the number of HTTP or similar protocol requests made each second. This metric is particularly relevant for application-layer attacks (Layer 7), where the intent is to <b>overwhelm a specific application or service by overloading its request handling</b>, and is useful for measuring attacks targeting web servers, APIs, or applications because it reflects the volume of requests, not just raw data transfer.</p></li><li><p><b>Packets per second (pps):</b> Represents the number of individual packets sent to the target per second, regardless of their size. This metric is critical for network-layer attacks (Layers 3 and 4), where the goal is to <b>overwhelm network infrastructure by exceeding its packet-processing capacity</b>. pps measurements are useful for volumetric attacks, identifying a quantity of packets that can impact routers, switches, or firewalls.</p></li><li><p><b>Bits per second (bps):</b> This measures the total data transferred per second and is especially useful in evaluating network-layer attacks that aim to saturate the bandwidth of the target or its upstream provider. bps is widely used measuring Layer 3 and 4 attacks, such as UDP floods, where the attack intends to clog network bandwidth. This metric is often highlighted for DDoS attacks because high bps values (often measured in gigabits or terabits) signal <b>bandwidth saturation</b>, which is a common goal of large-scale DDoS campaigns.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>Evolution of DDoS attack sizes over the last decade</h2>
      <a href="#evolution-of-ddos-attack-sizes-over-the-last-decade">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>So, how have DDoS attack sizes changed in the last decade? During this period, DDoS attacks have grown bigger and stronger, each year having the potential to be more disruptive. </p><p>If we look at the metrics associated with large attacks seen in the last 10 years, does it look like we have a steady increase in an exponential curve that keeps steepening, especially in the last few years, or is it closer to a linear growth?<b> </b>We found that it is exponential, so let’s have a look at the details around why we came to that conclusion.</p><p>In this analysis, we used <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-to-protect-your-site-from-ddos-attacks-with-cloud-networking"><u>attacks that Google has seen from 2010 until 2022</u></a> as a baseline (Figure 1) that we extended with attacks that Cloudflare has seen in 2023 and 2024 (Figure 2). </p><p>Going back in time, early in the 2010s, the largest attacks were measured in the Gigabits per second (Gbps) scale, but these days, it’s all about Terabits per second (Tbps). The number of requests per second (rps) and bits per second (bps) are also significantly higher these days, as we will see.</p><p>The historical data from Google shown below in Figure 1 reveals a rising trend in requests per second during DDoS attacks observed between 2010 and 2022, peaking at 6 Million requests per second (Mrps) in 2020. The increase highlights a significant escalation in attack volume across the decade.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1OLkt2rSuO6OBGH8H1k1o6/d63d32df3f56eab0fe105a00dec45e03/BLOG-2616_2.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Figure 1</i></sup><sup>.</sup><sup><i> Largest known DDoS attacks, 2010 - 2022. (</i></sup><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-to-protect-your-site-from-ddos-attacks-with-cloud-networking"><sup><i>Source: Google</i></sup></a><sup><i>)</i></sup><sup> </sup></p><p>Figure 2 (below) provides a view of trends seen across the different metrics. The escalation seen in Google’s statistics is also visible in Cloudflare’s data regarding large mitigated DDoS attacks observed in 2023 and 2024, reaching 201 Mrps (green line) in September 2024. The rate of packets per second (pps) demonstrates (blue line) a slight exponential growth over time, rising from 230 Mpps in 2015 to 2,100 Mpps in 2024, suggesting that attackers are achieving higher throughput. For bits per second (bps), the trend is also exponential and with a steeper upwards curve (red line), building from a 309 Gbps attack in 2013 to a 5.6 Tbps (5,600 Gbps) attack in 2024. </p><p>Over roughly the last decade, attacks driving these metrics have seen significant growth rates:</p><ul><li><p>Bits per second increased by 20x between 2013 and 2024</p></li><li><p>Packets per second increased by 10x between 2015 and 2024</p></li><li><p>Requests per second increased by 70x between 2014 and 2024</p></li></ul>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/38ps28b6t40SAtoQxMp0z1/90d59911b3bcf8b55cf7ac36d56f8a5b/BLOG-2616_3.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Figure 2. Data from Figure 1 extended with large attacks observed by Cloudflare in 2023 and 2024.</i></sup></p><p>The blog posts listed in Table 1 highlight some of the attacks that we observed from 2021 to 2024.</p><table><tr><td><p><b>Month</b></p></td><td><p><b>Attack size</b></p></td><td><p><b>Blog post</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2021</p></td><td><p>17.2 Mrps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-thwarts-17-2m-rps-ddos-attack-the-largest-ever-reported/"><i><u>Cloudflare thwarts 17.2M rps DDoS attack — the largest ever reported</u></i></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2022</p></td><td><p>15 Mrps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/15m-rps-ddos-attack/"><i><u>Cloudflare blocks 15M rps HTTPS DDoS attack</u></i></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2022</p></td><td><p>26 Mrps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/26m-rps-ddos/"><i><u>Cloudflare mitigates 26 million request per second DDoS attack</u></i></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2023</p></td><td><p>71 Mrps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-mitigates-record-breaking-71-million-request-per-second-ddos-attack/"><i><u>Cloudflare mitigates record-breaking 71 million request-per-second DDoS attack</u></i></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2024</p></td><td><p>3.8 Tbps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-cloudflare-auto-mitigated-world-record-3-8-tbps-ddos-attack/"><i><u>How Cloudflare auto-mitigated world record 3.8 Tbps DDoS attack</u></i></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2024</p></td><td><p>4.2 Tbps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/ddos-threat-report-for-2024-q3/"><i><u>4.2 Tbps of bad packets and a whole lot more: Cloudflare's Q3 DDoS report</u></i></a><i> </i></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2024</p></td><td><p>5.6 Tbps</p></td><td><p><a href="https://x.com/Cloudflare/status/1851589717885649320"><u>5.6 Tbps attack</u></a></p></td></tr></table><p><sup><b>Table 1.</b></sup><sup> Notable DDoS attacks observed by Cloudflare between 2021 - 2024.</sup></p><p>An overview of other selected significant high volume DDoS attacks that have occurred over the last decade, including<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/memcrashed-major-amplification-attacks-from-port-11211/"><u> 2018’s Memcached abuse</u></a> and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/"><u>2023’s HTTP/2 “Rapid Reset” attacks</u></a>, can be found <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/famous-ddos-attacks/"><u>on the Cloudflare Learning Center</u></a>.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Attack duration as a metric</h2>
      <a href="#attack-duration-as-a-metric">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Attack duration is not an effective metric to use to qualify attack aggressiveness because establishing a duration of a single attack or campaign is challenging, due to their possible intermittent nature, the potential for a multitude of attack vectors being used at the same time, or how the different defense layers triggered over time. </p><p>The attack patterns can differ considerably, with some consisting of a single large spike, while others featuring multiple tightly grouped spikes, or a continuous load maintained over a period of time, along with other changing characteristics.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Trend in types of devices used to create attacks</h2>
      <a href="#trend-in-types-of-devices-used-to-create-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>DDoS attacks are increasingly shifting from IoT-based botnets to more powerful VM-based botnets. This change is primarily due to the higher computational and throughput capabilities of cloud-hosted virtual machines, which allow attackers to launch massive attacks with far fewer devices. </p><p>This shift is facilitated by several factors: VM botnets can be easier to establish than IoT botnets, as they don’t necessarily require widespread malware infections, since attackers can deploy them on cloud provider infrastructure anonymously using stolen payment details from data breaches or <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/navigating-the-maze-of-magecart/"><u>Magecart attacks</u></a>.</p><p>This trend points to the evolution of DDoS tactics, as attackers exploit both the processing power of VMs and anonymized access to cloud resources, enabling smaller, more efficient botnets capable of launching large-scale attacks without the complexities involved in infecting and managing fleets of IoT devices.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>How does Cloudflare help protect against DDoS attacks?</h2>
      <a href="#how-does-cloudflare-help-protect-against-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare's Connectivity Cloud, built on our expansive anycast global network, plays a crucial role in defending against DDoS attacks by leveraging automated detection, traffic distribution, and rapid response capabilities. Here’s how it strengthens DDoS protection:</p><p><b>Automated attack detection and mitigation</b>: Cloudflare’s DDoS protection relies heavily on automation, using machine learning algorithms to identify suspicious traffic patterns in real time. By <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/training-a-million-models-per-day-to-save-customers-of-all-sizes-from-ddos/"><u>automating the detection process</u></a>, Cloudflare can quickly recognize and block DDoS attacks without requiring manual intervention, which is critical in high-volume attacks that would overwhelm human responders.</p><p><b>Global traffic distribution with IP anycast</b>: Cloudflare's network spans over 330 cities worldwide, and DDoS traffic gets distributed across our multiple data centers. <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/cdn/glossary/anycast-network/"><u>IP anycast</u></a> allows us to distribute traffic across this global network, and this wide distribution helps absorb and mitigate large-scale attacks, as attack traffic is not directed towards a single point, reducing strain on individual servers and networks. </p><p><b>Layered defense</b>: Cloudflare’s Connectivity Cloud offers defense across multiple layers, including network (Layer 3), transport (Layer 4), and application (Layer 7). This layered approach allows for tailored defense strategies depending on the attack type, ensuring that even complex, multi-layered attacks can be mitigated effectively. Learn more about DDoS protection at layers 3, 4, and 7 in <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/"><u>our DDoS protection documentation</u></a>.</p><p><b>Unmetered DDoS mitigation</b>: Pioneering this approach since 2017 to ensure Internet security, Cloudflare provides <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/unmetered-mitigation/"><u>unmetered DDoS protection</u></a>, meaning customers are protected without worrying about bandwidth or cost limitations during attacks. This approach helps ensure that businesses, regardless of size or budget, can benefit from robust DDoS protection.</p><p>Cloudflare’s distributed cloud infrastructure and advanced technology allows us to detect, absorb, and mitigate DDoS attacks in a way that is both scalable and responsive, avoiding downtime and maintaining service reliability, providing a robust solution to tackle the rising intensity and frequency of DDoS attacks compared to traditional options.</p><p>Protecting against DDoS attacks is essential for organizations of every size. Although humans initiate these attacks, they’re carried out by bots, so effective defense requires automated tools to counter bot-driven threats. Real-time detection and mitigation should be as automated as possible, since relying solely on human intervention puts defenders at a disadvantage as attackers adapt to new barriers and can change attack vectors, traffic behavior, payload signatures, among others, creating an unpredicted scenario and thus rendering some manual configurations useless. Cloudflare’s automated systems continuously identify and block DDoS attacks on behalf of our customers, enabling tailored protection that meets individual needs.</p><p>Our mission is to help build a better Internet, and providing resilience in the face of DDoS threats is a part of accomplishing that mission.</p><p>Read more about Cloudflare DDoS protection in our public <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/"><u>technical documentation</u></a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Attacks]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5JhHzAWP0tvrl8ZolsnvyE</guid>
            <dc:creator>José Salvador</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Exploring Internet traffic shifts and cyber attacks during the 2024 US election]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-shifts-and-cyber-attacks-during-the-2024-us-election/</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ Election Day 2024 in the US saw a surge in cyber activity. Cloudflare blocked several DDoS attacks on political and election sites, ensuring no impact. In this post, we analyze these attacks, as well ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Elections are not just a matter of casting ballots. They depend on citizens being able to register to vote and accessing information about candidates and the election process, which in turn depend on the strength and security of the Internet. Despite the risks posed by potential cyberattacks aimed to disrupt democracy, Cloudflare did not observe any significant disruptions to campaigns or local government websites from cyberattack.</p><p>Tuesday, November 5, 2024 was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election"><u>Election Day in the United States</u></a>. It not only decided the next president and vice president but also included elections for the US Senate, House of Representatives, state governorships, and state legislatures. Results confirm that Republican Donald Trump won the presidential election.</p><p>In this blog post, we examine online attacks against election-related sites — some of which were notable but none were disruptive — and how initial election results impacted Internet traffic across the US at both national and state levels, with increases in traffic as much as 15% nationwide. We’ll also explore email phishing trends and general DNS data around news interest, the candidates, and election-related activity.</p><p>We’ve been tracking 2024 elections globally through our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/election-security/"><u>blog</u></a> and <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>election report on Cloudflare Radar</u></a>, covering some of the more than 60 national elections around the globe this year. At Cloudflare, we support many of these efforts to ensure a secure and trustworthy election process. We worked closely with election officials, government agencies, and civil society groups across the country to ensure that groups working in the election space had the tools they needed to stay online. </p><p>Regarding the US elections, we have previously reported on trends surrounding the first <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-first-2024-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic-and-security-trends"><u>Biden vs. Trump debate</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/exploring-internet-traffic-during-the-2024-us-republican-national-convention"><u>attempted assassination of Trump and the Republican National Convention</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-security-trends-2024-us-democratic-convention"><u>Democratic National Convention</u></a>, and the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-harris-trump-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic"><u>Harris-Trump presidential debate</u></a>.</p><p>Key takeaways:</p><ul><li><p>In the 24 hour period from October 31 - November 1, Cloudflare automatically mitigated over 6 billion HTTP DDoS requests that targeted US election-related websites–such as state and local government election sites and political campaigns. There were no significant disruptions to the targeted websites during this time period.</p></li><li><p>The day before the election, DNS traffic to Trump/Republican and Harris/Democrat websites peaked, with daily DNS traffic rising 59% and 4% respectively.</p></li><li><p>On election day, states in the midwest saw the highest traffic growth across the US, as compared to the previous week. </p></li><li><p>Internet traffic in the US peaked after the first polling stations closed, with a 15% increase over the previous week. </p></li><li><p>DNS traffic to news, polling, and election websites also saw large traffic jumps. Polling services were up 756% near poll closures and news sites were up 325% by late evening.</p></li></ul>
    <div>
      <h2>How Cloudflare assists with election infrastructure </h2>
      <a href="#how-cloudflare-assists-with-election-infrastructure">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3tqSzKOhzUbLTgnwfP4cIU/8a433526fab8fbebf0aa3ae8633e78dc/BLOG-2618_2.png" />
          </figure><p>Cloudflare’s goal is to ensure that sites that enable democracy — such as voter registration sites, election information portals, campaign websites, and results reporting platforms — remain secure and accessible, especially under heavy traffic periods or cyberattacks. Through our Impact programs, we provide essential cybersecurity resources to more than 800 websites that work on election infrastructure. </p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/galileo/"><b><u>Project Galileo</u></b></a><b>:</b> Launched in 2014, Project Galileo provides free Business level services to media organizations, human rights defenders and non-profit organizations around the world. We protect more than 65 Internet properties related to elections in the United States that work on a range of topics related to voting rights, promoting free and fair elections, and posting election results. These organizations include <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/case-studies/voteamerica/"><u>Vote America</u></a>, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/case-studies/decision-desk-hq/"><u>Decision Desk HQ</u></a>, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/case-studies/us-vote-foundation/"><u>US Vote Foundation</u></a>, and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/case-studies/us-vote-foundation/"><u>Electionland</u></a>.</p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/athenian/"><b><u>Athenian Project</u></b></a><b>: </b>Launched in 2017, the Athenian Project provides state and local governments that run elections with free Enterprise level services to ensure that voters can access accurate and up-to-date information about voter registration, polling places, and election results without interruption. We currently protect 423 websites in 33 states under the project.</p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/campaigns/usa/"><b><u>Cloudflare for Campaigns</u></b></a><b>:</b> Launched in 2020, in partnership with <a href="https://defendcampaigns.org/"><u>Defending Digital Campaigns</u></a>, Cloudflare for Campaigns provides a package of products to address the increasing risks posed by cyberattacks on political campaigns and state parties. We currently protect more than 354 campaigns and 34 state-level political parties in the United States. </p></li></ul><p>Since 2020, we’ve strengthened our partnerships with election officials, government agencies, and nonprofits to provide essential protections. Throughout 2024, we’ve collaborated with <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/"><u>CISA</u></a> (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) and the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/partnerships-and-collaboration/joint-cyber-defense-collaborative"><u>Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative</u></a>, briefing over 300 election officials on emerging threats and conducting 50+ calls with state and local governments to review security practices. Additionally, we held webinars on cyber threats to election groups and strategies for protecting election infrastructure.</p><p>With Defending Digital Campaigns, we worked to onboard more than 90 campaigns and parties weeks before election day. As part of this, we also worked with political vendors managing campaign infrastructure to provide insight on emerging threats and how to mitigate. Under Project Galileo, we onboarded more than 60 local media and journalism sites reporting on elections to ensure they can provide timely, accurate information on voting processes, candidate platforms, and election results.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Political and election-related cyber attacks </h2>
      <a href="#political-and-election-related-cyber-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>As we've seen several times this year, specific DDoS (<a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>Distributed Denial of Service</u></a>) attacks often target political party or candidate websites around election day. While online attacks are frequent and not always election-related, we saw recent DDoS incidents in <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/first-round-of-french-election-2024-party-attacks-and-a-modest-traffic-dip"><u>France</u></a>, the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/dutch-political-websites-hit-by-cyber-attacks-as-eu-voting-starts"><u>Netherlands</u></a>, and <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/uk-election-day-2024-traffic-trends-and-attacks-on-political-parties"><u>the U.K.</u></a> focused on political parties during election periods. </p><p>In the US, we saw a similar uptick in attacks immediately prior to the election. Cloudflare blocked  cyberattacks targeting websites affiliated with both parties, attempting to take the sites offline. Although some attacks had high volumes of traffic, the targeted websites remained online.</p><p>DDoS attacks targeting US political or elections-related Internet properties in particular clearly picked up starting in September, with the more than 6 billion HTTP DDoS requests seen during the first six days of November exceeding the volume seen during all of September and October.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3hYmLIj3qjBvrUxtasPJwy/e247cfbd6c546a52025bbefbfe37d503/BLOG-2618_3.png" />
          </figure><p> </p><p>Some campaign websites drove most of the malicious HTTP request traffic as part of DDoS attacks, with a clear increase since October 1, compared to minimal DDoS activity earlier in 2024. </p><p>Let’s look at a few examples of specific DDoS attacks, as these are easier to track.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>High-profile campaign website, October 29 - November 6 </h3>
      <a href="#high-profile-campaign-website-october-29-november-6">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare blocked a series of DDoS attacks targeting a high-profile campaign website. The attacks began on October 29, with a four-minute spike reaching 345,000 requests per second. On October 31, more intense attacks followed, with the first lasting over an hour, peaking at 213,000 requests per second. Hours later, on November 1, a larger attack reached 700,000 requests per second, followed by two more waves at 311,000 and 205,000 requests per second.</p><p>Over 16 hours, Cloudflare blocked more than 6 billion malicious HTTP requests between October 31 and November 1. Additional attacks continued on November 3, with peaks at 200,000 requests per second (rps); on November 4, at 352,000; on Election Day, November 5, at 271,000 around 14:33 ET (11:33 PT); and on November 6, at 108,000.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7a7BGcwhBRbIppTPwGeMEM/70a460bbb3a37db416bf991324f79773/BLOG-2618_4.png" />
          </figure><p>Our data shows that the attacker(s) randomized user agents, attempted cache-busting techniques (methods to bypass cached content and overload servers with unique requests), and employed a geodiverse approach.</p><p>The DDoS attack on November 1 reached peak bandwidth of over 16 Gbps sent to Cloudflare and maintained over 8 Gbps throughout the main attack, which lasted more than two hours.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2WVwTuYycGskegN4Bj6GyC/e0d0a39516f2097fa98e1c6d9771244f/BLOG-2618_5.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>US campaign infrastructure website, November 3</h3>
      <a href="#us-campaign-infrastructure-website-november-3">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Attackers also expanded their attacks beyond campaign sites, to political parties and their infrastructure, attempting — unsuccessfully — to disrupt services.  For example, on November 3, 2024, a DDoS attack targeted infrastructure associated with a major campaign, lasting two minutes and reaching 260,000 malicious HTTP requests per second. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5QEogge3prSiTXFHHV9SZx/752b1ffda3d559c577c0fc8110bb00d7/BLOG-2618_7.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>US state political party, October 29</h3>
      <a href="#us-state-political-party-october-29">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>On October 29, 2024, a high-volume DDoS attack targeted a U.S. political party website from a specific state. The attack lasted over four hours, from 12:00 to 17:29 ET (09:00 to 14:29 PT), and peaked at 206,000 requests per second. In total, over 2 billion malicious HTTP requests were blocked that day as part of this DDoS attack.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5zE45tcuR8ejFHGdNddc7L/ed8093200c0a1a571a2f8f665dc9edd6/BLOG-2618_8.png" />
          </figure><p>The same method used in the November 1 attack on one of the main campaign websites, mentioned above, was also used in this case. Here, the DDoS attack reached a peak of 5.7 Gbps sent to Cloudflare by the attacker, and sustained over 3 Gbps for most of its four-and-a-half-hour duration.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2v9kxcUtFVGQFwzJU6XkOp/390188c9f24fda8b89cbf020d4d89d87/BLOG-2618_9.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>US counties as a target, September 13</h3>
      <a href="#us-counties-as-a-target-september-13">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Since September, US state and local websites protected by Cloudflare under the Athenian Project have experienced increased DDoS attacks, particularly targeting specific counties. These types of sites have seen over 290 million malicious HTTP requests since September 1, with 4% of all requests blocked as threats. These attacks were less frequent and intense than those on US political campaigns infrastructure. </p><p>On September 13, 2024, a DDoS attack targeted a county website from 19:29 UTC to 22:32 UTC (15:29 to 18:32 ET), lasting three hours and peaking at 46,000 of malicious HTTP requests per second.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/8S5AmvI1llskUuUiZ3JvR/6cb636695b8682170bd8e2f1f7bece7b/BLOG-2618_10.png" />
          </figure><p>These rates of DDoS attacks are already significant, even more so when we compare it with the 2020 US presidential election. In 2020, we <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/2020-us-election-cybersecurity-analysis/"><u>saw</u></a> more varied blocked cyberattack HTTP requests, split between WAF (Web Application Firewall) and firewall rules, and DDoS attacks. There were also significantly fewer blocked requests related to DDoS and WAF, with nearly 100 million in the whole month of October 2020 and close to 25 million in November 2020, the month of the election. In contrast, during November 1-6, 2024, alone, we observed over 6 billion malicious HTTP requests in DDoS attacks targeting campaigns.</p><p>It’s also important to note that even smaller attacks can be devastating for websites not well-protected against such high levels of traffic. DDoS attacks not only overwhelm systems but also serve, if successful, as a <a href="https://cloudflare.tv/shows/this-week-in-net/d-do-s-report-certificate-changes-qr-phishing-and-more/oZK6nra4"><u>distraction for IT teams</u></a> while attackers attempt other types of breaches.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Internet traffic in the US grows after polls closed</h2>
      <a href="#internet-traffic-in-the-us-grows-after-polls-closed">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Generally, <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/election-security"><u>election days</u></a> do not lead to drastic changes in Internet traffic. Traffic usually slightly dips during voting hours, though not as sharply as on national holidays, and rises in the evening as results are announced. </p><p>In the US, a similar pattern was observed on November 5, 2024, with increased Internet traffic at night. However, traffic throughout the day was generally 6% higher than the previous week, starting as early as 09:15 ET (06:15 PT). This may also be because, unlike in other countries, Election Day in the US is on a weekday rather than a weekend and is not a national holiday. Internet traffic peaked after the first polls closed, around 21:15 ET (18:15 PT), as TV news stations displayed countdown clocks. At that moment, traffic was 15% higher than the previous week.</p><p><i>Note: The previous 7 days line that appears in the next chart is one hour behind due to the Daylight Saving Time change over the weekend in the US. All growth calculations in this post take that change into account.</i></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4gShhxZxAddFNz0pBRHR0s/ecb6986c4665410f55988b2045d2362c/BLOG-2618_11.png" />
          </figure><p>The biggest spike in traffic growth (compared to the previous week) of Election Day occurred at around 01:30 am ET (22:30 PT), when <a href="https://x.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1854046880574980484"><u>projections</u></a> began to favor Trump for the presidential victory and <a href="https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1854046899155660983"><u>Fox News</u></a> called Pennsylvania in his favor, with traffic rising 32% compared to the previous week. Later, during Donald Trump's speech between 02:30 and 02:45 am ET (23:30 and 23:45 PT), Internet traffic was 31% higher than the previous week. </p><p>On Election Day, daily Internet traffic in the US reached its highest level of 2024 in terms of requests, showing a 6% increase compared to the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7bTq4tRaszFIMNXTLwgWPw/6aa76a2986bb474a042fc72c6188bc53/BLOG-2618_12.png" />
          </figure><p>As expected for a typical election day, considering what we observed in other countries, the share of traffic from mobile devices was also slightly higher on Election Day at 43%, compared to 42% the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5kKIYDj8eglPtj0zffHXOA/76c7367b1e7af4abe2f74b712834fb00/BLOG-2618_13.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>State-level traffic growth peaks at 21:00 ET (18:00 PT) </h3>
      <a href="#state-level-traffic-growth-peaks-at-21-00-et-18-00-pt">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>State-level traffic shifts on Election Day, compared to the previous week, reveal more detail than country-level data. The map below highlights the biggest traffic changes, peaking at 21:00 ET (18:00 PT) after polling stations began to close. Notably, traffic increased nationwide and at the state level on Election Day, unlike during the two-hour presidential debates, which were broadcast on nationwide TV.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5GyyxpTCD4ADVIk21R2pOQ/03ea8617b81cd317d14afa17cdd680e1/BLOG-2618_14.png" />
          </figure><p>The most significant traffic increases were observed in Maine (44%), South Dakota (44%), and Montana (44%). Interestingly, central states saw higher percentages of Internet traffic growth than coastal ones. More populous states, such as California (8%), Texas (19%), New York (22%), and Florida (23%), also experienced notable traffic increases.</p><p>The seven swing states that are <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c511pyn3xw3o"><u>considered</u></a> to have been decisive in the election — Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (we’re not considering Arizona due to data issues) — each saw traffic growth between 17% and 36%. Here’s a more focused view of those swing states for easier consumption:</p><table><tr><td><p><b>State</b></p></td><td><p><b>Growth in traffic</b></p></td><td><p><b>Local time 
(in each state)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Georgia</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>21:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Michigan</p></td><td><p>34%</p></td><td><p>21:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nevada</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>18:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Carolina</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td><td><p>21:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pennsylvania</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td><td><p>21:15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wisconsin</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>20:15</p></td></tr></table>
    <div>
      <h2>DNS trends: from news outlets to polling services</h2>
      <a href="#dns-trends-from-news-outlets-to-polling-services">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Switching our focus to domain trends, our <a href="http://1.1.1.1/"><u>1.1.1.1</u></a> resolver DNS data reveals a clear impact during the US elections when analyzing specific categories.</p><p>Analysis of DNS traffic for <b>US news media outlets</b> shows that traffic from the United States rose significantly right after 09:00 ET (06:00 PT), increasing around 15%, compared to the previous week. Traffic continued to climb throughout the day, peaking between 22:00 and 23:00 ET (19:00 and 20:00 PT) with DNS request traffic volume 325% higher than the previous week. There was also a brief spike on Wednesday, November 6, at 05:00 ET (02:00 PT), showing a 117% increase.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3eoBJOHz37gSZYFdbuapSY/c5fe40345d841ebb5ed69ed4c7f67a8a/BLOG-2618_15.png" />
          </figure><p>We observed significantly higher DNS traffic for <b>polling services </b>websites — websites of platforms or organizations that conduct and publish polls — on Election Day, peaking at 13:00 ET (10:00 PT) with a 206% increase from the previous week, and again at 22:00 ET (19:00 PT), after the polls started to close, with a 756% increase. Daily traffic to this category was up 145% on Election Day, and 36% the day prior.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1IOBseQF9hWO2vLGCUOu2A/b6f0b628b23ea1d82f1d98667706ab00/BLOG-2618_16.png" />
          </figure><p><b>Election and voting information-related </b>websites also saw a notable rise in DNS traffic around Election Day. Traffic clearly began to increase the day before the election, and peaked on November 5, 2024, at 12:00 ET (09:00 PT), with a 313% increase from the previous week. Daily traffic was 139% higher on Election Day, and 68% higher the day before.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7gXUO3FvfuPf9QvUrJ7C7a/c2eaf29a518306b2f783ecd1847edae9/BLOG-2618_17.png" />
          </figure><p>Social media sites/applications, especially <b>microblogging platforms</b> like X and Threads, were also impacted during Election Day. DNS traffic for these microblogging platforms peaked at 22:00 ET (19:00 PT), aligning with spikes for news organizations and polling services, showing a 91% increase compared to the previous week. In this microblogging category, daily DNS traffic on Election Day rose by 12% from the previous week.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2LUkx7e6abYPbqWH9vpXs1/bd9da044ebafafffa22d22fbf26e34f3/BLOG-2618_18.png" />
          </figure><p>Regarding the two main presidential candidates, DNS traffic for their websites and their parties’ websites was much higher the day before the election than on Election Day. On November 4, 2024, daily DNS traffic to <b>Trump and Republican</b> websites was up 59% compared to the previous week, while traffic to <b>Harris and Democrat</b> websites, which had a more significant increase in DNS traffic the previous week, rose by 4%. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3jZy22GPey40FDg3gxjBg1/a99412b55d6b032117051d6f3f1f38f3/BLOG-2618_19.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2sDIbWHfRmyt0vqifwl72F/4f61cf9c1d5186cde5e611ec2f9a3028/BLOG-2618_20.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Candidate-related email phishing trends</h2>
      <a href="#candidate-related-email-phishing-trends">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>From a cybersecurity perspective, trending <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/paris-2024-olympics-recap"><u>events</u></a>, topics, and individuals often attract more emails, including malicious, phishing, and spam messages. Our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-first-2024-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic-and-security-trends"><u>earlier</u></a> analysis covered email trends involving “Joe Biden” and “Donald Trump” since January. We’ve since updated it to include Kamala Harris after the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/internet-security-trends-2024-us-democratic-convention/"><u>Democratic Convention</u></a> and the <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-the-harris-trump-us-presidential-debate-influenced-internet-traffic/"><u>Harris-Trump debate</u></a>.</p><p>From June 1 through November 4, 2024, <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/zero-trust/products/email-security/"><u>Cloudflare’s Cloud Email Security</u></a> service processed over 19 million emails with “Donald Trump” or “Kamala Harris” in the subject line — 13.9 million for Trump and 5.3 million for Harris. Nearly half of these emails (49%) were sent since September. In the last 10 days of the campaign (since October 24), Harris was named in 800,000 email subject lines and Trump in 1.3 million.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/21O0KXy0aKPf5zX8KI186y/60c89b6c9d0cedc8f2791943fc50f2ff/BLOG-2618_21.png" />
          </figure><p>Since June 1, 12% of emails mentioning Trump were marked as spam, and 1.3% were flagged as malicious or phishing. This rate has dropped since September 1, with only 3% marked as spam and 0.3% as malicious. For emails mentioning Harris, the rates were lower: 0.6% were marked as spam and 0.2% as malicious since June, increasing slightly to 1.2% spam and 0.2% malicious since September 1. Trump was mentioned more frequently in email subjects than Harris and was found in higher overall percentages of spam and malicious emails.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3MeF2avFWsQhJiq1emyBtr/2e9f3b785c1bed52394b52f720f8c84b/BLOG-2618_22.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion: keeping track of elections</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion-keeping-track-of-elections">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Although Cloudflare observed a notable increase in DDoS attacks on political and election-related sites, blocking billions of malicious requests, these attacks resulted in no significant disruption due to planning and proactive defenses. We share the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/statement-cisa-director-easterly-security-2024-elections"><u>view</u></a> that “our election infrastructure has never been more secure” and concur with their conclusion that  “We have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure." Keeping our elections secure and resilient is critical to the functioning of democracy, and Cloudflare is proud to have played our part. </p><p>If you want to follow more trends and insights about the Internet and elections in particular, you can check <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>, and more specifically our new <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/elections-2024"><u>2024 Elections Insights</u></a> report, which will be updated as elections take place throughout the year.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Athenian Project]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Cloudflare for Campaigns]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Election Security]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Policy & Legal]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1YyA4YHY9p5HoeHCrgO3L5</guid>
            <dc:creator>João Tomé</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Jocelyn Woolbright</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Cloudflare’s perspective of the October 30, 2024, OVHcloud outage]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-perspective-of-the-october-30-2024-ovhcloud-outage/</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ On October 30, 2024, cloud hosting provider OVHcloud (AS16276) suffered a brief but significant outage. Within this post, we review Cloudflare’s perspective on this outage. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On October 30, 2024, cloud hosting provider <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as16276"><u>OVHcloud (AS16276)</u></a> suffered a brief but significant outage. According to their <a href="https://network.status-ovhcloud.com/incidents/qgb1ynp8x0c4"><u>incident report</u></a>, the problem started at 13:23 UTC, and was described simply as “<i>An incident is in progress on our backbone infrastructure.</i>” OVHcloud noted that the incident ended 17 minutes later, at 13:40 UTC. As a major global cloud hosting provider, some customers use OVHcloud as an origin for sites delivered by Cloudflare — if a given content asset is not in our cache for a customer’s site, we retrieve the asset from OVHcloud.</p><p>We observed traffic starting to drop at 13:21 UTC, just ahead of the reported start time. By 13:28 UTC, it was approximately 95% lower than pre-incident levels. Recovery appeared to start at 13:31 UTC, and by 13:40 UTC, the reported end time of the incident, it had reached approximately 50% of pre-incident levels. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/62w8PcLJ3Q05F1BtA12zUb/6d8ce87f85eb585a7fe0ac02f8cd93d5/image4.jpg" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Traffic from OVHcloud (AS16276) to Cloudflare</i></sup></p><p></p><p>Cloudflare generally exchanges most of our traffic with OVHcloud over peering links. However, as shown below, peered traffic volume during the incident fell significantly. It appears that some small amount of traffic briefly began to flow over transit links from Cloudflare to OVHcloud due to sudden changes in which Cloudflare data centers we were receiving OVHcloud requests. (Peering is a direct connection between two network providers for the purpose of exchanging traffic. Transit is when one network pays an intermediary network to carry traffic to the destination network.) </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2L0IaXd7B5C6RX23iTG5Pf/3fd2489f159e2281d191f157f5695f94/image3.jpg" />
          </figure><p>Because we peer directly, we exchange most traffic over our private peering sessions with OVHcloud. Instead, we found OVHcloud routing to Cloudflare dropped entirely for a few minutes, then switched to just a single Internet Exchange port in Amsterdam, and finally normalized globally minutes later.</p><p>As the graphs below illustrate, we normally see the largest amount of traffic from OVHcloud in our Frankfurt and Paris data centers, as <a href="https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/about-us/global-infrastructure/regions/"><u>OVHcloud has large data center presences in these regions</u></a>. However, in that shift to transit, and the shift to an Amsterdam Internet Exchange peering point, we saw a spike in traffic routed to our Amsterdam data center. We suspect the routing shifts are the earliest signs of either internal BGP reconvergence, or general network recovery within AS16276, starting with their presence nearest our Amsterdam peering point.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/yCDGCplEsmqXU7uRifjTU/12176147c10ab6e9a766ee5d788b133a/image2.jpg" />
          </figure><p>The <a href="https://network.status-ovhcloud.com/incidents/qgb1ynp8x0c4"><u>postmortem</u></a> published by OVHcloud noted that the incident was caused by “<i>an issue in a network configuration mistakenly pushed by one of our peering partner[s]</i>” and that “<i>We immediately reconfigured our network routes to restore traffic.</i>” One possible explanation for the backbone incident may be a BGP route leak by the mentioned peering partner, where OVHcloud could have accepted a full Internet table from the peer and therefore overwhelmed their network or the peering partner’s network with traffic, or caused unexpected internal BGP route updates within AS16276.</p><p>Upon investigating what route leak may have caused this incident impacting OVHcloud, we found evidence of a maximum prefix-limit threshold being breached on our peering with <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as49981"><u>Worldstream (AS49981)</u></a> in Amsterdam. </p>
            <pre><code>Oct 30 13:16:53  edge02.ams01 rpd[9669]: RPD_BGP_NEIGHBOR_STATE_CHANGED: BGP peer 141.101.65.53 (External AS 49981) changed state from Established to Idle (event PrefixLimitExceeded) (instance master)</code></pre>
            <p></p><p>As the number of received prefixes exceeded the limits configured for our peering session with Worldstream, the BGP session automatically entered an idle state. This prevented the route leak from impacting Cloudflare’s network. In analyzing <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7854"><u>BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)</u></a> data from AS49981 prior to the automatic session shutdown, we were able to confirm Worldstream was sending advertisements with AS paths that contained their upstream Tier 1 transit provider.</p><p>During this time, we also detected over 500,000 BGP announcements from AS49981, as Worldstream was announcing routes to many of their peers, visible on <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/routing/as49981?dateStart=2024-10-30&amp;dateEnd=2024-10-30#bgp-announcements"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a>.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2YmTSJfXomzeb3mh93JyRH/15c764790576468a47d3760bc7f48153/Screenshot_2024-10-30_at_12.49.25_PM.png" />
          </figure><p>Worldstream later <a href="https://noc.worldstream.nl"><u>posted a notice</u></a> on their status page, indicating that their network experienced a route leak, causing routes to be unintentionally advertised to all peers:</p><blockquote><p><i>“Due to a configuration error on one of the core routers, all routes were briefly announced to all our peers. As a result, we pulled in more traffic than expected, leading to congestion on some paths. To address this, we temporarily shut down these BGP sessions to locate the issue and stabilize the network. We are sorry for the inconvenience.”</i></p></blockquote><p>We believe Worldstream also leaked routes on an OVHcloud peering session in Amsterdam, which caused today’s impact.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Conclusion</h2>
      <a href="#conclusion">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare has written about<a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-incident-on-june-27-2024"> <u>impactful route leaks</u></a> before, and there are multiple methods available to prevent BGP route leaks from impacting your network. One is setting <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7454.html#section-8"><u>max prefix-limits</u></a> for a peer, so the BGP session is automatically torn down when a peer sends more prefixes than they are expected to. Other forward-looking measures are<a href="https://manrs.org/2023/02/unpacking-the-first-route-leak-prevented-by-aspa/"> <u>Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA) for BGP</u></a>, where Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) helps protect a network from accepting BGP routes with an invalid AS path, or<a href="https://rfc.hashnode.dev/rfc9234-observed-in-the-wild"> <u>RFC9234,</u></a> which prevents leaks by tying strict customer, peer, and provider relationships to BGP updates. For improved Internet resilience, we recommend that network operators follow recommendations defined within<a href="https://manrs.org/netops/"> <u>MANRS for Network Operators</u></a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Consumer Services]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Outage]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">Vn5VV2dLkJbOn1YNqSSBv</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bryton Herdes</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>David Belson</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Tanner Ryan</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[How Cloudflare auto-mitigated world record 3.8 Tbps DDoS attack]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-cloudflare-auto-mitigated-world-record-3-8-tbps-ddos-attack/</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ Over the past couple of weeks, Cloudflare's DDoS protection systems have automatically and successfully mitigated multiple hyper-volumetric L3/4 DDoS attacks exceeding 3 billion packets per second (Bpps). Our systems also automatically mitigated multiple attacks exceeding 3 terabits per second (Tbps), with the largest ones exceeding 3.65 Tbps. The scale of these attacks is unprecedented. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Since early September, <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/about/components/#autonomous-edge"><u>Cloudflare's DDoS protection systems</u></a> have been combating a month-long campaign of hyper-volumetric L3/4 DDoS attacks. Cloudflare’s defenses mitigated over one hundred hyper-volumetric L3/4 DDoS attacks throughout the month, with many exceeding 2 billion packets per second (Bpps) and 3 terabits per second (Tbps). The largest attack peaked 3.8 Tbps — the largest ever disclosed publicly by any organization. Detection and mitigation was fully autonomous. The graphs below represent two separate attack events that targeted the same Cloudflare customer and were mitigated autonomously.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7hXUgmEd37kzZrMs0KPXLl/21a4779022bdff91f760dc66759eb955/BLOG-2586_2.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>A mitigated 3.8 Terabits per second DDoS attack that lasted 65 seconds</i></sup></p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1uxvtlkdFoH6KU6waXxK3o/d17fe7cf0e33c20e64a47b3ca0e6ca63/BLOG-2586_3.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>A mitigated 2.14 billion packet per second DDoS attack that lasted 60 seconds</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Cloudflare customers are protected</h2>
      <a href="#cloudflare-customers-are-protected">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Cloudflare customers using Cloudflare’s HTTP reverse proxy services (e.g. <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/"><u>Cloudflare WAF</u></a> and <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/cache/"><u>Cloudflare CDN</u></a>) are automatically protected.</p><p>Cloudflare customers using <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/spectrum/"><u>Spectrum</u></a> and <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/magic-transit/"><u>Magic Transit</u></a> are also automatically protected. Magic Transit customers can further optimize their protection by deploying <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/magic-firewall/"><u>Magic Firewall</u></a> rules to enforce a strict positive and negative security model at the packet layer.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Other Internet properties may not be safe</h2>
      <a href="#other-internet-properties-may-not-be-safe">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The scale and frequency of these attacks are unprecedented. Due to their sheer size and bits/packets per second rates, these attacks have the ability to take down unprotected Internet properties, as well as Internet properties that are protected by on-premise equipment or by cloud providers that just don’t have sufficient network capacity or global coverage to be able to handle these volumes alongside legitimate traffic without impacting performance. </p><p>Cloudflare, however, does have the network capacity, global coverage, and intelligent systems needed to absorb and automatically mitigate these monstrous attacks. </p><p>In this blog post, we will review the attack campaign and why its attacks are so severe. We will describe the anatomy of a Layer 3/4 DDoS attack, its objectives, and how attacks are generated. We will then proceed to detail how Cloudflare’s systems were able to autonomously detect and mitigate these monstrous attacks without impacting performance for our customers. We will describe the key aspects of our defenses, starting with how our systems generate real-time (dynamic) signatures to match the attack traffic all the way to how we leverage kernel features to drop packets at wire-speed.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Campaign analysis</h2>
      <a href="#campaign-analysis">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We have observed this attack campaign targeting multiple customers in the financial services, Internet, and telecommunication industries, among others. This attack campaign targets bandwidth saturation as well as resource exhaustion of in-line applications and devices.</p><p>The attacks predominantly leverage <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/glossary/user-datagram-protocol-udp/"><u>UDP</u></a> on a fixed port, and originated from across the globe with larger shares coming from Vietnam, Russia, Brazil, Spain, and the US. </p><p>The high packet rate attacks appear to originate from multiple types of compromised devices, including MikroTik devices, DVRs, and Web servers, orchestrated to work in tandem and flood the target with exceptionally large volumes of traffic. The high bitrate attacks appear to originate from a large number of compromised ASUS home routers, likely exploited using <a href="https://censys.com/june-20-improper-authentication-vulnerability-in-asus-routers/"><u>a CVE 9.8 (Critical) vulnerability that was recently discovered by Censys</u></a>.</p><div>
    <figure>
        <table>
            <colgroup>
                <col></col>
                <col></col>
            </colgroup>
            <tbody>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Russia</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>12.1%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Vietnam</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>11.6%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>United States</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>9.3%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Spain</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>6.5%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Brazil</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>4.7%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>France</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>4.7%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Romania</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>4.4%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Taiwan</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>3.4%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>United Kingdom</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>3.3%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>Italy</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p><span><span>2.8%</span></span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
            </tbody>
        </table>
    </figure>
</div><p><sup><i>Share of packets observed by source location</i></sup></p>
    <div>
      <h2>Anatomy of DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#anatomy-of-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Before we discuss how Cloudflare automatically detected and mitigated the largest DDoS attacks ever seen, it‘s important to understand the basics of DDoS attacks. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7HLtAHnyjS33iiJAR1B9h9/2e1fc2cab871440fc95fa803989ae156/BLOG-2586_5.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Simplified diagram of a DDoS attack</i></sup></p><p>The goal of a <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/what-is-a-ddos-attack/"><u>Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack</u></a> is to deny legitimate users access to a service. This is usually done by exhausting resources needed to provide the service. In the context of these recent Layer 3/4 DDoS attacks, that resource is CPU cycles and network bandwidth.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Exhausting CPU cycles</h3>
      <a href="#exhausting-cpu-cycles">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Processing a packet consumes CPU cycles. In the case of regular (non-attack) traffic, a <i>legitimate</i> packet received by a service will cause that service to perform some action, and different actions require different amounts of CPU processing. However, before a packet is even delivered to a service there is per-packet work that needs to be done. Layer 3 packet headers need to be parsed and processed to deliver the packet to the correct machine and interface. Layer 4 packet headers need to be processed and routed to the correct socket (if any). There may be multiple additional processing steps that inspect every packet. Therefore, if an attacker sends at a high enough packet rate, then they can potentially saturate the available CPU resources, denying service to legitimate users.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3aBbNG4Fc7TY6MTugLl3BE/064fb17761aebbce737a5a4518a14235/BLOG-2586_6.png" />
          </figure><p>To defend against high packet rate attacks, you need to be able to inspect and discard the bad packets using as few CPU cycles as possible, leaving enough CPU to process the good packets. You can additionally acquire more, or faster, CPUs to perform the processing — but that can be a very lengthy process that bears high costs. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>Exhausting network bandwidth</h3>
      <a href="#exhausting-network-bandwidth">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Network bandwidth is the total amount of data per time that can be delivered to a server. You can think of bandwidth like a pipe to transport water. The amount of water we can deliver through a drinking straw is less than what we could deliver through a garden hose. If an attacker is able to push more garbage data into the pipe than it can deliver, then both the bad data <i>and</i> the good data will be discarded upstream, at the entrance to the pipe, and the DDoS is therefore successful.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/OehVItOhGfP9ApllRvDDM/fce73e6f375173a1a53bc22026e0b9b1/BLOG-2586_7.png" />
          </figure><p>
Defending against attacks that can saturate network bandwidth can be difficult because there is very little that can be done if you are on the downstream side of the saturated pipe. There are really only a few choices: you can get a bigger pipe, you can potentially find a way to move the good traffic to a new pipe that isn’t saturated, or you can hopefully ask the upstream side of the pipe to stop sending some or all of the data into the pipe.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Generating DDoS attacks</h2>
      <a href="#generating-ddos-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>If we think about what this means from the attackers point of view you realize there are similar constraints. Just as it takes CPU cycles to receive a packet, it also takes CPU cycles to create a packet. If, for example, the cost to send and receive a packet were equal, then the attacker would need an equal amount of CPU power to generate the attack as we would need to defend against it. In most cases this is not true — there is a cost asymmetry, as the attacker is able to generate packets using fewer CPU cycles than it takes to receive those packets. However, it is worth noting that generating attacks is not free and can require a large amount of CPU power.</p><p>Saturating network bandwidth can be even more difficult for an attacker. Here the attacker needs to be able to output more bandwidth than the target service has allocated. They actually need to be able to exceed the capacity of the receiving service. This is so difficult that the most common way to achieve a network bandwidth attack is to use a reflection/amplification attack method, for example a <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/dns-amplification-ddos-attack/"><u>DNS Amplification attack</u></a>. These attacks allow the attacker to send a small packet to an intermediate service, and the intermediate service will send a large packet to the victim.</p><p>In both scenarios, the attacker needs to acquire or gain access to many devices to generate the attack. These devices can be acquired in a number of different ways. They may be server class machines from cloud providers or hosting services, or they can be compromised devices like DVRs, routers, and webcams that have been infected with the attacker’s malware. These machines together form the botnet.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>How Cloudflare defends against large attacks</h2>
      <a href="#how-cloudflare-defends-against-large-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Now that we understand the fundamentals of how DDoS attacks work, we can explain how Cloudflare can defend against these attacks.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Spreading the attack surface using global anycast</h3>
      <a href="#spreading-the-attack-surface-using-global-anycast">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The first not-so-secret ingredient is that Cloudflare’s network is built on <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/cdn/glossary/anycast-network/"><u>anycast</u></a>. In brief, anycast allows a single IP address to be advertised by multiple machines around the world. A packet sent to that IP address will be served by the closest machine. This means when an attacker uses their distributed botnet to launch an attack, the attack will be received in a distributed manner across the Cloudflare network. An infected DVR in Dallas, Texas will send packets to a Cloudflare server in Dallas. An infected webcam in London will send packets to a Cloudflare server in London.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/48tW6A6ACUT4Fd9h3l70F4/c6bcea8f037fc853477d0987c939e007/BLOG-2586_8.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Anycast vs. Unicast networks</i></sup></p><p>Our anycast network additionally allows Cloudflare to allocate compute and bandwidth resources closest to the regions that need them the most. Densely populated regions will generate larger amounts of legitimate traffic, and the data centers placed in those regions will have more bandwidth and CPU resources to meet those needs. Sparsely populated regions will naturally generate less legitimate traffic, so Cloudflare data centers in those regions can be sized appropriately. Since attack traffic is mainly coming from compromised devices, those devices will tend to be distributed in a manner that matches normal traffic flows sending the attack traffic proportionally to datacenters that can handle it. And similarly, within the datacenter, traffic is distributed across multiple machines.</p><p>Additionally, for high bandwidth attacks, Cloudflare’s network has another advantage. A large proportion of traffic on the Cloudflare network does not consume bandwidth in a symmetrical manner. For example, an HTTP request to get a webpage from a site behind Cloudflare will be a relatively small incoming packet, but produce a larger amount of outgoing traffic back to the client. This means that the Cloudflare network tends to egress far more legitimate traffic than we receive. However, the network links and bandwidth allocated are symmetrical, meaning there is an abundance of ingress bandwidth available to receive volumetric attack traffic.</p>
    <div>
      <h3>Generating real-time signatures</h3>
      <a href="#generating-real-time-signatures">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>By the time you’ve reached an individual server inside a datacenter, the bandwidth of the attack has been distributed enough that none of the upstream links are saturated. That doesn’t mean the attack has been fully stopped yet, since we haven’t dropped the bad packets. To do that, we need to sample traffic, qualify an attack, and create rules to block the bad packets. </p><p>Sampling traffic and dropping bad packets is the job of our <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/l4drop-xdp-ebpf-based-ddos-mitigations/"><u>l4drop</u></a> component, which uses <a href="https://netdevconf.info/2.1/papers/Gilberto_Bertin_XDP_in_practice.pdf"><u>XDP (eXpress Data Path)</u></a> and leverages an extended version of the Berkeley Packet Filter known as <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/tag/ebpf/"><u>eBPF (extended BPF)</u></a>. This enables us to execute custom code in kernel space and process (drop, forward, or modify) each packet directly at the network interface card (NIC) level. This component helps the system drop packets efficiently without consuming excessive CPU resources on the machine. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1NUxGTvKFs5l6G2UCSxvqw/3632f6728f9361123169d9694c807f0b/BLOG-2586_9.png" />
          </figure><p><sup><i>Cloudflare DDoS protection system overview</i></sup></p><p>We use XDP to sample packets to look for suspicious attributes that indicate an attack. The samples include fields such as the source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port, protocol, TCP flags, sequence number, options, packet rate and more. This analysis is conducted by the <i>denial of service daemon (dosd).</i> <i>Dosd</i> holds our secret sauce. It has many <i>filters</i> which instruct it, based on our curated heuristics, when to initiate mitigation. To our customers, these filters are logically grouped by attack vectors and exposed as the <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/managed-rulesets/"><u>DDoS Managed Rules</u></a>. Our customers can <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/managed-rulesets/adjust-rules/"><u>customize their behavior</u></a> to some extent, as needed.</p><p>As it receives samples from XDP, dosd will generate multiple permutations of fingerprints for suspicious traffic patterns. Then, using a data streaming algorithm, dosd will identify the most optimal fingerprints to mitigate the attack. Once an attack is qualified, dosd will push a mitigation rule inline as an eBPF program to surgically drop the attack traffic. </p><p>The detection and mitigation of attacks by dosd is done at the server level, at the data center level and at the global level — and it’s all software defined. This makes our network extremely resilient and leads to almost instant mitigation. There are no out-of-path “scrubbing centers” or “scrubbing devices”. Instead, each server runs the full stack of the Cloudflare product suite including the DDoS detection and mitigation component. And it is all done autonomously. Each server also <i>gossips (multicasts)</i> mitigation instructions within a data center between servers, and globally between data centers. This ensures that whether an attack is localized or globally distributed, dosd will have already installed mitigation rules inline to ensure a robust mitigation.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Strong defenses against strong attacks</h2>
      <a href="#strong-defenses-against-strong-attacks">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Our software-defined, autonomous DDoS detection and mitigation systems run across our entire network. In this post we focused mainly on our dynamic fingerprinting capabilities, but our arsenal of defense systems is much larger. The <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/tcp-protection/"><u>Advanced TCP Protection</u></a> system and <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/dns-protection/"><u>Advanced DNS Protection</u></a> system work alongside our dynamic fingerprinting to identify sophisticated and highly randomized TCP-based DDoS attacks and also leverages statistical analysis to thwart complex DNS-based DDoS attacks. Our defenses also incorporate real-time threat intelligence, traffic profiling, and machine learning classification as part of our <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ddos-protection/managed-rulesets/adaptive-protection/"><u>Adaptive DDoS Protection</u></a> to mitigate traffic anomalies. </p><p>Together, these systems, alongside the full breadth of the Cloudflare Security portfolio, are built atop of the Cloudflare network — one of the largest networks in the world — to ensure our customers are protected from the largest attacks in the world.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Attacks]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4j6QWqeVFn6qzs0Md0LK7h</guid>
            <dc:creator>Manish Arora</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Shawn Bohrer</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Omer Yoachimik</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Cody Doucette</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Alex Forster</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Nick Wood</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Impact of Verizon’s September 30 outage on Internet traffic]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/impact-of-verizons-september-30-outage-on-internet-traffic/</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Monday, September 30, customers on Verizon’s mobile network in multiple cities across the United States reported experiencing a loss of connectivity. HTTP request traffic data from Verizon’s mobile ASN (AS6167) showed nominal declines across impacted cities.
 ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On Monday, September 30, 2024, customers on Verizon’s mobile network in multiple cities across the United States <a href="https://apnews.com/article/verizon-outage-sos-mode-phone-service-b03c9b8615e0650669339daa2eaa1713"><u>reported</u></a> experiencing a loss of connectivity. Impacted phones showed “SOS” instead of the usual bar-based signal strength indicator, and customers complained of an inability to make or receive calls on their mobile devices.</p><p><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as6167"><u>AS6167 (CELLCO)</u></a> is the <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system</u></a> used by Verizon for its mobile network. To better understand how the outage impacted Internet traffic on Verizon’s network, we took a look at HTTP request volume from AS6167 independent of geography, as well as traffic from AS6167 in various cities that were <a href="https://mashable.com/live/verizon-outage-live-updates"><u>reported</u></a> to be the most significantly impacted.</p><p>Although initial reports of connectivity problems started around 09:00 ET (13:00 UTC), we didn’t see a noticeable change in request volume at an ASN level until about two hours later. Just before 12:00 ET (16:00 UTC), Verizon <a href="https://x.com/VerizonNews/status/1840780785084985777"><u>published a social media post acknowledging the problem</u></a>, stating “<i>We are aware of an issue impacting service for some customers. Our engineers are engaged and we are working quickly to identify and solve the issue.</i>”</p><p>As the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;loc=as6167&amp;dt=2024-09-30_2024-09-30&amp;timeCompare=2024-09-23"><u>Cloudflare Radar graph</u></a> below shows, a slight decline (-5%) in HTTP traffic as compared to traffic at the same time a week prior is first visible around 11:00 ET (15:00 UTC). Request volume fell as much as 9% below expected levels at 13:45 ET (17:45 UTC).</p><p>Just after 17:00 ET (21:00 UTC), Verizon <a href="https://x.com/VerizonNews/status/1840860310997254609"><u>published a second social media post</u></a> noting, in part, “<i>Verizon engineers are making progress on our network issue and service has started to be restored.</i>” Request volumes returned to expected levels around the same time, surpassing the previous week’s levels at 17:15 ET (21:15 UTC). At 19:18 ET (23:18 UTC), a <a href="https://x.com/VerizonNews/status/1840893978411221191"><u>social media post</u></a> from Verizon noted “Verizon engineers have fully restored today's network disruption that impacted some customers. Service has returned to normal levels.”</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5fwaspr4MBTWT0zf36YEmf/86dfccdab0df85ea90edaa369520c23b/BLOG-2587_2.png" />
          </figure><p>Media reports listed cities including Chicago, Indianapolis, New York City, Atlanta, Cincinnati, Omaha, Phoenix, Denver, Minneapolis, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas as being most impacted. In addition to looking at comparative traffic trends across the whole Verizon Wireless network, we also compared request volumes in the listed cities to the same time a week prior (September 23).</p><p>Declines in request traffic starting around 11:00 ET (15:00 UTC) are clearly visible in cities including Los Angeles, Seattle, Omaha, Denver, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Indianapolis, and Chicago. In contrast to other cities, Omaha’s request volume was already trending lower than last week heading into today’s outage, but its graph clearly shows the impact of today’s disruption as well. Omaha’s difference in traffic was the most significant, down approximately 30%, while other cities saw declines in the 10-20% range. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/wg0aCH9hUSpECGnzs4I9s/c7eeef574e5ba07cf26c7c667a0a9239/BLOG-2587_3.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5kE1kBRS4tTyB5TPY8ain7/5a153b7c7052352e9e44c6d88b1fab1c/BLOG-2587_4.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7gg28UcLpcp92UYvLpykuO/715fa25efcfcdfc6dd18b8dd5b81b0ca/BLOG-2587_5.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7rcGVaVuBsK7oMhPaAfOx3/3b785c2b4d296b6d459e5f50a5d69da7/BLOG-2587_6.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/2WuYIbLm9MdkjN5C20JgG2/6784dca790e32ad199f2fb2122e21fcb/BLOG-2587_7.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3YTBl2XO8YDDgFSzAoIAxo/0a9481add616709fa8d95762cfbfc71e/BLOG-2587_8.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3dt2aD35Ipq0eZKuQcF8PB/2f51bd06ee1ced5fab68a76cc71f70ce/BLOG-2587_9.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6NS4Wq7KB0U60IkhyzhwTs/f69159fe84dd373c6905ebe56e570b6d/BLOG-2587_10.png" />
          </figure><p>Request traffic from Las Vegas initially appeared to exhibit a bit of volatility around 11:00 ET (15:00 UTC), but continues to track fairly closely to last week’s levels before exceeding them starting at 16:00 ET (20:00 UTC). Cincinnati was tracking slightly above last week’s request volume before the outage began, and tracked closely to the prior week during the outage period.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4NatjBWUvwgaU2mRRHAEUV/9a21e0c3ce61eb4fc11a0fb1d239c411/BLOG-2587_11.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3jqFrqdvO203QDKMsFUWrM/1d3e538cd3f00b7e522be922eb6b3664/BLOG-2587_12.png" />
          </figure><p>We observed week-over-week traffic increases during the outage period in New York and Atlanta. However, in both cities, traffic was already slightly above last week’s levels, and that trend continued throughout the day. </p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/UnTO0qSD24rreW9LHRk0H/043ebdf603b7604c4018944ad5192f2c/BLOG-2587_13.png" />
          </figure>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1gDfClWDv7hqlgZE30HRjF/b427490198d2ba4fc74c6e84753de502/BLOG-2587_14.png" />
          </figure><p>Based on our observations, it appears that voice services on Verizon’s network may have been more significantly impacted than data services, as we saw some declines in request traffic across impacted cities, but none experienced full outages.</p><p>As of this writing (19:15 ET, 23:15 UTC), no specific information has been made available by Verizon regarding the root cause of the network problems. </p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Consumer Services]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Outage]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2dMuW3phhA9ClF8ROOAYPH</guid>
            <dc:creator>David Belson</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Network trends and natural language: Cloudflare Radar’s new Data Explorer & AI Assistant]]></title>
            <link>https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-data-explorer-ai-assistant/</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[ The Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer provides a simple Web-based interface to build more complex API queries, including comparisons and filters, and visualize the results. The accompanying AI Assistant translates a user’s natural language statements or questions into the appropriate Radar API calls. ]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><b></b><a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/"><u>Cloudflare Radar</u></a> showcases global Internet traffic patterns, attack activity, and technology trends and insights. It is powered by data from Cloudflare's global network, as well as aggregated and anonymized data from Cloudflare's <a href="https://1.1.1.1/dns"><u>1.1.1.1 public DNS Resolver</u></a>, and is built on top of a rich, publicly accessible <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/"><u>API</u></a>. This API allows users to explore Radar data beyond the default set of visualizations, for example filtering by protocol, comparing metrics across multiple locations or autonomous systems, or examining trends over two different periods of time. However, not every user has the technical know-how to make a raw API query or process the JSON-formatted response.</p><p>Today, we are launching the <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer"><u>Cloudflare Radar Data Explorer</u></a>, which provides a simple Web-based interface to enable users to easily build more complex API queries, including comparisons and filters, and visualize the results. And as a complement to the Data Explorer, we are also launching an AI Assistant, which uses <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/"><u>Cloudflare Workers AI</u></a> to translate a user’s natural language statements or questions into the appropriate Radar API calls, the results of which are visualized in the Data Explorer. Below, we introduce the AI Assistant and Data Explorer, and also dig into how we used Cloudflare Developer Platform tools to build the AI Assistant.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Ask the AI Assistant</h2>
      <a href="#ask-the-ai-assistant">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Sometimes, a user may know what they are looking for, but aren’t quite sure how to build the relevant API query by selecting from the available options and filters. (The sheer number may appear overwhelming.) In those cases, they can simply pose a question to the AI Assistant, like “Has there been an uptick in malicious email over the last week?” The AI Assistant makes a series of Workers AI and Radar API calls to retrieve the relevant data, which is visualized within seconds:</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3HRBy5Bm5aNQ1gUj1MBCj5/e0fcd717765a8f234996b9e98e43389a/image8.png" />
          </figure><p>The AI Assistant pane is found on the right side of the page in desktop browsers, and appears when the user taps the “AI Assistant” button on a mobile browser. To use the AI Assistant, users just need to type their question into the “Ask me something” area at the bottom of the pane and submit it. A few sample queries are also displayed by default to provide examples of how and what to ask, and clicking on one submits it.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/79srygHorwU84nyQg9KLSl/be609d62b0ebf4a708f6f523fed817f1/Screenshot_2024-09-26_at_20.32.43.png" />
          </figure><p>The submitted question is evaluated by the AI Assistant (more <a href="#AIAssistant"><u>below</u></a> on how that happens), and the resulting visualization is displayed in the <b>Results</b> section of the Data Explorer. In addition to the visualization of the results, the appropriate <b>Data</b>, <b>Filter</b>, and <b>Compare</b> options are selected in the <b>Query</b> section above the visualization, allowing the user to further tune or refine the results if necessary. The <i>Keep current filters</i> toggle within the AI Assistant pane allows users to build on the previous question. For example, with that toggle active, a user could ask “Traffic in the United States”, see the resultant graph, and then ask “Compare it with traffic in Mexico” to add Mexico’s data to the graph.</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Building a query directly</h2>
      <a href="#building-a-query-directly">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>For users that prefer a more hands-on approach, a wide variety of Radar datasets are available to explore, including traffic metrics, attacks, Internet quality, email security, and more. Once the user selects a dataset, the <i>Breakdown By:</i> dropdown is automatically populated with relevant options (if any), and <b>Filter</b> options are also dynamically populated. As the user selects additional options, the visualization in the <b>Result</b> section is automatically updated.</p><p>In addition to building the query of interest, Data Explorer also enables the user to compare the results, both against a specific date range and/or another location or <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/network-layer/what-is-an-autonomous-system/"><u>autonomous system (AS)</u></a>. To compare results with the immediately previous period (the last seven days with the seven days before that, for instance), just toggle on the <i>Previous period</i> switch. Otherwise, clicking on the <i>Date Range</i> field brings up a calendar that enables the user to select a starting date — the corresponding date range is intelligently selected, based on the date range selected in the <b>Filter</b> section. To compare results across locations or ASNs, clicking on the “Location or ASN” field brings up a search box in which the user can enter a location (country/region) name, AS name, or AS number, with search results updating as the user types. Note that locations can be compared with other locations or ASes, and ASes can be compared with other ASes or locations. This enables a user, for example, to compare trends for their ISP with trends for their country.</p>
            <figure>
            
            <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1R9F5Cxe8gkJCUHzLitNH3/87225186868c22f4a3b17a19c1bddd8c/image7.png" />
            
            </figure>
    <div>
      <h2>Visualizing the results</h2>
      <a href="#visualizing-the-results">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Much of the value of Cloudflare Radar comes from its visualizations – the graphs, maps, and tables that illustrate the underlying data, and Data Explorer does not disappoint here. Depending on the dataset and filters selected, and the volume of data returned, results may be visualized in a time series graph, bar chart, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treemapping"><u>treemap</u></a>, or global <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choropleth_map"><u>choropleth map</u></a>. The visualization type is determined automatically based on the contents of the API response. For example, the presence of countryalpha2 keys in the response means a choropleth map will be used, the presence of timestamps in the response means a line graph (“xychart”) should be shown, and more than 40 items in the response selects a treemap as the visualization type.</p><p>To illustrate the extended visualizations available in Data Explorer, the figure below is an expanded version of one that would normally be found on <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage/us#http-1-x-vs-http-2-vs-http-3"><u>Radar’s </u><b><u>Adoption &amp; Usage</u></b><u> page</u></a>. The “standard” version of the graph plots the shares of the HTTP versions over the last seven days for the United States, as well as the summary share values. In this <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;groupBy=http_version&amp;loc=US&amp;filters=botClass%253DLikely_Human%252CdeviceType%253DMobile&amp;dt=7d&amp;timeCompare=1&amp;compareWith=701"><u>extended version of the graph generated in the Data Explorer</u></a>, we compare data for the United States with HTTP version share data for <a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/as701"><u>AS701 (Verizon)</u></a>, for both the past seven days and the previous seven-day period. In addition to the comparisons plotted on the time series graph, the associated summary values are also compared in an accompanying bar chart. This comprehensive visualization makes comparisons easy.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1Euh3n9A79zjXN05GQsTu0/e53fcfc5630beba215babd237875c610/image2.png" />
          </figure><p>For some combinations of datasets/filters/comparisons, time series graphs can get quite busy, with a significant number of lines being plotted. To isolate just a single line on the graph, double-click on the item in the legend. To add/remove additional lines back to/from the graph, single-click on the relevant legend item.</p><p>Similar to other visualizations on Radar, the resulting graphs or maps can be downloaded, copied, or embedded into another website or application. Simply click on the “Share” button above the visualization card to bring up the <b>Share</b> modal dialog. We hope to see these graphs shared in articles, blog posts, and presentations, and to see embedded visualizations with real-time data in your portals and operations centers!</p>
    <div>
      <h2>Still want to use the API? No problem.</h2>
      <a href="#still-want-to-use-the-api-no-problem">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>Although Data Explorer was designed to simplify the process of building, and viewing the results of, more complex API queries, we recognize that some users may still want to retrieve data directly from the API. To enable that, Data Explorer’s <b>API</b> section provides copyable API calls as a direct request URL and a <a href="https://curl.se"><u>cURL</u></a> command. The raw data returned by the query is also available to copy or download as a JSON blob, for those users that want to save it locally, or paste it into another application for additional manipulation or analysis.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1W3Zqrpfdtb0BgTnyV0bhu/e65e49260a67d0460b3e6e5d41fb7ae7/image6.png" />
          </figure><h2>How we built the AI Assistant</h2><p>Knowing all that AI is capable of these days, we thought that creating a system for an <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ai/what-is-large-language-model/"><u>LLM</u></a> to answer questions didn’t seem like an overly complex task. While there were some challenges, Cloudflare’s developer platform tools thankfully made it fairly straightforward. </p>
    <div>
      <h3>LLM-assisted API querying</h3>
      <a href="#llm-assisted-api-querying">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>The main challenge we encountered in building the API Assistant was the large number of combinations of datasets and parameters that can potentially be visualized in the Data Explorer. There are around 100 <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/radar/"><u>API endpoints</u></a> from which the data can be fetched, with most able to take multiple parameters.</p><p>There were a few potential approaches to getting started. One was to take a previously trained LLM and further train it with the API endpoint descriptions in order to have it return the output in the required structured format which would then be used to execute the API query. However, for the first version, we decided against this approach of <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/fine-tunes/"><u>fine-tuning</u></a>, as we wanted to quickly test a few different models supported by <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/"><u>Workers AI</u></a>, and we wanted the flexibility to easily add or remove parameter combinations, as Data Explorer development was still under way. As such, we decided to start with prompt engineering, where all the endpoint-specific information is placed in the instructions sent to the LLM.</p><p>Putting the full detailed description of the API endpoints supported by the Data Explorer into the system prompt would be possible for an LLM with a larger context window (the number of tokens the model takes as input before generating output). Newer models are getting better with the <a href="https://github.com/gkamradt/LLMTest_NeedleInAHaystack"><u>needle in a haystack problem</u></a>, which refers to the issue whereby LLMs do not retrieve information (the needle) equally well if it is placed in different positions within the long textual input (the haystack). However, <a href="https://cs.stanford.edu/~nfliu/papers/lost-in-the-middle.arxiv2023.pdf"><u>it has been empirically shown</u></a> that the position of information within the large context still matters. Additionally, many of the Radar API endpoints have quite similar descriptions, and putting all the descriptions in a single instruction could be more confusing for the model, and the processing time also increases with larger contexts. Based on this, we adopted the approach of having multiple inference calls to an LLM.</p><p>First, when the user enters a question, a <a href="https://workers.cloudflare.com/"><u>Worker</u></a> sends this question and a short general description of the available datasets to the LLM, asking it to determine the topic of the question. Then, based on the topic returned by the model, a system prompt is generated with the endpoint descriptions, including only those related to the topic. This prompt, along with the original question, is sent to the LLM asking it to select the appropriate endpoint and its specific parameters. At the same time, two parallel inference calls to the model are also made, one with the question and the system prompt related to the description of location parameters, and another with the description of time range parameters. Then, all three model outputs are put together and validated.</p><p>If the final output is a valid dataset and parameter combination, it is sent back to the Data Explorer, which executes the API query and displays the resulting visualization for the user. Different LLMs were tested for this task, and at the end, <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b-awq/"><u>openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b</u></a>, trained on code datasets, was selected as the best option. To give the model more context, not only is the user’s current question sent to the model, but the previous one and its response are as well, in case the next question asked by the user is related to the previous one. In addition, calls to the model are sent through Cloudflare’s <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/ai-gateway/"><u>AI Gateway</u></a>, to allow for caching, rate limiting, and logging.</p><p>After the user is shown the result, they can indicate whether what was shown to them was useful or not by clicking the “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” icons in the response. This rating information is saved with the original question in <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/d1/"><u>D1</u></a>, our <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/developer-platform/products/d1/">serverless SQL database</a>, so the results can be analyzed and applied to future AI Assistant improvements.</p><p>The full end-to-end data flow for the Cloudflare Radar AI Assistant is illustrated in the diagram below.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1EMv28isng00dvxUwmVKWE/958791d319985a3441cbce7234fa1588/image1.png" />
          </figure>
    <div>
      <h3>When the LLM doesn’t know the answer</h3>
      <a href="#when-the-llm-doesnt-know-the-answer">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>In some cases, however, the LLM may not “know” the answer to the question posed by the user. If the model does not generate a valid final response, then the user is shown three alternative questions. The intent here is to guide the user into asking an answerable question — that is, a question that is answerable with data from Radar.</p><p>This is achieved using a previously compiled (static) list of various questions related to different Radar datasets. For each of these questions, their <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ai/what-are-embeddings/"><u>embedding</u></a> is calculated using an <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/models/bge-small-en-v1.5"><u>embeddings model</u></a>, and stored in our <a href="https://developers.cloudflare.com/vectorize/"><u>Vectorize</u></a> <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ai/what-is-vector-database/"><u>vector database</u></a>. “Embeddings” are  numerical representations of textual data (vectors) capturing their semantic meaning and relationships, with similar text having vectors that are closer. When a user’s question does not generate a valid model response, the embedding of that question is calculated, and its vector is compared against all the stored vectors from the vector database, and the three most similar ones are selected. These three questions, determined to be similar to the user's original question, are then shown to the user.</p><p>There are also cases when the LLM gives answers which do not correspond to what the user asked, as hallucinations <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.11817"><u>are currently inevitable</u></a> in LLMs, or when time durations are calculated inaccurately, as LLMs sometimes struggle with mathematical calculations. To help guard against this, AI Assistant responses are first validated against the API schema to confirm that the dataset and the parameter combination is valid. Additionally, Data Explorer dropdown options are automatically populated based on the AI Assistant’s response, and the chart titles are also automatically generated, so the user always knows exactly what data is shown in the visualization, even if it might not answer their actual question. </p>
    <div>
      <h2>Looking ahead</h2>
      <a href="#looking-ahead">
        
      </a>
    </div>
    <p>We’re excited to enable more granular access to the rich datasets that currently power Cloudflare Radar. As we add new datasets in the future, such as DNS metrics, these will be available through Data Explorer and AI Assistant as well.</p><p>As noted above, Radar offers a predefined set of visualizations, and these serve as an excellent starting point for further exploration. We are adding links from each Radar visualization into Data Explorer, enabling users to further analyze the associated data to answer more specific questions. Clicking the “pie chart” icon next to a graph’s description brings up a Data Explorer page with the relevant metrics, options, and filters selected.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/3O1sG7QnjASEX81lu6ooBy/d81664234dfc8024121eedba75aaef6d/image5.png" />
          </figure><p>Correlating observations across two different metrics is another capability that we are also working on adding to Data Explorer. For example, if you are investigating an Internet disruption, you will be able to plot traffic trends and announced IP address space for a given country or autonomous system on the same graph to determine if both dropped concurrently.</p><p>But for now, use the Data Explorer and AI Assistant to go beyond what Cloudflare Radar offers, finding answers to your questions about what’s happening on the Internet.  If you share Data Explorer visualizations on social media, be sure to tag us: <a href="https://x.com/CloudflareRadar"><u>@CloudflareRadar</u></a> (X), <a href="https://noc.social/@cloudflareradar"><u>noc.social/@cloudflareradar</u></a> (Mastodon), and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/radar.cloudflare.com"><u>radar.cloudflare.com</u></a> (Bluesky). You can also reach out on social media, or contact us via email, with suggestions for future Data Explorer and AI Assistant functionality.</p>
          <figure>
          <img src="https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6LCKQEfkvBhOQFugqOGhy2/239db21c6fc18a830b8643171534372f/image4.png" />
          </figure><p></p> ]]></content:encoded>
            <category><![CDATA[Birthday Week]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Quality]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Attacks]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4R2kUv9mZSgnAXmKOKTbLz</guid>
            <dc:creator>David Belson</dc:creator>
            <dc:creator>Sabina Zejnilovic</dc:creator>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>